Home Medicine Fuzzy-based computational simulations of brain functions – preliminary concept
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Fuzzy-based computational simulations of brain functions – preliminary concept

  • Piotr Prokopowicz and Dariusz Mikołajewski EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: July 7, 2016
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Research on the computational models of the brain constitutes an important part of the current challenges within computational neuroscience. The current results are not satisfying. Despite the continuous efforts of scientists and clinicians, it is hard to fully explain all the mechanisms of a brain function. Computational models of the brain based on fuzzy logic, including ordered fuzzy numbers, may constitute another breakthrough in the aforementioned area, offering a completing position to the current state of the art. The aim of this paper is to assess the extent to which possible opportunities concerning computational brain models based on fuzzy logic techniques may be exploited both in the area of theoretical and experimental computational neuroscience and in clinical applications, including our own concept. The proposed approach can open a family of novel methods for a more effective and (neuro)biologically reliable brain simulation based on fuzzy logic techniques useful in both basic sciences and applied sciences.

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Employment or leadership: None declared.

  4. Honorarium: None declared.

  5. Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.

References

1. Markram H. Seven challenges for neuroscience. Funct Neurol 2013;28:145–51.Search in Google Scholar

2. Woodman MM, Pezard L, Domide L, Marmaduke Woodman M, Pezard L, Domide L, et al. Integrating neuroinformatics tools in TheVirtualBrain. Front Neuroinform 2014;8:36.10.3389/fninf.2014.00036Search in Google Scholar

3. D’Angelo E, Solinas S, Garrido J, Casellato C, Pedrocchi A, Mapelli J, et al. Realistic modeling of neurons and networks: towards brain simulation. Funct Neurol 2013;28:153–66.Search in Google Scholar

4. Carnevale NT, Hines ML. The NEURON book. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.10.1017/CBO9780511541612Search in Google Scholar

5. Bower JM, Beeman D. The book of GENESIS: exploring realistic neural models with the general neural simulation system. New York: Springer, 1998.10.1007/978-1-4612-1634-6Search in Google Scholar

6. O’Reilly RC, Munakata Y. Computational explorations in cognitive neuroscience. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2000.10.7551/mitpress/2014.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

7. Faisal AA. Noise in neurons and other constraints. In: Le Novère N, editor. Computational systems neurobiology. New York: Springer, 2012.10.1007/978-94-007-3858-4_8Search in Google Scholar

8. Faisal AA, Selen LP, Wolpert DM. Noise in the nervous system. Nat Rev Neurosci 2008;9:292–303.10.1038/nrn2258Search in Google Scholar

9. Parvisi J, Damasio A. Consciousness and the brainstem. Cognition 2001;79:135–59.10.1016/S0010-0277(00)00127-XSearch in Google Scholar

10. Balduzzi D, Tononi G. Integrated information in discrete dynamical systems: motivation and theoretical framework. PLoS Comput Biol 2008;4:e1000091.10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000091Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

11. Seth AK, Dienes Z, Cleermans A, Overgaard M, Pessoa L. Measuring consciousness: relating behavioural and neurophysiological approaches. Trends Cognit Sci 2008;12:314–21.10.1016/j.tics.2008.04.008Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

12. Wójcik GM, Kaminski WA. Liquid state machine and its separation ability as function of electrical parameters of cell. Neurocomputing 2007;70:2593–697.10.1016/j.neucom.2006.12.015Search in Google Scholar

13. Wójcik GM. Self-organising criticality in the simulated models of the rat cortical microcircuits. Neurocomputing 2012;79:61–7.10.1016/j.neucom.2011.10.004Search in Google Scholar

14. Duch W, Dobosz K, Mikołajewski D. Autism and ADHD: two ends of the same spectrum? Lect Notes Comput Sci 2013;8226:623–30.10.1007/978-3-642-42054-2_78Search in Google Scholar

15. Dobosz K, Duch W. Visualization for understanding of neurodynamical systems. Cognit Neurodyn 2011;5:145–60.10.1007/s11571-011-9153-1Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

