Abstract
By defending the following views – that Aristotle identifies the generator and perhaps the obstacle remover (in an extended sense) as an essential cause of the natural sublunary elemental motion in Physics VIII 4; that this view is consistent with the view of Physics II 1 that the sublunary simple bodies have a principle of internal motion; and that the sublunary and the celestial elements have a nature in the very same way – I shall offer what has so far eluded Aristotelian commentators: a consistent interpretation of Aristotle's theory of the natural motions of the sublunary and also the celestial elements.
Published Online: 2011-04-06
Published in Print: 2011-March
© Walter de Gruyter 2011
You are currently not able to access this content.
You are currently not able to access this content.
Articles in the same Issue
- Socrates, the philosopher in the Theaetetus digression (172c–177c), and the ideal of homoiôsis theôi
- The Unity of the Virtues and the Degeneration of Kallipolis
- Why Five Worlds? Plato's Timaeus 55C–D
- Soul and Elemental Motion in Aristotle's Physics VIII 4
- Natural and Neutral States in Plato's Philebus
Articles in the same Issue
- Socrates, the philosopher in the Theaetetus digression (172c–177c), and the ideal of homoiôsis theôi
- The Unity of the Virtues and the Degeneration of Kallipolis
- Why Five Worlds? Plato's Timaeus 55C–D
- Soul and Elemental Motion in Aristotle's Physics VIII 4
- Natural and Neutral States in Plato's Philebus