Home “把” 字句中情态动词的位置
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

“把” 字句中情态动词的位置

  • Junjun Xiu

    修俊俊, 浙江大学汉语言文字学博士, 北京大学博雅博士后。 研究兴趣包括理论语言学、国际汉语教学。 发表《焦点算子 “也” 与情态动词的相对语序限制》《动词重叠的否定与情态组配》《情态动词正反重叠式的语义及其句法分布》等论文。 Junjun Xiu is a Boya postdoctoral fellow of Peking University. He received his PhD in Chinese linguistics from Zhejiang University. His research focuses on theoretical linguistics and international Chinese language teaching. His main publications include The Restriction of Word Order between Focus Operator ‘ye’ and Modal Verbs, Negation of verb reduplication and modality arrangement, and Semantic and syntactic distribution of reduplication of modal verbs.

    EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: March 29, 2024
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

提要

汉语语法学界一般认为情态动词只能用于 “把” 字句的 “把” 字之前, 但语言事实显示情态动词在一定的条件下, 也能用于 “把” 字之后。 本文主要考察了情态动词用于 “把” 字之后的允准与限制、使用特点、表达效果与语法意义。 情态动词出现在 “把” 字之后, 可以出现在作为假设小句、宾语小句、推测主句之类的 “把” 字句中, 此类 “把” 字句存在时体与情态语义的限制, 即: (一) 当把字句存在现实体 “了1”, 情态动词一般不能进入。 (二) 当把字句没有时体成分出现时, “把” 后的情态动词语义无标记情况下不能是动力情态[意愿] (被动), 认识情态[推测], 而道义情态[义务], 动力情态[能力]则可以出现。 语用上则具有主观认识性、虚拟假设性、以及非现实的施为性等要求。 情态动词用于 “把” 字之后, 此时的 “把” 字句处置性减弱, 叙述性、描述性增强, “把” 字后为道义情态表现为施为句, “把” 字后为认识情态则表现为叙事句。 情态动词作为焦点敏感算子, 在 “把” 前后表现为焦点与焦点辖域的不同。 这可以从距离像似性得到解释, 距离情态动词越近的成分越容易成为焦点。 本文还为 “把” 字句表达 “完全” 意义, “把” 字之后的宾语不一定是有定成分等观点提供了形式与意义上的证据。

Abstract

It is generally believed that modals can only occur before Ba in the Ba-construction in modern Chinese, but natural data also show that modals can occur after Ba under certain conditions. This paper studies the licensing of, and restriction on, the uses of modal verbs in Ba-construction, such as syntactical features, expressing effect, and grammatical meaning. Modal verbs can occur after Ba of the Ba-construction in some specific sentence patterns, including hypothetical clause, object complement clause, speculative main sentence, and so on, with restrictions of tense-aspect and modality semantics. Modals appearing after Ba in the Ba-constructions occur obligatorily with quantifiers, making the Ba-constructions much more prominent with the ‘total affectedness’ and manifesting the relatedness between the quantity sensitivity of modality and the semantic function of BA-constructions. The BA-construction with modal verbs after BA usually express a low-probability event, other than a causative or a disposal event. Unlike the object of BA in a typical BA-constructions, the objects of BA in the BA-constructions with the modal verbs after BA indicate much lower definiteness, sometimes even no definiteness. As a focus-sensitive operator, modal verbs show the difference between focus and focus scope before and after BA. This can be explained by distance iconicity. The closer the component is to the modal verb, the easier it is to become the focus. This article also provides formal and meaningful evidence for the view that the word BA expresses a “complete” meaning, and the object after the word BA does not necessarily have a definite component.


Corresponding author: 修 俊俊 (Junjun Xiu), School of Chinese as a Second Language, Peking University, Yi He Yuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100871, P.R. China, E-mail:

Funding source: 国家社科基金项目 “汉语情态与体的同现限制研究”

Award Identifier / Grant number: 23BYY042

About the author

俊俊 修

修俊俊, 浙江大学汉语言文字学博士, 北京大学博雅博士后。 研究兴趣包括理论语言学、国际汉语教学。 发表《焦点算子 “也” 与情态动词的相对语序限制》《动词重叠的否定与情态组配》《情态动词正反重叠式的语义及其句法分布》等论文。 Junjun Xiu is a Boya postdoctoral fellow of Peking University. He received his PhD in Chinese linguistics from Zhejiang University. His research focuses on theoretical linguistics and international Chinese language teaching. His main publications include The Restriction of Word Order between Focus Operator ‘ye’ and Modal Verbs, Negation of verb reduplication and modality arrangement, and Semantic and syntactic distribution of reduplication of modal verbs.

