The Gender-bias Effect of Test Scoring and Framing: A Concern for Personnel Selection and College Admission

References

Baldiga, K. 2014. “Gender Differences in Willingness to Guess.” Management Science 60 (2): 434–48, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2013.1776.Search in Google Scholar

Bar-Hillel, M., Budescu, D., and Attali, Y. 2005. “Scoring and Keying Multiple Choice Tests: A Case Study in Irrationality.” Mind & Society 4 (1): 3–12, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11299-005-0001-z.Search in Google Scholar

Barber, B.M., Odean, T. 2001. Boys will be Boys: Gender, Overconfidence, and Common Stock Investment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 116 (1), 261–92. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355301556400.Search in Google Scholar

Ben-Shakhar, G., and Sinai, Y. 1991. “Gender Differences in Multiple-choice Tests: The Role of Differential Guessing Tendencies.” Journal of Educational Measurement 28 (1): 23–35, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.1991.tb00341.x.Search in Google Scholar

Bereby-Meyer, Y., Meyer, J., and Budescu, D. V. 2003. “Decision Making Under Internal Uncertainty: The Case of Multiple-choice Tests with Different Scoring Rules.” Acta Psychologica 112 (2): 207–20, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0001-6918(02)00085-9.Search in Google Scholar

Betts, L. R., Elder, T. J., Hartley, J., and Trueman, M. 2009. “Does Correction for Guessing Reduce Students' Performance on Multiple-choice Examinations? Yes? No? Sometimes?.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 34 (1): 1–15, https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930701773091.Search in Google Scholar

Bliss, L. B. 1980. “A Test of Lord's Assumption Regarding Examinee Guessing Behavior on Multiple-choice Tests Using Elementary School Students.” Journal of Educational Measurement 17 (2): 147–52, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.1980.tb00823.x.Search in Google Scholar

Bolger, N., and Kellaghan, T. 1990. “Method of Measurement and Gender Differences in Scholastic Achievement.” Journal of Educational Measurement 27 (2): 165–74, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.1990.tb00740.x.Search in Google Scholar

Borghans, L., Heckman, J. J., Golsteyn, B. H. H., and Meijers, H. 2009. “Gender Differences in Risk Aversion and Ambiguity Aversion.” Journal of the European Economic Association 7 (2–3): 649–58, https://doi.org/10.1162/jeea.2009.7.2-3.649.Search in Google Scholar

Budescu, D., and Bar-Hillel, M. 1993. “To Guess or not to Guess: A Decision-theoretic View of Formula Scoring.” Journal of Educational Measurement 30 (4): 277–91, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.1993.tb00427.x.Search in Google Scholar

Budescu, D. V., and Bo, Y. 2015. “Analyzing Test-taking Behavior: Decision Theory Meets Psychometric Theory.” Psychometrika 80 (4): 1105–22, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-014-9425-x.Search in Google Scholar

Collet, L. S. 1971. “Elimination Scoring: An Empirical Evaluation.” Journal of Educational Measurement 8 (3): 209–14, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.1971.tb00927.x.Search in Google Scholar

Croson, R., and Gneezy, U. 2009. “Gender Differences in Preferences.” Journal of Economic Literature 47 (2): 448–74, https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.47.2.448.Search in Google Scholar

Direr, A. 2020. Efficient Scoring of Multiple-choice Tests. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3546770 or https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3546770.Search in Google Scholar

Espinosa, M. P., and Gardeazabal, J. 2010. “Optimal Correction for Guessing in Multiple-choice Tests.” Journal of Mathematical Psychology 54 (5): 415–25, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2010.06.001.Search in Google Scholar

Espinosa, M. P., and Gardeazabal, J. 2013. “Do Students Behave Rationally in multiple choice tests? Evidence from a Field Experiment.” Journal of Economics and Management 9 (2): 107–35, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.878548.Search in Google Scholar

Huang, J., and Kisgen, D. J. 2013. “Gender and Corporate Finance: Are Male Executives Overconfident Relative to Female Executives?” Journal of Financial Economics 108 (3): 822–39, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2012.12.005.Search in Google Scholar

