Abstract
Despite intensive research on English academic writing, few studies compare how English-as-a-first-language (L1) and English-as-an-additional-language (EAL) writers conceptualise the task rather than simply perform it. Addressing this gap, this study surveyed 458 UK postgraduate students (258 EAL, 200 L1) from eight research-led universities using a Conceptual Metaphor Theory (CMT) prompt (“Academic writing is like…because…”) and followed up with 45 metaphor-checking interviews. Inductive coding of metaphor entries generated four overarching themes. Two revealed clear language-group contrasts: EAL writers framed difficulty as external precision or gatekeeping, whereas L1 peers emphasised internal struggle and self-expression. The other two themes – an affective arc from struggle to catharsis and a constructive blueprint of building, crafting, and journeying – were strikingly similar across groups. These patterns extend CMT by showing how positionality in Anglophone knowledge networks shapes source-domain choice, yet also corroborate academic-literacies claims that cognitive, rhetorical, and emotional demands transcend native-speaker status. The study thus offers an integrated lens for theorising academic-writing cognition and lays a conceptual foundation for more equitable support strategies.
Funding source: Yibin University High-Level Talent Launch Program – The Translation, Dissemination, and Influence of the Shi Jing in the United Kingdom
Award Identifier / Grant number: 2021QH042
References
Akbulut, Fatma Demiray. 2020. A bibliometric analysis of lexical bundles usage in native and non-native academic writing. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies 16(3). 1146–1166.10.17263/jlls.803583Search in Google Scholar
Altinmakas, Derya & Yasemin Bayyurt. 2019. An exploratory study on factors influencing undergraduate students’ academic writing practices in Turkey. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 37. 88–103.10.1016/j.jeap.2018.11.006Search in Google Scholar
Aydın, Gülnur & Sultan Baysan. 2018. Perceptions of postgraduate students on academic writing skills: A metaphor analysis study. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies 14(2). 212–239.Search in Google Scholar
Bailey, Stephen. 2022. Academic writing for university students. Oxon: Routledge.10.4324/9781003010210Search in Google Scholar
Bakla, Arif & Ali Karakaş. 2022. Technology and strategy use in academic writing: Native, native-like versus non-native speakers of English. Iberica 44. 285–314.10.17398/2340-2784.44.285Search in Google Scholar
Barbara, Siu Wing Yee, Muhammad Afzaal & Hessah Saleh Aldayel. 2024. A corpus-based comparison of linguistic markers of stance and genre in the academic writing of novice and advanced engineering learners. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 11. 284.10.1057/s41599-024-02757-4Search in Google Scholar
Bullo, Stella & Jasmine Heath Hearn. 2021. Parallel worlds and personified pain: A mixed methods analysis of pain metaphor use by women with endometriosis. British Journal of Health Psychology 26. 271–288.10.1111/bjhp.12472Search in Google Scholar
Carless, David & David Boud. 2018. The development of student feedback literacy: Enabling uptake of feedback. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 43(8). 1315–1325.10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354Search in Google Scholar
Coll-Florit, Marta, Salvador Climent, Marco Sanfilippo & Eulàlia Hernández-Encuentra. 2021. Metaphors of depression: Studying first person accounts of life with depression published in blogs. Metaphor and Symbol 36(1). 1–19.10.1080/10926488.2020.1845096Search in Google Scholar
Darvin, Ron & Bonny Norton. 2015. Identity and a model of investment in applied linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 35. 36–56.10.1017/S0267190514000191Search in Google Scholar
De Sain Preux, Anna Doquin & Ocarina Masid Blanco. 2021. The power of conceptual metaphors in the age of pandemic: The influence of the WAR and SPORT domains on emotions and thoughts. Language and Communication 81. 37–47.10.1016/j.langcom.2021.08.003Search in Google Scholar
Fazel, Ismaeil. 2019. Writing for publication as a native speaker: The experiences of two anglophone novice scholars. In Pejman Habibie & Ken Hyland (eds.), Novice writers and scholarly publication, 79–95. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-3-319-95333-5_5Search in Google Scholar
Flower, Linda & John R. Hayes. 1981. A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication 32(4). 365–387.10.58680/ccc198115885Search in Google Scholar
Glaser, G. Barney. 1965. The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Social Problems 12(4). 436–445.10.1525/sp.1965.12.4.03a00070Search in Google Scholar
Gray, E. David. 2021. Doing research in the real world, 5th edn. London: SAGE.Search in Google Scholar