16. Dobosz K, Duch W. Understanding neurodynamical systems via fuzzy symbolic dynamics. Neural Netw 2010;23:487–96.10.1016/j.neunet.2009.12.005Search in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Dobosz K, Duch W. Fuzzy symbolic dynamics for neurodynamical systems. Lect Notes Comput Sci 2008;5164:471–8.10.1007/978-3-540-87559-8_49Search in Google Scholar

18. Li H, Deklerck R, De Cuyper B, Hermanus A, Nyssen E, Cornelis J. Object recognition in brain CT-scans: knowledge-based fusion of data from multiple feature extractors. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1995;14:212–29.10.1109/42.387703Search in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Zadeh L. The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning. Springfield: National Technical Information Service, 1973.Search in Google Scholar

20. Mamdani E, Assilian S. An experiment in linguistic synthesis with a fuzzy logic controller. Int J Man-Machine Stud 1975;7:1–15.10.1016/B978-1-4832-1450-4.50032-8Search in Google Scholar

21. Raju GV, Zhou J, Kisner RA. Hierarchical fuzzy control. Int J Control 1991;54:1201–16.10.1080/00207179108934205Search in Google Scholar

22. Gegov A. Fuzzy networks for complex systems – a modular rule base approach. In: Studies in fuzziness and soft computing 259. New York: Springer, 2010:1–277.10.1007/978-3-642-15600-7_1Search in Google Scholar

23. Kosiński W, Prokopowicz P, Ślęzak D. Ordered fuzzy numbers. Bull Polish Acad Sci Ser Sci Math 2003;51:327–38.Search in Google Scholar

24. Kosiński W, Prokopowicz P. Fuzziness – representation of dynamic changes, using ordered fuzzy numbers arithmetic, new dimensions in fuzzy logic and related technologies. In: Stepnicka M, Nova V, Bodenhofer U, editors. Proc. 5th EUSFLAT Conference, vol I, Ostrava, Czech Republic, September 11–14, 2007:449–56.Search in Google Scholar

25. Kosiński W, Prokopowicz P, Kacprzak D. Fuzziness – representation of dynamic changes by ordered fuzzy numbers. In: Seising R, editor. Studies in fuzziness and soft computing. Views of fuzzy sets and systems from different perspectives. Heidelberg: Springer, 2009:243:485–508.10.1007/978-3-540-93802-6_24Search in Google Scholar

26. Prokopowicz P. Flexible and simple methods of calculations on fuzzy numbers with the ordered fuzzy numbers model. In: Rutkowski L, Korytkowski M, Scherer R, Tadeusiewicz R, Zadeh LA, Zurada JM, editors. Proc. ICAISC 2013, Part I. LNCS (LNAI). Heidelberg: Springer 2013;7894:365–75.10.1007/978-3-642-38658-9_33Search in Google Scholar

27. Kosiński W, Prokopowicz P, Rosa A. Defuzzification functionals of ordered fuzzy numbers. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 2013;21:1163–9.10.1109/TFUZZ.2013.2243456Search in Google Scholar

28. Prokopowicz P. Adaptation of rules in the fuzzy control system using the arithmetic of ordered fuzzy numbers. In: Proc. ICAISC 2008. LNCS (LNAxI). New York: Springer, 2008:5097:306–16.10.1007/978-3-540-69731-2_30Search in Google Scholar

29. Prokopowicz P, Malek S. Aggregation operator for ordered fuzzy numbers concerning the direction. In: Rutkowski L, Korytkowski M, Scherer R, Tadeusiewicz R, Zadeh LA, Zurada JM, editors. Proc. ICAISC 2014, Part I. LNCS (LNAI). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, 2014;8467:267–78.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2016-5-11
Accepted: 2016-5-30
Published Online: 2016-7-7
Published in Print: 2016-9-1

©2016 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 26.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/bams-2016-0009/pdf
Scroll to top button