Home Examining the auditory approach: Lexical effects in the perceptual judgment of Chinese L2 tone production
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Examining the auditory approach: Lexical effects in the perceptual judgment of Chinese L2 tone production

  • Yan Jiang

    Yan Jiang is a Ph.D. candidate at Gevirtz Graduate School of Education at the University of California, Santa Barbara. Her research interests include L2 teaching and learning, tone and intonation, as well as computer-assisted language learning. She received a B. A. in English from Tsinghua University, China, and an M. A. in Education from San Diego State University. She has published articles in the Journal of Second Language Pronunciation and Proceedings of the Pronunciation in Second Language Learning and Teaching Conference.

    EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: October 13, 2017
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Auditory perception is generally used by raters who are asked to evaluate the accuracy of tone production by non-native speakers (hereafter NNSs) who are learning Mandarin Chinese. However, its validity needs to be examined as the native speaking (hereafter NS) listeners’ lexical knowledge (i.e., knowing the possible combination of syllables and tones) may affect their judgments in different listening contexts. This lexical effect has been reported at the segmental level in non-tonal languages (McClelland et al. 2006; Norris et al. 2000). The present study extends to the suprasegmental dimension and compares NS listeners’ judgment on NNSs’ tonal performance of high frequency disyllabic word covering Mandarin disyllabic tonal combination in three lexical contexts, namely (1) hearing pairs of humming tones (syllables removed via Praat); (2) hearing disyllabic words (syllables + tones); (3) hearing disyllabic words + seeing target pinyin orthography. Statistical analyses revealed a significant effect of lexical contexts on the perceived tone accuracy, which increased when auditory and visual lexical cues were available, as in Conditions 2 and 3. Acoustic analyses further revealed the nature of the two lexical effects. Hearing words had a positive effect on the precision of the NSs’ tonal perception compared to hearing tones only. However, the visual presence of pinyin misled NSs to compensate for learners’ tone production deficiencies. The findings have implications for future research involving the rating of tones using auditory approach and also shed light on the teaching of Mandarin tones to NNSs.

摘要

听力识別在对外汉语声调教学中被广泛使用来测试学生的声调发音。然而,施测者掌握的句法知识(即听到音节便知其可能的声调)或会影响其判断,所以该方法的有效性需要被测试。研究表明在非声调语言(如英语)中句法语境对音节识別具有影响。本文延伸到超音节维度,比较了三种不同语境中施测者对学生声调发音的判断,即(1)只听到声调;(2)听到完整词语;(3)听到完整词语并看到目标词语的拼音。统计分析发现句法语境对声调识別有显著影响,在后两种语境中同样声调被判断为发音准确的比率依次上升。声学分析进一步表明听到完整词语有助于迅速准确地识別学生的声调发音。但是,看到目标词语的拼音则导致测评人忽视学生的声调发音错误。

About the author

Yan Jiang

Yan Jiang is a Ph.D. candidate at Gevirtz Graduate School of Education at the University of California, Santa Barbara. Her research interests include L2 teaching and learning, tone and intonation, as well as computer-assisted language learning. She received a B. A. in English from Tsinghua University, China, and an M. A. in Education from San Diego State University. She has published articles in the Journal of Second Language Pronunciation and Proceedings of the Pronunciation in Second Language Learning and Teaching Conference.

Acknowledgements

I gratefully acknowledge the helpful suggestions of two anonymous reviewers, the comments of Dr. Dorothy M. Chun and Dr. Jin Sook Lee on an earlier version of the manuscript, and the assistance of Dr. Xiang Qiu, Dr. Jinpeng Wang, Jingwen Wu and Yunyun Zhao and all of the students who participated in the study.

