Comparing Guaranteed Minimum Income and Universal Basic Income: The Importance of Household Structure
-
Peter Limerick
Abstract
Proposals for various forms of Basic Income, including Guaranteed Minimum Income (GMI) and Universal Basic Income (UBI) have received increasingly broad attention in recent years, both globally and in Australia. If all existing payments and taxes are applied on a purely individual basis (or entirely on a household basis), the distributional impacts of the introduction of GMI and UBI are equivalent. The key concept here is the effective marginal rate of taxation (EMTR), which is the combined effect of taxes paid on additional income and welfare payments withdrawn as income rises. This equivalence between UBI, GMI and Negative Income Tax (NIT) breaks down if, as in Australia, taxes are levied primarily on individual income while benefits are paid to households and means tested on a household basis. The purpose of this paper is to use micro-simulation to illustrate how this distinction changes the distributional effects of Basic Income schemes and the magnitude of the EMTR required to finance them. Modelling is completed through microsimulation using Treasury’s CAPITA model.
References
Atkinson, A. B. 2018. Inequality: What Can be Done. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Australian Bureau of Statistics. 2019. “2017-19 ABS Survey of Income & Housing (ABS).”Search in Google Scholar
Colombino, U. 2014. “Five Crossroads on the Way to Basic Income: An Italian Tour.” IZA Discussion Paper No. 8087 https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2424186.Search in Google Scholar
Dawkins, P., D. Johnson, R. Scutella, G. Beer, and A. Harding. 1998. “Towards a Negative Income Tax System for Australia.” The Australian Economic Review 31: 237–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8462.00069.Search in Google Scholar
Friedman, M. 1987. “The Case for the Negative Income Tax.” In The Essence of Friedman, edited by K. Leube, 57–68. Stanford: Hoover Institution Press.Search in Google Scholar
Harvey, P. 2006. “The Relative Cost of a Universal Basic Income and a Negative Income Tax.” Basic Income Studies 1 (2): 1–24. https://doi.org/10.2202/1932-0183.1032.Search in Google Scholar
Honkanen, P. 2014. “Basic Income and Negative Income Tax: A Comparison with a Simulation Model.” Basic Income Studies 9 (1-2): 119–35. https://doi.org/10.1515/bis-2014-0015.Search in Google Scholar
Humphreys, J. 2005. Reform 30/30: Rebuilding Australia’s Tax and Welfare Systems. Sydney: Centre for Independent Studies.Search in Google Scholar
Ingles, D., B. Phillips and M. Stewart. 2019. “A Basic Income for Australia? Exploring Rationale, Design, Distribution and Cost.”Search in Google Scholar
Melbourne Institute. 2020. Poverty Lines: Australia: December Quarter 2019. https://melbourneinstitute.unimelb.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/3369397/Poverty-Lines-Australia-December-2019-Final.pdf.Search in Google Scholar
Phillips, B. 2018. Research Note: Modelling a Basic Income for Australia – simple example of a universal pension funded by increased personal income taxation. Canberra: ANU Centre for Social Research and Methods.Search in Google Scholar
Quiggin, J., E. Klein, and T. Henderson. 2020. Meet the Liveable Income Guarantee: a Budget-Ready Proposal that Would Prevent Unemployment Benefits Falling off a Cliff. https://theconversation.com/meet-the-liveable-income-guarantee-a-budget-ready-proposal-that-would-prevent-unemployment-benefits-falling-off-a-cliff-146990.Search in Google Scholar
Scutella, R. 2004. Moves to a Basic Income-Flat Tax System in Australia: Implications for the Distribution of Income and Supply of Labour. https://minerva-access.unimelb.edu.au/bitstream/handle/11343/33799/66034_00000578_01_wp2004n05.pdf?sequence=1.Search in Google Scholar
Spies-Butcher, B., B. Phillips, and T. Henderson. 2020. “Between Universalism and Targeting: Exploring Policy Pathways for an Australian Basic Income.” Economic and Labour Relations Review 31: 502–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1035304620964272.Search in Google Scholar
Stevenson, M., D. Ledda, V. Pineda, T. Henderson, M. Smith, and S. Kluth 2017. CAPITA - Treasury’s Microsimulation Model of Personal Income Tax and Transfers. https://treasury.gov.au/sites/default/files/2019-03/170915-PT-Treasury-Research-Institute-Paper-CAPITA-MSN-edits.pdf.Search in Google Scholar
© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Research Notes
- Universal Basic Income in Appalachia: A Strategy for Clean Energy Transition?
- Research Articles
- Challenging the Justice of a Basic Income Policy When Focusing on the Homeless Population: A Case Study on Germany
- Exploring the Conceptualization and Factors of Basic Income Feasibility: A Systematic Literature Review
- Attitudes Towards Universal Basic Income in Korea Before and After the COVID-19 Pandemic
- Comparing Guaranteed Minimum Income and Universal Basic Income: The Importance of Household Structure
- The Inability to Form a Coalition: The Case of the Basic Income Proposal in Mexico
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Research Notes
- Universal Basic Income in Appalachia: A Strategy for Clean Energy Transition?
- Research Articles
- Challenging the Justice of a Basic Income Policy When Focusing on the Homeless Population: A Case Study on Germany
- Exploring the Conceptualization and Factors of Basic Income Feasibility: A Systematic Literature Review
- Attitudes Towards Universal Basic Income in Korea Before and After the COVID-19 Pandemic
- Comparing Guaranteed Minimum Income and Universal Basic Income: The Importance of Household Structure
- The Inability to Form a Coalition: The Case of the Basic Income Proposal in Mexico
