Home Technology The impact of the mass density on selected optical and non-optical properties of oxide coatings
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

The impact of the mass density on selected optical and non-optical properties of oxide coatings

  • Olaf Stenzel finished his diploma thesis in laser spectroscopy at the physics department of Moscow State University, Russia, in 1986. He received his PhD from Chemnitz University of Technology, Germany, in 1990 and habilitated there in 1999 in the field of optical properties of heterogeneous optical coatings. From 2001, he has worked at the Optical Coating Department of Fraunhofer Institute for Applied Optics and Precision Engineering IOF in Jena, Germany. He is the author of The Physics of Thin Film Optical Spectra: An Introduction, (Springer 2005).

    EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: July 4, 2013
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The density of optical coatings is one of the most crucial material-related parameters in interference coating science and technology. It has an impact on the refractive index, the transparency range, and the mechanical stress of a coating material. This tutorial provides a background on the classical theory relating the coating density to the mentioned parameters. Simple models are presented that highlight the correlations between optical constants, stress, and shifting behavior of different oxide coatings. Comparison with the experiment is performed on the basis of numerous experimental data, which stem from hafnium oxide, zirconium oxide, tantalum pentoxide, and silicon dioxide.


Corresponding author: Olaf Stenzel, Fraunhofer IOF Jena, Albert-Einstein-Str. 7, 07745 Jena, Germany, e-mail:

About the author

Olaf Stenzel

Olaf Stenzel finished his diploma thesis in laser spectroscopy at the physics department of Moscow State University, Russia, in 1986. He received his PhD from Chemnitz University of Technology, Germany, in 1990 and habilitated there in 1999 in the field of optical properties of heterogeneous optical coatings. From 2001, he has worked at the Optical Coating Department of Fraunhofer Institute for Applied Optics and Precision Engineering IOF in Jena, Germany. He is the author of The Physics of Thin Film Optical Spectra: An Introduction, (Springer 2005).

The author would like to thank Prof. Angus Macleod for the invitation to contribute this tutorial to this special issue of Advanced Optical Technologies. It appeared straightforward to give a survey on simple classical models, but as soon as any practically relevant theory is to be supported or falsified by experimental data, it appeared necessary to complete the text with comprehensive experimental material. The latter had been collected over the latest decade by many of my colleagues and collaborators, and it is impossible to mention all of them here. Instead, I would like to express my thanks en masse to the consortia of the projects IntIon, nanomorph, TACo, TAILOR, and PluTO, and to acknowledge the support by the sponsoring ministries – the BMWi, the BMWA, and the BMBF in Germany. More concrete data on the collaborators and companies/institutions are found in the author lists and acknowledgments of the cited references. Technical assistance in the figure and manuscript preparation has been provided by Josephine Wolf and Steffen Wilbrandt (both IOF in Jena). The TEM images from Figure 9 was supplied by Prof. Ute Kaiser, Ulm University, Germany.

References

[1] M. Born and E. Wolf, in ‘Principles of Optics’, (Pergamon Press, Oxford London Edinburgh New York Paris Frankfurt, 1968).Search in Google Scholar

[2] R. P. Feynman, R. B. Leighton and M. Sands, in ‘The Feynman Lectures of Physics Part 2’, (Boston, MA, USA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company Inc., 1964).10.1063/1.3051743Search in Google Scholar

[3] L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifschitz, in ‘Lehrbuch der theoretischen Physik, Bd. VIII: Elektrodynamik der Kontinua’ [engl.: Textbook of Theoretical Physics, vol. VIII: Electrodynamics of Continuous Media], (Akademie-Verlag, Berlin, 1985).Search in Google Scholar

[4] O. Stenzel and A. Macleod, Adv. Opt. Technol. 1, 463–481 (2012).Search in Google Scholar

[5] O. Stenzel, S. Wilbrandt, S. Yulin, N. Kaiser, M. Held, et al., Opt. Mater. Exp. 1, 278–292 (2011).10.1364/OME.1.000278Search in Google Scholar

