A kinetic mechanism for in vivo protein folding

References

1. Anfinsen CB. Principles that govern the folding of protein chains. Science 1973;181:223–30.10.1126/science.181.4096.223Search in Google Scholar

2. Gutte B, Merrifield RB. The synthesis of ribonuclease A. J Biol Chem 1971;246:1922–40.10.1016/S0021-9258(18)62396-8Search in Google Scholar

3. Merrifiel B. The chemical synthesis of proteins. Protein Sci 1996;5:1947–51.10.1002/pro.5560050925Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

4. Nilsson BL, Soellner MB, Raines RT. Chemical synthesis of proteins. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 2005;34:91–118.10.1146/annurev.biophys.34.040204.144700Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

5. Lau KF, Dill KA. A lattice statistical mechanics model of the conformational and sequence spaces of proteins. Macromolecules 1989;22:3986–97.10.1021/ma00200a030Search in Google Scholar

6. Shakhnovich E, Gutin A. Enumeration of all compact conformation of copolymers with random sequence of links. J Chem Phys 1990;93:5967–71.10.1063/1.459480Search in Google Scholar

7. Pande VS, Joerg C, Grosberg AY, Tanaka T. Enumerations of the Hamiltonian walks on a cubic sublattice. J Phys A Math Gen 1994;27:6231–6.10.1088/0305-4470/27/18/030Search in Google Scholar

8. Dill KA, Bromberg S, Yue K, Fiebig KM, Yee DP, Thomas PD, et al. Principles of protein folding – a perspective from simple exact models. Protein Sci 1995;4:561–602.10.1002/pro.5560040401Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

9. Bryngelson JD, Onuchic JN, Socci ND, Wolynes PG. Funnels, pathways, and the energy landscape of protein folding: a synthesis. Proteins 1995;21:167–95.10.1002/prot.340210302Search in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Onuchic JN, Luthey-Schulten Z, Wolynes PG. Theory of protein folding: the energy landscape perspective. Annu Rev Phys Chem 1997;48:545–600.10.1146/annurev.physchem.48.1.545Search in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Schram RD, Schiessel H. Exact enumeration of Hamiltonian walks on the 4 x 4 x 4 cube and applications to protein folding. J Phys A Math Gen 2013;46:485001.10.1088/1751-8113/46/48/485001Search in Google Scholar

12. Lazaridis T, Karplus M. “New view” of protein folding reconciled with the old through multiple unfolding simulations. Science 1997;278:1928–31.10.1126/science.278.5345.1928Search in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Cruzeiro L. Protein’s multi-funnel energy landscape and misfolding diseases. J Phys Org Chem 2008;21:549–54.10.1002/poc.1315Search in Google Scholar

14. Cruzeiro L, Lopes PA. Are the native states of proteins kinetic traps? Mol Phys 2009;107:1485–93.10.1080/00268970902950386Search in Google Scholar

15. Cruzeiro L. Protein folding. In: Springborg M, editor. Specialist periodical reports, chemical modelling, Vol. 7. London, UK: Royal Society of Chemistry, 2010:89–114.Search in Google Scholar

16. Hecht MH, Richardson JS, Richardson DC, Ogden RC. De novo design, expression, and characterization of Felix: a four-helix bundle protein of native-like sequence. Science 1990;249: 884–91.10.1126/science.2392678Search in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Kuhlman B, Dantas G, Ireton GC, Varani G, Stoddard BL, Baker D. Design of a novel globular protein fold with atomic-level accuracy. Science 2003;302:1364–8.10.1126/science.1089427Search in Google Scholar PubMed

18. Shaw DE, Maragakis P, Lindorff-Larsen K, Piana S, Dror RO, Eastwood MP, et al. Atomic-level characterization of the structural dynamics of proteins. Science 2010;330:341–6.10.1126/science.1187409Search in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Sanchez-Ruiz JM. Protein kinetic stability. Biophys Chem 2010;148:1–15.10.1016/j.bpc.2010.02.004Search in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Levinthal C. Are there pathways for protein folding? J Chem Phys 1968;65:44–5.10.1051/jcp/1968650044Search in Google Scholar

