Comment on David Estlund. What Good Is it?—Unrealistic Political Theory and the Value of Intellectual Work

Nora Kreft

doi:10.1515/auk-2011-0205

Home Social Sciences Comment on David Estlund. What Good Is it?—Unrealistic Political Theory and the Value of Intellectual Work

Article

Licensed

Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Comment on David Estlund. What Good Is it?—Unrealistic Political Theory and the Value of Intellectual Work

Nora Kreft

Published/Copyright: February 11, 2016

Published by

Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Author Information Explore this Subject

From the journal Analyse & Kritik Volume 33 Issue 2

MLA
APA
Harvard
Chicago
Vancouver

MLA
APA
Harvard
Chicago
Vancouver

Kreft, Nora. "Comment on David Estlund. What Good Is it?—Unrealistic Political Theory and the Value of Intellectual Work" Analyse & Kritik, vol. 33, no. 2, 2011, pp. 417-422. https://doi.org/10.1515/auk-2011-0205

Kreft, N. (2011). Comment on David Estlund. What Good Is it?—Unrealistic Political Theory and the Value of Intellectual Work. Analyse & Kritik, 33(2), 417-422. https://doi.org/10.1515/auk-2011-0205

Kreft, N. (2011) Comment on David Estlund. What Good Is it?—Unrealistic Political Theory and the Value of Intellectual Work. Analyse & Kritik, Vol. 33 (Issue 2), pp. 417-422. https://doi.org/10.1515/auk-2011-0205

Kreft, Nora. "Comment on David Estlund. What Good Is it?—Unrealistic Political Theory and the Value of Intellectual Work" Analyse & Kritik 33, no. 2 (2011): 417-422. https://doi.org/10.1515/auk-2011-0205

Kreft N. Comment on David Estlund. What Good Is it?—Unrealistic Political Theory and the Value of Intellectual Work. Analyse & Kritik. 2011;33(2): 417-422. https://doi.org/10.1515/auk-2011-0205

Copy

Copied to clipboard

BibTeX EndNote RIS

Published Online: 2016-02-11

Published in Print: 2011-11-01

You are currently not able to access this content.

Articles in the same Issue

Editorial
Ideal Justice and Rational Dissent. A Critique of Amartya Sen’s The Idea of Justice
Comment on Wilfried Hinsch. Ideal Justice and Rational Dissent: A Critique of Amartya Sen’s The Idea of Justice
What Good Is It? Unrealistic Political Theory and the Value of Intellectual Work
Comment on David Estlund. What Good Is it?—Unrealistic Political Theory and the Value of Intellectual Work
Justice, Peace and Compromise
Comment on Véronique Zanetti. On Moral Compromise
Individual Expectations and Climate Justice
Comment on Lukas Meyer and Pranay Sanklecha. Individual Expectations and Climate Justice
Stepping in for the Polluters? Climate Justice under Partial Compliance
Comment on Sabine Hohl and Dominic Roser. Stepping in for the Polluters? Climate Justice under Partial Compliance
Discussion: Comment on Anton Leist. Potentials of Cooperation (Analyse & Kritik 01/2011)
Authors

Search journal Search the content of this journal

https://doi.org/10.1515/auk-2011-0205

Articles in the same Issue

Editorial
Ideal Justice and Rational Dissent. A Critique of Amartya Sen’s The Idea of Justice
Comment on Wilfried Hinsch. Ideal Justice and Rational Dissent: A Critique of Amartya Sen’s The Idea of Justice
What Good Is It? Unrealistic Political Theory and the Value of Intellectual Work
Comment on David Estlund. What Good Is it?—Unrealistic Political Theory and the Value of Intellectual Work
Justice, Peace and Compromise
Comment on Véronique Zanetti. On Moral Compromise
Individual Expectations and Climate Justice
Comment on Lukas Meyer and Pranay Sanklecha. Individual Expectations and Climate Justice
Stepping in for the Polluters? Climate Justice under Partial Compliance
Comment on Sabine Hohl and Dominic Roser. Stepping in for the Polluters? Climate Justice under Partial Compliance
Discussion: Comment on Anton Leist. Potentials of Cooperation (Analyse & Kritik 01/2011)
Authors