  1. Research funding: 国家社科基金项目 “汉语情态与体的同现限制研究” (23BYY042) 阶段成果。

参考文献 (References)

Austin, John Langshaw. 1975. How to do things with words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198245537.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan & Suzanne Fleischman (eds.). 1995. Modality in grammar and discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.32Search in Google Scholar

Chen, Changlai (陈昌来). 2009. Shiyong daxue yuwen 实用大学语文 [Practical College Language]. Beijing: Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chung, Sandra & Alan Timeberlake. 1985. Tense, aspect and mood. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, V. II: Grammatical categories and the Lexicon, 202–258. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Cui, Xiliang (崔希亮). 1995. Baziju de ruogan jufa yuyi wenti “把” 字句的若干句法语义问题 [Some Syntactic and Semantic Puzzles Concerning the BA-Construction]. Shijie hanyu jiaoxue 世界汉语教学 [Chinese Teaching in the World] 1995(3). 12–21.Search in Google Scholar

Dowty, David. 1991. Thematic proto-roles and argument selcction. Language 67(3). 547–619. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1991.0021.Search in Google Scholar

Fu, Yuxian (傅雨贤). 1997. Xiandai hanyu jieci yanjiu 现代汉语介词研究 [Prepositions in Modern Chinese]. Guangzhou: Yat-sen University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Huang, Borong & Xudong Liao (黄伯荣、廖序东). 2002. Xiandaihanyu 现代汉语 [Modern Chinese]. Beijing: Higher Education Press.Search in Google Scholar

Huang, Shi-Zhe (黄师哲). 1996. Quantification and predication in Mandarin Chinese: A case study of Dou. Philadelphia: PhD Dissertation of University of Pennsylvania.Search in Google Scholar

Jackendoff, Ray. 1971. Modal structure in semantic representation. Linguistic Inquiry 2. 479–514.Search in Google Scholar

Jiang, Jingzhong & Haihua Pan (蒋静忠、潘海华). 2013. Dou de yuyi fenhe ji jieshi guize “都” 的语义分合及解释规则 [How many DOUs do we really need?]. Zhongguo Yuwen 中国语文 [Studies of the Chinese Language] 2013(1). 38–50+96.Search in Google Scholar

Kratzer, Angelika. 1977. What “must” and “can” must and can mean. Linguistics and Philosophy 1. 337–355. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00353453.Search in Google Scholar

Li, Baolun, Haihua Pan & Liejiong Xu (李宝伦、潘海华、徐烈炯). 2003. Dui jiaodian jiegou ji jiaodian de yuyi jieshi (shang) 对焦点敏感的结构及焦点的语义解释 (上) [Focus-sensitive constructions and the interpretation of focus]. Dangdai yuyanxue 当代语言学 [Contemporary Linguistics] 5(1). 1–11.Search in Google Scholar

Lu, Fubo (卢福波). 2011. Duiwai hanyu jiaoxue shiyong yufa 对外汉语教学实用语法 [Practical Grammar for Teaching Chinese as a Foreign Language]. Beijing: Beijing Language Institute Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lu, Jianming (陆俭明). 2018. Xinjiapo huayu yufa 新加坡华语语法 [Singapore Chinese Grammar]. Beijing: Commercial Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lü, Shuxiang (吕叔湘). 1979. Hanyu yufa fenxi wenti 汉语语法分析问题. Beijing: Commercial Press.Search in Google Scholar

Miu, Xiaofang (缪小放). 1991. Laoshe zuopin zhong de BA+NVP 老舍作品中的 “把 NVP”. In Zhang Zhigong (ed.), Yuwen lunji (4) 载张志公主编《语文论集》(第四集). Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.Search in Google Scholar

Palmer. 1986. Mood and modality, 1st edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Palmer. 2001. Mood and modality, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Pan, Haihua (潘海华). 2006. Jiaodian san fen jiegou yu hanyu DOU de yuyi jieshi 焦点, 三分结构与汉语 “都” 的语义解释 [Focus, tripartite structure, and Dou quantification]. In Yufayanjiu he tansuo (13) 语法研究和探索 (十三). Beijing: Commercial Press.Search in Google Scholar

Partee, Barbara. 1991. Topic, focus and quantification. In Steven K. Moore & Adam Wyner (eds.), Proceedings from semantics and linguistic theory (SALT I), 159–187. Ithaca: Cornell University.10.3765/salt.v1i0.2918Search in Google Scholar

Peng, Lizhen (彭利贞). 2005. Xiandai hanyu qingtai yanjiu 现代汉语情态研究 [On modality of modern Chinese]. Shanghai: Doctoral dissertation of Fudan University.Search in Google Scholar