21. Baker D, Sohl JL, Agard DA. A protein-folding reaction under kinetic control. Nature 1992;356:263–5.10.1038/356263a0Search in Google Scholar PubMed

22. Sohl JL, Jaswal SS, Agard DA. Unfolded conformations of alpha-lytic protease are more stable than its native state. Nature 1998;395:817–9.10.1038/27470Search in Google Scholar PubMed

23. Gettins PGW. Serpin structure, mechanism, and function. Chem Rev 2002;102:4751–803.10.1021/cr010170+Search in Google Scholar PubMed

24. Luo X, Tang Z, Xia G, Wassmann K, Matsumoto T, Rizo J, et al. The Mad2 spindle checkpoint protein has two distinct natively folded states. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2004;11:338–45.10.1038/nsmb748Search in Google Scholar PubMed

25. Tuinstra RL, Peterson FC, Kutlesa S, Elgin ES, Kron MA, Volkman BF. Interconversion between two unrelated protein folds in the lymphotactin native state. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008;105:5057–62.10.1073/pnas.0709518105Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

26. Murzin AG. Metamorphic proteins. Science 2008;320: 1725–26.10.1126/science.1158868Search in Google Scholar PubMed

27. Burmann BM, Knauer SH, Sevostyanova A, Schweimer K, Mooney RA, Landick R, et al. An a helix to β barrel domain switch transforms the transcription factor RfaH into a translation factor. Cell 2012;150:291–303.10.1016/j.cell.2012.05.042Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

28. Prusiner SB. Novel proteinaceous infectious particles cause scrapie. Science 1982;216:136–44.10.1126/science.6801762Search in Google Scholar PubMed

29. Prusiner SB. Molecular biology of prion diseases. Science 1991;252:1515–22.10.1126/science.1675487Search in Google Scholar PubMed

30. Braselmann E, Chaney JL, Clark PL. Folding the proteome. TIBS 2013;38:337–44.10.1016/j.tibs.2013.05.001Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

31. Bhushan S, Gartmann M, Halic M, Armache JP, Jarasch A, Mielke T, et al. Alpha-helical nascent polypeptide chains visualized within distinct regions of the ribosomal exit tunnel. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2010;17:313–7.10.1038/nsmb.1756Search in Google Scholar PubMed

32. Wilson DN, Beckmann R. The ribosomal tunnel as a functional environment for nascent polypeptide folding and translational stalling. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2011;21:274–82.10.1016/j.sbi.2011.01.007Search in Google Scholar

33. Zhang G, Ignatova Z. Folding at the birth of the nascent chain: coordinating translation with co-translational folding. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2011;21:25–31.10.1016/j.sbi.2010.10.008Search in Google Scholar

34. Fedyukina DV, Cavagnero S. Protein folding at the exit tunnel. Annu Rev Biophys 2011;40:337–59.10.1146/annurev-biophys-042910-155338Search in Google Scholar

35. Kaiser CM, Goldman DH, Chodera JD, Tinoco Jr I, Bustamante C. The ribosome modulates nascent protein folding. Science 2011;334:1723–7.10.1126/science.1209740Search in Google Scholar

36. Sander IM, Chaney JL, Clark PL. Expanding Anfinsen’s principle: contributions of synonymous codon selection to rational protein design. J Am Chem Soc 2014;136:858–61.10.1021/ja411302mSearch in Google Scholar

37. Levinthal C. How to fold graciously. In: Mossbauer spectroscopy in biological systems: proceedings of a meeting held at Allerton House, Monticello, Illinois, 1969;22–24.Search in Google Scholar

