Characterization of magnetic nanoparticle systems with respect to their magnetic particle imaging performance

References

[1] Adolphi NL, Huber DL, Bryant HC, et al. Characterization of single-core magnetite nanoparticles for magnetic imaging by SQUID magnetorelaxometry. Phys Med Biol 2010; 55: 5985–6003.10.1088/0031-9155/55/19/023Search in Google Scholar

[2] Ahrentrop F, Astalan AP, Jonasson C, et al. Sensitive high frequency ac susceptometry in magnetic nanoparticle applications. AIP Conf Proc 2010; 1311: 213–223.10.1063/1.3530015Search in Google Scholar

[3] Berkov DV, Görnert P, Buske N, et al. New method for the determination of the particle magnetic moment distribution in a ferrofluid. J Phys D Appl Phys 2000; 33: 331–337.10.1088/0022-3727/33/4/303Search in Google Scholar

[4] Biederer S, Knopp T, Sattel TF, et al. Magnetization response spectroscopy of superparamagnetic nanoparticles for magnetic particle imaging. J Phys D Appl Phys 2009; 42: 205007-1-7.10.1088/0022-3727/42/20/205007Search in Google Scholar

[5] Briehl A, Gleich B, Weizenecker J, et al. Compositions containing magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles, and use of said compositions in imaging methods. US 2007/0036729 A1 (15.02.2007).Search in Google Scholar

[6] Chantrell RW, Hoon SR, Tanner BK. Time-dependent magnetization in fine-particle ferromagnetic systems. J Magn Magn Mater 1983; 38: 133–141.10.1016/0304-8853(83)90037-9Search in Google Scholar

[7] Chantrell RW, Popplewell J, Charles SW. Measurements of particle size distribution parameters in ferrofluids. IEEE Trans Mag 1978; MAG14: 975–977.10.1109/TMAG.1978.1059918Search in Google Scholar

[8] Chung SH, Hoffmann A, Kuslienko K, et al. Biological sensing with magnetic nanoparticles using Brownian relaxation. J Appl Phys 2005; 97: 10R101-1-5.10.1063/1.1853694Search in Google Scholar

[9] Debye P. Polar molecules. New York: Chemical Catalog Company 1929.Search in Google Scholar

[10] Drung D. High-performance dc SQUID read-out electronics. Physica C 2002; 368: 134–140.10.1016/S0921-4534(01)01154-6Search in Google Scholar

[11] Eberbeck D, Bergemann C, Hartwig S, Steinhoff U, Trahms L. Binding kinetics of magnetic nanoparticles on latex beads and yeast cells studied by magnetorelaxometry. J Magnet Magn Mat 2005; 289: 435–438.10.1016/j.jmmm.2004.11.122Search in Google Scholar

[12] Eberbeck D, Trahms L, Kratz H. Evaluation of different magnetic particle systems with respect to its MPI performance. In: Magnetic nanoparticles: particle science, imaging technology, and clinical applications. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co Pte Ltd 2010: 53–57.10.1007/978-3-642-24133-8_9Search in Google Scholar

[13] Eberbeck D, Wiekhorst F, Steinhoff U, Trahms L. Aggregation behaviour of magnetic nanoparticle suspensions investigated by magnetorelaxometry. J Phys D: Appl Phys 2006; 18: S2829–S2846.10.1088/0953-8984/18/38/S20Search in Google Scholar

[14] Eberbeck D, Wiekhorst F, Trahms L. Evidence of aggregates of magnetic nanoparticles in suspensions which determine the magnetization behavior. In: Magnetic nanoparticles: particle science, imaging technology, and clinical applications. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co Pte Ltd 2010: 66–72.10.1142/9789814324687_0009Search in Google Scholar

[15] Eberbeck D, Wiekhorst F, Wagner S, Trahms L. How size distribution of magnetic nanoparticles determines their magnetic particle imaging performance. Appl Phys Lett 2011; 98: 182502-1-3.10.1063/1.3586776Search in Google Scholar

