Abstract
BIEN’s definitive statement of a Basic Income (BI) and the commentaries on its five characteristics are examined in turn, to identify potential clarifications, revisions and omissions. The following amendments are proposed as a basis for further discussion: to shift the position of ‘unconditionally’ in the definitive statement so that it refers to the cash payment rather than to its delivery; some clarifications to characteristics 3 ‘individual’ and 4 ‘universal’; to introduce ‘uniform’, without which BIs could be used to endorse flagrant discrimination against, or even zero amounts for, less favoured groups; to restore the comprehensive nature of ‘unconditionality’ (which is now characteristic 6), by substituting ‘behavioural requirement’ in place of ‘work requirement’; to give the characteristic ‘without means test’ its own commentary (no. 7). The introduction of ‘uniform’ and ‘behavioural’ into the definitive statement should help to prevent BIEN’s definition from being regarded as male orientated.
Acknowledgements
I am very grateful to Mike Danson, Reinhard Huss, Walter Van Trier and two anonymous referees for helpful comments on earlier drafts, and to Toru Yamamori, Ali Mutlu Köylüoglu and Télémaque Masson Recipon for our many discussions in BIEN’s Clarification of the Basic Income Definition working group, without which this paper could not have been written.
References
Atkinson, Anthony B. 2015. Inequality: What Can Be Done? Cambridge: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674287013Search in Google Scholar
Davala, Sarath, Renata Jhabvala, Soumya Kapoor Mehta, and Guy Standing. 2015. Basic Income: A Transformative Policy for India. London: Bloomsbury Academic.10.5040/9781472593061Search in Google Scholar
Department of Work & Pensions. 2023. “Benefit and Pension Rates 2023/24.” https://www.gov.uk/ (accessed September 11, 2023).Search in Google Scholar
De Wispelaere, Jurgen, and Lindsay Stirton. 2004. “The Many Faces of Universal Basic Income.” The Political Quarterly 75 (3): 266–74.10.1111/j.1467-923X.2004.00611.xSearch in Google Scholar
Gentelini, Ugo, Margaret Grosh, Jamele Rigolini, and Ruslan Yentsov, eds. 2020. Exploring Universal Basic Income: A Guide to Navigating Concepts, Evidence and Practice. Washington DC: World Bank. https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/soci.alprotection/publications/Exploring-universal-basic-income-a-guide-to-navigating-concepts-evidence-practice (accessed September 29, 2021).10.1596/978-1-4648-1458-7Search in Google Scholar
International Labour Organisation. 2000. “Most of World Lacks Unemployment Insurance.” https://www.ilo.org/global/about-the-ilo/newsroom/news/WCMS_007901.lang--en/index.htm (accessed September 17, 2023).Search in Google Scholar
Kennedy, Helena. 1993. Eve Was Framed: Women and British Justice. London: Vintage Books.Search in Google Scholar
Maskivker, Julia. 2018. “Why a Uniform Basic Income Offends Justice.” Erasmus Journal of Philosophy and Economics 11 (2): 191–219.10.23941/ejpe.v11i2.335Search in Google Scholar
Miller, Annie. 2023. Basic Income: A Short Guide. Edinburgh: Luath Press.Search in Google Scholar
Miller, Anne. 2024. “What Is the Essential Difference Between a Basic Income and an Income-Tested Benefit System?” Basic Income Studies. https://doi.org/10.1515/bis-2023-0010.10.1515/bis-2023-0010Search in Google Scholar
Parker, Hermione. 1991. “Terminology.” BIRG Bulletin No 12: 6. www.citizensincome.org/publications/ (accessed August 25, 2021).Search in Google Scholar
Van Parijs, Philippe. 1988. “‘Basic Income: a Terminological Note’.” In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Basic Income, Louvain-La-Neuve, September 1986, edited by Miller. Leuven: BIEN.Search in Google Scholar
Van Parijs, Philippe, and Yannick Vanderborght. 2017. Basic Income, A Radical Proposal for a Free Society and a Sane Economy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674978072Search in Google Scholar
Yamamori, Toru. 2016. “International BIEN’s Clarification of UBI: Report to Executive Committee following the 2016 General Assembly.” https://basicincome.org/news/2016/10/international-biens-clarification-ubi (accessed October 15, 2024).Search in Google Scholar
© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Research Articles
- The Debate Over the Definition of Basic Income
- The Case for a Revision of BIEN’s Definition of Basic Income
- A Survey of Universal Basic Income Experiments
- Macroeconomic Observations on Paying for and Funding Universal Basic Income
- Exploring Young People’s Attitudes Towards Basic Income
- Is G.A. Cohen’s Egalitarian Ethos Consistent with Unconditional Basic Income?
- Unconditional Endowment and Acceptance of Taxes: A Lab-in-the-Field Experiment on UBI with Unemployed
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Research Articles
- The Debate Over the Definition of Basic Income
- The Case for a Revision of BIEN’s Definition of Basic Income
- A Survey of Universal Basic Income Experiments
- Macroeconomic Observations on Paying for and Funding Universal Basic Income
- Exploring Young People’s Attitudes Towards Basic Income
- Is G.A. Cohen’s Egalitarian Ethos Consistent with Unconditional Basic Income?
- Unconditional Endowment and Acceptance of Taxes: A Lab-in-the-Field Experiment on UBI with Unemployed