Home Business & Economics Automation Creates a New Kind of Collective Property That Can Fund Basic Incomes, Equal in Size to the Total Incomes Lost to Automation
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Automation Creates a New Kind of Collective Property That Can Fund Basic Incomes, Equal in Size to the Total Incomes Lost to Automation

  • ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: January 24, 2025

Abstract

Technological unemployment is what happens when automation eliminates jobs and not enough new jobs arrive to employ everyone, leaving part of the workforce permanently unemployed. Who owns the money that used to pay them? Business owners will argue that it’s theirs. I will argue that it’s not. I consider and refute several arguments for their claim, and then argue that this money is collective property. Because it’s collective property, we can use it to fund basic incomes for the technologically unemployed without violating anyone’s property rights. Moreover, it is equal in amount to the total incomes lost to technological unemployment, and therefore big enough to fund a decent standard of living for the unemployed, no matter how numerous they are. This is a new kind of collective property, distinct and different from other collective properties, such as the natural world, employment rents, and social capital.


Corresponding author: John K. Davis, Department of Philosophy, California State University Fullerton, Fullerton, USA, E-mail:

References

Abbott, Ryan, and Bret Bogenschneider. 2018. “Should Robots Pay Taxes? Tax Policy in the Age of Automation.” Harvard Law and Policy Review 12: 145–175.10.2139/ssrn.2932483Search in Google Scholar

Autor, David H. 2015. “Why Are There Still So Many Jobs? The History and Future of Workplace Automation.” The Journal of Economic Perspectives 29 (3): 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.29.3.3.Search in Google Scholar

Autor, David H., Frank Levy, and Richard Murnane. 2003. “The Skill Content of Recent Technological Change: An Empirical Approach.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 118 (4): 129–33.10.1162/003355303322552801Search in Google Scholar

Becker, Lawrence C. 1977. Property Rights: Philosophic Foundations. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Search in Google Scholar

Bellamy, Edward. 1888. “Looking Backward: 2000 to 1887.” https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/624 (accessed June 16, 2023).Search in Google Scholar

Benkler, Yochai. 2006. The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. New Haven: Yale University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Brynjolfsson, Erik, and Andrew McAfee. 2011. Race Against the Machine. Lexington: Digital Frontier Press.Search in Google Scholar

Grace, Katja, John Salvatier, Allan Dafoe, Baobao Zhang, and Owain Evans. 2017. “When Will AI Exceed Human Performance? Evidence from AI Experts.” https://arxiv.org/abs/1705.08807.10.1613/jair.1.11222Search in Google Scholar

Keynes, John Maynard. 1932. “Economic Possibilities for Our Grandchildren.” In Essays in Persuasion. New York: Harcourt Brace.Search in Google Scholar

Locke, John. 1689. “Second Treatise of Government.” https://www.gutenberg.org/files/7370/old/trgov10h.htm.Search in Google Scholar

Marx, Karl. 1846. “The German Ideology.” https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1845/german-ideology/.Search in Google Scholar

Marx, Karl. 1875. “Critique of the Gotha Program.” https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1875/gotha/.Search in Google Scholar

McKinsey Global Institute. 2017. “A Future that Works: Automation, Employment, and Productivity.” https://www.mckinsey.com/∼/media/mckinsey/featured%20insights/Digital%20Disruption/Harnessing%20automation%20for%20a%20future%20that%20works/MGI-A-future-that-works-Full-report.ashx.Search in Google Scholar

Munzer, Stephen R. 1990. A Theory of Property. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511609138Search in Google Scholar

Paine, Thomas. 1796. “Agrarian Justice.” http://piketty.pse.ens.fr/files/Paine1795.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Say, Jean Baptiste. 1819. “Of the Market for Products.” http://files.libertyfund.org/files/2495/Say_Markets1819.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Srnicek, Nick, and Alex Williams. 2016. Inventing the Future: Postcapitalism and a World Without Work. London: Verso Books.Search in Google Scholar

Susskind, Daniel. 2020. A World Without Work: Technology, Automation, and How We Should Respond. New York: Henry Holt.Search in Google Scholar

Tideman, Nicolaus, and Peter Vallentyne. 2013. “Left-Libertarianism and a Global Rent Payment.” In Basic Income: An Anthology, edited by Karl Widerquist, Jose A. Noguera, Yannick Vanderborght, and Jurgen de Wispelaere. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Van Parijs, Philippe. 1991. “Why Surfers Should Be Fed: The Crazy-Lazy Challenge.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 20 (2): 101–31.Search in Google Scholar

Van Parijs, Philippe, and Yannick Vanderborght. 2017. “Ethically Justifiable? Free Riding Versus Fair Shares.” In Basic Income: A Radical Proposal for a Free Society and a Sane Economy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674978072Search in Google Scholar

West, Darrell M. 2018. The Future of Work: Robots, AI, and Automation. Washington: Brookings Institution Press.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2023-07-29
Accepted: 2025-01-03
Published Online: 2025-01-24

© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 26.3.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/bis-2023-0029/html
Scroll to top button