Article
Licensed
Unlicensed
Requires Authentication
Comment on John Foster
-
Anna Kusser
Published/Copyright:
May 14, 2016
Abstract
Modern environmental thought is characterized by a paradox. The value of environmental goods seems to transcend all purely human values. At the same time environmental goods have to be placed within an overall ranking if there is to be rational environmental policy. It is argued that J. Foster's concept of value-judgement cannot solve this paradox.
Published Online: 2016-05-14
Published in Print: 1994-11-01
© 1994 by Lucius & Lucius, Stuttgart
You are currently not able to access this content.
You are currently not able to access this content.
Articles in the same Issue
- Structured and Unstructured Valuation
- Beyond Costs and Benefits: Weighing Environmental Goods
- Comment on John Foster
- Sind alle Werte vergleichbar?
- Cost-Benefit Analysis and Procedural Values
- Comment on Douglas MacLean
- Trying to Find the Right Approach to Greenhouse Economics
- Comment on Clive L. Spash
- Preferences, Virtues, and Institutions
- Comment on John O’Neill
Articles in the same Issue
- Structured and Unstructured Valuation
- Beyond Costs and Benefits: Weighing Environmental Goods
- Comment on John Foster
- Sind alle Werte vergleichbar?
- Cost-Benefit Analysis and Procedural Values
- Comment on Douglas MacLean
- Trying to Find the Right Approach to Greenhouse Economics
- Comment on Clive L. Spash
- Preferences, Virtues, and Institutions
- Comment on John O’Neill
