Abstract
The linguistic differences between Hieroglyphic and Cuneiform Luwian have long been known. However, it is unclear how these should be assessed: How exactly do the two varieties relate to each other? Are they different dialects, just different registers or even different sociolects? Based on the thesis developed recently, according to which the transformation of the Luwian hieroglyphs into a veritable writing system only took place in the context of the late Hittite empire, this article works out that Hieroglyphic Luwian probably is to be considered a functiolect.
Danksagung
Mein besonderer Dank gilt dem unbekannten peer reviewer, dessen Kommentare zu einer deutlichen Schärfung der Argumentation beigetragen haben. Ebenfalls danken möchte ich den Financiers des Projekts, in welchem die vorliegende Studie entstand.
Bibliografie
Adiego, I.-X. et al. (ed.) (2019): Luwic Dialects and Anatolian: Inheritance and Diffusion (BMO 12), Barcelona. Search in Google Scholar
Bolatti Guzzo, N., et al. (2017): The „Hattusa Project“: A German-Italian Cooperation for the Three-Dimensional Documentation and Representation of an UNESCO Archaeological Site, News from the Lands of the Hittites 1, 17–48.Search in Google Scholar
Bossert, H. (1944): Ein hethitisches Königssiegel: Neue Beiträge zur Geschichte und Entzifferung der hethitischen Hieroglyphenschrift (IstF 18), Berlin.Search in Google Scholar
Bossert, H. (1957): Die hieroglyphische-hethitische Inschrift von Karaburna, Muséon 70, 145–170.Search in Google Scholar
Bossert, H. (1960): Ist die B–L Schrift im wesentlichen entziffert?, Or. 29, 423–432.Search in Google Scholar
Bossert, H. (1961a): Die Entzifferung der B–L Schrift wird fortgesetzt, Or. 30, 314–322.Search in Google Scholar
Bossert, H. (1961b): Zur Vokalisation des Luwischen, Or. 30, 314–322.Search in Google Scholar
Breyer, F. (2010): Ägypten und Anatolien: Politische, materielle und sprachliche Beziehungen zwischen dem Niltal und Kleinasien im 2. Jahrtausend v. Chr. (DÖAW 63), Wien.10.1553/0x00252209Search in Google Scholar
Bryce, T. (1998): The Kingdom of the Hittites, Oxford.Search in Google Scholar
Bryce, T. (2003): History. In: C. Melchert (ed.), The Luwians (HdOr. 1/68), Leiden, 27–127.10.1163/9789047402145_004Search in Google Scholar
Cammarosano, M. et al. (2019): They Wrote on Wax: Wax Boards in the Ancient Near East, Mesopotamia 54, 121–180.Search in Google Scholar
Carruba, O. (1970): Das Palaische: Texte, Grammatik, Lexikon (StBoT 10), Wiesbaden.Search in Google Scholar
Carruba, O. (1981): Unità e varietà nell’anatolico, AIUON 3, 113–140.Search in Google Scholar
Carruba, O. (1998): Geroglifico anatolico 1995, note conclusive alla giornata di studio. In: M. Marazzi et al. (ed.), Il geroglifico anatolico: sviluppi della ricerca a venti anni dalla sua „ridecifrazione“. Atti del Colloquio e della tavola rotonda, Napoli-Procida, 5–9 giugno 1995 (IUO Ser. Minor 57), Neapel, 267–283.Search in Google Scholar
Cau, N. (1999–2000): L’uso delle formule di datazione nelle iscrizioni licie, Egitto e Vicino Oriente 22–23, 179–188.Search in Google Scholar
d’Alfonso, L./A. Payne (2016): The Palaeography of Anatolian Hieroglyphic Stone Inscriptions, JCS 68, 107–127.10.5615/jcunestud.68.2016.0107Search in Google Scholar
