Home Medicine Optimization of the proposed hybrid denoising technique to overcome over-filtering issue
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Optimization of the proposed hybrid denoising technique to overcome over-filtering issue

  • Sumit Kushwaha EMAIL logo and Rabindra Kumar Singh
Published/Copyright: April 12, 2019

Abstract

Image denoising has become a crucial task in medical ultrasound (US) imaging due to the presence of speckle or multiplicative noise and additive Gaussian noise. Recently, several denoising techniques such as adaptive wavelet thresholding & joint bilateral (AWT + JB) filter, adaptive fuzzy switching weighted mean (AFSWM) filter and median patch-based locally optimal Wiener (MPBLOW) filter have been proposed to remove the speckle noise. However, these denoising techniques were found to remove noise along with the essential parts of the actual image data which is known as over-filtering. Thereby, it reduces the accuracy of the recognition process. In this paper, a new hybrid filter technique is proposed by combining anisotropic diffusion (AD) with Butterworth band pass filter to overcome over-filtering of the image. In addition, the performance of the proposed hybrid filter and its design parameters are enhanced using the particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm. The simulation results show that the proposed filtering technique achieves a better denoising performance when compared with other filtering techniques in terms of peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), structural similarity index (SSIM) and edge preservation index (EPI). Moreover, the results validated that the proposed filtering technique using PSO achieves effective performance than using the harmony search algorithm (HSA) and other filtering techniques.

  1. Author Statement

  2. Research funding: Authors state no funding involved.

  3. Conflict of interest: Authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Informed consent: Informed consent is not applicable.

  5. Ethical approval: The conducted research is not related to either human or animal use.

References

[1] Ramos-Llordén G, Vegas-Sánchez-Ferrero G, Martin-Fernandez M, Alberola-López C, Aja-Fernández S. Anisotropic diffusion filter with memory based on speckle statistics for ultrasound images. IEEE Trans Image Process 2015;24:345–58.10.1109/TIP.2014.2371244Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[2] Sivakumar R, Gayathri MK, Nedumaran D. Speckle filtering of ultrasound B-scan images – a comparative study between spatial and diffusion filters. Int Conf Open Systems (ICOS) 2010:80–5.10.1109/ICOS.2010.5720068Search in Google Scholar

[3] Ramos-Llordén G, Vegas-Sánchez-Ferrero G, Aja-Fernández S, Martín-Fernández M, Alberola-López C. Fast anisotropic speckle filter for ultrasound medical images. In: Roa Romero LM, editor. XIII Mediterranean Conference on Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing, Vol 41. Cham: IFMBE Proceedings Springer; 2013:253–6.10.1007/978-3-319-00846-2_63Search in Google Scholar

[4] Bhateja V, Singh G, Srivastava A. A novel weighted diffusion filtering approach for speckle suppression in ultrasound images. Proceedings of the International Conference on Frontiers of Intelligent Computing: Theory and Applications (FICTA) 2013:459–66.10.1007/978-3-319-02931-3_52Search in Google Scholar

[5] Gupta D, Anand RS, Tyagi B. Speckle filtering of ultrasound images using a modified non-linear diffusion model in non-subsampled shearlet domain. IET Image Process 2014;9:107–17.10.1049/iet-ipr.2014.0330Search in Google Scholar

[6] Coupé P, Hellier P, Kervrann C, Barillot C. Nonlocal means-based speckle filtering for ultrasound images. IEEE Trans Image process 2009;18:2221–9.10.1109/TIP.2009.2024064Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[7] Yang J, Fan J, Ai D. Local statistics and non-local mean filter for speckle noise reduction in medical ultrasound image. Neurocomputing 2016;195:88–95.10.1016/j.neucom.2015.05.140Search in Google Scholar

[8] Ambrosanio M, Baselice F, Ferraioli G, Pascazio V. Ultrasound despeckling based on non local means. EMBEC & NBC 2017:109–12.10.1007/978-981-10-5122-7_28Search in Google Scholar

[9] Zhang X, Cheng S, Ding H, Wu H. Ultrasound medical image denoising based on multi-direction median filter. Information Technology in Medicine and Education (ITME), IEEE 8th International Conference 2016:835–9.10.1109/ITME.2016.0194Search in Google Scholar

[10] Kazubek M. Wavelet domain image denoising by thresholding and Wiener filtering. IEEE Signal Process Lett 2003;10:324–6.10.1109/LSP.2003.818225Search in Google Scholar

[11] Farzana E, Tanzid M, Mohsin KM, Bhuiyan MIH, Hossain S. Adaptive bilateral filtering for despeckling of medical ultrasound images. IEEE Conf TENCON 2010:1728–33.10.1109/TENCON.2010.5686140Search in Google Scholar

[12] Esakkirajan S, Vimalraj CT, Muhammed R, Subramanian G. Adaptive wavelet packet-based de-speckling of ultrasound images with bilateral filter. Ultrasound Med Biol 2013;39:2463–76.10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2013.07.009Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[13] Vanithamani R, Umamaheswari G. Wavelet based despeckling of medical ultrasound images with bilateral filter. IEEE Int Conf TENCON 2011:389–93.10.1109/TENCON.2011.6129131Search in Google Scholar

[14] Kishore PVV, Sastry ASCS, Kartheek A, Mahatha SH. Block based thresholding in wavelet domain for denoising ultrasound medical images. International Conference on Signal Processing and Communication Engineering Systems (SPACES) 2015:265–9.10.1109/SPACES.2015.7058262Search in Google Scholar

[15] Yu Y, Acton ST. Speckle reducing anisotropic diffusion. IEEE Trans Image Process 2002;11:1260–70.10.1109/TIP.2002.804276Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[16] Yu Y, Molloy JA, Acton ST. Three-dimensional speckle reducing anisotropic diffusion. Conference Record of the Thirty-Seventh Asilomar Conference on In Signals, Systems and Computers, Vol. 2, 2003:1987–91.Search in Google Scholar

[17] Krissian K, Westin CF, Kikinis R, Vosburgh KG. Oriented speckle reducing anisotropic diffusion. IEEE Trans Image Process 2007;6:1412–24.10.1109/TIP.2007.891803Search in Google Scholar

[18] Bini AA, Bhat MS. Despeckling low SNR, low contrast ultrasound images via anisotropic level set diffusion. Multidim Syst Signal Process 2014;25:41–65.10.1007/s11045-012-0184-5Search in Google Scholar

[19] Guleryuz OG. A nonlinear loop filter for quantization noise removal in hybrid video compression. IEEE International Conference on ICIP 2005.10.1109/ICIP.2005.1530059Search in Google Scholar

[20] Chithra MS. Bayesian denoising of ultrasound images using heavy-tailed levy distribution. IET Image Process 2014;9:338–45.Search in Google Scholar

[21] Babu JJJ, Sudha GF. Non-subsampled contourlet transform based image denoising in ultrasound thyroid images using adaptive binary morphological operations. IET Comput Vis 2014;8:718–28.10.1049/iet-cvi.2014.0008Search in Google Scholar

[22] Fu X, Wang Y, Chen L, Dai Y. Quantum-inspired hybrid medical ultrasound images despeckling method. Electronics Lett 2015;51:321–3.10.1049/el.2014.3742Search in Google Scholar

[23] Kang J, Lee JY, Yoo Y. A new feature-enhanced speckle reduction method based on multiscale analysis for ultrasound B-mode imaging. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2016;63:1178–91.10.1109/TBME.2015.2486042Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[24] Gai S, Zhang B, Yang C, Yu L. Speckle noise reduction in medical ultrasound image using monogenic wavelet and Laplace mixture distribution. ELSEVIER Digital Signal Process 2018;72:192–207.10.1016/j.dsp.2017.10.006Search in Google Scholar

[25] Baselice F, Ferraioli G, Pascazio V, Schirinzi G. Enhanced Wiener filter for ultrasound image denoising. EMBEC & NBC 2017:65–8.10.1007/978-981-10-5122-7_17Search in Google Scholar

[26] Tay PC, Garson CD, Acton ST, Hossack JA. Ultrasound despeckling for contrast enhancement. IEEE Trans Image Process 2010;19:1847–60.10.1109/TIP.2010.2044962Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[27] Kushwaha S. An efficient filtering approach for speckle reduction in ultrasound images. Biomed Pharmacol J 2017;10: 1355–67.10.13005/bpj/1240Search in Google Scholar

[28] Perona P, Malik J. Scale-space and edge detection using anisotropic diffusion. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 1990;12:629–39.10.1109/34.56205Search in Google Scholar

[29] Developing a Wildlife Enterprise – Wildlife Basics. Available online at http://forestandrange.org/modules/Wildlifeenterprise/Wildlife_Basics/Wildlife_Concepts/Edges_and_Contrast.html.Search in Google Scholar

[30] Iheme LO. Frequency Domain band pass filtering for image processing. Electrical and Electronic Engineering Department 583 (Digital Image Processing). Eastern Mediterranean University; 2011.Search in Google Scholar

[31] Kennedy J, Eberhart R. Particle swarm optimization. Proceedings IEEE International Conference Neural Networks 1995:4.10.1109/ICNN.1995.488968Search in Google Scholar

[32] Poli R, Kennedy J, Blackwell T. Particle swarm optimization. Swarm intelligence 2007;1:33–57.10.1007/s11721-007-0002-0Search in Google Scholar

[33] Pal A, Singh SB, Deep K. Use of particle swarm optimization algorithm for solving integer and mixed integer optimization problems. Int J Comput Sci Commun Technol 2011;4:663–7.Search in Google Scholar

[34] A Gallery of High-Resolution, Ultrasound, Color Doppler & 3D Images – Liver. Available online at http://www.ultrasound-images.com/liver/.Search in Google Scholar

[35] Neeru N, Kau L. A new hybrid filtering technique based on neighboring pixels to remove impulse noise from digital images. International Journal of Signal Processing, Image Processing and Pattern Recognition 2016;9:401–18.10.14257/ijsip.2016.9.9.37Search in Google Scholar

[36] Bibina VC, Viswasom S. Adaptive wavelet thresholding & joint bilateral filtering for image denoising. IEEE International Conference on INDICON 2012:1100–4.10.1109/INDCON.2012.6420781Search in Google Scholar

[37] Wang Y, Wang J, Song X, Han L. An Efficient adaptive fuzzy switching weighted mean filter for salt-and-pepper noise removal. IEEE Signal Process Lett 2016;23:1582–6.10.1109/LSP.2016.2607785Search in Google Scholar

[38] Cao M, Li S, Wang R, Li N. Interferometric phase denoising by median patch-based locally optimal wiener filter. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett 2015;12:1730–4.10.1109/LGRS.2015.2422788Search in Google Scholar

[39] Yang XS. Harmony search as a metaheuristic algorithm. music-inspired harmony search algorithm: theory and applications, Studies Comput Intelligence 2009;191:1–14.10.1007/978-3-642-00185-7_1Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2018-06-05
Accepted: 2018-10-18
Published Online: 2019-04-12
Published in Print: 2019-09-25

©2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 18.2.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/bmt-2018-0101/html
Scroll to top button