Home A degenerate migration-consumption model in domains of arbitrary dimension
Article Open Access

A degenerate migration-consumption model in domains of arbitrary dimension

  • Michael Winkler EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: April 30, 2024

Abstract

In a smoothly bounded convex domain Ω R n with n ≥ 1, a no-flux initial-boundary value problem for

u t = Δ u ϕ ( v ) , v t = Δ v u v ,

is considered under the assumption that near the origin, the function ϕ suitably generalizes the prototype given by

ϕ ( ξ ) = ξ α , ξ [ 0 , ξ 0 ] .

By means of separate approaches, it is shown that in both cases α ∈ (0, 1) and α ∈ [1, 2] some global weak solutions exist which, inter alia, satisfy

C ( T ) ess sup t ( 0 , T ) Ω u ( , t ) ln u ( , t ) < for all  T > 0 ,

with sup T>0 C(T) < ∞ if α ∈ [1, 2].

1 Introduction

Local sensing mechanisms are relevant to partially directed motion of cell motion ([1]–[5]). It their simplest form, macroscopic models for such processes describe the population density u = u(x, t) by parabolic equations of the form

(1.1) u t = Δ a ( x , t ) u

([1], [2]), where in typical application situations, the cell motility coefficient a may depend on a chemical substance, represented through its concentration v = v(x, t) itself forming an unknown of the system, via various functional laws ([3], [6]).

In recent analytical literature, significant activity has been directed toward an understanding of resulting two-component parabolic models in cases in which the respective signal is produced by cells, and which thus, as in the classical Keller-Segel systems from [7], reflect taxis-mediated active communication between cells. Hence focusing on systems of the form

(1.2) u t = Δ u ϕ ( v ) , v t = Δ v v + u ,

as well as on some parabolic-elliptic simplifications thereof, a considerable collection of studies has identified various conditions on the key ingredient ϕ as sufficient for global solvability and hence for suppression of finite-time blow-up (see [8], [9], [10]–[13], [14], [15] for an incomplete selection, and also [16], [17]–[19], [20], [21], [22] for some studies on variants accounting for sources and density-dependent diffusion mechanisms); on the other hand, some results detecting the occurrence of infinite-time blow-up in the particular case when ϕ(v) = e v , v ≥ 0, indicate a certain reminiscence of Keller-Segel dynamics ([11]; cf. also [13]): Passing over from classical Keller-Segel-production systems to models of the form (1.2) may thus, depending on the choice of ϕ, delay but not entirely rule out unboundedness phenomena ([9]).

In comparison to the above, much less seems known for related systems addressing situations of local sensing in which the directing signal is consumed by individuals, and in which thus cells, in particular, are incapable of active communication. In fact, for corresponding migration-absorption models of the form

(1.3) u t = Δ u ϕ ( v ) , v t = Δ v u v ,

the literature so far appears to concentrate on non-degenerate cases determined by motilities which are strictly positive on [0, ∞), and which hence reflect non-degenerate diffusion: In such situations, the additional dissipative influence exerted by the absorptive reaction substantially facilitates global existence theories, in frameworks both of classical small-data and of generalized large-data solutions ([23], [24]); as strongly indicated by quite far-reaching findings on large time stabilization toward spatially homogeneous steady states, however, non-degenerate settings of this flavor seem unable to adequately capture any of the strongly structure-supporting features of collective movement observed in populations of aerobic bacteria ([25]).

This is in line with refined modeling approaches which, in order to particularly address such situations, suggest to explicitly account for reduction of bacterial motility in nutrient-poor environments ([25], [26]). Indeed, a recent result indicates that in sharp contrast to said case of positive ϕ, nontrivial long term dynamics may indeed occur in corresponding versions of (1.3) which accordingly include migration rates reflecting motility degeneracies at small signal concentrations: When ϕ is suitably smooth with

(1.4) ϕ ( 0 ) = 0 , ϕ ( 0 ) > 0 and ϕ > 0  on  ( 0 , ) ,

namely, an associated no-flux type boundary value problem for (1.3) in one- or two-dimensional domains has been found to admit some classical solutions (u, v) for which u approaches a nonconstant profile in the large time limit ([27]). However, the question whether such types of behavior are restricted to such special settings, or rather constitute a characteristic feature of degenerate motilities in (1.3) within a more general framework, appears to be open up to now; in particular, the only precedent we are aware of which addresses somewhat stronger degeneracies, in fact covering any decay behavior of ϕ near the origin which is of essentially algebraic type, is still limited to domains in R n with n ≤ 2 ([28]).

Main results. The present manuscript attempts to design an analytical approach for (1.3) which does not only allow for the inclusion of motility degeneracies more general than those determined by (1.4), but which moreover does not rely on assumptions on low dimensionality. Due to challenges which in comparison to those encountered in the setup from (1.4) seem considerably increased, we will focus here on issues from basic solution and regularity theories, leaving more detailed qualitative investigation for future research.

Specifically, we shall consider the initial-boundary value problem

(1.5) u t = Δ u ϕ ( v ) , x Ω , t > 0 , v t = Δ v u v , x Ω , t > 0 , u ϕ ( v ) ν = v ν = 0 , x Ω , t > 0 , u ( x , 0 ) = u 0 ( x ) , v ( x , 0 ) = v 0 ( x ) , x Ω ,

in n-dimensional smoothly bounded convex domains Ω, under the assumption that near the origin, ϕ suitably generalizes the prototype given by

(1.6) ϕ ( ξ ) = ξ α , ξ [ 0 , ξ 0 ] ,

with certain α > 0 and ξ 0 > 0.

Our first step will concentrate on the case α ∈ (0, 1), in which on the one hand a comparatively mild degeneracy retains some strength of diffusive smoothing, but for which on the other the corresponding cross-diffusive action is considerably singular in regions where v is small. In the context of the identity

(1.7) d d t Ω u ln u + Ω ϕ ( v ) | u | 2 u = Ω ϕ ( v ) u v

formally determining the evolution of the associated logarithmic entropy, the latter becomes manifest in a singular factor ϕ′(v) appearing in the rightmost integral, and a straightforward estimation thereof in terms of the dissipated quantity on the left thus seems not expedient. Forming a key observation in this regard, it will turn out that by linearly combining (1.7) with a corresponding identity describing the evolution of an appropriate bounded quantity, this expression can be suitably diminished in strength, and hence become conveniently controllable by respective diffusive contributions. Indeed, in Section 3 we shall see that for appropriately chosen a > 0, an inequality of the form

(1.8) d d t Ω u ln u a Ω u ϕ ( v ) + 1 2 Ω ϕ ( v ) | u | 2 u C Ω | v | 4 v 3 + C Ω u 2 v α

holds for solutions to certain regularized variants of (1.5) (see (2.5) and Lemma 3.4). In conjunction with some basic regularity features, originating from a standard duality-based reasoning and providing bounds for both summands on the right of (1.8) (Lemma 2.4, Lemma 2.7 and Corollary 3.1), this will lead to a priori information sufficient for the derivation of a result on global existence of weak solutions with locally bounded logarithmic entropies.

More precisely, the first of our main results can be stated as follows.

Theorem 1.1.

Let n ≥ 1 and Ω R n be a bounded convex domain with smooth boundary, and suppose that

(1.9) ϕ C 0 ( [ 0 , ) ) C 3 ( ( 0 , ) )  is such that  ϕ ( 0 ) = 0  and  ϕ ( ξ ) > 0   for all  ξ > 0 ,

and that with some α ∈ (0, 1) and ξ 0 > 0 we have

(1.10) lim inf ξ 0 ϕ ( ξ ) ξ α > 0

and

(1.11) lim sup ξ 0 | ϕ ( ξ ) | ξ α 1 <

as well as

(1.12) ϕ 1 α ( ξ ) 0 for all  ξ ( 0 , ξ 0 ) .