Durnford, S.P.B. (2010): How Old was the Ankara Silver Bowl when its Inscriptions were Added?, AnSt. 60, 51–70.10.1017/S0066154600001010Search in Google Scholar
Forrer, E. (1919): Die acht Sprachen der Boghazköy-Inschriften, SPAW 1919, 1029–1041.Search in Google Scholar
Forrer, E. (1922): Die Inschriften und Sprachen des Hatti-Reiches, ZDMG 76, 174–269.Search in Google Scholar
Forrer, E. (1932): Die hethitische Bilderschrift (SAOC 3), Chicago.10.1086/370337Search in Google Scholar
Gelb, I.J. (1931): Hittite Hieroglyphs I (SAOC 2), Chicago.Search in Google Scholar
Güterbock, H.G. (1956): Rez. von M. Riemschneider, Die Welt der Hethiter, Stuttgart 1954, OLZ 51, 513–522.Search in Google Scholar
Hajnal, I. (1995): Der lykische Vokalismus: Methoden und Erkenntnisse der vergleichenden anatolischen Sprachwissenschaft, angewandt auf das Vokalsystem einer Kleincorpussprache (Arbeiten aus der Abteilung „Vergleichende Sprachwissenschaft“ Graz 10), Graz.Search in Google Scholar
Hajnal, I. (2003): „Jungluwisch“ – eine Bestandsaufnahme. In: M. Giorgieri et al. (ed.), Licia e Lidia prima dell’ellenizzazione. Atti del Convegno internazionale Roma, 11–12 ottobre 1999, Rom, 187–205.Search in Google Scholar
Hawkins, J.D. (1975): The Negatives in Hieroglyphic Luwian, AnSt. 25, 119–156.10.2307/3642579Search in Google Scholar
Hawkins, J.D. (1986): Writing in Anatolia: Imported and Indigenous Systems, World Archaeology 17, 363–374.10.1080/00438243.1986.9979976Search in Google Scholar
Hawkins, J.D. (2000): Corpus of Hieroglyphic Luwian Inscriptions. Vol. 1: Inscriptions of the Iron Age (UISK NF 8.1), Berlin.10.1515/9783110804201Search in Google Scholar
Hawkins, J.D. (2003): Scripts and Texts. In: C. Melchert (ed.), The Luwians (HdOr. 1/68), Leiden, 128–169.10.1163/9789047402145_005Search in Google Scholar
Hawkins, J.D. (2018): The Rock Inscription of nişantaş (Boğazköy 5). In: J. Seeher/P. Neve (ed.), Die Oberstadt von Ḫattuša: Die Bauwerke. Band 3 (BoḪa. 20), Berlin, 137–148.Search in Google Scholar
Hawkins, J.D./A. Morpurgo Davies (1978): Il sistema grafico del luvio geroglifico, Annali della Scuola Normale di Pisa, Serie 3, 8/3, 755–782.Search in Google Scholar
Hawkins, J.D. et al. (1973): Hittite Hieroglyphs and Luwian: New Evidence for a Connection, NAWG 1973/6, 145–197.Search in Google Scholar
Herbordt, S. (2005): Die Prinzen- und Beamtensiegel der hethitischen Großreichszeit auf Tonbullen aus dem Nişantepe-Archiv in Hattusa. Mit Kommentaren zu den Siegelinschriften und Hieroglyphen von J. David Hawkins (BoḪa. 19), Mainz.Search in Google Scholar
Herbordt, S. (2019): Die Felsinschriften von Suratkaya – Latmos. In: H. Lohmann (ed.), Feldforschungen im Latmos (Asia Minor Studien 93), Bonn, 128–151.Search in Google Scholar
Hoffmann, M. (2007): Funktionale Varietäten des Deutschen. Kurz gefasst, Potsdam.Search in Google Scholar
Hrozný, B. (1933a): Les inscriptions hittites hiéroglyphiques. Vol. 1, Prag.Search in Google Scholar
Hrozný, B. (1933b): Les inscriptions hittites hiéroglyphiques. Vol. 2, Prag.Search in Google Scholar
