Dependence of clutch predation rate of Eurasian reed warbler Acrocephalus scirpaceus on nesting site selection: A model study

References

Báldi A. & Batáry P. 2005. Nest predation in European reedbeds: different losses in edges but similar losses in interiors. Folia Zool. 54 (3): 285–292.Search in Google Scholar

Báldi A. & Kisbenedek T. 1999. Species-specific distribution of reed-nesting passerine birds across reed-bed edges: Effects of spatial scale and edge type. Acta Zool. Acad. Sci. Hung. 45 (2): 97–114.Search in Google Scholar

Batáry P. & Báldi A. 2005. Factors affecting the survival of real and artificial Great Reed Warblers nests. Biologia 60 (2): 215–219.Search in Google Scholar

Batáry P., Winkler H. & Báldi A. 2004. Experiments with artificial nests on predation in reed habitats. J. Ornithol. 145 (1): 59–63. DOI: 10.1007/s10336-003-0010-910.1007/s10336-003-0010-9Search in Google Scholar

Čapek M., Pozgayova M., Procházka P. & Honza M. 2010. Repeated presentations of the common cuckoo increase nest defense by the Eurasian reed warbler but do not induce it to make recognition errors. Condor 112 (4): 763–769. DOI: http:10.1525/cond.2010.10006310.1525/cond.2010.100063Search in Google Scholar

Darolová A., Krištofík J. & Hoi H. 2014. Vegetation type variation in marsh habitats: does it affect nest site selection, reproductive success, and maternal investment in Reed Warblers? J. Ornithol. 155 (4): 997–1008. DOI: 10.1007/s10336-0141086-010.1007/s10336-0141086-0Search in Google Scholar

Duckworth J.W. 1991. Response of breeding reed warblers Acrocephalus scirpaceus to mounts of sparrowhawk Accipiter nissus, cuckoo Cuculus canorus and jay Garrulus glandarius. Ibis 133 (1): 68–74. DOI: 10.1111/j.1474919X.1991.tb04812.x10.1111/j.1474919X.1991.tb04812.xSearch in Google Scholar

Ferguson J.W.H. 1994. Do nest site characteristics affect the breeding success of Red Bishops Euplectes orix? Ostrich 65 (3-4): 274–280. DOI: 10.1080/00306525.1994.963268710.1080/00306525.1994.9632687Search in Google Scholar

Gill S.A. & Sealy S.G. 1996. Nest defence by yellow warblers: Recognition of a brod parasite and an avian nest predator. Behaviour 133 (3): 263–282. DOI: 10.1163/156853996X00 14310.1163/156853996X00 143Search in Google Scholar

Goławski A. & Mitrus C. 2014. Nest site characteristics and breeding success of the red-backed shrike (Lanius collurio) in agricultural landscape in eastern Poland: Advantage of nesting close to buildings. Ecoscience 21 (2): 168–173. DOI: 10.2980/21-2-365310.2980/21-2-3653Search in Google Scholar

Halupka L., Halupka K., Klimczuk E. & Sztwiertnia H. 2014. Coping with shifting nest predation refuges by European Reed Warblers Acrocephalus scirpaceus. PLoS One 9: e115456. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.011545610.1371/journal.pone.0115456Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Hoi H. & Winkler H. 1988. Feindruck auf Schilfbrüter eine experimentelle Untersuchung. J. Ornithol. 129 (4): 439–447. DOI: 10.1007/BF0164448710.1007/BF01644487Search in Google Scholar

Hoi H. & Winkler H. 1994. Predation on nests: a case of apparent competition. Oecologia 87 (3-4): 436–440. DOI: 10.1007/BF0032423410.1007/BF00324234Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Hoi H., Darolová A. & Krištofík J. 2001. Factors influencing nest depredation in European Reed Passerines, pp. 27–36. In: Hoi H. (ed.), The Ecology of Reed Birds, Biosystematics and Ecology Series 18, Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Wien, 177 pp. ISBN: 3700130260, 9783700130260Search in Google Scholar

Honza M., Øien I. J., Moksnes A. & Røskaft E. 1998. Survival of Reed Warbler Acrocephalus scirpaceus clutches in relation to nest position. Bird Study 45: 104–108. DOI: 10.1080/0006365980946108310.1080/00063659809461083Search in Google Scholar

Hume R. 2002. Ptáci Evropy [Birds of Europe]. Euromedia group Knižní klub, Praha, 448 pp. ISBN: 80-242-1133-5Search in Google Scholar