38. Cruzeiro L. Nonlinear models for protein folding and function. In: Rubio RG, Ryazantsev YS, Starov VM, Huang G-X, Chetverikov AP, Arena P, editors. Without bounds: a scientific canvas of nonlinearity and complex dynamics. Heidelberg, New York, Dordrecht, London: Springer, 2013:635–46.Search in Google Scholar

39. Ellis JP, Culviner PH, Cavagnero S. Confined dynamics of a ribosome-bound nascent globin: cone angle analysis of fluorescent depolarization decays in the presence of two local motions. Prot Sci 2009;18:2003–15.10.1002/pro.196Search in Google Scholar

40. Orengo, CA, Michie AD, Jones S, Jones DT, Swindells MB, Thornton JM. CATH – a hierarchic classification of protein domain structures. Structure 1997;5:1093–108.10.1016/S0969-2126(97)00260-8Search in Google Scholar

41. Schlitter J, Engels M, Krüger P, Jacoby E, Wollmer A. Targeted molecular dynamics simulation of conformational change: application to the T to R transition in insulin. Mol Simul 1994;10:291–309.10.1080/08927029308022170Search in Google Scholar

42. Apostolakis J, Ferrara P, Caflisch A. Calculation of conformational transitions and barriers in solvated systems: application to the alanine dipeptide in water. J Chem Phys 1999;110:2099–108.10.1063/1.477819Search in Google Scholar

43. Ovchinnikov V, Trout BL, Karplus M. Mechanical coupling in myosin V: a simulation study. J Mol Biol 2010;395:815–33.10.1016/j.jmb.2009.10.029Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

44. Negri A, Rodríguez-Larrea D, Marco E, Jiménez-Ruiz A, Sánchez-Ruiz JM, Gago F. Protein-protein interactions at an enzyme-substrate interface: characterization of transient reaction intermediates throughout a full catalytic cycle of Escherichia coli thioredoxin reductase. Proteins Struct Funct Bioinf 2010;78:36–51.10.1002/prot.22490Search in Google Scholar

45. Apostolakis J, Ferrara P, Caflisch A. Computer simulations of protein folding by targeted molecular dynamics. Proteins Struct Funct Gen 2000;39:252–60.10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(20000515)39:3<252::AID-PROT80>3.0.CO;2-3Search in Google Scholar

46. Gouda H, Torigoe H, Saito A, Sato M, Arata Y, Shimada I. Three-dimensional solution structure of the b domain of staphylococcal protein a: comparisons of the solution and crystal structures. Biochemistry 1992;31:9665–72.10.1021/bi00155a020Search in Google Scholar

47. Gallagher T, Alexander P, Bryan P, Gillilan GL. Two crystal structures of the B1 immunoglobulin-binding domain of streptococcal protein G and comparison with NMR. Biochemistry 1994;33:4721–9.10.1021/bi00181a032Search in Google Scholar

48. Hornak V, Abel R, Okur A, Strockbine B, Roitberg A, Simmerling C. Comparison of multiple Amber force fields and development of improved protein backbone parameters. Proteins 2006;65:712–25.10.1002/prot.21123Search in Google Scholar

49. Case DA, Darden TA, Cheatham III TE, Simmerling CL, Wang J, Duke RE, et al. AMBER 9, 2006; University of California, San Francisco.Search in Google Scholar

50. Wickstrom L, Okur A, Simmerling C. Evaluating the performance of the ff99SB force field based on NMR scalar coupling data. Biophys J 2009;97:853–6.10.1016/j.bpj.2009.04.063Search in Google Scholar

51. Weiser J, Shenkin PS, Still WC. Approximate atomic surfaces from linear combinations of pairwise overlaps (LCPO). J Comput Chem 1999;20:217–30.10.1002/(SICI)1096-987X(19990130)20:2<217::AID-JCC4>3.0.CO;2-ASearch in Google Scholar

52. Humphrey W, Dalke A, Schulten K. VMD – Visual Molecular Dynamics. J Mol Graphics 1996;14:33–8.10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5Search in Google Scholar