Joseph, J.E. (1987): The Engeneering of a Standard Language, Multilingua 3, 87–92.10.1515/mult.1984.3.2.87Search in Google Scholar
Klein, J. (1974): Hieroglyphic Inscriptions from Altintepe, AnSt. 24, 77–94.10.2307/3642600Search in Google Scholar
Kloekhorst, A. (2019): Kanišite Hittite: The Earliest Attested Record of Indo-European (HdOr. 1/132), Leiden.10.1163/9789004382107Search in Google Scholar
Koch, P./W. Oesterreicher (1994): Funktionale Aspekte der Schriftkultur. In: H. Günther/O. Ludwig (ed.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein Interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung. Vol. 1 (HSK 10/1), Berlin, 587–604.10.1515/9783110111293.1.5.587Search in Google Scholar
Laroche, E. (1958): Comparaison du louvite et du lycien, Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris 53, 159–197. Search in Google Scholar
Laroche, E. (1959): Dictionnaire de la langue louvite (BAH 6), Paris.Search in Google Scholar
Laroche, E. (1960a): Comparaison du louvite et du lycien, Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris 55, 155–185. Search in Google Scholar
Laroche, E. (1960b: Les hiéroglyphes hittites, Paris.Search in Google Scholar
Laroche, E. (1969a): Comparaison du louvite et du lycien, Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris 62, 46–66. Search in Google Scholar
Laroche, E. (1971): Les hiéroglyphes d’Altintepe, Anadolu 15, 55–61.10.1501/Andl_0000000130Search in Google Scholar
Laroche, E. (1975): Hieroglyphen, hethitische, RlA 4, § 5, 394–399.Search in Google Scholar
Löffler, H. (1985): Germanistische Soziolinguistik, Berlin.Search in Google Scholar
Luraghi, S. (2008): Possessive Constructions in Anatolian, Hurrian and Urartian as Evidence for Language Contact. In: B.J. Collins/M.R. Bachvarova/I.C. Rutherford (ed.), Anatolian Interfaces: Hittites, Greeks and their Neighbours. Proceedings of an International Conference on Cross-Cultural Interaction, September 17–19, 2004, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, Oxford, 143–151.Search in Google Scholar
Marazzi, M. (1990): Il geroglifico anatolico: problemi di analisi e prospettive di ricerca (Biblioteca di ricerche linguistiche e filologiche 24).Search in Google Scholar
Marazzi et al. (ed.) (1998): Il geroglifico anatolico: sviluppi della ricerca a venti anni dalla sua „ridecifrazione“. Atti del Colloquio e della tavola rotonda, Napoli-Procida, 5–9 giugno 1995 (IUO Ser. Minor 57), Neapel.Search in Google Scholar
Marazzi, M. (2010): Scrittura, percezione e cultura: qualche riflessione sull’Anatolia in età hittita, Kaskal 7, 219–255.Search in Google Scholar
Marazzi, M. (2018): News about Anatolian Hieroglyphic Writing, News from the Lands of the Hittites 2, 45–54.Search in Google Scholar
Marazzi, M. (2019): Schriftlichkeit und königliche Zelebration in Hattusa gegen Ende des 13. Jh. v. Chr.: Über die sogenannten „langen“ Hieroglypheninschriften. In: N. Bolatti Guzzo/P. Taracha (ed.), „And I Knew Twelve Languages“. A Tribute to Massimo Poetto on the Occasion of His 70th Birthday, Warschau, 332–355.Search in Google Scholar
Melchert, C. (1992): Relative Chronology and Anatolian: The Vowel System. In: R. Beekes et al. (ed.), Rekonstruktion und Relative Chronologie. Akten der VIII. Fachtagung der Indogermanischen Gesellschaft, Leiden, 31. August–4. September (IBS 65), Innsbruck, 41–53.Search in Google Scholar
