Home Effects of self-regulated learning strategy use on motivation in EFL writing: A comparison between high and low achievers in Hong Kong primary schools
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Effects of self-regulated learning strategy use on motivation in EFL writing: A comparison between high and low achievers in Hong Kong primary schools

  • Wenjuan Guo and Barry Bai ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: July 20, 2019
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

This study aimed to explore the effects of SRL strategy use on primary school students’ motivation (i.e. self-efficacy and interest) in EFL writing and to compare the differences in such effects between high and low achievers. Participants were 374 4th graders in Hong Kong. Results of t-tests indicated that the high achievers reported significantly a higher level of SRL strategy use (i.e. planning, self-monitoring, and revising) and motivation (i.e. self-efficacy and interest) in EFL writing than their low-achieving peers. Results of two-group structural equation modeling (SEM) indicated that the high achievers’ motivation increased through the use of planning and self-monitoring strategies in writing, while the low achievers’ motivation increased through the use of self-monitoring and revising strategies. The high achievers showed a high level of self-efficacy and the low achievers a low level. However, both groups of students did not show a high level of interest in EFL writing. Implications for future research and English teachers to improve students’ motivation in writing through use of SRL strategies are discussed.

Funding statement: This study was sponsored by Peak Discipline Construction Project of Education at East China Normal University.

References

Abu-Hamour, B. & H. Al-Hmouz. 2013. A study of gifted high, moderate, and low achievers in their personal characteristics and attitudes toward school and teachers. International Journal of Special Education 28(3). 5–15.Search in Google Scholar

Bai, B. 2015. An intervention study of writing strategies in Singapore primary schools. System 53. 96–106.10.1016/j.system.2015.05.009Search in Google Scholar

Bai, B. 2018. Understanding primary school students’ use of self-regulated writing strategies through think-aloud protocols. System 78. 15–26.10.1016/j.system.2018.07.003Search in Google Scholar

Bai, B. & W. J. Guo. 2018. Influences of self-regulated learning (SRL) strategy use on self-efficacy in primary school students’ English writing in Hong Kong. Reading & Writing Quarterly. doi:10.1080/10573569.2018.1499058.Search in Google Scholar

Bai, B., G. W. Hu & Y. Gu. 2014. The relationship between writing strategies and English proficiency in Singapore primary schools. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher 23. 355–365.10.1007/s40299-013-0110-0Search in Google Scholar

Bandura, A. 1986. Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, US: Prentice-Hall, Inc.Search in Google Scholar

Bandura, A. 1997. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.Search in Google Scholar

Bannert, M., P. Reimann & C. Sonnenberg. 2014. Process mining techniques for analyzing patterns and strategies in students’ self-regulated learning. Metacognition and Learning 9(2). 161–185. doi:10.1007/s11409-013-9107-6.Search in Google Scholar

Beilock, S. 2015. How the body knows its mind: The surprising power of the physical environment to influence how you think and feel. New York: Simon and Schuster.Search in Google Scholar

Berry, A. B. & L. H. Mason. 2012. The effects of self-regulated strategy development on the writing of expository essays for adults with written expression difficulties: Preparing for the GED. Remedial and Special Education 33(2). 124–136. doi:10.1177/0741932510375469.Search in Google Scholar

Bruning, R., M. Dempsey, D. F. Kauffman, C. McKim & S. Zumbrunn. 2013. Examining dimensions of self-efficacy for writing. Journal of Educational Psychology 105(1). 25–38. doi:10.1037/a0029692.Search in Google Scholar

Chien, S. C. 2012. Students’ use of writing strategies and their English writing achievements in Taiwan. Asia Pacific Journal of Education 32(1). 93–112. doi:10.1080/02188791.2012.655240.Search in Google Scholar

De Silva, R. 2015. Writing strategy instruction: Its impact on writing in a second language for academic purposes. Language Teaching Research 19. 301–323. doi:10.1177/1362168814541738.Search in Google Scholar

DiFrancesca, D., J. L. Nietfeld & L. Cao. 2016. A comparison of high and low achieving students on self-regulated learning variables. Learning and Individual Differences 45. 228236. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2015.11.010.Search in Google Scholar

Dörnyei, Z. & E. Ushioda. 2013. Teaching and researching: Motivation. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315833750Search in Google Scholar

Ennis, R. P. & K. Jolivette. 2014. Using self-regulated strategy development for persuasive writing to increase the writing and self-efficacy skills of students with emotional and behavioral disorders in health class. Behavioral Disorders 40(1). 26–36. doi:10.17988/0198-7429-40.1.26.Search in Google Scholar

Erkan, Y. D. & A. I. Saban. 2011. Writing performance relative to writing apprehension, self-efficacy in, writing and attitudes towards writing: A correlational study in Turkish tertiary level EFL. The Asian EFL Journal Quarterly 13(1). 163–191.Search in Google Scholar

Festas, I., A. L. Oliveira, J. A. Rebelo, M. H. Damião, K. Harris & S. Graham. 2015. Professional development in self-regulated strategy development: Effects on the writing performance of eighth grade Portuguese students. Contemporary Educational Psychology 40. 17–27. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.05.004.Search in Google Scholar

Flower, L. & J. R. Hayes. 1981. A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication 32(4). 365–387.10.2307/356600Search in Google Scholar

Graham, S., K. R. Harris & L. Mason. 2005. Improving the writing performance, knowledge, and self-efficacy of struggling young writers: The effects of self-regulated strategy development. Contemporary Educational Psychology 30(2). 207–241. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.08.001.Search in Google Scholar