53. Dill KA, Chan H-S. From Levinthal to pathways to funnels. Nat Struct Biol 1997;4:10–9.10.1038/nsb0197-10Search in Google Scholar

54. Dill KA, Ozkan SB, Shell MS, Weikl TR. The protein folding problem. Annu Rev Biophys 2008;37:289–316.10.1146/annurev.biophys.37.092707.153558Search in Google Scholar

55. Christen M, Hünenberger PH, Bakowies D, Baron R, Bürgi R, Geerke DP, et al. The GROMOS software for biomolecular simulation: GROMOS05. J Comput Chem. 2005;26:1719–51.10.1002/jcc.20303Search in Google Scholar PubMed

56. Brooks BR, Brooks III CL, Mackerell Jr AD, Nilsson L, Petrella RJ, Roux B, et al. CHARMM: the biomolecular simulation program. J Comput Chem 2009;30:1545–614.10.1002/jcc.21287Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

57. Allen F, Almasi G, Andreoni W, Beece D, Berne BJ, Bright A, et al. Blue Gene: a vision for protein science using a petaflop computer. IBM Syst J 2001;40:310–27.10.1147/sj.402.0310Search in Google Scholar

58. Berendsen HJC. A glimpse of the Holy Grail? Science 1998;282:642–3.10.1126/science.282.5389.642Search in Google Scholar PubMed

59. Horowitz PM. Ironing out the protein folding problem? Nat Biotechnol 1999;17:136–7.10.1038/6136Search in Google Scholar PubMed

60. Service RF. Problem Solved (sort of). Science 2008;321:784–6.10.1126/science.321.5890.784Search in Google Scholar PubMed

61. Pan KM, Baldwin M, Nguyen J, Gasset M, Serban A, Groth D, et al. Conversion of α-helices into β-sheets features in the formation of the scrapie prion proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1993;90:10962–6.10.1073/pnas.90.23.10962Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

62. Booth DR, Sunde M, Bellotti V, Robinson C.V, Hutchinson WL, Fraser PE, et al. Instability, unfolding and aggregation of human lysozyme variants underlying amyloid fibrillogenesis. Nature 1997;385:787–93.10.1038/385787a0Search in Google Scholar PubMed

63. Fändrich M, Fletcher MA, Dobson CM. Amyloid fibrils from muscle myoglobin. Nature 2001;410:165–6.10.1038/35065514Search in Google Scholar PubMed

64. Cruzeiro-Hansson L, Silva PAS. Protein folding: thermodynamic versus kinetic control. J Biol Phys 2001;27:S6–9.Search in Google Scholar

65. Cruzeiro L. Why are proteins with glutamine- and asparagine-rich regions associated with protein misfolding diseases? J Phys Condens Matter 2005;17:7833–44.10.1088/0953-8984/17/50/005Search in Google Scholar

66. Kohn JE, Millett IS, Jacob J, Zagrovic B, Dillon TM, Cingel N, et al. Random-coil behavior and the dimensions of chemically unfolded proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2004;34: 12491–6.10.1073/pnas.0403643101Search in Google Scholar

67. Bowler BE. Residual structure in unfolded proteins. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2012;22:4–13.10.1016/j.sbi.2011.09.002Search in Google Scholar

68. Ziv G, Haran G, Thirumalai D. Ribosome exit tunnel can entropically stabilize alpha-helices. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005;102:18956–61.10.1073/pnas.0508234102Search in Google Scholar

69. Silva PAS, Cruzeiro-Hansson L. A reduced set of exact equations of motion for a non-number-conserving Hamiltonian. Phys Lett A 2003;315/6:447–51.10.1016/S0375-9601(03)01112-5Search in Google Scholar

70. Silva PAS, Cruzeiro L. Dynamics of a nonconserving Davydov monomer. Phys Rev E 2006;74:021920.10.1103/PhysRevE.74.021920Search in Google Scholar PubMed