Melchert, C. (1993): Cuneiform Luvian Lexicon (Lexica Anatolica 2), Chapel Hill.Search in Google Scholar
Melchert, C. (2000): Aspects of Cuneiform Luvian Nominals Inflection. In: Y. Arbeitman (ed.), The Asia Minor Connexion. Studies in Pre-Greek Languages in Memory of Charles Carter (Orbis Supplementa 13), Leuven, 173–179.Search in Google Scholar
Melchert, C. (2002): The Dialectal Position of Lycian and Lydian within Anatolian. In: M. Giorgieri et al. (ed.), Licia e Lidia prima dell’ellenizzazione. Atti del Convegno internazionale Roma, 11–12 ottobre 1999, Rom, 265–272.Search in Google Scholar
Melchert, C. (2003) (ed.): The Luwians (HdOr. 1/68), Leiden.10.1163/9789047402145Search in Google Scholar
Melchert, C. (2003): Language. In: C. Melchert (ed.), The Luwians (HdOr. 1/68), Leiden, 170–210. 10.1163/9789047402145_006Search in Google Scholar
Melchert, C. (1987): PIE Velars in Luvian. In: C. Watkins (ed.), Studies in Memory of Warren Cowgill (1929–1985. Papers from the Foruth East Coast Indo-European Conference, Cornell University, June 6–9, 1985 (UISK NF 3), Berlin – New York, 182–204. Search in Google Scholar
Melchert, C. (2012a): Genitive Case and Possessive Adjective in Anatolian. In: V. Orioles (ed.), Per Roberto Gusmani. Studi in ricordo. Vol. 2: Linguistica storica e teorica 1, Udine, 273–286.Search in Google Scholar
Melchert, C. (2012b): Luvo-Lycian Dorsal Stops Revisited. In: R. Sukač/O. Šefčík (ed.), The Sound of Indo-European 2. Papers on Indo-European Phonetics, Phonemics and Morphophonemics (LINCOM Studies in Indo-European Linguistics 41), München, 206–218.Search in Google Scholar
Melchert, C. (2013): Luvian Language in „Luvian“ Rituals in Hattuša. In: B.J. Collin/P. Michalowski (ed.), Beyond Hatti. A Tribute to Gary Beckman, Atlanta, 159–172.10.5913/2013116.ch09Search in Google Scholar
Melchert, C. (2016): Formal and Semantic Aspects of Hittite gul(aš)ša- „fate“. In: S. Erkut/Ö. Sir Gavaz (ed.), Ahmet Ünal’a Armağan. Studies in Honour of Ahmet Ünal, Istanbul, 355–359.Search in Google Scholar
Meriggi, P. (1932): Sur le déchiffrement et la langue des hiéroglyphes „hittites“, RHA 2, 1–57.10.3406/rhita.1932.943Search in Google Scholar
Meriggi, P. (1933): Die „hethitischen“ Hieroglypheninschriften. I, WZKM 40, 233–280Search in Google Scholar
Meriggi, P. (1934a): Die „hethitischen“ Hieroglypheninschriften. II, WZKM 41, 1–42.10.1524/olzg.1933.36.16.37Search in Google Scholar
Meriggi, P. (1934b): Die längeren Bauinschriften in hethitischen Hieroglyphen nebst Glossar zu sämtlichen Texten, MVAeG 39/1, 1–177.Search in Google Scholar
Meriggi, P. (1935): La nuova lingua indoeuropea d’Asia Minore: il luvi geroglifico. In: Atti del III Congresso internazionale dei Linguisti (Roma 1933), Florenz, 390–394. Search in Google Scholar
Meriggi, P. (²1962): Hieroglyphisch-hethitisches Glossar, Wiesbaden. Search in Google Scholar
Meriggi, P. (1966–1975): Manuale di eteo geroglifico I, II/1, II/2–3, Rom.Search in Google Scholar
