Gracefully twisting the neck: literary commentaries as a (meta)genre of scholarly discourse

References

Abhirāma: Abhijnana-Sakuntalam: With the commentary of Abhirama (= Diṅmātradarśana). Srirangam: Sri Vani Vilas Press.Search in Google Scholar

Anandakichenin, Suganya / D’Avella, Victor B. (eds.) (2020): The Commentary Idioms of the Tamil Learned Traditions. Pondicherry: École française d’Extrême-Orient & Institut Français de Pondichéry.Search in Google Scholar

Angot, Michel (2017): Le Sanskrit commentarial I: Les gloses. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Search in Google Scholar

Assmann, Jan / Gladigow, Burkhard (eds.) (1995): Text und Kommentar. Archäologie der Literarischen Kommunikation IV. Munich.10.1007/978-3-476-03544-8_17Search in Google Scholar

Bai, Indira T. N. (1998): Abhijnanasakuntalacarcā: A Critical Study (Unpublished Thesis). Department of Sanskrit, University of Kerala.Search in Google Scholar

Banerji, Sures Chandra (1972): “Commentaries of Mallinātha”. In: S.K. De Memorial Volume. Edited by R. C. Hazra and S. C. Banerji. Calcutta: Firma K.L. Mukhopadhyay, 298–368.Search in Google Scholar

Bansat-Boudon, Lyne (1992): Poétique du théâtre indien. Lectures du Nāṭyaśāstra. Paris: École Française d’Extrême-Orient.Search in Google Scholar

Bronkhorst, Johannes (1990): “Vārttika”. Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde Südasiens 34: 123–126.Search in Google Scholar

Bronner, Yigal (1998): “Double-Bodied Poet, Double-Bodied Poem. Ravicandra’s Commentary on the Amaruśatakam and the Rules of Sanskrit Literary Interpretation”. Journal of Indian Philosophy 26: 233–261.10.1023/A:1004358522739Search in Google Scholar

Bronner, Yigal (2016): “Understanding Udbhaṭa: The Invention of Kashmiri Poetics in the Jayāpīḍa Moment”. In: Around Abhinavagupta; Aspects of the Intellectual History of Kashmir from the Ninth to the Eleventh Century. Edited by Eli Franco and Isabelle Ratié. Münster: LIT Verlag, 81–147.Search in Google Scholar

Bronner, Yigal (2020): “In Search of Scholasticism: Sanskrit Poetics and Its Long Path to Śāstrahood”. In: Les scolastiques indiennes. Genèses, développements, interactions. (Études thématiques 32). Edited by Emilie Aussant and Gérard Colas. Paris: École française d’Extrême-Orient, 87–101.Search in Google Scholar

Brückner, Heidrun (1995): “Bewahren und Erneuern: Philosophische Kommentartraditionen im indischen Mittelalter”. In: Text und Kommentar. Archäologie der Literarischen Kommunikation IV. Edited by Jan Assmann and Burkhard Gladigow. Munich, 237–246.Search in Google Scholar

Cattoni, Nadia (2012): “Le commentaire littéraire: entre classification et interprétation. Exemples issus de la Śṛṅgāradīpikā et de la Bhāvadīpikā de Vemabhūpāla”. Asiatische Studien/Études Asiatiques 66.2: 239–260.Search in Google Scholar

Chenet, François (1998): “Le commentaire en Inde”. In: Encyclopédie philosophique universelle, IV: Le discours philosophique. Edited by Jean-François Mattéi. Paris: Presses, 1654–1664.Search in Google Scholar

Cuneo, Daniele (2017): “‘This is Not a Quote’. Quotation Emplotment, Quotational Hoaxes and Other Unusual Cases of Textual Reuse in Sanskrit Poetics-cum-Dramaturgy”. In Adaptive Reuse. Aspects of Creativity in South Asian Cultural History, Abhandlungen für die Kunde des Morgenlandes Band 101. Edited by Elisa Freschi and Philipp Maas. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 219–253.Search in Google Scholar

Dallapiccola, Anna L. (ed.) (1989): Shastric Traditions in Indian Arts. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Search in Google Scholar

