Abstract
The damage in the spinal cord due to vertebral fractures may result in loss of sensation and muscle function either permanently or temporarily. The neurological condition of the patient can be improved only with the early detection and the treatment of the injury in the spinal cord. This paper proposes a spinal cord segmentation and injury detection system based on the proposed Crow search-Rider Optimization-based DCNN (CS-ROA DCNN) method, which can detect the injury in the spinal cord in an effective manner. Initially, the segmentation of the CT image of the spinal cord is performed using the adaptive thresholding method, followed by which the localization of the disc is performed using the Sparse FCM clustering algorithm (Sparse-FCM). The localized discs are subjected to a feature extraction process, where the features necessary for the classification process are extracted. The classification process is done using DCNN trained using the proposed CS-ROA, which is the integration of the Crow Search Algorithm (CSA) and Rider Optimization Algorithm (ROA). The experimentation is performed using the evaluation metrics, such as accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. The proposed method achieved the high accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 0.874, 0.8961, and 0.8828, respectively that shows the effectiveness of the proposed CS-ROA DCNN method in spinal cord injury detection.
Research funding: No Funding Involved.
Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.
Competing interest: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Research involving human participants and/or animals: All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008.
Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.
References
1. Raghavendra, U, Bhat, NS, Gudigar, A, Acharya, UR. Automated system for the detection of thoracolumbar fractures using a CNN architecture. Future Generat Comput Syst 2018;85:184–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2018.03.023.Search in Google Scholar
2. Al-Nashash, H, Fatoo, NA, Mirza, NN, Ahmed, RI, Agrawal, G, Nitish, V, et al.. Spinal cord injury detection and monitoring using spectral coherence. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2009;56:1971–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/tbme.2009.2018296.Search in Google Scholar
3. Leener, BD, Taso, M, Cohen-Adad, J, Callot, V. Segmentation of the human spinal cord. Magn Reson Mater Phys Biol Med 2016;29:125–53.10.1007/s10334-015-0507-2Search in Google Scholar
4. Lee, J, Kim, S, Kim, YS, Chung, WK. Automated segmentation of the lumbar pedicle in ct images for spinal fusion surgery. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2011;58:2051–63. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2011.2135351.Search in Google Scholar
5. Cinque, B, Torre, CL, Lombardi, F, Palumbo, P, Evtoski, Z, Santini, S, et al.. VSL# 3 probiotic differently influences IEC‐6 intestinal epithelial cell status and function. J Cell Physiol 2017;232:3530–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.25814.Search in Google Scholar
6. Cannuccia, E, Pulci, O, Sole, RD, Cascella, M. Optical properties of flavin mononucleotide: a QM/MM study of protein environment effects. Chem Phys 2011;389:35–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemphys.2011.07.020.Search in Google Scholar
7. Preetha, N, Praveena, S. Multiple feature sets and SVM classifier for the detection of diabetic retinopathy using retinal images. Multi Res 2018;1:17–26.10.46253/j.mr.v1i1.a3Search in Google Scholar
8. Ma, J, Lu, L. Hierarchical segmentation and identification of thoracic vertebra using learning-based edge detection and coarse-to-fine deformable model. Comput Vis Image Understand 2013;117:1072–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cviu.2012.11.016.Search in Google Scholar
9. Konsynski, BR. Advances in information systems design. In: Third inter conf ADVIS 2004; 1985. 5–32 pp.10.1080/07421222.1984.11517707Search in Google Scholar
10. Klinder, T, Ostermann, J, Ehm, M, Franz, A, Kneser, R, Lorenz, C. Automated model-based vertebra detection, identification, and segmentation in CT images. Med Image Anal 2009;13:471–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2009.02.004.Search in Google Scholar
11. Benameur, S, Mignotte, M, Parent, S, Labelle, H, Skalli, W, Guise, JD. 3D/2D registration and segmentation of scoliotic vertebrae using statistical models. Comput Med Imag Graph 2003;27:321–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0895-6111(03)00019-3.Search in Google Scholar
12. Hardisty, M, Gordon, L, Agarwal, P, Skrinskas, T, Whyne, C. Quantitative characterization of metastatic disease in the spine. Part I. Semiautomated segmentation using atlas-based deformable registration and the level set method. Med Phys 2007;34:3127–34. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.2746498.Search in Google Scholar
13. Mukherjee, I, Cheng, N, Ray, V, Mushahwar, M, Lebel, M, Basu, A. Automatic segmentation of spinal cord MRI using symmetric boundary tracing. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 2010;14:1275–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/titb.2010.2052060.Search in Google Scholar
14. Huang, SH, Chu, YH, Lai, SH, Novak, CL. Learning-based vertebra detection and iterative normalized-cut segmentation for spinal MRI. IEEE Trans Med Imag 2009;28:1595–605.10.1109/TMI.2009.2023362Search in Google Scholar PubMed
15. Archip, N, Erard, P-J, Egmont-Petersen, M, Haefliger, J-M, Germond, J-F. A knowledge-based approach to automatic detection of the spinal cord in CT images. IEEE Trans Med Imag 2002;21:1504–16. https://doi.org/10.1109/tmi.2002.806578.Search in Google Scholar
16. Wang, KSZQ, Lu, L, Wu, D, El-Zehiry, N, Zheng, Y, Shen, D. Automatic segmentation of spinal canals in CT images via iterative topology refinement. IEEE Trans Med Imag 2015;34:1694–704. https://doi.org/10.1109/tmi.2015.2436693.Search in Google Scholar
17. Markiewicz, A, Forczma, P. Computer analysis of images and patterns 14th international conference. In: 11th International conference, CAIP 2005 Versailles, France; 2015. 529–40 pp.Search in Google Scholar
18. Rangayyan, RM, Canada, ATN, Boag, GS. Method for the automatic detection and segmentation of the spinal canal in computed tomographic images. J Electron Imag 2006;15:1–9.10.1117/1.2234770Search in Google Scholar
19. Lin, X, Tench, CR, Evangelou, N, Jaspan, T, Constantinescu, CS. Measurement of spinal cord atrophy in multiple sclerosis. J Neuroimag 2004;14:20–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1552-6569.2004.tb00275.x.Search in Google Scholar
20. Fatoo, N, Mirza, N, Ahmad, R, Al-Nashash, H, Naeini, H, Thakor, N. Detection and assessment of spinal cord injury using spectral coherence. In: Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2007. 1426–9 pp.10.1109/IEMBS.2007.4352567Search in Google Scholar PubMed
21. Tomita, N, Cheung, YY, Hassanpour, S. Deep neural networks for automatic detection of osteoporotic vertebral fractures on CT scans. Comput Biol Med 2018;98:8–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2018.05.011.Search in Google Scholar
22. Leener, BD, Cohen-Adad, J, Kadoury, S. Automatic segmentation of the spinal cord and spinal canal coupled with vertebral labeling. IEEE Trans Med Imag 2015;34:1705–18.10.1109/TMI.2015.2437192Search in Google Scholar PubMed
23. Korez, R, Ibragimov, B, Likar, B, Pernus, F, Vrtovec, T. A framework for automated spine and vertebrae interpolation-based detection and model-based segmentation. IEEE Trans Med Imag 2015;34:1649–62. https://doi.org/10.1109/tmi.2015.2389334.Search in Google Scholar
24. Gros, C, De Leener, B, Badji, A, Maranzano, J, Eden, D, Dupont, SM, et al.. Automatic segmentation of the spinal cord and intramedullary multiple sclerosis lesions with convolutional neural networks. Neuroimage 2019;184:901–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.09.081.Search in Google Scholar
25. Perone, CS, Calabrese, E, Cohen-Adad, J. Spinal cord gray matter segmentation using deep dilated convolutions. Sci Rep 2018;5966. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-24304-3.Search in Google Scholar
26. Bradley, D, Roth, G. Adaptive thresholding using the integral image. J Graph Tools 2007;12:13–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/2151237x.2007.10129236.Search in Google Scholar
27. Chang, X, Wang, Q, Liu, Y, Wang, Y. Sparse regularization in fuzzy c-means for high-dimensional data clustering. IEEE Trans Cybern 2016;47:2616–27.10.1109/TCYB.2016.2627686Search in Google Scholar PubMed