Qi, Huyang (齐沪扬). 2005. Duiwai hanyu jiaoyu yufa 对外汉语教学语法 [Grammar for Teaching Chinese as a Foreign Language]. Shanghai: Fudan University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Searle, John. 1975. Indirect speech acts. In Peter Cole & Jerry Morgan (eds.), Syntax and semantics volume 3: Speech acts, 59–82. New York: Academic Press.10.1163/9789004368811_004Search in Google Scholar

Searle, John. 1983. Intentionality. Cambridge: Cambridge Uni. Press.Search in Google Scholar

Shen, Jiaxuan (沈家煊). 2002. Ruhe chuzhi chuzhishi: lun BA zi ju de zhuguanxing如何处置 “处置式”? — 论把字句的主观性. Zhongguo Yuwen 中国语文 [Studies of the Chinese Language] 2002(5). 387–399+478.Search in Google Scholar

Su, Yingxia (苏英霞). 2015. Yufa jiaoxue fangfa jiqiao 语法教学方法技巧. Beijing: Beijing Language and Culture University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Sun, Chaofen. 1996. Word-order change and grammaticalization in the history of Chinese. Standford: Standford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Tai, James Hao Yi. 1989. Toward a cognition based functional grammar of Chinese. In Haoyi Dai & Fengsheng Xue (eds.), (戴浩一、薛凤生主编) Gogneng zhuyi yu hanyu yufa 功能主义与汉语语法 [Functionalism and Chinese Grammar], 186–226. Beijing: Beijing Language Institute Press.Search in Google Scholar

Tsai, Weitien (蔡维天). 2010. Tan hanyu motaici de fenbu yu quanshi zhi duiying guanxi 谈汉语模态词的分布与诠释之对应关系 [On the syntax-semantics correspondences of Chinese modals]. Zhongguo yuwen 中国语文 [Studies of the Chinese Language] 2010(3). 208–221.Search in Google Scholar

Von Wright, Georg Henrik. 1951. An essay in modal logic. Amsterdam: North Holland.Search in Google Scholar

Wang, Huan (王还). 1984. BA zi ju he BEI zi ju “把” 字句和 “被” 字句 [BA-Construction and Bei-Construction]. Beijing: New Knowledge Press.Search in Google Scholar

Wang, Li (王力). 1984. Zhongguo yufa lilun 中国语法理论 [Chinese grammatical theory]. Jinan: Shandong Education Press.Search in Google Scholar

Wang, Yingying & Haihua Pan (王莹莹、潘海华). 2019. Paixu yuyi yu NENG he KEYI de yuyi he jufa fenxi 排序语义与 “能” 和 “可以” 的语义和句法分析 [Ordering Semantics and the Semantic and Syntactic Analysis of Neng and Keyi]. Dangdai yuangsue 当代语言学 [Contemporary Linguistics] 21(3). 385–399.Search in Google Scholar

Xing, Fuyi & Guosheng Wang (邢福义、汪国胜). 2011. Xiandai hanyu 现代汉语. Wuhan: Huazhong Normal University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Xiu, Junjun (修俊俊). 2023. Xiandai hanyu qingtai yu jiaodian hudong yanjiu 现代汉语情态与焦点互动研究. Hangzhou: Doctoral dissertation of Zhejiang University.Search in Google Scholar

Xue, Fengsheng (薛凤生). 1989. BA zi ju he BEI zi ju de jiegou yiyi “把” 字句和 “被” 字句的结构意义 [Structural significance of BA-Construction and Bei-Construction. In Haoyi Dai & Fengsheng Xue (eds.), (戴浩一、薛凤生主编) Gogneng zhuyi yu hanyu yufa 功能主义与汉语语法 [Functionalism and Chinese Grammar], 34–54. Beijing: Beijing Language Institute Press.Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, Bojiang (张伯江). 2000. Lun BA zi ju de jushi yuyi 论 “把” 字句的句式语义 [On Construction meaning of BA-Construction]. Yuyan yanjiu 语言研究 [Studies in Language and Linguistics] 20(1). 28–40.Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, Bojiang (张伯江). 2009. Cong shishou guanxi dao jushi yuyi 从施受关系到句式语义. Beijing: Commercial Press.Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, Bojiang (张伯江). 2019. Shuo BA zi ju 说把字句 [A study of BA-Construction]. Shanghai: Xuelin Press.Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, Jing (张静). 1988. Xiandai hanyu 现代汉语. Beijing: Higher Education Press.Search in Google Scholar

Zhou, Ren (周韧). 2019. Ye tan DOU de yixiang fen he也谈 “都” 字的义项分合. Dui wai Hanyu yanjiu 对外汉语研究 [Studies in Chinese as a Foreign Language] 2019(1). 26–40.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2024-03-29
Published in Print: 2024-05-27

© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 7.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/caslar-2024-0006/html
Scroll to top button