[6] F. Jenkner, Präparation von TiO2-, ZrO2- und HfO2-Schichten mittels Elektronenstrahlverdampfen, Fachhochschule Jena/Fraunhofer IOF, Bachelor thesis (2011).Search in Google Scholar

[7] R. Schlegel, Untersuchung des Einflusses des Arbeitsgases auf die Eigenschaften von mittels PIAD hergestellten Tantalpentoxidschichten, Ernst-Abbe-Fachhochschule Jena, Fachbereich SciTec, Master thesis (2012).Search in Google Scholar

[8] S. Pongratz and A. Zöller, J. Vac. Sci. Techn. A 10, 1897–1904 (1992).Search in Google Scholar

[9] A. S. Ferlauto, G. M. Ferreira, J. M. Pearce, C. R. Wronski, R. W. Collins, et al., J. Appl. Phys. 92, 2424–2436 (2002).Search in Google Scholar

[10] E. C. Freeman and W. Paul, Phys. Rev. B 20, 716–728 (1979).Search in Google Scholar

[11] M. Landmann, T. Köhler, S. Köppen, E. Rauls, T. Frauenheim, et al., Phys. Rev. B 86, 064201-1–20 (2012).10.1103/PhysRevB.86.064201Search in Google Scholar

[12] O. Stenzel, S. Wilbrandt, N. Kaiser, M. Vinnichenko, F. Munnik, et al., Thin Solid Films 517, 6058–6068 (2009).10.1016/j.tsf.2009.05.009Search in Google Scholar

[13] S. Jakobs, M. Lappschies, U. Schallenberg, O. Stenzel and S. Wilbrandt, Chin. Opt. Lett. 8, 73–77 (2010).Search in Google Scholar

[14] D. Liu, Characterization of single layer oxide thin films prepared by PIAD and sputter deposition on different substrates, Report on practical studies, Fraunhofer IOF (2012).Search in Google Scholar

[15] O. Stenzel, S. Wilbrandt, M. Schürmann, N. Kaiser, H. Ehlers, et al., Appl. Opt. 50, C69–C74 (2011).10.1364/AO.50.000C69Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[16] L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifschitz, in ‘Quantenmechanik’, (Akademie-Verlag, Berlin, 1967).Search in Google Scholar

[17] O. Stenzel, J. Phys. D 42, 055312 (2009).10.1088/0022-3727/42/5/055312Search in Google Scholar

[18] I. W. Donald and P. W. McMillan, J. Mater. Sci. 13, 2301–2312 (1978).Search in Google Scholar

[19] R. W. Tustison, SPIE Proc. CR39, 231–240 (1992).Search in Google Scholar

[20] J. H. Dobrowolski, F. C. Ho and A. Waldorf, Appl. Opt. 22, 3191–3196 (1983).Search in Google Scholar

[21] O. Stenzel, S. Wilbrandt, K. Friedrich and N. Kaiser, Vak. Forsch. Prax. 21(5), 15–23 (2009).10.1002/vipr.200900396Search in Google Scholar

[22] J. A. Woollam, B. Johs, C. Herzinger, J. Hilfiker, R. Synowicki, et al., SPIE Proc. CR72, 3–28 (1999).Search in Google Scholar

[23] S. Wilbrandt, O. Stenzel and N. Kaiser, Proc. SPIE 7101, [71010D-1]–[71010D-11] (2008).Search in Google Scholar

[24] O. Stenzel, M. Schürmann, S. Wilbrandt, N. Kaiser, A. Tünnermann, et al., Proc. SPIE 8168 81681W-1–81681W-10 (2011).Search in Google Scholar

[25] L. G. Parratt, Phys. Rev. 95, 359–369 (1954).Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2013-5-16
Accepted: 2013-5-22
Published Online: 2013-7-4
Published in Print: 2014-2-1

©2014 by THOSS Media & De Gruyter Berlin Boston

Downloaded on 25.3.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/aot-2013-0023/html
Scroll to top button