De, S. K. (1955): “Some Commentators on the Meghadūta”. Our Heritage 3.1: 15–28.10.1108/eb012229Search in Google Scholar

Dundas, Paul (1985): The Sattasaī and Its Commentators. Turin: Indologica Taurinensia.Search in Google Scholar

Foucault, M. (1990 [1963]): Naissance de la clinique. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.Search in Google Scholar

Freschi, Elisa / Maas, Philipp A. (eds.) (2017): Adaptive Reuse. Aspects of Creativity in South Asian Cultural History. (Abhandlungen für die Kunde des Morgenlandes Band 101). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.10.26530/OAPEN_623411Search in Google Scholar

Ganapati Sastri, T. (ed.) (1909): Vyaktiviveka of Rājānaka Mahimabhaṭṭa and its Commentary of Rājānaka Ruyyaka. Trivandrum: Travancore Government Press.Search in Google Scholar

Ganeri, Jonardon (2010): “Sanskrit Philosophical Commentary”. Journal of the Indian Council of Philosophical Research 25.1: 187–207.Search in Google Scholar

Ganser, Elisa (2022): Theatre and Its Other: Abhinavagupta on Dance and Dramatic Acting. (Gonda Indological Studies Series 23). Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004467057Search in Google Scholar

Gerow, Edwin (1979): “Plot Structure and Development of Rasa in Śakuntalā. Part 1”. Journal of the American Oriental Society 99.4: 559–572.10.2307/601446Search in Google Scholar

Gerow, Edwin (1980): “Plot Structure and Development of Rasa in Śakuntalā. Part 2”. Journal of the American Oriental Society 100.3: 267–282.10.2307/601799Search in Google Scholar

Godabole, Narayana Balakrishna / Parab, Kashinath Pandurang (eds.) (1891): The Abhijñāna-Śākuntala of Kālidāsa with the Commentary (Arthadyotanikā) of Rāghavabhaṭṭa (3rd revised ed.). Bombay: Nirnaya-Sagar Press.Search in Google Scholar

Goldman, Robert (1992): “Translating Texts Translating Texts: Issues in the Translation of Popular Literary Texts with Multiple Commentaries”. In: Translation East and West: A Cross-cultural Approach. Edited by Cornelia N. Moore and Lucy Lower. East-West Center: Univ. of Hawaii at Manoa, 93–105.Search in Google Scholar

Gomez, Kashi (2022): “Sanskrit and the labour of gender in early modern South India”. Modern Asian Studies, 1–28 (https://doi.org/10.1017/S0026749X21000640).Search in Google Scholar

Goodall, Dominic (2001): “Bhute ʿāha’ iti pramādāt: Firm Evidence for the Direction of Change Where Certain Verses of the Raghuvaṃśa Are Variously Transmitted”. Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft 151.1: 103–124.Search in Google Scholar

Goodall, Dominic (2009): “Retracer la transmission des textes littéraires à l’aide des textes “théoriques” de l’Alaṅkāraśāstra ancien: quelques exemples tirés du Raghuvaṃśa”. In: Écrire et transmettre en Inde classique. Edited by Gérard Colas and Gerdi Gerschheimer. Paris: École française d’Extrême-Orient, 63–77.Search in Google Scholar

Goodall, Dominic / Isaacson, Harunaga (eds.) (2003): The Raghupañcikā of Vallabhadeva. Being the Earliest Commentary on the Raghuvaṃśa of Kālidāsa. vol. 1: Critical Edition with Introduction and Notes. Groningen: Forsten.Search in Google Scholar

Grimal, François (1999): Le commentaire de Harihara sur le Mālatīmādhava de Bhavabhūti, Pondicherry: Institut Français de Pondichéry.Search in Google Scholar

Grimal, François (2000): “Pour décrire un commentaire traditionnel sur une œuvre littéraire sanskrite”. Bulletin de l’École Française d’Extrême-Orient 87.2: 765–785.10.3406/befeo.2000.3500Search in Google Scholar

