Ethics-related practices in Internet-based applied linguistics research

References

Baker, P., C. Gabrielatos & T. McEnery. 2013. Sketching Muslims: A corpus driven analysis of representations around the word ‘Muslim’ in the British press 1998–2009. Applied Linguistics 34(3). 255–278.10.1093/applin/ams048Search in Google Scholar

Baron, N. S. 2004. See you online gender issues in college student use of instant messaging. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 23(4). 397–423.10.1177/0261927X04269585Search in Google Scholar

Barton, D. & C. K. Lee. 2012. Redefining vernacular literacies in the age of Web 2.0. Applied linguistics 33(3). 282–298.10.1093/applin/ams009Search in Google Scholar

Bassett, E. H. & K. O’Riordan. 2002. Ethics of Internet research: Contesting the human subjects research model. Ethics and Information Technology 4(3). 233–247.10.1023/A:1021319125207Search in Google Scholar

Boellstorff, T. 2012. Rethinking digital anthropology. In H. A. Horst & D. Miller (eds.), Digital anthropology, 39–60. New York: Berg.10.4324/9781003085201-4Search in Google Scholar

Bruckman, A. 2002. Ethical guidelines for research online (version: 4/4/2002). http://documents.kenyon.edu/provost/irb_ethics_online.pdf (accessed 13 April 2016).Search in Google Scholar

Buchanan, E. A. 2011. Internet research ethics: Past, present, and future. In M. Consalvo & C. Ess (eds.), The Handbook of Internet Studies, 83–108. Singapore: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781444314861.ch5Search in Google Scholar

Buchanan, E. & C. Ess. 2009. Internet research ethics and the institutional review board: Current practices and issues. Computers and Society 39(3). 43–49.10.1145/1713066.1713069Search in Google Scholar

Burke, S. & S. Goodman. 2012. Bring back Hitler’s gas chambers’: Asylum seeking, Nazis and Facebook–a discursive analysis. Discourse & Society 23(1). 19–33.10.1177/0957926511431036Search in Google Scholar

Canagarajah, S. & P. Stanley. 2015. Ethical Considerations in Language Policy Research. In M. H. Hult & D. C. Johnson (eds.), Research Methods in Language Policy and Planning: A Practical Guide, 33–44. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc.10.1002/9781118340349.ch4Search in Google Scholar

D’Arcy, A. & T. M. Young. 2012. Ethics and social media: Implications for sociolinguistics in the networked public. Journal of Sociolinguistics 16(4). 532–546.10.1111/j.1467-9841.2012.00543.xSearch in Google Scholar

De Costa, P. I. 2016. Ethics in applied linguistics research: Language researcher narratives. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315816937Search in Google Scholar

de Oliveira, J. M., V. Esteve & M. Camacho. 2013. Interaction in the virtual world: An analysis of students’ construal of pedagogic subject positions in a 3D virtual learning environment. Text and Talk 33(3). 353–375.10.1515/text-2013-0016Search in Google Scholar

del-Teso-Craviotto, M. 2008. Gender and sexual identity authentication in language use: The case of chat rooms. Discourse Studies 10(2). 251–270.10.1177/1461445607087011Search in Google Scholar

Eikelboom, J. I., O. T. J. ten Cate, D. Jaarsma, J. A. N. Raat, L. Schuwirth & J. J. M. van Delden. 2012. A framework for the ethics review of education research. Medical Education-Oxford 46(8). 731–733.10.1111/j.1365-2923.2012.04293.xSearch in Google Scholar

Elm, M. S. 2009. How do various notions of privacy influence decisions in qualitative internet research? In A. N. Markham & N. K. Baym (eds.), Internet inquiry: Conversations about method, 69–92. Thousand Oaks: Sage.10.4135/9781483329086.n7Search in Google Scholar

[label=Ess, 2002] Ess, C, & AoIR ethics working committee. 2002. Ethical decision-making and Internet research: Recommendations from the aoir ethics working committee (approved by AoIR, November 27, 2002). http://www.aoir.org/reports/ethics.pdf (accessed 31 March 2016).10.4018/978-1-59140-152-0.ch002Search in Google Scholar

Ess, C. 2009. Foreword. In H. A. McKee & J. E. Porter (eds.), The ethics of Internet research: A rhetorical, case-based process, xiii-xvi. New York: Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar

Gao, X. 2007. A tale of Blue Rain Café: A study on the online narrative construction about a community of English learners on the Chinese mainland. System 35(2). 259–270.10.1016/j.system.2006.12.004Search in Google Scholar

Gao, X. & J. Tao. 2016. Ethical challenges in conducting text-based online applied linguistics research. In P. I. De Costa (ed.), Ethics in Applied linguistics research: Language researcher narratives, 181–194. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315816937-11Search in Google Scholar

Graber, M. A. & A. Graber. 2013. Internet-based crowdsourcing and research ethics: The case for IRB review. Journal of Medical Ethics 39(2). 115–118.10.1136/medethics-2012-100798Search in Google Scholar

Hammersley, M. 2006. Are ethics committees ethical? Qualitative Researcher 2(Spring). 4–8.Search in Google Scholar

Harriman, S. & J. Patel. 2014. The ethics and editorial challenges of internet-based research. BMC medicine 12(1). 124.10.1186/s12916-014-0124-3Search in Google Scholar

Hastie, B. & D. Rimmington. 2014. 200 years of white affirmative action’: White privilege discourse in discussions of racial inequality. Discourse and Society 25(2). 186–204.10.1177/0957926513516050Search in Google Scholar

Herring, S. C. 1997. Ethics in cyberresearch: To cite, or not to cite?. The College (magazine of the UTA College of Liberal Arts 1(2). 18–23.Search in Google Scholar

Huang, H. C. 2015. From web-based readers to voice bloggers: EFL learners’ perspectives. Computer Assisted Language Learning 28(2). 145–170.10.1080/09588221.2013.803983Search in Google Scholar

Hudson, J. M. & A. Bruckman. 2004. Go away”: Participant objections to being studied and the ethics of chatroom research. The Information Society 20(2). 127–139.10.1080/01972240490423030Search in Google Scholar

Jones, S. 2004. Introduction: Ethics and Internet studies. In M. D. Johns, S. S. Chen & G. J. Hall (eds.), Online social research: Methods, issues and ethics, 179–186. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Kausel, C. L. & P. M. Hackett. 2015. Netnography. Qualitative research methods. In P. M. Hackett (ed.), Consumer psychology: Ethnography and culture, 252–261. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Kozinets, R. V. 2010. Netnography: Doing ethnographic research online. London: Sage.Search in Google Scholar

Knapton, O. 2013. Pro-anorexia: Extensions of ingrained concepts. Discourse and Society 24(4). 461–477.10.1177/0957926513482067Search in Google Scholar

Kraut, R., J. Olson, M. Banaji, A. Bruckman, J. Cohen & M. Couper. 2004. Psychological research online: Report of Board of Scientific Affairs’ Advisory Group on the conduct of research on the Internet. American psychologist 59(2). 105.10.1037/0003-066X.59.2.105Search in Google Scholar

Kulavuz-Onal, D. 2015. Using netnography to explore the culture of online language teaching communities. CALICO Journal 32(3). 426–448.10.1558/cj.v32i3.26636Search in Google Scholar

Lange, M. M., W. Rogers & S. Dodds. 2013. Vulnerability in research ethics: A way forward. Bioethics 27(6). 333–340.10.1111/bioe.12032Search in Google Scholar

Luzón, M. J. 2011. Interesting Post, But I Disagree’: Social presence and antisocial behaviour in academic weblogs. Applied linguistics 32(5). 517–540.10.1093/applin/amr021Search in Google Scholar

Madge, C. 2007. Developing a geographers’ agenda for online research ethics. Progress in human geography 31(5). 654–674.10.1177/0309132507081496Search in Google Scholar

Mahboob, A., B. Paltridge, A. Phakiti, E. Wagner, S. Starfield, A. Burns, R. H. Jones & P. I. De Costa. 2016. TESOL quarterly research guidelines. TESOL Quarterly 50(1). 42–65.10.1002/tesq.288Search in Google Scholar

Maíz-Arévalo, C. 2013. Just click ‘Like’: Computer-mediated responses to Spanish compliments. Journal of Pragmatics 51. 47–67.10.1016/j.pragma.2013.03.003Search in Google Scholar