Graham, S. & D. Perin. 2007. A meta-analysis of writing instruction for adolescent students. Journal of Educational Psychology 99(3). 445–476. doi:10.1037/00220663.99.3.445.Search in Google Scholar

Guo, W. J. 2017. The Relationships between Chinese Secondary Teachers’ Feedback and Students’ Self-Regulated Learning (Doctoral dissertation). China: The Chinese University of Hong Kong.Search in Google Scholar

Lee, I., S. Yu & Y. Liu. 2018. Hong Kong secondary students’ motivation in EFL writing: A survey study. TESOL Quarterly 52(1). 176–187. doi:10.1002/tesq.364.Search in Google Scholar

Magogwe, J. M. & R. Oliver. 2007. The relationship between language learning strategies, proficiency, age and self-efficacy beliefs: A study of language learners in Botswana. System 35(3). 338–352. doi:10.1016/j.system.2007.01.003.Search in Google Scholar

McMillan, J. H. 2014. Classroom assessment: Principles and practice for effective standards-based instruction. Richmond: Pearson.Search in Google Scholar

Negari, G. M. 2011. A study on strategy instruction and EFL learners’ writing skill. International Journal of English Linguistics 1(2). 299–307. doi:10.5539/ijel.v1n2p299.Search in Google Scholar

Oxford, R. 2011. Teaching and researching language learning strategies. New York, NY: Pearson.Search in Google Scholar

Oxford, R. L. 1990. Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. New York: Newbury House.Search in Google Scholar

Pintrich, P. R. 1989. The dynamic interplay of student motivation and cognition in the college classroom. In C. Ames & M. Maehr (eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement: Vol. 6. Motivation enhancing environments, 117–160. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Search in Google Scholar

Pintrich, P. R., D. A. F. Smith, T. Garcla & W. J. McKeachie. 1991. A manual for the use of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement (ED).Search in Google Scholar

Prat-Sala, M. & P. Redford. 2012. Writing essays: Does self-efficacy matter? The relationship between self-efficacy in reading and in writing and undergraduate students’ performance in essay writing. Educational Psychology 32(1). 9–20. doi:10.1080/01443410.2011.621411.Search in Google Scholar

Schünemann, N., N. Spörer & J. C. Brunstein. 2013. Integrating self-regulation in whole-class reciprocal teaching: A moderator–Mediator analysis of incremental effects on fifth graders’ reading comprehension. Contemporary Educational Psychology 38(4). 289–305. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2013.06.002.Search in Google Scholar

Schunk, Dale H. & Barry J. Zimmerman. 2007. Influencing children’s self-efficacy and self-regulation of reading and writing through modeling. Reading & Writing Quarterly 23(1). 7–25. doi:10.1080/10573560600837578.Search in Google Scholar

Schunk, D. H. 2003. Self-efficacy for reading and writing: Influence of modeling, goal setting, and self-evaluation. Reading &Writing Quarterly 19(2). 159–172. doi:10.1080/10573560308219.Search in Google Scholar

Schunk, D. H. & J. A. Greene. 2018. Historical, contemporary, and future perspectives on self-regulated learning and peformance. In D. H. Schunk & J. A. Greene (eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance, 2nd edn., 1–15. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315697048-1Search in Google Scholar

Teng, L. S. & L. J. Zhang. 2018. Effects of motivational regulation strategies on writing performance: A mediation model of self-regulated learning of writing in English as a second/foreign language. Metacognition and Learning 13(2). 313–240. doi:10.1007/s11409-017-9171-4.Search in Google Scholar

Troia, G. A., A. G. Harbaugh, R. K. Shankland, K. A. Wolbers & A. M. Lawrence. 2013. Relationships between writing motivation, writing activity, and writing performance: Effects of grade, sex, and ability. Reading and Writing 26. 17–44. doi:10.1007/s11145-012-9379-2.Search in Google Scholar

Yeung, A.S., S. Lau & Y. Nie. 2011. Primary and secondary students’ motivation in learning English: Grade and gender differences. Contemporary Educational Psychology 36. 246–256. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.03.001.Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, L. J. 2010. Negotiating language, literacy and identity: A sociocultural perspective on children’s learning strategies in a multilingual ESL classroom in Singapore. The Applied Linguistics Review 1(1). 247–270. doi:10.1515/9783110222654.247.Search in Google Scholar

Zimmerman, B. J. 2000. Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology 25. 82–91. doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1016.Search in Google Scholar

Zimmerman, B. J. 2011. Motivational sources and outcomes of self-regulated learning and performance. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance, 49–64. Mahwah: Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar

Zimmerman, B. J. & A. Kitsantas. 2002. Acquiring writing revision and self-regulatory skill through observation and emulation. Journal of Educational Psychology 94(4). 660–668. doi:10.1037//0022-0663.94.4.660.Search in Google Scholar

Zimmerman, B. J. & R. Risemberg. 1997. Becoming a self-regulated writer: A social cognitive perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology 22(1). 73–101.10.1006/ceps.1997.0919Search in Google Scholar

Zumbrunn, S. & R. Bruning. 2013. Improving the writing and knowledge of emergent writers: The effects of self-regulated strategy development. Reading and Writing 26(1). 91–110. doi:10.1007/s11145-012-9384-5.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2019-07-20
Published in Print: 2022-01-27

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 9.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/applirev-2018-0085/html
Scroll to top button