Grimal, François (2001): “‘Par désir de faire une faveur à ceux dont l’esprit est lent’ et ‘Pour le plaisir des savants.’ Premières questions pour une étude des commentaires littéraires sanskrits”. In: Les sources et le temps – Sources and Time. Edited by François Grimal. Pondicherry: Institut Français de Pondichéry – École française d’Extrême-Orient, 77–92.Search in Google Scholar

Heim, Maria (2018): Voice of the Buddha: Buddhaghosa on the immeasurable words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780190906658.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

von Hinüber, Oskar (2007): “Buddhistische Kommentare aus dem alten Indien. Die Erklärung des Theravāda-Kanons”. In: Kommentarkulturen: Die Auslegung zentraler Texte der Weltreligionen. Ein vergleichender Überblick. Edited by Michael Quisinsky and Peter Walter. Cologne: Böhlau, 99–114.Search in Google Scholar

Hulin, Michel (2000): “Le commentaire dans la littérature philosophique de l’Inde ancienne”. In: Le commentaire entre tradition et innovation. Actes du Colloque International de l’Institut des Traditions Textuelles (Paris et Villejuif, 22- 25 septembre 1999). Edited by Marie-Odile Goulet-Cazé. Paris: Vrin, 425–434.Search in Google Scholar

Jyväsjärvi, Mari (2010): “Retrieving the hidden meaning: Jain commentarial techniques and the art of memory”. Journal of Indian Philosophy 38.2: 133–162.10.1007/s10781-010-9086-8Search in Google Scholar

Kapoor, Kapil (2005): Text and Interpretation. The Indian Tradition. New Delhi: D. K. Printworld.Search in Google Scholar

Klebanov, Andrey (2016): Texts Composed While Copying: A Critical Study of the Manuscripts of Selected Commentaries on the Kirātārjunīya, an Epic Poem in Sanskrit. PhD Thesis, Universität Hamburg.Search in Google Scholar

Klebanov, Andrey (2020): “Application of Structure Analysis to the Study of Sanskrit Commentaries on mahākāvya. A General Overview of the Subject with a Special Reference to the Commentaries on the Kirātārjunīya”. In: The Commentary Idioms of the Tamil Learned Traditions. Edited by Suganya Anandakichenin and Victor B. D’Avella. Pondicherry: École française d’Extrême-Orient & Institut Français de Pondichéry, 524–590.Search in Google Scholar

Krishnamoorthy, K. (ed.) (1992): Nātyaśāstra of Bharatamuni with the Commentary Abhinavabhāratī by Abhinavaguptācārya, Vol. 1 (Chapters 1–7), Baroda: Gaekwad’s Oriental Series [4th edition].Search in Google Scholar

Lalye, P.G. (ed.) (1981): Mallināthamaṇīṣā. Hyderabad: Osmania University.Search in Google Scholar

Lalye, P.G. (2002): Mallinātha. (Makers of Indian Literature). New Delhi: Sahitya Akademi.Search in Google Scholar

Livio, Chiara (2020): “A Poet with His Philosopher’s Hat On. A Preliminary Study of the Philosophical Section in the Seventeenth Canto of Maṅkha’s Śrīkaṇṭhacarita”. Religions of South Asia 14.1: 11–40.10.1558/rosa.19319Search in Google Scholar

Lubin, Timothy (2019): “Brāhmaṇa as Commentary”. In: Self, Sacrifice, and Cosmos. Edited by Lauren M. Bausch. Delhi: Primus Books, 23–40.Search in Google Scholar

Mainkar, T. G. (1971): Studies in Sanskrit Dramatic Criticism. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Search in Google Scholar

McCrea, Lawrence (2008): The Teleology of Poetics in Medieval Kashmir. Cambridge, MA/London: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

McCrea, Lawrence (2010): “Poetry in Chains: Commentary and Control in the Sanskrit Commentarial Tradition”. In: Language, Myth, and Poetry in Ancient India and Iran. Edited by David Shulman. Israel: Israeli Academy of Sciences and Humanities, 231–248.Search in Google Scholar

McCrea, Lawrence (2011): “Standards and Practices: Following, Making, and Breaking the Rules of Śāstra”. In: South Asian Texts in History. Critical Engagements with Sheldon Pollock. Edited by Yigal Bronner, Whitney Cox and Lawrence McCrea. Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Asian Studies, 229–239.Search in Google Scholar

Minkowski, Christopher (2005): “What Makes a Text ‘Traditional’? On the Success of Nīlakaṇṭhadīkṣita’s Mahābhārata Commentary”. In: Boundaries, Dynamics and Construction of Traditions in South Asia. Edited by Federico Squarcini. Florence: Firenze University Press, 225–252.10.7135/UPO9781843313977.011Search in Google Scholar

Minkowski, Christopher (2020): “Outlandishness in Sanskrit Commentary”. In : Les scolastiques indiennes. Genèses, développements, interactions. (Études thématiques 32). Edited by Emilie Aussant and Gérard Colas. Paris: École française d’Extrême-Orient, 185–202.Search in Google Scholar

Obrock, Luther J. (2015): Translation and History: The Development of a Kashmiri Textual Tradition from ca. 1000-1500 (Ph.D. Thesis). UC Berkeley: South & Southeast Asian Studies.Search in Google Scholar

Patel, Deven M. (2014): Text to Tradition: The Naiṣadhīyacarita and Literary Community in South Asia. New York: Columbia University Press.10.7312/pate16680Search in Google Scholar

Paulose, K. G. (ed.) (1993): Naṭāṅkuśa: A Critique on Dramaturgy. Tripunithura: Government Sanskrit College Committee.Search in Google Scholar

Pillai, Raghavan (1961): Abhijñānaśakuntalacarcā. University of Kerala.Search in Google Scholar

Pollock, Sheldon (1985a): “Review of Vallabhadeva’s Kommentar (Śāradā-Version) zum Kumārasaṃbhava des Kālidāsa by M. S. Narayana Murti, Klaus L. Janert and Vallabhadeva”. Journal of the American Oriental Society 105.2: 381–382.10.2307/601747Search in Google Scholar

Pollock, Sheldon (1985b): “The Theory of Practice and the Practice of Theory in Indian Intellectual History”. Journal of the American Oriental Society 105.3: 499–519.10.2307/601525Search in Google Scholar

Pollock, Sheldon (1989a): “The Idea of Śāstra in Traditional India”. In: Shastric Traditions in Indian Arts. Edited by Anna Libera Dallapiccola. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 17–26.Search in Google Scholar

Pollock, Sheldon (1989b): “Playing by the Rules: Śāstra and Sanskrit Literature”. In: Shastric Traditions in Indian Arts. Edited by Anna Libera Dallapiccola. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 301–312.Search in Google Scholar

Pollock, Sheldon (1989c): “Mīmāṃsā and the Problem of History in Traditional India”. Journal of the American Oriental Society 109.4: 603–610.10.2307/604085Search in Google Scholar

Pollock, Sheldon (2003): “Sanskrit Literary Culture from the Inside Out”. In: Literary Cultures in History: Reconstructions from South Asia. Edited by Sheldon Pollock. Berkeley: University of California.10.1525/9780520926738-006Search in Google Scholar

Pollock, Sheldon (2015a): “Introduction”. In: World Philology. Edited by Sheldon Pollock, Benjamin Elman and Ku-ming Kevin Chang. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1–25.Search in Google Scholar

Pollock, Sheldon (2015b): “What Was Philology in Sanskrit”. In: World Philology. Edited by Sheldon Pollock, Benjamin Elman and Ku-ming Kevin Chang. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 114–136.10.4159/harvard.9780674736122.c7Search in Google Scholar

Pollock, Sheldon (2016): A Rasa Reader: Classical Indian Aesthetics. New York: Columbia University Press.10.7312/poll17390Search in Google Scholar

Preisendanz, Karin (2008): “Text, Commentary, Annotation: Some Reflections on the Philosophical Genre”. Journal of Indian Philosophy 36: 599–618.10.1007/s10781-008-9036-xSearch in Google Scholar

