Abstract
In the Timaeus, Plato famously acknowledges the receptacle as extremely difficult to comprehend. It is neither intelligible (which is reserved exclusively for the Forms) nor sense-perceptible (as it is a principle far too basic). Instead, as Plato proposes, the receptacle can only be apprehended through a “bastard” sort of “reasoning” (νόθος λογισμός, Tim. 52b1-2.). This paper explores an exegesis of Plato’s claim as offered by Calcidius, the 4th century translator of and commentator on the Timaeus. I identify two distinctive methods Calcidius advances when grappling with the knowability of the material substratum that underpins our world. The first method – analysis (resolutio) – traces its intellectual lineage to earlier philosophical tradition, and Calcidius primarily uses it to uncover the proper nature and ontological characteristics of matter. Conversely, the second method corresponds to the only cognitive grasp of matter Calcidius believes humans are capable of. In his view, we can neither sense-perceive nor rationally understand matter. Instead, matter yields itself only to the cognitive mode of suspicion (suspicio). The paper provides a detailed analysis of Calcidius’ suspicio, delving into its intricacies and exploring the interrelationships between suspicio and resolutio. As such it offers a pioneering and comprehensive exploration of Calcidius’ account of the knowability of matter.
References
Arzhanov, Yury, tr. and ed. 2021. Porphyry, On Principles and Matter. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110747027Search in Google Scholar
Bakhouche, Béatrice, tr. and comm. 2011. Calcidius. Commentaire au Timée de Platon. Paris: Vrin.Search in Google Scholar
Charlton, William. 1992. Aristotle Physics: Books I and II. Oxford: Clarendon Press (first edition 1970).Search in Google Scholar
Dyson, Henry. 2009. Prolepsis and Ennoia in the Early Stoa. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110212297Search in Google Scholar
Ferrari, Franco. 2022. “Introduzione.” In Platone, ed. and tr. Federico M. Petrucci Timeo, xciii–c. Florence: Fondazione Lorenzo Valla.Search in Google Scholar
Gregoric, Pavel. 2021. “Perceiving that We Are Not Seeing and Hearing: Reflexive Awareness in Aristotle.” In Encounters with Aristotelian Philosophy of Mind, edited by Pavel Gregoric, and Jakob Leth Fink, 119–31. Abingdon, New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781003008484-8Search in Google Scholar
Hoenig, Christina. 2021. “Calcidius’ Philosophical Method.” Ancient Philosophy 41 (1): 185–206. https://doi.org/10.5840/ancientphil202141110.Search in Google Scholar
Karamanolis, George. 2006. Plato and Aristotle in Agreement? Platonists on Aristotle from Antiochus to Porphyry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0199264562.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Magee, John, tr. 2016. Calcidius. On Plato’s Timaeus. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Massie, Pascal. 2020. “Seeing Darkness, Hearing Silence: Meta-Sensation and the Limits of Perception in Aristotle’s De anima.” Epoché 25/1: 81–99. https://doi.org/10.5840/epoche20201014173.Search in Google Scholar
Marmodoro, Anna. 2014. Aristotle on Perceiving Objects. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199326006.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Moreschini, Claudio. 1978. Apuleio e il platonismo. Firenze: Olschki.Search in Google Scholar
Moro, Enrico. 2017. Il concetto di materia in Agostino. Rome: Aracne editrice.Search in Google Scholar
Opsomer, Jan. 2022. “Matter and Evil.” In The New Cambridge Companion to Plotinus, edited by Lloyd Gerson, and James Wilberding, 341–62. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108770255.015Search in Google Scholar
Polloni, Nicola. 2021. “Conceiving Prime Matter in the Middle Ages: Perception, Abstraction and Analogy.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 105: 414–43. https://doi.org/10.1515/agph-2020-0147.Search in Google Scholar
Reydams-Schils, Gretchen. 1999. Demiurge and Providence: Stoic and Platonist Readings of Plato’s Timaeus. Turnhout: Brepols.10.1484/M.MON-EB.5.112278Search in Google Scholar
Reydams-Schils, Gretchen. 2020. Calcidius on Plato’s Timaeus: Greek Philosophy, Latin Reception, and Christian Contexts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Reydams-Schils, Gretchen. forthcoming. “Calcidius on Matter and the Platonist Tradition: The Case of Porphyry Revisited.” In A Philosophical History of Prime Matter, Vol. 1: Ancient and Early Medieval Conceptions, edited by Nicola Polloni. Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
van Winden, J. C. M. 1959. Calcidius on Matter: His Doctrine and Sources. A Chapter in the History of Platonism. Leiden: Brill.Search in Google Scholar
Waszink, Jan Hendrik, ed. 1962. Timaeus a Calcidio Translatus Commentarioque Instructus. Corpus Platonicum Medi Aevi, Plato Latinus 4. Leiden: Brill.Search in Google Scholar
Zeyn, Donald. 2000. Plato. Timaeus. Translated with Introduction. Indianapolis: Hackett.Search in Google Scholar
© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston