Home Simulation and optimization of industrial production lines
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Simulation and optimization of industrial production lines

  • Claudio Santo Longo

    Claudio Santo Longo is a Ph.D. candidate in Industrial Innovation Engineering at the university of Modena and Reggio Emilia. Received the M.Sc. degree in Management Engineering in 2016, Claudio is very passionate about Big Data and Data analytics topics and he is widely using the techinique of the Hardware in the Loop to accomplish his projects with the best results.

    and Cesare Fantuzzi

    Cesare Fantuzzi received the M.S. degree in Electrical Engineering and Ph.D. degree in System Engineering from the University of Bologna (Italy) in 1990 and 1995, respectively. From 1996 to 2000 Dr Fantuzzi was an Assistant Professor of Automatic Control at University of Ferrara (Italy), from 2000 to 2006 he was an Associate Professor of Automatic Control at University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Engineering Faculty in Reggio Emilia, and from 2006 to now he is a Full Professor in the same Faculty. He is he director of the graduate program on Mechatronic Engineering at University of Modena and Reggio Emilia.

    EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: April 6, 2018

Abstract

Simulation and optimization techniques are the pillars of for the Virtual Commissioning of modern digital factories. In particular, industrial production lines are complex systems formed by a set of machines that have several cross-dependencies (i. e., the production efficiency of a machine impact deeply performance figures of the others and affects the whole line productivity). The simulation and optimization of production lines is an integrated approach that allows finding efficiently optimized production parameters. This paper presents an example of application of the simulation to the virtual design and optimization of an industrial production line.

Zusammenfassung

Simulations- und Optimierungstechniken sind Säulen für die virtuelle Inbetriebnahme von modernen digitalen Fabriken. Insbesondere sind industrielle Produktionslinien komplexe Systeme aus einer Reihe von Maschinen, die mehrere Querabhängigkeiten haben (d. h., die Produktionseffizienz von einer Maschine wirkt tief auf die Leistungsdaten der anderen und beeinflusst die gesamte Linienproduktivität). Die Simulation und Optimierung von Produktionslinien ist ein integrierter Ansatz, der es erlaubt, effizient Parameter für eine optimierte Produktion zu finden. Dieses Papier zeigt ein Anwendungsbeispiel, das von der Simulation zum virtuellen Design und zur Optimierung einer industriellen Produktionslinie reicht.

Award Identifier / Grant number: 678867

Funding statement: IMPROVE has received funding from the H2020 European Research Council research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. 678867.

About the authors

Claudio Santo Longo

Claudio Santo Longo is a Ph.D. candidate in Industrial Innovation Engineering at the university of Modena and Reggio Emilia. Received the M.Sc. degree in Management Engineering in 2016, Claudio is very passionate about Big Data and Data analytics topics and he is widely using the techinique of the Hardware in the Loop to accomplish his projects with the best results.

Cesare Fantuzzi

Cesare Fantuzzi received the M.S. degree in Electrical Engineering and Ph.D. degree in System Engineering from the University of Bologna (Italy) in 1990 and 1995, respectively. From 1996 to 2000 Dr Fantuzzi was an Assistant Professor of Automatic Control at University of Ferrara (Italy), from 2000 to 2006 he was an Associate Professor of Automatic Control at University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Engineering Faculty in Reggio Emilia, and from 2006 to now he is a Full Professor in the same Faculty. He is he director of the graduate program on Mechatronic Engineering at University of Modena and Reggio Emilia.

References

1. C. Fantuzzi, R. Panciroli (Universita degli Studi di Modena e Reggio nell’Emilia), and M. Gargiulo (Tetra Pak Packaging Solutions), Hardware in the loop simulation for Distributed Automation SystemsSearch in Google Scholar

2. L. Racchetti and C.Fantuzzi, “Hardware in the loop simulation and Machine Modular Development: Concepts and application,” 2013 IEEE 18th Conference on Emerging Technologies & Factory Automation (ETFA), Cagliari (2013), pp. 1–4. doi:10.1109/ETFA.201Search in Google Scholar

3. P. Bolzern, R. Scattolini, and N. Schiavoni, Fondamenti di Contr olli Automatici, Terza Edizione, McGraw-Hill (2008)Search in Google Scholar

4. M. Fowler, UML Distilled: A Brief Guide to the Standard Object Modeling Language, Third Edition, Addison-Wesley Professional (2003)Search in Google Scholar

5. R. Maidstone, Discrete Event Simulation, System Dynamics and Agent Based Simulation: Discussion and Comparison (March 7, 2012)Search in Google Scholar

6. Al Sweetser (Andersen Consulting), Comparison of System Dynamics (SD) and Discrete Event Simulation (DES)Search in Google Scholar

7. A.  A. Tako, S. Robinson (Warwick Business School), Comparing Model Development In Discrete Event Simulation And System Dynamics (2009), pp. 979–97110.1109/WSC.2009.5429423Search in Google Scholar

8. T. Barros Brito, E. F. Capovilla Trevisan (University of Sao Paulo, Department of Logistics Systems Engineering, CILIP), and R. C. Botter (University of Sao Paulo, Department of Naval Engineering, CILIP), A Conceptual Comparison Between Discrete And Continuous Simulation To Motivate The Hybrid Simulation Methodology (2011), pp. 3915–392710.1109/WSC.2011.6148082Search in Google Scholar

9. The IMPROVE Project Website: http://improvevfof.eu/Search in Google Scholar

10. P. Hoffmann, R. Schumann, T. M. A. Maksoud, and G. C. Premier, “Virtual commissioning of manufacturing systems a review and new approaches for simplification,” Proceedings – 24th European Conference on Modelling and Simulation, ECMS, Kuala Lumpur, Malaisia, 1–4 June 2010 (2010), pp. 175–18110.7148/2010-0175-0181Search in Google Scholar

11. The Xcelgo Website http://xcelgo.com/Search in Google Scholar

12. M. Oppelt, “Virtual commissioning in a virtual environment,” 2016 Petroleum and Chemical Industry Conference Europe (PCIC Europe), Berlin (2016), pp. 1–8. doi:10.1109/PCICEurope.2016.7604641Search in Google Scholar

13. J. Y. Jung, G. Blau, J. F. Pekny, G. V. Reklaitis, and D. Eversdyk, A simulation based optimization approach to supply chain management under demand uncertainty, Computers & Chemical Engineering, 28:10 (2004)10.1016/j.compchemeng.2004.06.006Search in Google Scholar

14. N. Rezg, X. Xie, and Y. Mati, Joint optimization of preventive maintenance and inventory control in a production line using simulation, International Journal of Production Research, 42:10 (2007), 2029–2046. doi:10.1080/00207540310001638235Search in Google Scholar

15. W. Kuhn, “Digital Factory – Simulation Enhancing the Product and Production Engineering Process,” Proceedings of the 2006 Winter Simulation Conference, Monterey, CA (2006), pp. 1899–1906. doi:10.1109/WSC.2006.322972Search in Google Scholar

16. A. Pratt et al., “Hardware-in-the-loop simulation of a distribution system with air conditioners under model predictive control,” 2017 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting, Chicago, IL (2017), pp. 1–5. doi:10.1109/PESGM.2017.8273757Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2017-11-28
Accepted: 2018-3-12
Published Online: 2018-4-6
Published in Print: 2018-4-25

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 5.11.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/auto-2017-0126/html
Scroll to top button