Abstract
The purpose of this essay is to summarize and critically evaluate the epistemological and pragmatic questions with regard to computer simulations as a new technological-scientific format as put forth in current philosophical debates. Computer simulation practices are situated in the broader context of model-building practices and experimentation; the scope and limits of knowledge generated by computer simulations are considered.
References
[1] J. M. Durán, ‘Computer Simulations in Science and Engineering’, (Springer Nature, Switzerland, Cham, 2018).10.1007/978-3-319-90882-3Search in Google Scholar
[2] D. Phan and F. Varenne, J. Art. Soc. Soc. Sim. 13, 5 (2010).10.18564/jasss.1532Search in Google Scholar
[3] E. Winsberg, in ‘The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy’, Ed. By E. N. Zalta (The Metaphysics Research Lab Center for the Study of Language and Information Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA, Spring 2019 Edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/simulations-science/.Search in Google Scholar
[4] P. Humphreys, ‘Extending Ourselves: Computational Science, Empiricism, and Scientific Method’, (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2004).10.1093/0195158709.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
[5] P. Humphreys, Synthese 169, 615–626 (2009).10.1007/s11229-008-9435-2Search in Google Scholar
[6] S. Norton and F. Suppe, in ‘Changing the Atmosphere: Expert Knowledge and Environmental Governance’, Eds. By C. Miller and P. Edwards (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2001) pp. 67–105.10.7551/mitpress/1789.003.0006Search in Google Scholar
[7] F. Rohrlich, in ‘Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association, Vol. 2’, Eds. By A. Fine, M. Forbes and L. Wessels (The Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, 1991) pp. 507–518.10.1086/psaprocbienmeetp.1990.2.193094Search in Google Scholar
[8] E. Winsberg, Sci. Cont. 12, 275–292 (1999).10.1017/S0269889700003422Search in Google Scholar
[9] E. Winsberg, Phil. Sci. 70, 105–125 (2003).10.1086/367872Search in Google Scholar
[10] E. Winsberg, ‘Science in the Age of Computer Simulation’, (Chicago University Press, Chicago, 2010).10.7208/chicago/9780226902050.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
[11] R. Frigg and J. Reiss, Synthese 169, 593–613 (2009).10.1007/s11229-008-9438-zSearch in Google Scholar
[12] M. Morgan, in ‘Model-Based Reasoning: Science, Technology, Values’, Eds. By L. Magnani and N. Nersessian (Kluwer, New York, 2002) pp. 41–58.10.1007/978-1-4615-0605-8_3Search in Google Scholar
[13] F. Guala, ‘The Methodology of Experimental Economics’ (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2005).10.1017/CBO9780511614651Search in Google Scholar
[14] F. Guala, in ‘Model-Based Reasoning: Science, Technology, Values’, Eds. By L. Magnani and N. Nersessian (Kluwer, New York, 2002) pp. 59–74.10.1007/978-1-4615-0605-8_4Search in Google Scholar
[15] W. S. Parker, Synthese 169, 483–496 (2009).10.1007/s11229-008-9434-3Search in Google Scholar
[16] M. Morrison, Philos. Stud. 143, 33–57 (2009).10.1007/s11098-008-9317-ySearch in Google Scholar
[17] C. Hubig, in ‘Technologisches Wissen, acatech DISKUTIERT’, Ed. By K. Kornwachs (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2010) pp. 211–225.10.1007/978-3-642-14372-4_11Search in Google Scholar
[18] W. Oberkampf and C. Roy, ‘Verification and Validation in Scientific Computing’, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA, 2010).10.1017/CBO9780511760396Search in Google Scholar
[19] N. Oreskes, K. Shrader-Frechette and K. Belitz, Science 263, 641–646 (1994).10.1126/science.263.5147.641Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[20] W. S. Parker, Synthese 163, 371–384 (2008).10.1007/s11229-007-9296-0Search in Google Scholar
[21] M. Morgan and M. Morrison, ‘Models as Mediators: Perspectives on Natural and Social Science’, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999).10.1017/CBO9780511660108Search in Google Scholar
[22] M. I. Richter, ‘Scientific Visualizations. Epistemic Weight and Surpluses’, (Peter Lang, Berlin, 2012).Search in Google Scholar
©2019 THOSS Media & De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Cover and Frontmatter
- Views
- Survey on teaching experiences in cinematography
- Community
- News
- Topical Issue: Interdisciplinary Simulation
- Editorial
- Why does interdisciplinary research matter?
- Research Articles
- The changing face of scientific practice – seeing things virtually
- Simulation and analysis of optical imaging systems including real freeform components
- Simulation of segmented mirrors with adaptive optics
- Transient simulation of laser beam propagation through turbulent cutting gas flow
- Interdisciplinary approach for simulation of starting points for optical and architectural design
- Review Article
- Novel refractive LiDAR sensor based on a variable lens pair prism
Articles in the same Issue
- Cover and Frontmatter
- Views
- Survey on teaching experiences in cinematography
- Community
- News
- Topical Issue: Interdisciplinary Simulation
- Editorial
- Why does interdisciplinary research matter?
- Research Articles
- The changing face of scientific practice – seeing things virtually
- Simulation and analysis of optical imaging systems including real freeform components
- Simulation of segmented mirrors with adaptive optics
- Transient simulation of laser beam propagation through turbulent cutting gas flow
- Interdisciplinary approach for simulation of starting points for optical and architectural design
- Review Article
- Novel refractive LiDAR sensor based on a variable lens pair prism