Abstract
China has been experiencing rapid development in its insurance market in recent years, with its reinsurance market also in a developing stage. Previous theoretical work using a game theory approach suggests that the appropriate number of companies in the insurance market should be the square root of the number of insurers (index = 0.5). To verify the validity of this square-root rule, we conduct an analysis using data over a period. To examine this relationship between the number of insurers and the number of reinsurers, we perform regression analyses using data from the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). We find that the level of the index fluctuates around an index level of 0.4, instead of 0.5, the optimal value by theory. We also observe that this index level fluctuation behaves similar to the price of risk and the property–liability combined ratio. In our analysis, we then replace the number of reinsurers and number of insurers by ceded premium and net premium, respectively, and find similar results. By comparing and calculating these theoretical relationships, we present two formulas of the average size of the reinsurance market with our interpretations on the gap between the theory and the data. In addition, we analyze the Chinese reinsurance market to offer more evidence of our interpretation.
References
Borch, K. 1960. “The Safety Loading of Reinsurance Premiums.” Skandinavisk Aktuarietidskrift3–4:163–84.10.1080/03461238.1960.10410587Search in Google Scholar
Borch, K.1962. “Equilibrium in a Reinsurance Market.” Econometrica30 (3):424–44.10.2307/1909887Search in Google Scholar
Madsen, C. K., and H. W.Pedersen. 2002. “An Examination of Insurance Pricing and Underwriting Cycles.” Warren Centre for Actuarial Studies and Research.Search in Google Scholar
Powers, M. R., and M.Shubik. 2001. “Toward a Theory of Reinsurance and Retrocession, Insurance.” Mathematics and Economics29 (2):271–90.10.1016/S0167-6687(01)00087-7Search in Google Scholar
Powers, M. R., and M.Shubik. 2006. “A ‘Square-Root Rule’ for Reinsurance.” Revista Contabilidade & Finanças17 (5):101–7.10.1590/S1519-70772006000500008Search in Google Scholar
Venezian, E. C., K. S.Viswanathan, and I. B.Jucá. 2005. “A ‘Square-Root Rule’ for Reinsurance? Evidence From Several National Markets.” Journal of Risk Finance6 (4):319–34.10.1108/15265940510613651Search in Google Scholar
Zhang, Y.2008. “The Empirical Research about Reinsurance Supply Market Structure of China.” Working paper, Fudan University.Search in Google Scholar
©2015 by De Gruyter
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Measuring Self-Service Technology Latent Difficulties: Insurance Decisions on Utilitarian and Hedonic Influences
- The Impact of Public Insurance on Private Insurance Demand
- Do the Over-the-Counter Sales at Banks Expand the Individual Annuity Market in Japan?
- Risk Analysis for Reverse Mortgages with Different Payout Designs
- The Fisher Hypothesis and Its Implications for Defined Benefits
- The Square-Root Rule for Reinsurance: Further Analysis and Consideration of China’s Market
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Measuring Self-Service Technology Latent Difficulties: Insurance Decisions on Utilitarian and Hedonic Influences
- The Impact of Public Insurance on Private Insurance Demand
- Do the Over-the-Counter Sales at Banks Expand the Individual Annuity Market in Japan?
- Risk Analysis for Reverse Mortgages with Different Payout Designs
- The Fisher Hypothesis and Its Implications for Defined Benefits
- The Square-Root Rule for Reinsurance: Further Analysis and Consideration of China’s Market