Pusalker, A. D. (1960): “Literary Background of Rāghavabhaṭṭa, Author of Padārthādarśa (comm. on Śāradātilaka) and Arthadyotanikā (comm. on Abhijñānaśākuntala)”. Annals of the Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute 41.1: 29-48.Search in Google Scholar

Quisinsky, Michael / Walter, Peter (eds.) (2007): Kommentarkulturen: Die Auslegung zentraler Texte der Weltreligionen. Ein vergleichender Überblick. Cologne: Böhlau.Search in Google Scholar

Rao, Ajay K. (2014): Re-Figuring the Rāmāyaṇa as Theology: A History of Reception in Premodern India. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203521496Search in Google Scholar

Roodbergen, J. A. F. (1984): Mallinātha’s Ghaṇṭāpatha on Kirātārjunīya I–VI. Part One: Introduction, Translation and Notes. Leiden: E. J. Brill.10.1163/9789004652835Search in Google Scholar

Sastri, C. Sankara Rama (ed.) (1947): Abhijñāna Śākuntala of Kālidāsa, with the Commentary Kumāragirirājīya of Kāṭayavema. Madras: Sri Balamanorama Press.Search in Google Scholar

Selby, Martha Ann (1996): “Desire for Meaning: Providing Contexts for Prākrit Gāthās”. The Journal of Asian Studies 55.1: 81–93.10.2307/2943637Search in Google Scholar

Shevchenko, Dimitry (2022): “The Many Selves of an Actor: Perceptibility of Second-order Characters in the Naṭāṅkuśa and Non-dualist Theories of Cognition”. Cracow Indological Studies 24.1: 111–130.10.12797/CIS.24.2022.01.06Search in Google Scholar

Shukla Shastri, Babulal (1992): Śrīdakṣiṇāvartanāthapraṇītam Abhijñānaśākuntalaṭippaṇam. In: Saṃskṛta-saṅgīta-vaijayantī: (Studies in Sanskrit and Musicology) Śrīmatī Kamaleśa Kumārī Kulaśreṣṭha smṛtyabhinandana grantha Studies in Sanskrit and Musicology, Smt. Kamlesh Kumari Kulshreshtha Commemoration Volume. Edited by Sushma Kulshreshtha and Satya Pal Narang. Delhi: Eastern Book Linkers, 233–240.Search in Google Scholar

Skraep, Poul (1978): “Some characteristic features of Pūrṇasarasvatī’s Meghadūta’commentary, Vidyullatā”. Orientalia Suecana 17: 176–210.Search in Google Scholar

Slaje, Walter (2007): “Der Sanskrit-Kommentar”. In: Kommentarkulturen: Die Auslegung zentraler Texte der Weltreligionen. Ein vergleichender Überblick. Edited by Michael Quisinsky and Peter Walter. Cologne: Böhlau, 69–96.Search in Google Scholar

Stietencron, Heinrich von (1995): “Typisierung und Sitz im Leben: Anmerkungen zum Kommentar in Indien”. In: Text und Kommentar. Archäologie der Literarischen Kommunikation IV. Edited by Jan Assmann and Burkhard Gladigow. Munich, 249–255.Search in Google Scholar

Tubb, Gary / Boose, Emery R. (2007): Scholastic Sanskrit: A Manual for Students. New York: American Institute of Buddhist Studies.Search in Google Scholar

Unithiri, N.V.P. (2004): Pūrṇasarasvatī, with the critical edition of a newly discovered work on dramaturgy, Bhāvaviveka by Divākara. Publication Division, University of Calicut.Search in Google Scholar

Unni, N. P. (1975): “The Trivandrum plays and the Abhijñānaśākuntala-carcā”. Vishveshvaranand Indological Journal 13.1–2: 376–384.Search in Google Scholar

Vasudeva, S. (2006): The Recognition of Shakuntala by Kalidasa, edited and translated. New York: New York University Press & JJC Foundation.Search in Google Scholar

Vimala, V. P. (2018): Critique on Performance (A Study of the Abhijñānaśakuntalacarcā). University of Calicut, Publication Division.Search in Google Scholar