Then whenever

(1.13) u 0 W 1 , ( Ω )  is nonnegative with  u 0 0 and  v 0 W 1 , ( Ω )  satisfies  v 0 > 0  in  Ω ̄ ,

one can find

(1.14) u L ( ( 0 , ) ; L 1 ( Ω ) ) and v L ( Ω × ( 0 , ) ) L loc ( [ 0 , ) ; W 1,2 ( Ω ) ) L loc 2 ( [ 0 , ) ; W 2,2 ( Ω ) )

such that u ≥ 0 and v > 0 a.e. in Ω × (0, ∞), that

(1.15) Ω u ( , t ) = Ω u 0 for a.e.   t > 0

as well as

(1.16) ess sup t ( 0 , T ) Ω u ( , t ) ln u ( , t ) < for all  T > 0

and

(1.17) 0 T Ω ( u ϕ ( v ) ) p ( α ) < for all  T > 0

with

(1.18) p ( α ) 2 2 α if  α ( 0 , 1 2 ) , 4 3 if  α [ 1 2 , 1 ) ,

and that (u, v) forms a global weak solution of (1.5) in the sense of Definition 2.1.

Next concerned with stronger degeneracies, we will need to appropriately cope with an apparent lack of structural features comparable to that from (1.8) in the case when α ≥ 1. We shall alternatively build our analysis in this respect on the observation that as long as α ∈ (1, 2), a favorable entropy-like evolution property of Dirichlet integrals involving mildly singular weights will lead to an inequality of the form

d d t Ω v α 2 | v | 2 + 1 C Ω v α 4 | v | 4 C Ω u 2 v α

(Lemma 4.3). Along with fairly standard extensions thereof to the borderline cases α = 1 and α = 2 (Corollary 4.4), this can be combined with an again duality-based control of 0 T Ω u 2 v α which now can even be achieved with bounds uniform with respect to T thanks to the fact that uv α is esentially dominated by the quantity uv known to belong to L 1(Ω × (0, ∞)) according to the second equation in (1.5) (Lemma 4.1 and (2.10)). In Lemma 4.5, we thereby see that whenever α ∈ [1, 2], a fairly straightforward estimation of the right-hand side in (1.7) becomes possible so as to ensure bounds which are now even independent of time.

In conclusion, this will enable us to derive the second of our main results, asserting global solvability and temporally uniform bounds in the presence of such superlinear degeneracies, and in arbitrarily high-dimensional settings, in the following sense.

Theorem 1.2.

Suppose that n ≥ 1 and Ω R n is a bounded convex domain with smooth boundary, and that ϕ satisfies (1.9), (1.10) and (1.11) with some α ∈ [1, 2]. Then for any choice of (u 0, v 0) fulfilling (1.13), one can find functions u and v which satisfy (1.14) with u ≥ 0 and v > 0 a.e. in Ω × (0, ∞), which are such that (1.15) holds as well as

(1.19) ess sup t > 0 Ω u ( , t ) ln u ( , t ) < , ess sup t > 0 Ω | v ( , t ) | 2 <

and

(1.20) 0 Ω v α 4 | v | 4 + 0 Ω ( u ϕ ( v ) ) 4 3 < ,

and that (u, v) forms a global weak solution of (1.5) in the sense of Definition 2.1.

We remark that the theory developed here forms the basis of the refined qualitative analysis undertaken in [29]; further information on large time stabilization has been obtained in [30] and in [27].

2 Approximation and some basic regularity features

The solution concept to be considered below appears to be quite in line with standard notions of generalized solvability in second order parabolic problems, particularly involving one-step integration by parts only.

Definition 2.1

Suppose that ϕC 0([0, ∞)), u 0L 1(Ω) and v 0L (Ω) are all nonnegative. Then by a global weak solution of (1.5) we mean a pair (u, v) of nonnegative functions

(2.1) u L loc 1 ( Ω ̄ × [ 0 , ) ) and v L loc ( Ω ̄ × [ 0 , ) ) L loc 1 ( [ 0 , ) ; W 1,1 ( Ω ) )

such that

(2.2) ( u ϕ ( v ) ) L loc 1 ( Ω ̄ × [ 0 , ) ; R n ) ,

and that

(2.3) 0 Ω u φ t + Ω u 0 φ ( , 0 ) = 0 Ω ( u ϕ ( v ) ) φ

and

(2.4) 0 Ω v φ t + Ω v 0 φ ( , 0 ) = 0 Ω v φ + 0 Ω u v φ

hold for any φ C 0 ( Ω ̄ × [ 0 , ) ) .

In order to achieve a convenient approximation of (1.5), let us regularize not only the diffusive contribution to the first equation, but also the reaction part in the second. In fact, this will ensure that for each ɛ ∈ (0, 1), the problem

(2.5) u ε t = Δ u ε ϕ ε ( v ε ) , x Ω , t > 0 , v ε t = Δ v ε u ε v ε 1 + ε u ε , x Ω , t > 0 , u ε ν = v ε ν = 0 , x Ω , t > 0 , u ε ( x , 0 ) = u 0 ( x ) , v ε ( x , 0 ) = v 0 ( x ) , x Ω .

with

(2.6) ϕ ε ( ξ ) ϕ ( ξ ) + ε , ξ 0 , ε ( 0,1 ) ,

is globally solvable in the classical sense:

Lemma 2.2.

Let n ≥ 1 and Ω R n be a bounded domain with smooth boundary, and assume (1.9) and (1.13). Then for each ɛ ∈ (0, 1) there exist

(2.7) u ε C 0 ( Ω ̄ × [ 0 , ) ) C 2,1 ( Ω ̄ × ( 0 , ) ) and v ε q > n C 0 ( [ 0 , ) ; W 1 , q ( Ω ) ) C 2,1 ( Ω ̄ × ( 0 , ) )

such that u ɛ ≥ 0 and v ɛ > 0 in Ω ̄ × [ 0 , ) , that (u ɛ , v ɛ ) solves (2.5), (2.6) in the classical sense, and that

(2.8) Ω u ε ( , t ) = Ω u 0 for all  t > 0

and

(2.9) v ε ( , t ) L ( Ω ) v 0 L ( Ω ) for all  t > 0

as well as

(2.10) 0 Ω u ε v ε 1 + ε u ε Ω v 0 for all  ε ( 0,1 ) .

Moreover, given any T > 0 one can find C(T) > 0 such that

(2.11) Ω ln 1 v ε ( , t ) C ( T ) for all  t ( 0 , T )  and  ε ( 0,1 ) ,

and that

(2.12) 0 T Ω | v ε | 2 v ε 2 C ( T ) for all  ε ( 0,1 ) .

Proof.

This can be verified by an essentially verbatim copy of the arguments from [28, Lemma 2.2, Lemma 4.1], supplemented by the observation that (2.10) holds due to the fact that

0 t Ω u ε v ε 1 + ε u ε = Ω v 0 Ω v ε ( , t ) Ω v 0 for all  t > 0  and  ε ( 0,1 )

according to the second equation in (2.5).□

Throughout the sequel, we shall henceforth fix a smoothly bounded Ω R n as well as initial data (u 0, v 0) fulfilling (1.13), and whenever a function ϕ satisfying (1.9) is given, we shall let ( ( u ε , v ε ) ) ε ( 0,1 ) denote the family of solutions to (2.5), (2.6) accordingly obtained in Lemma 2.2.

A first common regularity feature of these solutions will result from a duality-based argument based on the following observation which in its essence goes back to [15] already. Here and below, for φL 1(Ω) we abbreviate its average according to φ ̄ 1 | Ω | Ω φ .

Lemma 2.3.

Let D ( A ) { φ W 2,2 ( Ω ) | Ω φ = 0  and  φ ν = 0  on  Ω } and ≔ − Δφ for φD(A). Then whenever (1.9) holds, we have

(2.13) 1 2 d d t Ω A 1 2 ( u ε u ̄ 0 ) 2 + Ω u ε 2 ϕ ε ( v ε ) = u ̄ 0 2 | Ω | ε + u ̄ 0 Ω u ε ϕ ( v ε ) for all  t > 0  and  ε ( 0,1 ) .

Proof.