Iriberri, N., Rey-Biel, P. 2019a. Brave Boys and Play-it-safe Girls: Gender Differences in Willingness to Guess in a Large Scale Natural Field Experiment. CEPR Discussion Paper No. DP13541.10.1016/j.euroecorev.2020.103603Search in Google Scholar

Iriberri, N., and Rey-Biel, P. 2019b. “Competitive Pressure Widens the Gender Gap in Performance: Evidence from a Two-stage Competition in Mathematics.” The Economic Journal 129 (620): 1863–93, https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12617.Search in Google Scholar

Lundeberg, M. A., Fox, P. W., and Punćcohaŕ, J. 1994. “Highly Confident but Wrong: Gender Differences and Similarities in Confidence Judgments.” Journal of Educational Psychology 86 (1): 114–21, https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.86.1.114.Search in Google Scholar

Mazzeo, J., Schmitt, A. P., and Bleistein, C. A. 1993. Sex-related Performance Differences on Constructed Response and Multiple Choice Sections of Advanced Placement Examinations. College Board Report 92-7. New York: College Entrance Examination Board.10.1002/j.2333-8504.1993.tb01516.xSearch in Google Scholar

Pekkarinen, T. 2015. “Gender Differences in Behaviour Under Competitive Pressure: Evidence on Omission Patterns in University Entrance Examinations.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 115: 94–110, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2014.08.007.Search in Google Scholar

Pratt, J.W., Gibbons, J.D., 1981. Concepts of Nonparametric Theory. Springer-Verlag, New York Heidelberg Berlin.10.1007/978-1-4612-5931-2Search in Google Scholar

Prieto, G., and Delgado, A. R. 1999. “The Role of Instructions in the Variability of Sex-Related Differences in Multiple-Choice Tests.” Personality and Individual Differences 27 (6): 1067–77, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0191-8869(99)00049-5.Search in Google Scholar

Reardon, S. F., Kalogrides, D., Fahle, E. M., Podolsky, A., and Zárate, R. C. 2018. “The Relationship Between Test Item Format and Gender Achievement Gaps on Math and Ela Tests in Fourth and Eighth Grades.” Educational Researcher 47 (5): 284–94, https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x18762105.Search in Google Scholar

Ring, P., Neyse, L., David-Barett, T., and Schmidt, U. 2016. “Gender Differences in Performance Predictions: Evidence from the Cognitive Reflection Test.” Frontiers in Psychology 7: 1680, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01680.Search in Google Scholar

Romm, A. T., Schoer, V., and Kika, J. C. 2019. “A Test Taker's Gamble: The Effect of Average Grade to Date on Guessing Behaviour in a Multiple Choice Test with a Negative Marking Rule.” South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences 22: 1–12, https://doi.org/10.4102/sajems.v22i1.2542.Search in Google Scholar

Scotchmer, S., 2008. Risk Taking and Gender in Hierarchies. Theoretical Economics 3 (4), 499–524. https://econtheory.org/ojs/index.php/te/article/viewFile/20080499/2132/115.10.3386/w14464Search in Google Scholar

Vanderoost, J., Janssen, R., Eggermont, J., Callens, R., and De Laet, T. 2018. “Elimination Testing with Adapted Scoring Reduces Guessing and Anxiety in Multiple-choice Assessments, but Does not Increase Grade Average in Comparison with Negative Marking.” PLoS One 13 (10): e0203931, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203931.Search in Google Scholar

Wu, Q., De Laet, T., and Janssen, R. 2018. “Elimination Scoring Versus Correction for Guessing: A Simulation Study.” In Quantitative Psychology. IMPS 2017., volume 233 of Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics, edited by M.Wiberg, S.Culpepper, R.Janssen, and D.MolenaarCham: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-77249-3_16Search in Google Scholar

Zapechelnyuk, A. 2015. “An Axiomatization of Multiple-choice Test Scoring.” Economics Letters 132: 24–27, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2015.03.042.Search in Google Scholar