Miller, A. (1989): Comparing Maya Image and Text. In: W.F. Hanks/D.S. Rice (ed.), Word and Image in Maya Culture: Explorations in Language, Writing, and Representation, Salt Lake City, 176–188.Search in Google Scholar
Mora, C. (1991): Sull’origine della scrittura geroglifica anatolica, Kadmos 30, 1–28. 10.1515/kadm.1991.30.1.1Search in Google Scholar
Mora, C. (1994): L’étude de la glyptique anatolienne: bilan et nouvelles orientations de la recherche, Syria 71, 205–215.10.3406/syria.1994.7374Search in Google Scholar
Morpurgo Davies, A. (1982–1983): Dentals, Rhotazism and Verbal Endings in the Luwian Languages, Kuhns Zeitschrift 96, 245–270.Search in Google Scholar
Mouton, A. (2002): Y a-t-il une relation entre les motifs de la glyptique cappadocienne et les hiéroglyphes anatoliens?, SMEA 44, 83–113.Search in Google Scholar
Neumann, G. (1982): Die Konstruktion mit Adiectiva genetivalia in den luwischen Sprachen. In: E. Neu (ed.), Investigationes philologicae et comparativae. Gedenkschrift für Heinz Kronasser, Wiesbaden, 149–161.Search in Google Scholar
Neumann, G. (1992): System und Aufbau der hethitischen Hieroglyphenschrift, NAWG 1992/4, 25–48.10.1007/978-3-642-77302-0_4Search in Google Scholar
Oesterreicher, W. (1993): Verschriftung und Verschriftlichung im Kontext medialer und konzeptioneller Schriftlichkeit. In: U. Schaefer (ed.), Schriftlichkeit im frühen Mittelalter (ScriptOralia 53), Tübingen, 267–292. Search in Google Scholar
Oettinger, N. (1978): Die Gliederung des anatolischen Sprachgebietes, Kuhns Zeitschrift 92, 74–92.Search in Google Scholar
Oreshko, R. (2013): Hieroglyphic Inscriptions of Western Anatolia: Long Arm of the Empire or Vernacular Tradition(s)? In: A. Mouton et al. (ed.), Luwian Identities: Culture, Language and Religion between Anatolia and the Aegean (CHANE 64), Leiden, 345–420.10.1163/9789004253414_017Search in Google Scholar
Otten, H. (1953): Luvische und Palāische Texte (KUB 35), Berlin.Search in Google Scholar
Payne, A. (2006): Multilingual Inscriptions: Signs of Power or Weakness? In: S.L. Sanders (ed.), Margins of Writing, Origins of Cultures (OIS 2), Chicago, 121–136.Search in Google Scholar
Payne, A. (2007): Writing Systems and Identity. In: B.J. Collins/M.R. Bachvarova/I.C. Rutherford (ed.), Anatolian Interfaces: Hittites, Greeks and their Neighbours. Proceedings of an International Conference on Cross-Cultural Interaction, September 17–19, 2004, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, Oxford, 117–122.Search in Google Scholar
Payne, A. (2015): Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Die anatolische Hieroglyphenschrift, Wiesbaden.10.2307/j.ctvc16s7kSearch in Google Scholar
Payne, A. (2018): Determination in the Anatolian Hieroglyphic Script: The Late 10th and Early 9th Century BC, AoF 45, 1–20.10.1515/aofo-2018-0010Search in Google Scholar
Popko, M. (1984): Zum luwischen Wort tiu̯arii̯a, Kuhns Zeitschrift 97, 228–229.Search in Google Scholar
Rasmussen, J. (1992): The Distribution of e and a in Lycian. In: R. Beekes et al. (ed.), Rekonstruktion und Relative Chronologie. Akten der VIII. Fachtagung der Indogermanischen Gesellschaft, Leiden, 31. August–4. September (IBS 65), Innsbruck, 359–366.Search in Google Scholar