Since Ω ( u ε u ̄ 0 ) = 0 for all t > 0 and ɛ ∈ (0, 1) by (2.8), and since clearly also Ω u ε ϕ ε ( v ε ) u ε ϕ ε ( v ε ) ̄ = 0 for all t > 0 and ɛ ∈ (0, 1), using that according to (2.5) we have t ( u ε u ̄ 0 ) = Δ u ε ϕ ε ( v ε ) u ε ϕ ε ( v ε ) ̄ in Ω × (0, ∞) for all ɛ ∈ (0, 1), we see that

t A 1 ( u ε u ̄ 0 ) = u ε ϕ ε ( v ε ) + u ε ϕ ε ( v ε ) ̄ in  Ω × ( 0 , ) for all  ε ( 0,1 ) .

We only need to multiply this by u ε u ̄ 0 and use the self-adjointness of A 1 2 to infer that, indeed,

1 2 d d t Ω A 1 2 ( u ε u ̄ 0 ) 2 = Ω u ε ϕ ε ( v ε ) + u ε ϕ ε ( v ε ) ̄ ( u ε u ̄ 0 ) = Ω u ε 2 ϕ ε ( v ε ) + u ̄ 0 Ω u ε ϕ ε ( v ε ) + u ε ϕ ε ( v ε ) ̄ Ω ( u ε u ̄ 0 ) = Ω u ε 2 ϕ ε ( v ε ) + u ̄ 0 2 | Ω | ε + u ̄ 0 Ω u ε ϕ ( v ε ) for all  t > 0  and  ε ( 0,1 )

due to (2.6) and (2.8).□

In a general setting compatible with the assumptions both of Theorem 1.1 and Theorem 1.2, this can be seen to imply a first a priori estimate beyond those from Lemma 2.2. We announce already here, however, that in the context of nonlinearities ϕ which grow at most linearly near the origin, Lemma 4.1 will provide a significant refinement which will form the origin for the time-independent bounds claimed in Theorem 1.2.

Lemma 2.4.

Suppose that (1.9) and (1.10) hold with some α > 0. Then for all T > 0 there exists C(T) > 0 such that

(2.14) 0 T Ω u ε 2 ϕ ε ( v ε ) + 0 T Ω u ε 2 v ε α C ( T ) for all  ε ( 0,1 ) .

Proof.

Writing c 1 v 0 L ( Ω ) and c 2 ϕ L ( ( 0 , c 1 ) ) , from (2.9) we infer that ϕ(v ɛ ) ≤ c 2 in Ω × (0, ∞) for all ɛ ∈ (0, 1), with finiteness of c 2 being guaranteed by (1.9). On the right-hand side of (2.13), again using (2.8) we can accordingly estimate

u ̄ 0 2 | Ω | ε + u ̄ 0 Ω u ε ϕ ( v ε ) u ̄ 0 2 | Ω | ε + c 2 u ̄ 0 Ω u ε = ( ε + c 2 ) u ̄ 0 2 | Ω | ( 1 + c 2 ) u ̄ 0 2 | Ω | for all  t > 0  and  ε ( 0,1 ) ,

whence upon an integration in time we see that

(2.15) 1 2 Ω A 1 2 ( u ε ( , T ) u ̄ 0 ) 2 + 0 T Ω u ε 2 ϕ ε ( v ε ) 1 2 Ω A 1 2 ( u 0 u ̄ 0 ) 2 + ( 1 + c 2 ) u ̄ 0 2 | Ω | T

for all T > 0 and ɛ ∈ (0, 1). Since (1.10) asserts positivity of c 3 inf ξ ( 0 , c 1 ) ϕ ( ξ ) ξ α , and since (2.9) ensures that

ϕ ε ( v ε ) 1 2 ϕ ε ( v ε ) + c 3 2 v ε α in  Ω × ( 0 , ) for all  ε ( 0,1 ) ,

from (2.15) we already obtain (2.14).□

Playing a key role in our reasoning, the standard logarithmic entropy can be described with respect to a very basic evolution feature as follows.

Lemma 2.5.

If (1.9) holds, then

(2.16) d d t Ω u ε ln u ε + Ω ϕ ε ( v ε ) | u ε | 2 u ε = Ω ϕ ε ( v ε ) u ε v ε for all  t > 0  and  ε ( 0,1 ) .

Proof.

This can directly be seen upon multiplying the first equation in (2.5) by lnu ɛ and integrating by parts using (2.8).□

Thus led to provide appropriate control over the expression on the right of (2.16) and especially the taxis gradients ∇v ɛ , possibly with singular weights originating from potentially unbounded factors ϕ ε ( v ε ) , we first perform a very standard testing procedure to obtain a general statement on a basic regularity property, which at this stage is yet conditional by relying on a square integrability feature of ( u ε v ε ) ε ( 0,1 ) .

Lemma 2.6.

Assume (1.9). Then there exists C > 0 such that

(2.17) Ω | v ε ( , t ) | 2 C + 0 t Ω u ε 2 v ε 2 for all  t > 0  and  ε ( 0,1 ) ,

and that

(2.18) 0 T Ω | Δ v ε | 2 + 0 T Ω | v ε | 4 v ε 2 + 0 T Ω v ε t 2 C + C 0 T Ω u ε 2 v ε 2 for all  T > 0  and  ε ( 0,1 ) .

Proof.

We test the second equation in (2.5) against −Δv ɛ and v ɛt in a standard manner to see that due to Young’s inequality,

(2.19) d d t Ω | v ε | 2 + 1 2 Ω | Δ v ε | 2 + 1 2 Ω v ε t 2 = 1 2 Ω | Δ v ε | 2 1 2 Ω v ε t 2 + Ω u ε v ε 1 + ε u ε Δ v ε Ω u ε v ε 1 + ε u ε v ε t Ω u ε v ε 1 + ε u ε 2 Ω u ε 2 v ε 2 for all  t > 0  and  ε ( 0,1 ) .

Since

Ω | v ε | 4 v ε 2 = Ω | v ε | 2 v ε 1 v ε = Ω 1 v ε v ε | v ε | 2 + | v ε | 2 Δ v ε ( 2 + n ) Ω 1 v ε | v ε | 2 | D 2 v ε | 1 2 Ω | v ε | 4 v ε 2 + ( 2 + n ) 2 2 Ω | D 2 v ε | 2 for all  t > 0  and  ε ( 0,1 ) ,

and since thus

Ω | v ε | 4 v ε 2 ( 2 + n ) 2 Ω | Δ v ε | 2 for all  t > 0  and  ε ( 0,1 )

due to the fact that according to the identity v ε Δ v ε = 1 2 Δ | v ε | 2 | D 2 v ε | 2 we have

Ω | Δ v ε | 2 = Ω v ε Δ v ε = Ω | D 2 v ε | 2 1 2 Ω | v ε | 2 ν Ω | D 2 v ε | 2 for all  t > 0  and  ε ( 0,1 )

thanks to the convexity of Ω ([31]), from (2.19) we obtain both (2.17) and (2.18).□

As a crucial preparation for our analysis of (2.16) in the context of both Theorem 1.1 and the particular subcase α = 1 of Theorem 1.2, we note that if integral bounds even for u ε 2 v ε can be drawn on, then the taxis gradient can be controlled even when weighted in a more singular manner than in (2.18). This can be confirmed in the course of another fairly well-established variational reasoning:

Lemma 2.7.

Assume (1.9). Then there exists C > 0 such that

(2.20) 0 T Ω | v ε | 4 v ε 3 C + C 0 T Ω u ε 2 v ε for all  T > 0  and  ε ( 0,1 ) .

Proof.

We integrate by parts using the second equation in (2.5) to find that again since v ε Δ v ε = 1 2 Δ | v ε | 2 | D 2 v ε | 2 for all ɛ ∈ (0, 1),

(2.21) 1 2 d d t Ω | v ε | 2 v ε = Ω v ε v ε Δ v ε u ε v ε 1 + ε u ε 1 2 Ω | v ε | 2 v ε 2 Δ v ε u ε v ε 1 + ε u ε = 1 2 Ω 1 v ε Δ | v ε | 2 Ω | D 2 v ε | 2 v ε 1 2 Ω | v ε | 2 v ε 2 Δ v ε + Ω u ε v ε 1 + ε u ε v ε v ε + 1 2 Ω u ε 1 + ε u ε | v ε | 2 v ε = Ω | D 2 v ε | 2 v ε + Ω 1 v ε 2 v ε | v ε | 2 Ω | v ε | 4 v ε 3 + 1 2 Ω 1 v ε | v ε | 2 ν + Ω u ε 1 + ε u ε Δ v ε 1 2 Ω u ε 1 + ε u ε | v ε | 2 v ε Ω | D 2 v ε | 2 v ε + Ω 1 v ε 2 v ε | v ε | 2 Ω | v ε | 4 v ε 3 + Ω u ε 1 + ε u ε Δ v ε for all  t > 0  and  ε ( 0,1 ) ,

because | v ε | 2 ν 0 on Ω × (0, ∞) for all ɛ ∈ (0, 1) by convexity of Ω ([31]). Here we may use the well-known facts ([32, p. 331] and [33, Lemma 3.4]) that

Ω | D 2 v ε | 2 v ε + Ω 1 v ε 2 v ε | v ε | 2 Ω | v ε | 4 v ε 3 = Ω v ε | D 2 ln v ε | 2

for all t > 0 and ɛ ∈ (0, 1), and that with c 1 1 2 ( 3 + n ) we have

c 1 Ω | v ε | 4 v ε 3 + c 1 Ω | D 2 v ε | 2 v ε Ω v ε | D 2 ln v ε | 2 for all  t > 0  and  ε ( 0,1 ) ,

and employ Young’s inequality to estimate

Ω u ε 1 + ε u ε Δ v ε n Ω u ε | D 2 v ε | c 1 Ω | D 2 v ε | 2 v ε + n 4 c 1 Ω u ε 2 v ε for all  t > 0  and  ε ( 0,1 ) .

An integration of (2.21) therefore shows that

1 2 Ω | v ε ( , T ) | 2 v ε ( , T ) + c 1 0 T Ω | v ε | 4 v ε 3 1 2 Ω | v 0 | 2 v 0 + n 4 c 1 0 T Ω u ε 2 v ε for all  T > 0  and  ε ( 0,1 ) ,

and hence establishes (2.20) according to (1.13).□

The following analysis of the products u ε v ε 2 will provide a handy path toward the derivation of a favorable compactness feature which, thanks to the positivity feature of the v ɛ encrypted in (2.11), will form the source for pointwise a.e. convergence of ( u ε ) ε ( 0,1 ) along a suitable subsequence (cf. Lemma 3.6).

Lemma 2.8.

Assume (1.9), (1.10) and (1.11) with some α ∈ (0, 2], and let k N be such that k > n + 2 2 . Then there exists C > 0 such that

(2.22) Ω ( u ε v ε 2 ) C Ω ϕ ε ( v ε ) | u ε | 2 u ε + Ω | v ε | 4 v ε 2 + Ω u ε 2 v ε 2 + 1

and

(2.23) t ( u ε v ε 2 ) ( W k , 2 ( Ω ) ) C Ω ϕ ε ( v ε ) | u ε | 2 u ε + Ω | Δ v ε | 2 + Ω | v ε | 4 v ε 2 + Ω u ε 2 v ε 2 + 1

for all t > 0 and ɛ ∈ (0, 1).

Proof.

Using (1.9), (1.10), (1.11) and (2.9), we fix positive constants c 1, c 2, c 3 and c 4 such that

(2.24) v ε c 1 , c 2 v ε α ϕ ε ( v ε ) c 3 and | ϕ ε ( v ε ) | c 4 v ε α 1 in  Ω × ( 0 , ) for all  ε ( 0,1 ) ,

whence due to Young’s inequality and (2.8),

(2.25) Ω ( u ε v ε 2 ) Ω v ε 2 | u ε | + 2 Ω u ε v ε | v ε | 1 2 Ω ϕ ε ( v ε ) | u ε | 2 u ε + 1 2 Ω u ε v ε 4 ϕ ε ( v ε ) + Ω u ε 2 v ε 2 + 1 2 Ω | v ε | 4 v ε 2 + 1 2 Ω v ε 2 1 2 Ω ϕ ε ( v ε ) | u ε | 2 u ε + c 1 4 α 2 c 2 u ̄ 0 | Ω | + Ω u ε 2 v ε 2 + 1 2 Ω | v ε | 4 v ε 2 + c 1 2 | Ω | 2

for all t > 0 an ɛ ∈ (0, 1). Likewise, for fixed φ C ( Ω ̄ ) fulfilling φ L ( Ω ) + φ L ( Ω ) 1 , recalling (2.5) we see that

(2.26) Ω t ( u ε v ε 2 ) φ = Ω ( u ε ϕ ε ( v ε ) ) ( v ε 2 φ ) + 2 Ω u ε v ε Δ v ε u ε v ε 1 + ε u ε φ = 2 Ω v ε ϕ ε ( v ε ) ( u ε v ε ) φ 2 Ω u ε v ε ϕ ε ( v ε ) | v ε | 2 φ Ω v ε 2 ϕ ε ( v ε ) u ε φ Ω u ε v ε 2 ϕ ε ( v ε ) v ε φ + 2 Ω u ε v ε Δ v ε φ 2 Ω u ε 2 v ε 2 1 + ε u ε φ 2 Ω v ε ϕ ε ( v ε ) | u ε | | v ε | + 2 c 4 Ω u ε v ε α | v ε | 2 + Ω v ε 2 ϕ ε ( v ε ) | u ε | + c 4 Ω u ε v ε α + 1 | v ε | + 2 Ω u ε v ε | Δ v ε | + 2 Ω u ε 2 v ε 2 Ω ϕ ε ( v ε ) | u ε | 2 u ε + Ω u ε v ε 2 ϕ ε ( v ε ) | v ε | 2 + 2 c 4 Ω u ε v ε α | v ε | 2 + 1 2 Ω ϕ ε ( v ε ) | u ε | 2 u ε + 1 2 Ω u ε v ε 4 ϕ ε ( v ε ) + c 4 2 Ω v ε 2 α | v ε | 2 + Ω | Δ v ε | 2 + c 4 2 + 3 Ω u ε 2 v ε 2 for all  t > 0  and  ε ( 0,1 ) .

Here, again by Young’s inequality, (2.24) and (2.8),

Ω u ε v ε 2 ϕ ε ( v ε ) | v ε | 2 + 2 c 4 Ω u ε v ε α | v ε | 2 + c 4 2 Ω v ε 2 α | v ε | 2 1 2 Ω u ε 2 v ε 2 + 1 2 Ω v ε 2 ϕ ε 2 ( v ε ) | v ε | 4 + c 4 Ω u ε 2 v ε 2 + c 4 Ω v ε 2 α 2 | v ε | 4 + c 4 4 Ω | v ε | 4 v ε 2 + c 4 4 Ω v ε 4 α + 2 c 4 + 1 2 Ω u ε 2 v ε 2 + c 1 4 c 3 2 2 + c 1 2 α c 4 + c 4 4 Ω | v ε | 4 v ε 2 + c 1 4 α + 2 c 4 | Ω | 4

and

1 2 Ω u ε v ε 4 ϕ ε ( v ε ) c 1 4 c 3 2 Ω u 0

for all t > 0 and ɛ ∈ (0, 1). Therefore, (2.25) implies (2.22), whereas (2.23) results from (2.26), because W k,2(Ω) ↪ W 1,∞(Ω) due to our assumption that k > n + 2 2 .□

3 The case α ∈ (0, 1). Proof of Theorem 1.1

In the particular setting specified in Theorem 1.1, a very rough estimation of the expressions on the right-hand sides of (2.17), (2.18) and (2.20) on the basis of Lemma 2.4 immediately yields time-dependent bounds for the second solution component in the following sense.

Corollary 3.1.

If (1.9) and (1.10) hold with some α ∈ (0, 1), then for any T > 0 there exists C(T) > 0 such that

Ω | v ε ( , t ) | 2 C ( T ) for all  t ( 0 , T )  and  ε ( 0,1 ) ,

and that

0 T Ω | Δ v ε | 2 + 0 T Ω v ε t 2 + 0 T Ω | v ε | 4 v ε 2 + 0 T Ω | v ε | 4 v ε 3 C ( T ) for all  ε ( 0,1 ) .

Proof.