Kameníková M. 2009. Sledování hnízdních parametrů rákosníka obecného (Acrocephalus scirpaceus)nanáhodně vybraných lokalitách v CHKO Třeboňsko [Observation of nesting parameters of reed warbler (Acrocephalus scirpaceus)ataccidentally chosen localities in PLA Trebonsko]. Mgr. Thesis, Jihočeská univerzita v Českých Budějovicích, Přírodovědecká fakulta, České Budějovice, 51 pp.Search in Google Scholar

Lopez-Iborra G., Pinheiro R. T., Sancho C. & Martinez A. 2004. Nest size influences nest predation risk in two coexisting Acrocephalus warblers. Ardea 92 (1): 85–91.Search in Google Scholar

Moskát C. 2005. Nest defence and egg rejection in great reed warblers over the breeding cycle: are they synchronised with the risk of brood parasitism? Ann. Zool. Fenn. 42 (6): 579–586.Search in Google Scholar

Musil P. 1998. Změny početnosti hnízdních populací vodních ptáků na rybnících Třeboňské pánve v letech 1981–1997 [Changes in numbers of breeding populations of water birds on fishponds in Třeboň Basin in the years 1981–1997]. Sylvia 34 (1): 13–26.Search in Google Scholar

Musil P. 2000. Monitoring hnízdních populací vodních ptáků [Monitoring of waterbird nesting populations]. Sylvia 36 (1): 6–11.Search in Google Scholar

Neudorf D.L. & Sealy S.G. 1992. Reaction of four passerine species to threats of predation and cowbird parasitism – enemy recognition or generalized responses. Behaviour 123 (1): 84–105. DOI: 10.1163/156853992X0013810.1163/156853992X00138Search in Google Scholar

Øien I.J., Honza M., Moksnes A. & Røskaft E. 1996. The risk of parasitism in relation to the distance from reed warbler nests to cuckoo perches. J. Anim. Ecol. 65 (2): 147–153. DOI: 10.2307/571710.2307/5717Search in Google Scholar

Polak M. 2014. Protective nesting association between the Barred Warbler Sylvia nisoria and the Red-backed Shrike Lanius collurio: an experiment using artificial and natural nests. Ecol. Res. 29: 949–957. DOI: 10.1007/s11284-014-1183-910.1007/s11284-014-1183-9Search in Google Scholar

Sieving K.E. & Willson M.F. 1998. Nest predation and avian species diversity in northwestern forest understory. Ecology 79 (7): 2391–2402. DOI: 10.1890/0012-9658(1998)079[2391: NPAASD]2.0.CO;210.1890/0012-9658(1998)079[2391: NPAASD]2.0.CO;2Search in Google Scholar

Sloan S.S., Holme R.T. & Sherry T.W. 1998. Depredation rates and predators at artificial bird nests in an unfragmented northern hardwoods forest. J. Wildl. Manage. 62 (2): 529–539. DOI: 10.2307/380232610.2307/3802326Search in Google Scholar

Stokke B.G., Hafstad I., Rudolfse G., Bargain B., Beier J., Camp`as D. B., Dyrcz A., Honza M., Leisler B., Pap P.L., Patapavičius R., Procházka P., Schulze-Hagen K., Thomas R., Moksnes A., Møller A.P., Røskaft E. & Soler M. 2007. Host density predicts presence of cuckoo parasitism in reed warblers. Oikos 116 (6): 913–922. DOI: 10.1111/j.00301299.2007.15832.x10.1111/j.00301299.2007.15832.xSearch in Google Scholar

Šťastný K., Bejček V. & Hudec K. 2006. Atlas hnízdního rozšíření ptáků v České republice 2001–2003 [Atlas of Bird Nesting Distribution of the Czech Republic]. Aventinum, Praha, 464 pp. ISBN: 80-86858-19-7Search in Google Scholar

Trnka A., Batáry P. & Prokop P. 2009. Interacting effects of vegetation structure and breeding patterns on the survival of Great Reed Warbler Acrocephalus arundinaceus nests. Ardea 97 (1): 109–116. DOI: doi:10.5253/078.097.0113doi:10.5253/078.097.0113Search in Google Scholar

Trnka A., Peterkova V. & Prokop P. 2014. Management of reedbeds: mosaic reed cutting does not affect prey abundance and nest predation rate of reed passerine birds. Wetlands Ecol. Manage. 22 (3): 227–234. DOI: 10.1007/s11273-0139325-310.1007/s11273-0139325-3Search in Google Scholar

Trnka A. & Prokop P. 2006. Do predators cause a chase in passerine movement patterns as indicated by mist-net tramping rates? Ardea 94 (1): 71–76.Search in Google Scholar