[16] Ferguson RM, Khandhar AP, Krishnan KM. Tracer design for magnetic particle imaging. J Appl Phys 2012; 111: 07B318-1-5.10.1063/1.3676053Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[17] Ferguson RM, Minard KR, Khandhar AP, Krishnan KM. Optimizing magnetic nanoparticles for mass sensitivity in magnetic particle imaging. Med Phys 2011; 38: 1619–1626.10.1118/1.3554646Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[18] Gehrke N, Briel A, Ludwig F, Remmer H, Wawrzik T, Wellert S. New perspectives for MPI: a toolbox for tracer research. In: Magnetic nanoparticles: particle science, imaging technology, and clinical applications. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co Pte Ltd 2010: 99–103.10.1007/978-3-642-24133-8_16Search in Google Scholar

[19] Gleich B, Weizenecker J. Tomographic imaging using the nonlinear response of magnetic particles. Nature 2005; 435: 1214–1217.10.1038/nature03808Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[20] Goodwill PW, Conolly SM. Multidimensional X-space magnetic particle imaging. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2011; 30: 1581–1590.10.1109/TMI.2011.2125982Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[21] Löwa N, Eberbeck D, Steinhoff U, Wiekhorst F, Trahms L. Potential of improving MPI performance by magnetic separation. In: Magnetic nanoparticles: particle science, imaging technology, and clinical applications. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co Pte Ltd 2010: 73–78.10.1007/978-3-642-24133-8_12Search in Google Scholar

[22] Ludwig F. Characterization of magnetic core-shell nanoparticle suspensions using ac susceptibility for frequencies up to 1 MHz. AIP Conf Proc 2010; 1311: 249–254.10.1063/1.3530020Search in Google Scholar

[23] Ludwig F, Guillaume A, Schilling M, Frickel N, Schmidt AM. Determination of core and hydrodynamic size distributions of CoFe₂O₄ nanoparticle suspensions using ac susceptibility measurements. J Appl Phys 2010; 108: 033918-1-5.10.1063/1.3463350Search in Google Scholar

[24] Ludwig F, Heim E, Schilling M. Characterization of superparamagnetic nanoparticles by analyzing the magnetization and relaxation dynamics using fluxgate magnetometers. J Appl Phys 2007; 101: 113909-1-10.10.1063/1.2738416Search in Google Scholar

[25] Ludwig F, Heim E, Schilling M. Characterization of magnetic core-shell nanoparticles by fluxgate magnetorelaxometry, ac susceptibility, transmission electron microscopy and photon correlation spectroscopy – a comparative study. J Magn Magn Mater 2009; 321: 1644–1647.10.1016/j.jmmm.2009.02.105Search in Google Scholar

[26] Ludwig F, Wawrzik T, Schilling M. Characterization of magnetic nanoparticles for magnetic particle imaging by magnetorelaxometry, ac susceptibility, magnetic particle spectroscopy and static magnetization measurements. In: Magnetic nanoparticles: particle science, imaging technology, and clinical applications. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co Pte Ltd 2010: 35–40.10.1007/978-3-642-24133-8_6Search in Google Scholar

[27] Ludwig F, Wawrzik T, Yoshida T, et al. Optimization of magnetic nanoparticles for magnetic particle imaging. IEEE Trans Magn 2012; 48: 3780–3783.10.1109/TMAG.2012.2197601Search in Google Scholar

[28] Rahmer J, Gleich B, Bontus C, et al. Rapid 3d in vivo magnetic particle imaging with a large field of view. Proc Intl Soc Mag Reson Med 2011; 19: 3285.Search in Google Scholar

[29] Rauwerdink AM, Weaver JB. Viscous effects on nanoparticle magnetization harmonics. J Magn Magn Mater 2010; 322: 609–613.10.1016/j.jmmm.2009.10.024Search in Google Scholar