Since for all T > 0 and ɛ ∈ (0, 1) we have

0 T Ω u ε 2 v ε 2 v 0 L ( Ω ) 2 α 0 T Ω u ε 2 v ε α and 0 T Ω u ε 2 v ε v 0 L ( Ω ) 1 α 0 T Ω u ε 2 v ε α

due to (2.9) and the inequality α < 1, this is a direct consequence of Lemma 2.6, Lemma 2.7 and Lemma 2.4.□

The core of our analysis concerning Theorem 1.1 can now be found launched in the following evolution feature of 0 ≤ t Ω u ɛ (⋅, t)ϕ ɛ (v ɛ (⋅, t)).

Lemma 3.2.

Assume (1.9). Then

(3.1) d d t Ω u ε ϕ ε ( v ε ) = Ω ϕ ε ( v ε ) ϕ ε ( v ε ) + ϕ ε ( v ε ) u ε v ε Ω u ε ϕ ε 2 ( v ε ) + ϕ ε ( v ε ) | v ε | 2 Ω u ε 2 v ε 1 + ε u ε ϕ ε ( v ε ) for all  t > 0  and  ε ( 0,1 ) .

Proof.

This follows from straightforward computation using (2.5): Indeed, for all t > 0 and ɛ ∈ (0, 1) we have

(3.2) d d t Ω u ε ϕ ε ( v ε ) = Ω Δ ( u ε ϕ ε ( v ε ) ) ϕ ε ( v ε ) + Ω u ε ϕ ε ( v ε ) Δ v ε u ε v ε 1 + ε u ε = Ω u ε ϕ ε ( v ε ) Δ ϕ ε ( v ε ) + Ω u ε ϕ ε ( v ε ) Δ v ε Ω u ε 2 v ε 1 + ε u ε ϕ ε ( v ε ) ,

where one further integration by parts shows that

(3.3) Ω u ε ϕ ε ( v ε ) Δ ϕ ε ( v ε ) + Ω u ε ϕ ε ( v ε ) Δ v ε = Ω u ε ϕ ε ( v ε ) ϕ ε ( v ε ) | v ε | 2 + Ω u ε ϕ ε ( v ε ) ϕ ε ( v ε ) + ϕ ε ( v ε ) Δ v ε = Ω u ε ϕ ε ( v ε ) ϕ ε ( v ε ) | v ε | 2 Ω ϕ ε ( v ε ) ϕ ε ( v ε ) + ϕ ε ( v ε ) u ε v ε Ω u ε ϕ ε ϕ ε + ϕ ε ( v ε ) | v ε | 2 for all  t > 0  and  ε ( 0,1 ) .

Since

ϕ ε ϕ ε ϕ ε ϕ ε + ϕ ε = ϕ ε 2 ϕ ε on  ( 0 , ) for all  ε ( 0,1 ) ,

from (3.2) and (3.3) we obtain (3.1).□

In fact, it will turn out that when appropriately combined with Lemma 2.5, the property (3.1) will imply a quasi-energy feature of certain among the functionals in (1.8). Our selection of the number a > 0 appearing therein will be accomplished in the course of the following elementary but crucial analysis concerned with the behavior of ( ϕ ε ) ε ( 0,1 ) within finite intervals of the form [0, ξ ], where ξ will finally be chosen to coincide with v 0 L ( Ω ) .

Lemma 3.3.

Suppose that (1.9) and (1.12) hold with some α ∈ (0, 1) and ξ 0 > 0. Then there exist a > 0 and ɛ ∈ (0, 1) with the property that whenever ξ > 0, one can find C(ξ ) > 0 such that

(3.4) a ϕ ε ( ξ ) ϕ ε ( ξ ) + ( a 1 ) ϕ ε ( ξ ) 2 2 ϕ ε ( ξ ) + a ϕ ε 2 ( ξ ) + a ϕ ε ( ξ ) C ( ξ ) ξ for all  ξ [ 0 , ξ ]  and  ε ( 0 , ε ) .

Proof.

We let a 1 α and then observe that since α < 1,

lim ϕ ̃ 0 a 2 ϕ ̃ 2 + 2 a ( a 1 ) ϕ ̃ + ( a 1 ) 2 + 2 a ϕ ̃ 2 ( 1 α ) a α = ( a 1 ) 2 2 ( 1 α ) a α = a 2 2 α a + 1 = 1 1 α 2 < 0 ,

whence due to the identity ϕ(0) = 0 required in (1.9) we can fix ξ 1 ∈ (0, ξ 0) such that

max ξ [ 0 , ξ 1 ] a 2 ϕ 2 ( ξ ) + 2 a ( a 1 ) ϕ ( ξ ) + ( a 1 ) 2 + 2 a ϕ ( ξ ) 2 ( 1 α ) a α < 0 .

Since clearly ϕ ɛ ϕ in L ([0, ξ 1]) as ɛ ↘ 0, this entails the existence of ɛ ∈ (0, 1) such that

(3.5) a 2 ϕ ε 2 ( ξ ) + 2 a ( a 1 ) ϕ ε ( ξ ) + ( a 1 ) 2 + 2 a ϕ ε ( ξ ) 2 ( 1 α ) a α 0 for all  ξ [ 0 , ξ 1 ]  and  ε ( 0 , ε ) .

To derive (3.4) from this, we note that thanks to (1.12),

0 ϕ 1 α ( ξ ) = 1 α ϕ 1 α 1 ( ξ ) ϕ ( ξ ) + 1 α 1 α 1 ϕ 1 α 2 ( ξ ) ϕ 2 ( ξ ) for all  ξ ( 0 , ξ 0 ) ,

and that thus

ϕ ( ξ ) ϕ ( ξ ) 1 α α ϕ 2 ( ξ ) for all  ξ ( 0 , ξ 0 ) ,

in particular implying that ϕ″ ≤ 0 on (0, ξ 0) and hence also

ϕ ε ( ξ ) ϕ ε ( ξ ) = ϕ ( ξ ) ϕ ( ξ ) + ε ϕ ( ξ ) ϕ ( ξ ) ϕ ( ξ ) 1 α α ϕ 2 ( ξ ) = 1 α α ϕ ε 2 ( ξ ) for all  ξ ( 0 , ξ 0 )  and  ε ( 0,1 ) .

As ξ 1ξ 0, (3.5) therefore guarantees that

(3.6) a ϕ ε ( ξ ) ϕ ε ( ξ ) + ( a 1 ) ϕ ε ( ξ ) 2 + 2 a ϕ ε ( ξ ) ϕ ε 2 ( ξ ) + 2 a ϕ ε ( ξ ) ϕ ε ( ξ ) a ϕ ε ( ξ ) ϕ ε ( ξ ) + ( a 1 ) ϕ ε ( ξ ) 2 + 2 a ϕ ε ( ξ ) ϕ ε 2 ( ξ ) 2 ( 1 α ) a α ϕ ε 2 ( ξ ) = ϕ ε 2 ( ξ ) a 2 ϕ ε 2 ( ξ ) + 2 a ( a 1 ) ϕ ε ( ξ ) + ( a 1 ) 2 + 2 a ϕ ε ( ξ ) 2 ( 1 α ) a α 0 for all  ξ [ 0 , ξ 1 ]  and  ε ( 0 , ε ) .

Now given ξ > 0, in the case when ξ ξ 1 we immediately infer (3.4) from (3.6). Otherwise, we use the regularity and positivity properties of ϕ asserted by (1.9) to see that, again since ϕ ɛ = ϕ + ɛ and thus ϕ ε ϕ as well as ϕ ε ϕ for all ɛ ∈ (0, 1), we can find c 1(ξ ) > 0 such that

a ϕ ε ( ξ ) ϕ ε ( ξ ) + ( a 1 ) ϕ ε ( ξ ) 2 2 ϕ ε ( ξ ) + a ϕ ε 2 ( ξ ) + a ϕ ε ( ξ ) c 1 ( ξ ) for all  ξ [ ξ 1 , ξ ]  and  ε ( 0,1 ) .

Once more in view of (3.6), we thus infer that (3.4) also holds in this case if we let C(ξ )≔ξ c 1(ξ ).□

Our main step toward Theorem 1.1 can now be achieved by concatenating Lemma 2.5 and Lemma 3.2 through Lemma 3.3.