Maíz-Arévalo, C. & A. García-Gómez. 2013. You look terrific!’ Social evaluation and relationships in online compliments. Discourse Studies 15(6). 735–760.10.1177/1461445613490011Search in Google Scholar

Markham, A. & E. Buchanan. 2012. Ethical decision-making and Internet research: Recommendations from the AoIR Ethics Working Committee (Version 2.0). http://www.aoir.org/reports/ethics2.pdf (accessed 1 April 2016).Search in Google Scholar

Miyazoe, T. & T. Anderson. 2010. Learning outcomes and students’ perceptions of online writing: Simultaneous implementation of a forum, blog, and wiki in an EFL blended learning setting. System 38(2). 185–199.10.1016/j.system.2010.03.006Search in Google Scholar

North, S. 2007. The voices, the voices’: Creativity in online conversation. Applied Linguistics 27(4). 538–555.10.1093/applin/amm042Search in Google Scholar

Page, R., D. Barton, J. W. Unger & M. Zappavigna. 2014. Researching language and social media: A student guide. London and New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315771786Search in Google Scholar

Pihlaja, S. 2014. Christians” and “bad Christians”: Categorization in atheist user talk on YouTube. Text & Talk 34(5). 623–639.10.1515/text-2014-0020Search in Google Scholar

Prentice, S. 2010. Using automated semantic tagging in critical discourse analysis: A case study on Scottish independence from a Scottish nationalist perspective. Discourse & Society 21(4). 405–437.10.1177/0957926510366198Search in Google Scholar

Simpson, J. 2005. Conversational floors in synchronous text-based CMC discourse. Discourse Studies 27(3). 337–361.10.1177/1461445605052190Search in Google Scholar

Smithson, J., S. Sharkey, E. Hewis, R. Jones, T. Emmens, T. Ford & C. Owens. 2011. Problem presentation and responses on an online forum for young people who self-harm. Discourse Studies 13(4). 487–501.10.1177/1461445611403356Search in Google Scholar

Stromer-Galley, J. & A. M. Martinson. 2009. Coherence in political computer-mediated communication: Analyzing topic relevance and drift in chat. Discourse and Communication 3(2). 195–216.10.1177/1750481309102452Search in Google Scholar

Stohl, M. 2006. Cyber terrorism: A clear and present danger, the sum of all fears, breaking point or patriot games? Crime, law and social change 46(4–5). 223–238.10.1007/s10611-007-9061-9Search in Google Scholar

Stommel, W. & T. Koole. 2010. The online support group as a community: A micro-analysis of the interaction with a new member. Discourse Studies 12(3). 357–378.10.1177/1461445609358518Search in Google Scholar

Tanskanen, S. K. & J. Karhukorpi. 2008. Concessive Repair and negotiation of affiliation in e-mail discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 40(9). 1587–1600.10.1016/j.pragma.2008.04.018Search in Google Scholar

The Guardian. 2015, October 31. Secular publisher hacked to death in latest Bangladesh attacks. http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/oct/31/faisal-abedin-deepan-bangladesh-secular-publisher-hacked-to-death (accessed 31 March 2016).Search in Google Scholar

Thomas, J. 2004. Reexamining the ethics of Internet research: Facing the challenge of overzealous oversight. In M. D. Johns, S. S. Chen, & G. J. Hall (eds.), Online social research: Methods, issues and ethics, 187–201. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Trent, J., X. Gao & M. Gu. 2013. Language teacher education in multilingual context. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-94-007-7392-9Search in Google Scholar

Vásquez, C. 2011. Complaints online: The case of TripAdvisor. Journal of Pragmatics 43(6). 1707–1717.10.1016/j.pragma.2010.11.007Search in Google Scholar

Walther, J. B. 2002. Research ethics in Internet-enabled research: Human subjects issues and methodological myopia. Ethics and Information Technology 4(3). 205–216.10.1023/A:1021368426115Search in Google Scholar

Wilkinson, D. & M. Thelwall. 2011. Researching personal information on the public web methods and ethics. Social Science Computer Review 29(4). 387–401.10.1177/0894439310378979Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, W. & C. Kramarae. 2014. “SlutWalk” on connected screens: Multiple framings of a social media discussion. Journal of Pragmatics 73. 66–81.10.1016/j.pragma.2014.07.008Search in Google Scholar