Rieken, E. (2014): Bemerkungen zum Ursprung einiger Merkmale der anatolischen Hieroglyphenschrift, WO 45, 216–231.10.13109/wdor.2015.45.2.216Search in Google Scholar
Sasseville, D. (2015): Anatolische verbale Stammbildung: Das Faktitivsuffix *-eh2-, MSS 69, 281–297.Search in Google Scholar
Sasseville, D. (2020): Anatolian Verbal Stem Formation: Luwian, Lycian and Lydian (Brill’s Studies in Indo-European Languages & Linguistics 21), Leiden.10.1163/9789004436299Search in Google Scholar
Seeher, J. (2009): Der Landschaft sein Siegel aufdrücken: Hethitische Felsbilder und Hieroglypheninschriften als Ausdruck des herrscherlichen Macht- und Territorialanspruchs, AoF 36, 119–139.10.1524/aofo.2009.0006Search in Google Scholar
Simon, Z. (2016): Ist die Possessivkonstruktion im Kizzuwatna-Luwischen kontaktbedingt zustande gekommen? AulaOr. 34, 325–334.Search in Google Scholar
Sommer, F. (1932): Die Aḫḫijavā-Urkunden (AbhMünchen NF 6), München.Search in Google Scholar
Starke, F. (1985): Die keilschrift-luwischen Texte in Umschrift (StBoT 30), Wiesbaden.Search in Google Scholar
Starke, F. (1990): Untersuchungen zur Stammbildung des keilschrift-luwischen Nomens (StBoT 31), Wiesbaden. Search in Google Scholar
Starke, F. (1997): Troia im Kontext des historisch-politischen und sprachlichen Umfeldes Kleinasiens im 2. Jahrtausend, StTroica 7, 447–487.Search in Google Scholar
Starke, F. (1999): Luwisch, Der neue Pauly 7, 528–534. Search in Google Scholar
Simon, S. (2009): Die ANKARA-Silberschale und das Ende des hethitischen Reiches, ZA 99, 247–269.10.1515/ZA.2009.007Search in Google Scholar
Tischler, J. (1995): Die kappadokischen Texte als älteste Quelle indogermanischen Sprachgutes. In: O. Carruba et al. (ed.), Atti del II Congresso Internazionale di Hittitologia (StMed. 9), Pavia, 359–368.Search in Google Scholar
Waal, W.J.I. (2011): They Wrote on Wood: The Case for a Hieroglyphic Scribal Tradition in Hittite Anatolia, AnSt. 61, 21–34.10.1017/S0066154600008760Search in Google Scholar
Waal, W.J.I. (2013): Writing in Anatolia: The Origins of the Anatolian Hieroglyphs and the Introduction of the Cuneiform Script, AoF 39, 287–315.10.1524/aofo.2012.0020Search in Google Scholar
Waal, W.J.I. (2014): Changing Fate: Hittite GUL-š-, C. Luwian GUL-zāi-, H. Luwian REL-za- and the Kuwanšeš Deities. In: P. Taracha (ed.), Proceedings of the Eighth International Congress of Hittitology, Warsaw 5–9 September 2011, Warschau, 1016–1034.Search in Google Scholar
Waal, W.J.I. (2017): Anatolian Hieroglyphs on Hittite Clay Tablets. In: D. Kertai/O. Nieuwenhuyse (ed.) From the Four Corners of the Earth: Studies in Iconography and Cultures of the Ancient Near East in Honour of F.A.M Wiggermann (AOAT 441), Münster, 297–308.Search in Google Scholar
Waal, W.J.I. (2019): Fate Strikes Back: New Evidence for the Identification of the Hittite Fate Deities and its Implications for Hieroglyphic Writing in Anatolia, JCS 71, 121–132.10.1086/703856Search in Google Scholar
Woudhuizen, F.C. (2004): Luwian Hieroglyphic Monumental Rock and Stone Inscriptions from the Hittite Empire Period (IBK Sonderheft 116).Search in Google Scholar