Lemma 3.4.

Assume (1.9), (1.10), (1.11) and (1.12) with some α ∈ (0, 1) and ξ 0 > 0. Then there exists ɛ ∈ (0, 1) such that for each T > 0 it is possible to fix C(T) > 0 in such a way that

(3.7) Ω u ε ( , t ) ln u ε ( , t ) C ( T ) for all  t ( 0 , T )  and  ε ( 0 , ε )

and

(3.8) 0 T Ω ϕ ε ( v ε ) | u ε | 2 u ε C ( T ) for all  ε ( 0 , ε ) .

Proof.

We let a > 0 and ɛ ∈ (0, 1) be as provided by Lemma 3.3, and applying said lemma to ξ v 0 L ( Ω ) , thanks to (2.9) we can pick c 1 > 0 such that

(3.9) a ϕ ε ( v ε ) ϕ ε ( v ε ) + ( a 1 ) ϕ ε 2 ( v ε ) 2 2 ϕ ε ( v ε ) + a ϕ ε 2 ( v ε ) + a ϕ ε ( v ε ) c 1 v ε in  Ω × ( 0 , ) for all  ε ( 0 , ε ) .

Keeping this value of a fixed, we combine Lemma 2.5 with Lemma 3.2 to see that

(3.10) d d t Ω u ε ln u ε a Ω u ε ϕ ε ( v ε ) + Ω ϕ ε ( v ε ) | u ε | 2 u ε = Ω ϕ ε ( v ε ) u ε v ε + a Ω ϕ ε ( v ε ) ϕ ε ( v ε ) + ϕ ε ( v ε ) u ε v ε + a Ω u ε ϕ ε 2 ( v ε ) + ϕ ε ( v ε ) | v ε | 2 + a Ω u ε 2 v ε 1 + ε u ε ϕ ε ( v ε ) for all  t > 0  and  ε ( 0,1 ) .

Here by Young’s inequality and (3.9),

(3.11) Ω ϕ ε ( v ε ) u ε v ε + a Ω ϕ ε ( v ε ) ϕ ε ( v ε ) + ϕ ε ( v ε ) u ε v ε + a Ω u ε ϕ ε 2 ( v ε ) + ϕ ε ( v ε ) | v ε | 2 = Ω a ϕ ε ( v ε ) ϕ ε ( v ε ) + ( a 1 ) ϕ ε ( v ε ) u ε v ε + a Ω u ε ϕ ε 2 ( v ε ) + ϕ ε ( v ε ) | v ε | 2 1 2 Ω ϕ ε ( v ε ) | u ε | 2 u ε + Ω u ε a ϕ ε ( v ε ) ϕ ε ( v ε ) + ( a 1 ) ϕ ε ( v ε ) 2 2 ϕ ε ( v ε ) + a ϕ ε 2 ( v ε ) + a ϕ ε ( v ε ) | v ε | 2 1 2 Ω ϕ ε ( v ε ) | u ε | 2 u ε + c 1 Ω u ε v ε | v ε | 2 for all  t > 0  and  ε ( 0 , ε ) ,

and again employing Young’s inequality and using (2.9) we find that

(3.12) c 1 Ω u ε v ε | v ε | 2 c 1 2 Ω | v ε | 4 v ε 3 + c 1 2 Ω u ε 2 v ε c 1 2 Ω | v ε | 4 v ε 3 + c 1 v 0 L ( Ω ) 1 α 2 Ω u ε 2 v ε α for all  t > 0  and  ε ( 0,1 ) .

As, by (1.11) and (2.9), with some c 2 > 0 we have | ϕ ε ( v ε ) | c 2 v ε α 1 in Ω × (0, ∞) for all ɛ ∈ (0, 1), we can furthermore estimate

a Ω u ε 2 v ε 1 + ε u ε ϕ ε ( v ε ) c 2 a Ω u ε 2 v ε α for all  t > 0  and  ε ( 0,1 ) ,

from (3.10), (3.11) and (3.12) we infer that

(3.13) d d t Ω u ε ln u ε a Ω u ε ϕ ε ( v ε ) + 1 2 Ω ϕ ε ( v ε ) | u ε | 2 u ε c 1 2 Ω | v ε | 4 v ε 3 + c 1 v 0 L ( Ω ) 1 α 2 + c 2 a Ω u ε 2 v ε α for all  t > 0  and  ε ( 0 , ε ) .

Since (2.9) together with (1.9) clearly entails the existence of c 3 > 0 such that

a Ω u ε ϕ ε ( v ε ) c 3 for all  t > 0  and  ε ( 0,1 ) ,

upon integrating (3.13) we readily see that (3.7) and (3.8) are consequences of Corollary 3.1 and Lemma 2.4.□

Based on the weighted estimate in (3.8), we can additionally make sure that also the fluxes acting in the first equation from (2.5) enjoy bounds in reflexive Lebesgue spaces determined by (1.18).

Lemma 3.5.

Let (1.9), (1.10), (1.11) and (1.12) be satisfied with some α ∈ (0, 1) and ξ 0 > 0. Then one can find ɛ ∈ (0, 1) such that for each T > 0 there exists C(T) > 0 such that

(3.14) 0 T Ω ( u ε ϕ ε ( v ε ) ) p ( α ) C ( T ) for all  ε ( 0 , ε ) ,

where p(α) is as defined in (1.18).

Proof.

According to (1.9), (1.11) and (2.9), there exist positive constants c 1, c 2 and c 3 such that

(3.15) v ε c 1 , ϕ ε ( v ε ) c 2 and | ϕ ε ( v ε ) | c 3 v ε α 1 in  Ω × ( 0 , ) for all  ε ( 0,1 ) ,

whence fixing T > 0 and ɛ ∈ (0, 1) henceforth and writing p = p(α) we see that

(3.16) 0 T Ω ( u ε ϕ ε ( v ε ) ) p = 0 T Ω ϕ ε ( v ε ) u ε + u ε ϕ ε ( v ε ) v ε p 2 p 1 0 T Ω ϕ ε p ( v ε ) | u ε | p + 2 p 1 c 3 p × 0 T Ω u ε p v ε p ( α 1 ) | v ε | p .

Here since p 4 3 , we may use Young’s inequality along with (3.15) to estimate

(3.17) 0 T Ω ϕ ε p ( v ε ) | u ε | p 0 T Ω ϕ ε 4 3 ( v ε ) | u ε | 4 3 + | Ω | T = 0 T Ω ϕ ε ( v ε ) | u ε | 2 u ε 2 3 u ε 2 3 ϕ ε 2 3 ( v ε ) + | Ω | T 0 T Ω ϕ ε ( v ε ) | u ε | 2 u ε + 0 T Ω u ε 2 ϕ ε 2 ( v ε ) + | Ω | T 0 T Ω ϕ ε ( v ε ) | u ε | 2 u ε + c 2 0 T Ω u ε 2 ϕ ε ( v ε ) + | Ω | T ,

and in the case when α 1 2 , we can proceed similarly to find that

(3.18) 0 T Ω u ε p v ε p ( α 1 ) | v ε | p = 0 T Ω | v ε | 4 v ε 3 1 3 u ε 4 3 v ε 4 α 1 3 0 T Ω | v ε | 4 v ε 3 + 0 T Ω u ε 2 v ε 4 α 1 2 0 T Ω | v ε | 4 v ε 3 + c 1 2 α 1 2 0 T Ω u ε 2 v ε α .

If α < 1 2 , then again by Young’s inequality,

(3.19) 0 T Ω u ε p v ε p ( α 1 ) | v ε | p = 0 T Ω u ε 2 v ε α p 2 v ε p ( α 2 ) 2 | v ε | p 0 T Ω u ε 2 v ε α + 0 T Ω v ε p ( α 2 ) 2 p | v ε | 2 p 2 p ,

where according to (1.18) we then have p 2 p = 1 1 α and thus, once more by Young’s inequality,

(3.20) 0 T Ω v ε p ( α 2 ) 2 p | v ε | 2 p 2 p = 0 T Ω v ε α 2 1 α | v ε | 2 1 α = 0 T Ω | v ε | 2 v ε 2 1 2 α 1 α v ε 3 α 1 α | v ε | 4 α 1 α 0 T Ω | v ε | 2 v ε 2 + 0 T Ω | v ε | 4 v ε 3 .

In view of (3.16)(3.20), the claim thus becomes a consequence of Lemma 3.4, Lemma 2.4, Corollary 3.1 and (2.12).□

A straightforward subsequence extraction now yields a global solution in the flavor of Theorem 1.1.

Lemma 3.6.

Assume (1.9), (1.10), (1.11) and (1.12) with some α ∈ (0, 1) and ξ 0 > 0, and let (1.13) hold. Then there exist ( ε j ) j N ( 0,1 ) as well as functions u and v fulfilling (1.14)(1.17) such that ɛ j ↘ 0 as j → ∞, that u ≥ 0 and v > 0 a.e. in Ω × (0, ∞), and that

(3.21) u ε u in  L loc 1 ( Ω ̄ × [ 0 , ) )  and a.e. in  Ω × ( 0 , ) ,

(3.22) v ε v in  L loc p ( Ω ̄ × [ 0 , ) )  for all  p [ 1 , )  and a.e. in  Ω × ( 0 , ) and

(3.23) v ε v in  L loc 2 ( Ω ̄ × [ 0 , ) )

as ɛ = ɛ j ↘ 0. Moreover, (1.15) holds, and (u, v) is a global weak solution of (1.5) in the sense of Definition 2.1.

Proof.

For fixed T > 0, from Lemma 3.4 we particularly obtain that with ɛ > 0 as introduced there,

(3.24) ( u ε ) ε ( 0 , ε )  is uniformly integrable over  Ω × ( 0 , T ) ,

while using Corollary 3.1 we find that

(3.25) ( v ε ) ε ( 0,1 )  is bounded in  L ( ( 0 , T ) ; W 1,2 ( Ω ) )  and in  L 2 ( ( 0 , T ) ; W 2,2 ( Ω ) ) ,

and that

(3.26) ( v ε t ) ε ( 0,1 )  is bounded in  L 2 ( Ω × ( 0 , T ) ) ,

which in line with an Aubin–Lions lemma ([34]) particularly means that

(3.27) ( v ε ) ε ( 0,1 )  is relatively compact with respect to the strong topology in  L 2 ( ( 0 , T ) ; W 1,2 ( Ω ) ) .

Apart from that, Lemma 2.8 together with Lemma 3.4, Corollary 3.1, Lemma 2.4, (2.8) and (2.9) ensures that

( u ε v ε 2 ) ε ( 0,1 )  is bounded in  L 1 ( ( 0 , T ) ; W 1,1 ( Ω ) )

and that whenever k N is such that k > n + 2 2 ,

t ( u ε v ε 2 ) ε ( 0,1 )  is bounded in  L 1 ( 0 , T ) ; W k , 2 ( Ω ) ,

and that thus, once more by an Aubin–Lions lemma,

( u ε v ε 2 ) ε ( 0,1 )  is relatively compact in  L 1 ( Ω × ( 0 , T ) ) .

In view of a standard extraction argument using (2.9), we accordingly infer the existence of ( ε j ) j N ( 0 , ε ) such that ɛ j ↘ 0 as j → ∞, and that (3.22) and (3.23) as well as

(3.28) u ε v ε 2 z a.e. in  Ω × ( 0 , ) as  ε = ε j 0

with some nonnegative functions v L ( Ω × ( 0 , ) ) L loc ( [ 0 , ) ; W 1,2 ( Ω ) ) L loc 2 ( [ 0 , ) ; W 2,2 ( Ω ) ) and z L loc 1 ( Ω ̄ × [ 0 , ) ) , about which due to (2.11) and Fatou’s lemma we even know that v > 0 a.e. in Ω × (0, ∞). Therefore, letting u z v 2 defines an a.e. in Ω × (0, ∞) finite measurable function u for which thanks to (3.28) and (3.22) we have u ɛ u a.e. in Ω × (0, ∞) as ɛ = ɛ j ↘ 0, and which thus satisfies (3.21), and hence due to (2.8) also (1.15), as a consequence of (3.24) and the Vitali convergence theorem. The inequality in (1.16) hence results from (3.21) and Lemma 3.4 upon an application of Fatou’s lemma, and to deduce (1.17) we note that since (3.24), (1.9) and (2.9) moreover entail that also ( u ε ϕ ε ( v ε ) ) ε ( 0 , ε ) is uniformly integrable over Ω × (0, T), by means of (3.22) and again the Vitali convergence theorem we infer that furthermore

(3.29) u ε ϕ ε ( v ε ) u ϕ ( v ) in  L loc 1 ( Ω ̄ × [ 0 , ) )

as ɛ = ɛ j ↘ 0. This enables us to identify corresponding weak limits obtained upon employing Lemma 3.5, according to which, namely, we know that with p(α) > 1 taken from (1.18), ( ( u ε ϕ ε ( v ε ) ) ) ε ( 0,1 ) is bounded, and hence relatively compact with respect to the weak topology, in L p (Ω × (0, T)) for all T > 0; therefore, (3.29) implies that

(3.30) u ε ϕ ε ( v ε ) u ϕ ( v ) in  L loc p ( α ) ( Ω ̄ × [ 0 , ) )

as ɛ = ɛ j ↘ 0, and that thus (u, v) especially satisfies (1.17).

Finally, for arbitrary φ C 0 ( Ω ̄ × [ 0 , ) ) , the identities in (2.3) and (2.4) can be derived in a straightforward manner from (3.21)(3.23) and (3.29), relying on the fact that according to (3.21) and (3.22), and once more thanks to the Vitali theorem, also u ε v ε 1 + ε u ε u v in L loc 1 ( Ω ̄ × [ 0 , ) ) as ɛ = ɛ j ↘ 0.□

Our main result on global solvability in the weakly degenerate case has, in fact, thereby been established:

Proof of Theorem 1.1.

The statement has fully been covered by Lemma 3.6 already.□

4 The case α ∈ [1, 2]. Proof of Theorem 1.2

In the context of the assumptions from Theorem 1.2, essentially due to local Lipschitz continuity of ϕ thereby implied we can refine our analysis already at a rather early stage as follows.

Lemma 4.1.

Assume (1.9), (1.10) and (1.11) with some α ≥ 1. Then there exists C > 0 such that

(4.1) 0 T Ω u ε 2 ϕ ε ( v ε ) + 0 T Ω u ε 2 v ε α C I ε ( T ) for all  T > 0  and  ε ( 0,1 ) ,

where we have set

(4.2) I ε ( T ) 1 + ε T + 0 T Ω ε u ε 2 v ε 1 + ε u ε for  T > 0  and  ε ( 0,1 ) .

Proof.

Let c 1 v 0 L ( Ω ) . Then noting that c 2 ϕ L ( [ 0 , c 1 ] ) is finite by (1.11) and our assumption that α ≥ 1, using (2.9) we see that ϕ ɛ (v ɛ ) ≤ c 2 v ɛ + ɛ in Ω × (0, ∞) for all ɛ ∈ (0, 1). Therefore, an integration of (2.13) shows that

(4.3) 1 2 Ω A 1 2 ( u ε ( , T ) u ̄ 0 ) 2 + 0 T Ω u ε 2 ϕ ε ( v ε ) 1 2 Ω A 1 2 ( u 0 u ̄ 0 ) 2 + 2 u ̄ 0 2 | Ω | ε T + c 2 u ̄ 0 0 T Ω u ε v ε for all  T > 0  and  ε ( 0,1 ) .