Gustafsson, W. Anna, Charlotte Hommerberg & Anna Sandgren. 2019. Coping by metaphors: The versatile function of metaphors in blogs about living with advanced cancer. Medical Humantities 46(3). 1–11.10.1136/medhum-2019-011656Search in Google Scholar
Haake, Lisa. 2025. Does the relationship between executive functions and L2 writing depend on language proficiency? Journal of Writing Research 17(1). 115–153.10.17239/jowr-2025.17.01.05Search in Google Scholar
Habibie, Pejman. 2016. Writing for scholarly publication in a Canadian higher education context: A case study. In Cecile Badenhorst & Cally Guerin (eds.), Research literacies and writing pedagogies for masters and doctoral writers, 51–67. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004304338_004Search in Google Scholar
Hill, Jennifer, Kethy Berlin, Julia Choate, Lisa Craven-Brown, Lisa McKendrick-Calder & Susan Smith. 2023. Emotions experienced by instructors delivering written feedback and dialogic feed-forward. Teaching and Learning Inquiry 11. 1–21.10.20343/teachlearninqu.11.6Search in Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken. 2002. Authority and invisibility: Authorial identity in academic writing. Journal of Pragmatics 34(8). 1091–1112.10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00035-8Search in Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken. 2016. Academic publishing and the myth of linguistic injustice. Journal of Second Language Writing 31. 58–69.10.1016/j.jslw.2016.01.005Search in Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken. 2019. Second language writing, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Jensen, X. Lasse, Margaret Bearman & David Boud. 2021. Understanding feedback in online learning – A critical review and metaphor analysis. Computers and Education 173. 104271.10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104271Search in Google Scholar
Jin, Fangzhou, Lanfang Sun, Yunqiu Pan & Chin-His Lin. 2025. High heels, compass, spider-man, or drug? Metaphor analysis of generative artificial intelligence in academic writing. Computers and Education 228. 105248.10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105248Search in Google Scholar
Kövecses, Zoltán. 2020. Metaphor: A practical introduction, 3rd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar
Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson. 1999. Philosophy in the flesh. New York: Basic Books.Search in Google Scholar
Larsson, Tove. 2017. A functional classification of the introductory it pattern: Investigating academic writing by non-native-speaker and native-speaker students. English for Specific Purposes 48. 57–70.10.1016/j.esp.2017.06.001Search in Google Scholar
Lea, R. Mary & Brain V. Street. 2006. The “academic literacies” model: Theory and applications. Theory Into Practice 45. 368–377.10.1207/s15430421tip4504_11Search in Google Scholar
Leki, Ilona. 2007. Undergraduates in a second language: Challenges and complexities of academic literacy development. Oxon: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Li, Mingyu. 2024b. Non-native English-speaking (NNES) students’ English academic writing experiences in higher education: A meta-ethnographic qualitative synthesis. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 71. 101430.10.1016/j.jeap.2024.101430Search in Google Scholar
Li, Mingyu. 2024a. Experience, context, and conflict in language teacher cognition: Narratives of a novice l2 writing teacher. Asia Pacific Journal of Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2024.2441674.Search in Google Scholar
Li, Mingyu. 2025. Teaching, learning, and growing: The construction of a novice L2 writing teacher’s personal practical knowledge. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education 10. 5.10.1186/s40862-024-00308-7Search in Google Scholar
Li, Mingyu & Zhimin Shen. 2025. Positive impacts of the take-home timeline as a reflective practice tool on teacher development: An exploratory study of novice public school teachers in China. Reflective Practice 26(2). 262–276.10.1080/14623943.2024.2426280Search in Google Scholar
Li, Mingyu & Fengqiang Wang. 2025. “I thought I knew how to write in my own language…” Unveiling vulnerability in NES university students’ English academic writing experience. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 79. 101618.10.1016/j.jeap.2025.101618Search in Google Scholar
Li, Mingyu & Fengqiang Wang. 2026. EAL scholars’ experiences of writing for publication in English: A meta-ethnographic synthesis of qualitative evidence. English for Specific Purposes 81. 16–31.10.1016/j.esp.2025.09.001Search in Google Scholar
Li, Weizu & Hui Zhou. 2025. “This study is an attempt to”: Metadiscursive nouns in L1 and L2 applied linguistics research article abstracts. English for Specific Purposes 81. 1–15.10.1016/j.esp.2025.08.003Search in Google Scholar