28. Askarzadeh, A. A novel metaheuristic method for solving constrained engineering optimization problems: crow search algorithm. Comput Struct 2016;169:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2016.03.001.Search in Google Scholar
29. Binu, D, Kariyappa, BS. RideNN : a new rider optimization algorithm-based neural network for fault diagnosis in analog circuits. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 2018;99:1–25. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2018.2836058.Search in Google Scholar
30. Wellner, PD. Adaptive thresholding for the digitaldesk. Technical report; 1993. 93–110 pp.Search in Google Scholar
31. Osteoporotic vertebral fractures. [Online]. Available at: http://spineweb.digitalimaginggroup.ca/spineweb/index.php?n=Main.Datasets#Dataset_9.3A_Automatic_vertebral_fracture_analysis_and_identification_from_VFA_by_DXA.Search in Google Scholar
32. Vojt, J. Deep neural networks and their implementation. Department of Theoretical Computer Science and Mathematical Logic; 2016.Search in Google Scholar
33. Giuffrida, JP, Crago, PE. Functional restoration of elbow extension after spinal-cord injury using a neural network-based synergistic FES controller. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2005;13:147–52. https://doi.org/10.1109/tnsre.2005.847375.Search in Google Scholar
34. Qu, C, Fu, Y. Crow search algorithm based on neighborhood search of non-inferior solution set. IEEE Access 2019;7:52871–95. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2019.2911629.Search in Google Scholar
35. Han, X, Xu, Q, Yue, L, Dong, Y, Xie, G, Xu, X. An improved crow search algorithm based on spiral search mechanism for solving numerical and engineering optimization problems. IEEE Access 2020;8:92363–82.10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2980300Search in Google Scholar
36. Wang, G, Yuan, Y, Guo, W. An improved rider optimization algorithm for solving engineering optimization problems. IEEE Access 2019;7:80570–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2019.2923468.Search in Google Scholar
© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Review
- Surrogate based continuous noninvasive blood pressure measurement
- Research Articles
- Smart automated heart health monitoring using photoplethysmography signal classification
- In vivo evaluation of two adaptive Starling-like control algorithms for left ventricular assist devices
- A patient-independent classification system for onset detection of seizures
- Prediction of salivary cortisol level by electroencephalography features
- Confocal laser microscopy without fluorescent dye in minimal-invasive thoracic surgery: an ex-vivo pilot study in lung cancer
- Spinal cord segmentation and injury detection using a Crow Search-Rider optimization algorithm
- Experimental and numerical investigations of fracture and fatigue behaviour of implant-supported bars with distal extension made of three different materials
- Compression and tension behavior of the prosthetic foam materials polyurethane, EVA, Pelite™ and a combination of polyurethane and EVA: a preliminary study
- Evaluation of a novel stair-climbing transportation aid for emergency medical services
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Review
- Surrogate based continuous noninvasive blood pressure measurement
- Research Articles
- Smart automated heart health monitoring using photoplethysmography signal classification
- In vivo evaluation of two adaptive Starling-like control algorithms for left ventricular assist devices
- A patient-independent classification system for onset detection of seizures
- Prediction of salivary cortisol level by electroencephalography features
- Confocal laser microscopy without fluorescent dye in minimal-invasive thoracic surgery: an ex-vivo pilot study in lung cancer
- Spinal cord segmentation and injury detection using a Crow Search-Rider optimization algorithm
- Experimental and numerical investigations of fracture and fatigue behaviour of implant-supported bars with distal extension made of three different materials
- Compression and tension behavior of the prosthetic foam materials polyurethane, EVA, Pelite™ and a combination of polyurethane and EVA: a preliminary study
- Evaluation of a novel stair-climbing transportation aid for emergency medical services