[30] Rosensweig RE. Ferrohydrodynamics. New York: Cambridge University Press 1985.Search in Google Scholar

[31] Rosensweig RE. Heating magnetic fluid with alternating magnetic field. J Magn Magn Mater 2002; 252: 370–374.10.1016/S0304-8853(02)00706-0Search in Google Scholar

[32] Schilling M, Ludwig F, Kuhlmann C, Wawrzik T. 3D Magnetic particle imaging-scanner with 10 kHz drive-field frequency. This issue.Search in Google Scholar

[33] Warzemann L, Schambach J, Weber P, Weitschies W, Kötitz R. LTS SQUID gradiometer system for in vivo magnetorelaxometry. Supercond Sci Technol 1999; 12: 953–955.10.1088/0953-2048/12/11/377Search in Google Scholar

[34] Wawrzik T, Kuhlmann C, Ludwig F, Schilling M. Scanner setup and reconstruction for three-dimensional magnetic particle imaging. Proc SPIE 8672, Medical Imaging 2013: Biomedical Applications in Molecular, Structural, and Functional Imaging (March 29, 2013). DOI:10.1117/12.2006392.10.1117/12.2006392Search in Google Scholar

[35] Wawrzik T, Ludwig F, Schilling M. Multivariate magnetic particle spectroscopy for magnetic nanoparticle characterization. AIP Conf Proc 2010; 1311: 267–270.10.1063/1.3530024Search in Google Scholar

[36] Wawrzik T, Ludwig F, Schilling M. Magnetic particle imaging: exploring particle mobility. In: Buzug TM, Borgert J, editors. Magnetic particle imaging: a novel SPIO nanoparticle imaging technique. Springer Proc Phys 2012; 140: 21–26.10.1007/978-3-642-24133-8_4Search in Google Scholar

[37] Wawrzik T, Schilling M, Ludwig F. Perspectives of magnetic particle spectroscopy for magnetic nanoparticle characterization. In: Buzug TM, Borgert J, editors. Magnetic particle imaging: a novel SPIO nanoparticle imaging technique. Springer Proceedings in Physics 2012; 140: 41–46.10.1007/978-3-642-24133-8_7Search in Google Scholar

[38] Weitschies W, Kötitz R, Bunte T, Trahms L. Determination of relaxing or remanent nanoparticle magnetization provides a novel binding-specific technique for the evaluation of immunoassays. Pharm Pharmacol Lett 1997; 7: 5–8.Search in Google Scholar

[39] Weizenecker J, Gleich B, Rahmer J, Borgert J. Particle dynamics of mono-domain particles in magnetic particle imaging. In: Magnetic nanoparticles: particle science, imaging technology, and clinical applications. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co Pte Ltd 2010: 3–15.10.1142/9789814324687_0001Search in Google Scholar

[40] Weizenecker J, Gleich B, Rahmer J, Dahnke H, Borgert J. Three-dimensional real-time in vivo magnetic particle imaging. Phys Med Biol 1009; 54: L1–L10.10.1088/0031-9155/54/5/L01Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[41] Wiekhorst F, Steinhoff U, Eberbeck D, Trahms L. Magnetorelaxometry assisted biomedical applications of magnetic nanoparticles. Pharm Res 2012; 29: 1189–1202.10.1007/s11095-011-0630-3Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[42] Yoshida T, Enpuku K, Ludwig F, et al. Characterization of Resovist for magnetic particle imaging. In: Buzug TM, Borgert J, editors. Magnetic particle imaging: a novel SPIO nanoparticle imaging technique. Springer Proceedings in Physics 2012; 140: 3–7.10.1007/978-3-642-24133-8_1Search in Google Scholar

[43] Yoshida T, Enpuku K. Simulation and quantitative clarification of ac susceptibility of magnetic fluid in nonlinear Brownian relaxation region. Japan J Appl Phys 2009; 48: 127002-1-7.10.1143/JJAP.48.127002Search in Google Scholar