Lindholm, Camilla & Emilia Luukka. 2024. Sustainably on the seas of academia: Comparing metaphors of social and independent academic writing. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 69. 1161–1174.10.1080/00313831.2024.2394403Search in Google Scholar
Liu, Yuyao, Shuo Cao, Ao Wang & Hua Wang. 2025. Researching Chinese doctoral students’ experiences in English academic writing: A metaphor analysis. Arab World English Journal 16(2). 168–184.10.24093/awej/vol16no2.10Search in Google Scholar
Ma, Lai Ping Florence. 2021. Writing in English as an additional language: Challenges encountered by doctoral students. Higher Education Research and Development 40(6). 1176–1190.10.1080/07294360.2020.1809354Search in Google Scholar
Morton, Janne, Neomy Storch & Celia Thompson. 2015. What our students tell us: Perceptions of three multilingual students on their academic writing in first year. Journal of Second Language Writing 30. 1–13.10.1016/j.jslw.2015.06.007Search in Google Scholar
Munday, Imogene, Toby Newton-John & Ian Kneebone. 2020. Barbed wire wrapped around my feet’: Metaphor use in chronic pain. British Journal of Health Psychology 25. 814–830.10.1111/bjhp.12432Search in Google Scholar
Murray, Rowena & Sarah Moore. 2006. The handbook of academic writing: A fresh approach. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Quinlan, Thomas, Maaike Loncke, Marielle Leijten & Luuk Van Waes. 2021. Coordinating the cognitive processes of writing: The role of the monitor. Written Communication 29(3). 345–368.10.1177/0741088312451112Search in Google Scholar
Rasse, Carina, Alexander Onysko & Francesca M. M. Citron. 2020. Conceptual metaphors in poetry interpretation: A psycholinguistic approach. Language and Cognition 12(2). 310–342.10.1017/langcog.2019.47Search in Google Scholar
Rayner, Gerry, Theo Papakonstantinou & Roslyn Gleadow. 2016. Comparing the self-efficacy and writing-related abilities of native and non-native English-speaking students. Cogent Education 3(1). 1179164.10.1080/2331186X.2016.1179164Search in Google Scholar
Saban, Ahmet, Beyhan Nazli Kocbeker & Aslihan Saban. 2007. Prospective teachers’ conceptions of teaching and learning revealed through metaphor analysis. Learning and Instruction 7(2). 123–139.10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.01.003Search in Google Scholar
Sadeghi, Karim & Mahsa Alinasab. 2020. Academic conflict in applied linguistics research article discussions: The case of native and non-native writers. English for Specific Purposes 59. 17–28.10.1016/j.esp.2020.03.001Search in Google Scholar
Scharlau, Ingrid, Andrea Karsten & Katharina Rohlfing. 2021. Building, emptying out, or dreaming? Action structures and space in undergraduates’ metaphors of academic writing. Journal of Writing Research 12(3). 493–529.10.17239/jowr-2021.12.03.01Search in Google Scholar
Schenck, Andrew. 2020. Examining the influence of native and non-native English-speaking teachers on Korean EFL writing. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education 5. 2.10.1186/s40862-020-00081-3Search in Google Scholar
Subandowo, Dedy & Csilla Sardi. 2023. Academic essay writing in an English medium instruction environment: Indonesian graduate students’ experiences at Hungarian universities. Ampersand 11. 100158.10.1016/j.amper.2023.100158Search in Google Scholar
Wan, Wan. 2014. Constructing and developing ESL students’ beliefs about writing through metaphor: An exploratory study. Journal of Second Language Writing 23. 53–73.10.1016/j.jslw.2014.01.002Search in Google Scholar
Wang, Meihui & Graham Parr. 2021. A Chinese doctoral student’s experience of L2 English academic writing in Australia: Negotiating practices and identities. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 49. 100944.10.1016/j.jeap.2020.100944Search in Google Scholar
Wang, Jingjing & Liangjing Zeng. 2021. Disciplinary recognized self-presence: Self-mention used with hedges and boosters in PhD students’ research writing. Sage Open 11(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211005454.Search in Google Scholar
Xing, Congcong, Guanglun Michael Mu & Deborah Henderson. 2024. Problematising English monolingualism in the ‘multicultural’ university: A Bourdieusian study of Chinese international research students in Australia. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 45(6). 1851–1863.10.1080/01434632.2022.2026366Search in Google Scholar
Zhang, Lei & Jing Wang. 2024. To be like a “scholar”: A study on the construction of authorial identity of Chinese EFL learners in academic writing: An intertextuality perspective. Frontiers in Psychology 14. 1297557.10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1297557Search in Google Scholar
Zhao, Jun. 2017. Native speaker advantage in academic writing? Conjunctive realizations in EAP writing by four groups of writers. Ampersand 4. 47–57.10.1016/j.amper.2017.07.001Search in Google Scholar
© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston