Home Overstandin: Upscaling reading positions and rescaling texts/signs
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Overstandin: Upscaling reading positions and rescaling texts/signs

  • Jaspal Naveel Singh ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: March 3, 2020
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Overstandin occurs when languagers upscale their reading positions to rescale the meanings of texts or signs according to their own intentions. While understanding is an important faculty for languagers and a central analytical category for applied linguistics research, it cannot fully grasp agency and creativity in complex languaging in postcolonial worlds. By focusing on processes of overstandin, this article shows how languagers assume an upscaled reading position from which they find opportunities to attack the form and function of a text/sign. Thereby they can destabilise the indexical equilibrium of a sign and show up the ambivalence of language. Understanding often erases this ambivalence. For this reason, the exposure of ambivalence through overstandin can be emancipative, especially in postcolonial thinking. I further argue that overstandin is emphasised in the dream-state – both conceptualised as a state of relative unconscious experiencing and a wish, desire, aspiration for an emancipated future. In the dream-state the signifier stands over the signified. Such processes of overstandin pose challenges to applied linguistics, which continues to rely on wake-state understanding as a central analytical category for its gaze and its methods and thereby reproduces hegemonic knowledge-power structures that have been put in place during Enlightenment, colonialism and current global modernities. This article suggests that an account of processes of overstandin as an agentive meaning-making of the epistemic hinterlands of the postcolonial, could rehabilitate ambivalence as an anthropological category for our discipline. My detour via dream-states is merely a rhetoric of the argument presented here and it should not be assumed that I suggest that applied linguists have to turn to mysticism or dream analysis in order to account for overstandin, scaling and indexical ambivalence. The oneiric rhetoric itself is an overstandin, which aims to challenge common-sense empiricism in our discipline.

Acknowledgements

I thank Tom Bartlett, Massimiliano Spotti, Nicky Runge, Gabriel Dattatreyan and Bryan Vit for closely reading, discussing and improving earlier versions of this paper. All remaining overstatements and undertextual gaps are of course half my own.

References

Alim, H. S. 2006. Roc the mic right: The language of hip hop culture. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203006733Search in Google Scholar

Alim, H. S. & G. Smitherman. 2016. Articulate while Black: Barack Obama, language, and race in the U.S. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bakhtin, M. M. 1986. Speech genres and other late essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bartlett, A. 2004. Airshafts, loudspeakers, and the hip hop sample: Contexts and African American musical aesthetics. In M. Forman & M. A. Neal (eds.), That’s the joint! The hip hop studies reader, 393–406. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Bhabha, H. K. 2004[1994]. The location of culture. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203820551Search in Google Scholar

Blommaert, J. 2005. Discourse: A critical introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511610295Search in Google Scholar

Blommaert, J. 2007. Sociolinguistic scales. Intercultural Pragmatics 4(1). 1–19.10.1515/IP.2007.001Search in Google Scholar

Blommaert, J. 2010. The sociolinguistics of globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511845307Search in Google Scholar

Blommaert, J. 2015. Chronotopes, scales, and complexity in the study of language in society. Annual Review of Anthropology 44. 105–116.10.1146/annurev-anthro-102214-014035Search in Google Scholar

Booth, W. C. 1979. Critical understanding: The powers and limits of pluralism. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P. 2001. Masculine domination. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Briggs, C. L. & R. Bauman. 1992. Genre, intertextuality, and social power. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 2(2). 131–172.10.1525/jlin.1992.2.2.131Search in Google Scholar

Brown, J. 1974. Funky President (People It’s Bad) [song]. Reality [album]. Polydor.Search in Google Scholar

Bucholtz, M. & K. Hall. 2005. Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies 7(4/5). 585–614.10.1177/1461445605054407Search in Google Scholar

Canagarajah, S. A. 2013. Translingual practice: Global Englishes and cosmopolitan relations. Abingdon: Routledge.10.4324/9780203120293Search in Google Scholar

Culler, J. 1992. In defence of overinterpretation. In Umberto Eco (ed.), Interpretation and overinterpretation, 109–123. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511627408Search in Google Scholar

Dascal, M. & I. Berenstein. 1987. Two modes of understanding: Comprehending and grasping. Language and Communication 7(2). 139–151.10.1016/0271-5309(87)90004-8Search in Google Scholar

Franke, C. 2015. You Understand or You Overstand? Eine Betrachtung der Sprache der Rastafari. Munich: Grinn.Search in Google Scholar

Freud, S. 1955[1900]. The interpretation of dreams. New York: Basic Books. Available online (15/03/2018) http://psychclassics.yorku.ca/Freud/Dreams/dreams.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Flores, N. & J. Rosa. 2015. Undoing appropriateness: Raciolinguistic ideologies and language diversity in education. Harvard Education Review 85(2). 149–171.10.17763/0017-8055.85.2.149Search in Google Scholar

Green, L. J. 2002. African-American English: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511800306Search in Google Scholar

Hall, K. 2014. Hypersubjectivity: Language anxiety, and indexical dissonance in globalization. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication 24(2). 261–273.10.1075/japc.24.2.06halSearch in Google Scholar

Irvine, J. & S. Gal. 2000. Language ideology and linguistic differentiation. In P. V. Kroskrity (ed.), Regimes of language: Ideologies, polities, and identities, 35–84. Santa Fe, New Mexico: School of American Research.Search in Google Scholar

Jakobson, R. & M. Halle. 1956. Two aspects of language and two types of aphasic disturbances. In R. Jakobson & M. Halle (ed.), Fundamentals in language, 69–95. Mouton: The Hague.10.2307/1419105Search in Google Scholar

KRS-One. 1993. Sound of da Police [song]. Return of the Boom Bap [album]. Jive.Search in Google Scholar

Lacan, J. 1966. The instance of the letter in the unconscious, or reason since Freud. In J. Lacan (ed.), Écrits, 493–528. New York: W.W. Norton.Search in Google Scholar

Laclau, E. 1996. Emancipation(s). London: Verso.Search in Google Scholar

Marley, B. 1980. Redemption Song [song]. Uprising [album]. Tuff Gong/Island Records.Search in Google Scholar

Mignolo, W. 2000. Local histories/global designs: Coloniality, subaltern knowledges, and border thinking. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Nakassis, C. 2018. Indexicality’s ambivalent ground. Signs and Society 6(1). 281–304.10.1086/694753Search in Google Scholar

Ortiz, F. 1947. Cuban counterpoint. Tobacco and sugar. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Search in Google Scholar

Pichler, P. & N. Williams. 2016. Hipsters in the hood: Authenticating indexicalities in young men’s hip-hop talk. Language and Society 45(4). 557–581.10.1017/S0047404516000427Search in Google Scholar

Pratt, M. L. 1992. Imperial eyes: Travel writing and transculturation. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203163672Search in Google Scholar

Roth-Gordon, J. 2009. Conversational sampling, race trafficking, and the invocation of the gueto in Brazilian hip hop. In H. S. Alim, A. Ibrahim & A. Pennycook (eds.), Global linguistic flows: Hip hop cultures, youth identities, and the politics of language, 63–77. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Saussure, F. 1959[1916]. Course in general linguistics. New York: Philosophical Library.Search in Google Scholar

Schloss, J. G. 2004. Making beats: The art of sample-based hip hop. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Schumacher, T. G. 2004. ‘This is a sampling sport’: Digital sampling, rap music, and the law in cultural production. In M. Forman & M. A. Neal (eds.), That’s the joint! The hip hop studies reader, 443–458. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Shilliam, R. 2015. The black pacific: Anti-colonial struggles and oceanic connections. London: Bloomsbury.10.5040/9781474218788Search in Google Scholar

Silverstein, M. 2003. Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language and Communication 23. 193–229.10.1016/S0271-5309(03)00013-2Search in Google Scholar

Silverstein, M. 2013. Discourse and the no-thing-ness of culture. Signs and Society 1(2). 327–366.10.1086/673252Search in Google Scholar

Slade, B. 2018. Overstandin Idren: Special features of Rasta talk morphology. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 33(2). 280–306.10.1075/jpcl.00017.slaSearch in Google Scholar

Smitherman, G. 1977. Talkin and testifyin: The language of Black America. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Search in Google Scholar

Sullivan, J. 2007. Understanding and overstanding: Religious reading in historical perspective. International Journal of Christianity and Education 11(2). 25–38.10.1177/205699710701100203Search in Google Scholar

Swiboda, M. A. 2014. When beats meet critique: Documenting hip-hop sampling as critical practice. Critical Studies in Improvisation/études Critiques En Improvisation 10(1). Available online (15/03/2018): http://www.criticalimprov.com/article/view/3027/3584.10.21083/csieci.v10i1.3027Search in Google Scholar

Sykes, H. 2001. Understanding and overstanding: Feminist poststructural life histories of physical education teachers. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 14(1). 13–31.10.1080/0269172001009744Search in Google Scholar

Tagliamonte, S. A. 2012. Variationist sociolinguistics: Change, observation, interpretation. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Taylor, T. J. 1986. Do you understand? Criteria of understanding in verbal interaction. Language and Communication 6(3). 171–180.10.1016/0271-5309(86)90020-0Search in Google Scholar

Trudgill, P. 1972. Sex, covert prestige and linguistic change in the urban British English of Norwich. Language in Society 1(2). 179–195.10.1017/S0047404500000488Search in Google Scholar

Vološinov, V. N. 1973. Marxism and the philosophy of language. Boston: Seminar.Search in Google Scholar

Williams, J. A. 2010. Musical Borrowing in Hip-Hop Music: Theoretical frameworks and case studies. The University of Nottingham: Unpublished PhD thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Williams, J. A. 2015. Intertextuality, sampling, and copyright. In J. A. Williams (ed.), The Cambridge companion to hip-hop, 206–221. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CCO9781139775298.018Search in Google Scholar

Williams, Q. E. 2016. Multilingual Rastafarian-Herbalists enregisterment of voice​​ in an informal marketplace. Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics Plus 49. 279–299.10.5842/49-0-674Search in Google Scholar

Williams, Q. E. 2017. Remix multilingualism: Hip hop, ethnography and performing marginalized voices. London: Bloomsbury.10.5040/9781474295420Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2020-03-03
Published in Print: 2021-09-27

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 27.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/applirev-2019-0138/html
Scroll to top button