References

Altman, Gerry T. M. 1990. Lexical statistics and cognitive models of speech processing. In T. M. Altman Gerry (ed.), Cognitive models of speech processing, 211–235. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Boersma, Paul & David Weenink. 2014. Praat: Doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 5.3.77 (retrieved 18 May 2014 from http://www.praat.org/).Search in Google Scholar

Bolinger, Dwight. 1989. Intonation and its uses: Melody in grammar and discourse. Stanford: Stanford University Press.10.1515/9781503623125Search in Google Scholar

Chun, Dorothy M. 2002. Discourse intonation in NNS: From theory and research to practice. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/lllt.1Search in Google Scholar

Chun, Dorothy M., Yan Jiang & Natalia Avila. 2013. Visualization of tone for learning Mandarin Chinese. In J. Levis & K. LeVelle (Eds.). Proceedings of the 4th Pronunciation in Seclnd Language Learning and Teaching Conference. Aug. 2012. (pp. 77–89). Ames, IA: Iowa State University.Search in Google Scholar

Chun, Dorothy M., Yan Jiang, Justine Meyr & Rong Yang. 2015. Acquisition of L2 Mandarin Chinese tones with learner-created tone visualizations. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation 1(1). 86–114.10.1075/jslp.1.1.04chuSearch in Google Scholar

Cohen, Jacob. 1988. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar

Davis, Matthew H., Ingrid S. Johnsrude, Alexis Hervais-Adelman, Karen Taylor & McGettigan. Carolyn 2005. Lexical information drives perceptual learning of distorted speech: Evidence from the comprehension of noise-vocoded sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology General 134. 222–241.10.1037/0096-3445.134.2.222Search in Google Scholar

Duanmu, San. 2006. Chinese (Mandarin): Phonology. Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, 2nd edn. ed. by Keith Brown, 351–355. Oxford, UK: Elsevier Publishing House.10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/00096-1Search in Google Scholar

Fu, Qian-jie, Fan-Gang Zeng, Robert Shannon & Sigfrid Soli. 1998. Importance of tonal envelope cues in Chinese speech recognition. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 104(1). 505–510.10.1121/1.423251Search in Google Scholar

Ganong, William F. 1980. Phonetic categorization in auditory word perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 6(1). 110–125.10.1037/0096-1523.6.1.110Search in Google Scholar

Garner, Wendell R. 1974. The processing of information and structure. Potomac, MD: Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar

Gimson, Alan C. 2008. The Pronunciation of English. London: Hodder.Search in Google Scholar

Hallé, Pierre A., Yueh-Chin Chang & Catherine Best. 2004. Identification and discrimination of Mandarin Chinese tones by Mandarin Chinese vs. French listeners. Journal of Phonetics 32. 395–421.10.1016/S0095-4470(03)00016-0Search in Google Scholar

Howie, John M. 1976. An acoustic study of Mandarin tones and vowels. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Huang, Tsan. 2007. Perception of Mandarin tones by Chinese- and English-speaking listeners. In Jurgen Trouvain & William M. Barry (eds.) Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Science, 1797–1800. Dudweiler, Germany: Pirrot.Search in Google Scholar

Huang, Tsan & Keith Johnson. 2010. Language-specificity in speech perception: Perception of Mandarin tones by native and nonnative listeners. Phonetica 67. 243–267.10.1159/000327392Search in Google Scholar

Hume, Elizabeth & Keith Johnson. 2001. A model of the interplay of speech perception and phonology. In Elizabeth Hume & Keith Johnson (eds.) The Role of Perception in Phonology, 3–26. New York: Academic Press.10.1163/9789004454095Search in Google Scholar

Ladd, Robert D., Kim E. Silverman, Frank Tolkmitt, Gunther Bergmann & Klaus Scherer. 1985. Evidence for the independent function of intonation contour type, voice quality, and F0 range in signaling speaker affect. Journal of Acoustical Society America 78. 435–444.10.1121/1.392466Search in Google Scholar

Lee, Lisa & Howard C. Nusbaum. 1993. Processing interactions between segmental and suprasegmental information in native speakers of English and Mandarin Chinese. Perception & Psychophysics 53(2). 157–165.10.3758/BF03211726Search in Google Scholar

Levi, Susannah V., Stephen J. Winters & David B. Pisoni. 2007. Speaker-independent factors affecting the perception of foreign accent in a second language. Journal of Acoustical Society of America 121(4). 2327–2338.10.1121/1.2537345Search in Google Scholar

McClelland, James L., Daniel Mirman & Lori L. Holt. 2006. Are there interactive processes in speech perception? TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences 10(8). 363–369.10.1016/j.tics.2006.06.007Search in Google Scholar

Norris, Dennis., James M. McQueen & Alan Cutler. 2000. Merging information in speech recognition: Feedback is never necessary. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23. 299–370.10.1017/S0140525X00003241Search in Google Scholar

Orton, Jane. 2013. Developing Chinese oral skills – A research base for practice. In Istvan Kecskes (ed.) Research in Chinese as a Second Language. 9–32. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9781614512554.9Search in Google Scholar

Otake, Takashi., Kiyoko Yoneyama, Anne Cutler & Arie Van Der Lugt. 1996. The representation of Japanese moraic nasals. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 100. 3831–3842.10.1121/1.417239Search in Google Scholar

Peabody, Mitchell & Stephanie. Seneff 2009. Annotation and features of non-native Mandarin tone quality. INTERSPEECH. 460–463.10.21437/Interspeech.2009-163Search in Google Scholar

Repp, Bruno H. & Hwei-Bing Lin. 1990. Integration of segmental and tonal information in speech perception: A cross-linguistic study. Journal of Phonetics 18. 481–495.10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30410-3Search in Google Scholar

Rose, Phil. 1987. Considerations in the normalisation of the fundamental frequency of linguistic tone. Speech Communication 6(4). 343–352.10.1016/0167-6393(87)90009-4Search in Google Scholar

Samuel, Arthur G. 2001. Knowing a word affects the fundamental perception of the sounds within it. Psychological Science 12. 348–351.10.1111/1467-9280.00364Search in Google Scholar

Shen, Susan X. & Maocan Lin. 1991. A perceptual study of Mandarin tones 2 and 3. Language and Speech 34. 145–156.10.1177/002383099103400202Search in Google Scholar

Sun, Kuo-Chan & Tsan Hang. 2012. A cross-linguistic study of Taiwanese tone perception by Taiwanese and English listeners. Journal of East Asian Linguistic 21. 305–327.10.1007/s10831-012-9092-9Search in Google Scholar

Tong, Yunxia, Alexander L. Francis & Jackson T. Gandour. 2007. Processing dependencies between segmental and suprasegmental features in Mandarin Chinese. Language and Cognitive Processes 23(5). 689–708.10.1080/01690960701728261Search in Google Scholar

Tseng, Chiu-yu. 1990. An acoustic phonetic study on tones in Mandarin Chinese. Taipei: Institute of History & Philology, Academia Sinica.Search in Google Scholar

Wang, William S-Y. 1976. Language change. Annals of the New York Academy Sciences 280. 61–72.10.1111/j.1749-6632.1976.tb25472.xSearch in Google Scholar

Wang, Yue, Allard Jongman & Joan A. Sereno. 2003. Acoustic and perceptual evaluation of Mandarin tone productions before and after perceptual training. Journal of Acoustical Society America 133 (2). 1033–1043.10.1121/1.1531176Search in Google Scholar

Whalen, D. H. & Yi Xu. 1992. Information for Mandarin tones in the amplitude contour and in brief segments. Phonetica 49(1). 25–47.10.1159/000261901Search in Google Scholar

Xu, Li, Yuhjung Tsai & Bryan E. Pfingst. 2002. Features of stimulation affecting tonal-speech perception: Implications for cochlear prostheses. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 112. 247–258.10.1121/1.1487843Search in Google Scholar

Zue, Victor W. 1976. Some perceptual experiments on the Mandarin tones. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 60 (1). S45.10.1121/1.2003354Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2017-10-13
Published in Print: 2017-10-26

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 12.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/caslar-2017-0010/html
Scroll to top button