Woudhuizen, F.C. (2016): The Genitive Plural in Luwian Hieroglyphic and its Comparanda from the Related Luwian Languages. In: E. Dündar et al. (ed.), Havva İşkan’a Armağan, Lykıarkhıssa, Festschrift für Havva İşkan, Istanbul, 881–884.Search in Google Scholar
Woudhuizen, F.C. (2018): Origin of the Luwian Hieroglyphic Script. In: A. Süel (ed.), Acts of the IXth International Congress of Hittitology, Çorum, 1–7 September 2014, Ankara, 1145–1169.Search in Google Scholar
Yakubovich, I. (2008): The Origin of the Luwian Possessive Adjective. In: K. Jones-Bley et al. (ed.), Proceedings of the 19th Annual UCLA Indo-European Conference, Los Angeles, November 2–3, 2006, Washington, 193–217.Search in Google Scholar
Yakubovich, I. (2010): Sociolinguistics of the Luvian Language (Brill’s Studies in Indo-European Languages & Linguistics 2), Leiden.10.1163/9789047440277Search in Google Scholar
Yakubovich, I. (2013): Anatolian Names in -wiya. In: A. Mouton et al. (ed.), Luwian Identities: Culture, Language and Religion between Anatolia and the Aegean (CHANE 64), Leiden, 87–123.10.1163/9789004253414_006Search in Google Scholar
Yakubovich, I. (2014): The Luwian Deity Kwanza, Aramazd 8/1–2, 282–297.Search in Google Scholar
Yakubovich, I. (2020): Rezension von Kloekhorst 2019, ZA 110, 277–288.Search in Google Scholar
© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Frontmatter
- A School Tablet in the Shape of a Five-Sided Prism in Adana Museum
- Das Verhältnis zwischen Hieroglyphen- und Keilschrift-Luwisch
- The Survey of Qaleh (Ghalee) Tepe in Sīstān: Chronology and Analysis of Findings
- Two Hurro-Urartian Lexical Parallels
- Eine neubabylonische Edition eines mittelbabylonischen Nergal-Balaĝs (BM.35434)
- On the Identity of Hartapu
- Hethitisch māri- ,Sichelschwert(?)‘ aus archäologischer, philologischer und etymologischer Sicht
- Religious Discourse in the Ancient Near East Proceedings of the Conference “Religious Discourse in the Ancient Near East” held at Sorbonne University (Paris) on December 12–13, 2019
- Introduction
- Verbal Art in Luwian and Hittite Incantations
- Luwian Curses as Religious Discourse
- Hurrian and Luwian Elements in the Kizzuwatna Religious Texts
- The Cult of Ištanuwa (and Lallubiya) between Hattian and Aegean Cultures
- Religious Discourse in Ancient Mesopotamia
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Frontmatter
- A School Tablet in the Shape of a Five-Sided Prism in Adana Museum
- Das Verhältnis zwischen Hieroglyphen- und Keilschrift-Luwisch
- The Survey of Qaleh (Ghalee) Tepe in Sīstān: Chronology and Analysis of Findings
- Two Hurro-Urartian Lexical Parallels
- Eine neubabylonische Edition eines mittelbabylonischen Nergal-Balaĝs (BM.35434)
- On the Identity of Hartapu
- Hethitisch māri- ,Sichelschwert(?)‘ aus archäologischer, philologischer und etymologischer Sicht
- Religious Discourse in the Ancient Near East Proceedings of the Conference “Religious Discourse in the Ancient Near East” held at Sorbonne University (Paris) on December 12–13, 2019
- Introduction
- Verbal Art in Luwian and Hittite Incantations
- Luwian Curses as Religious Discourse
- Hurrian and Luwian Elements in the Kizzuwatna Religious Texts
- The Cult of Ištanuwa (and Lallubiya) between Hattian and Aegean Cultures
- Religious Discourse in Ancient Mesopotamia