Here, again relying on (2.9) we may estimate ϕ ε ( v ε ) c 3 v ε α in Ω × (0, ∞) for all ɛ ∈ (0, 1), with c 3 inf ξ [ 0 , c 1 ] ϕ ( ξ ) ξ α being positive by (1.10), so that again

0 T Ω u ε 2 ϕ ε ( v ε ) 1 2 0 T Ω u ε 2 ϕ ε ( v ε ) + c 3 2 0 T Ω u ε 2 v ε α for all  T > 0  and  ε ( 0,1 ) .

Since furthermore

0 T Ω u ε v ε = 0 T Ω u ε v ε 1 + ε u ε + 0 T Ω ε u ε 2 v ε 1 + ε u ε Ω v 0 + 0 T Ω ε u ε 2 v ε 1 + ε u ε for all  T > 0  and  ε ( 0,1 )

by (2.10), from (4.3) we thus obtain (4.1) with some appropriately large C > 0.□

Now of crucial relevance in an appropriate handling of the stronger degeneracies from Theorem 1.2 will be the observation that not only for α ∈ (0, 1) as in the previous part, but also for some α ≥ 1, the accordingly weaker regularity information then gained from bounds for 0 T Ω u ε 2 v ε α can be turned into expedient knowledge on the respective second solution components. Our considerations in this direction will be rooted in the following outcome of elementary calculus.

Lemma 4.2.

Let α ∈ (1, 2). Then for all φ C 2 ( Ω ̄ ) fulfilling φ > 0 in Ω ̄ and φ ν = 0 on Ω, we have

(4.4) 2 Ω φ α 2 | D 2 φ | 2 ( α 2 ) Ω φ α 3 φ | φ | 2 + ( α 2 ) Ω φ α 3 | φ | 2 Δ φ = 2 ( α 1 ) 2 Ω φ α + 2 | D 2 φ α 1 | 2 ( α 1 ) ( 2 α ) Ω φ α 4 | φ | 4

as well as

(4.5) Ω φ α 2 | D 2 φ | 2 2 ( α 1 ) 2 Ω φ α + 2 | D 2 φ α 1 | 2 + 2 ( α 2 ) 2 Ω φ α 4 | φ | 4

for any such φ.

Proof.

In view of a standard approximation procedure, we only need to consider the case when additionally φ C 3 ( Ω ̄ ) . We may then integrate by parts to rewrite

( α 2 ) Ω φ α 3 φ | φ | 2 + ( α 2 ) Ω φ α 3 | φ | 2 Δ φ = 4 ( α 2 ) Ω φ α 3 φ ( D 2 φ φ ) ( α 2 ) ( α 3 ) Ω φ α 4 | φ | 4 ,

and to thus obtain (4.4) by using the pointwise identity

(4.6) | D 2 φ | 2 = 1 ( α 1 ) 2 φ 4 2 α | D 2 φ α 1 | 2 2 ( α 2 ) 1 φ φ ( D 2 φ φ ) ( α 2 ) 2 | φ | 4 φ 2 .

Since, again by (4.6), and by Young’s inequality, any such φ satisfies

| D 2 φ | 2 1 ( α 1 ) 2 φ 4 2 α | D 2 φ α 1 | 2 + 1 2 | D 2 φ | 2 + 2 ( α 2 ) 2 | φ | 4 φ 2 ( α 2 ) 2 | φ | 4 φ 2

and thus

| D 2 φ | 2 2 ( α 1 ) 2 φ 4 2 α | D 2 φ α 1 | 2 + 2 ( α 2 ) 2 | φ | 4 φ 2 ,

the inequality in (4.5) follows after multiplication by φ α−2 and integration.□

When (1.9) and (1.10) hold with some α ∈ (1, 2), controlling cross-diffusive gradients through (4.1) thereby becomes possible by means of another independent testing procedure applied to the second equation from (2.5):

Lemma 4.3.

Assume (1.9) and (1.10) with some α ∈ (1, 2). Then there exists C > 0 such that

(4.7) 0 T Ω v ε α 4 | v ε | 4 C I ε ( T ) for all  T > 0  and  ε ( 0,1 ) ,

where ( I ε ) ε ( 0,1 ) is as defined through (4.2).

Proof.

We use the second equation in (2.5) and integrate by parts to see that again since for all ɛ ∈ (0, 1) we have v ε Δ v ε = 1 2 Δ | v ε | 2 | D 2 v ε | 2 in Ω × (0, ∞) and | v ε | 2 ν 0 on Ω × (0, ∞) by convexity of Ω ([31]),

(4.8) d d t Ω v ε α 2 | v ε | 2 = 2 Ω v ε α 2 v ε Δ v ε v ε u ε v ε 1 + ε u ε + ( α 2 ) Ω v ε α 3 | v ε | 2 Δ v ε u ε v ε 1 + ε u ε = Ω v ε α 2 Δ | v ε | 2 2 Ω v ε α 2 | D 2 v ε | 2 + ( α 2 ) × Ω v ε α 3 | v ε | 2 Δ v ε + 2 Ω u ε v ε 1 + ε u ε ( v ε α 2 v ε ) ( α 2 ) Ω u ε v ε α 2 1 + ε u ε | v ε | 2 = ( α 2 ) Ω v ε α 3 v ε | v ε | 2 + Ω v ε α 2 | v ε | 2 ν 2 Ω v ε α 2 | D 2 v ε | 2 + ( α 2 ) Ω v ε α 3 | v ε | 2 Δ v ε + 2 Ω u ε v ε α 1 1 + ε u ε Δ v ε + ( α 2 ) Ω u ε v ε α 2 1 + ε u ε | v ε | 2 ( α 2 ) Ω v ε α 3 v ε | v ε | 2 2 Ω v ε α 2 | D 2 v ε | 2 + ( α 2 ) Ω v ε α 3 | v ε | 2 Δ v ε + 2 Ω u ε v ε α 1 1 + ε u ε Δ v ε for all  t > 0  and  ε ( 0,1 ) ,

because α ≤ 2. Here according to (4.4),

(4.9) ( α 2 ) Ω v ε α 3 v ε | v ε | 2 2 Ω v ε α 2 | D 2 v ε | 2 + ( α 2 ) Ω v ε α 3 | v ε | 2 Δ v ε = 2 ( α 1 ) 2 Ω v ε α + 2 | D 2 v ε α 1 | 2 ( α 1 ) ( 2 α ) Ω v ε α 4 | v ε | 4

for all t > 0 and ɛ ∈ (0, 1), while thanks to the second statement in Lemma 4.2 we can fix c 1 > 0 such that

(4.10) 2 ( α 1 ) 2 Ω v ε α + 2 | D 2 v ε α 1 | 2 + ( α 1 ) ( 2 α ) 2 Ω v ε α 4 | v ε | 4 c 1 Ω v ε α 2 | Δ v ε | 2

for all t > 0 and ɛ ∈ (0, 1). We thereupon employ Young’s inequality to see that

2 Ω u ε v ε α 1 1 + ε u ε Δ v ε c 1 Ω v ε α 2 | Δ v ε | 2 + 1 c 1 Ω u ε 2 v ε α ( 1 + ε u ε ) 2 c 1 Ω v ε α 2 | Δ v ε | 2 + 1 c 1 Ω u ε 2 v ε α for all  t > 0  and  ε ( 0,1 ) ,

whence combining this with (4.8)(4.10) shows that

d d t Ω v ε α 2 | v ε | 2 + ( α 1 ) ( 2 α ) 2 Ω v ε α 4 | v ε | 4 1 c 1 Ω u ε 2 v ε α for all  t > 0  and  ε ( 0,1 ) .

In view of Lemma 2.4, an integration in time completes the proof.□

Combining this with previous knowledge yields the following summary of regularity features enjoyed by ( v ε ) ε ( 0,1 ) throughout the entire range of parameters α ∈ [1, 2].

Corollary 4.4.

If (1.9) and (1.10) hold with some α ∈ [1, 2], then there exists C > 0 such that with ( I ε ) ε ( 0,1 ) taken from (4.2) we have

(4.11) Ω | v ε ( , t ) | 2 C I ε ( t ) for all  t ( 0 , T ) , any  T > 0  and each  ε ( 0,1 )

as well as

(4.12) 0 T Ω | Δ v ε | 2 + 0 T Ω v ε t 2 C I ε ( T ) for all  T > 0  and  ε ( 0,1 )

and

(4.13) 0 T Ω v ε α 4 | v ε | 4 C I ε ( T ) for all  T > 0  and  ε ( 0,1 ) .

Proof.

The estimates in (4.11) and (4.12) directly result from Lemma 2.6 and Lemma 2.4. To confirm (4.13), we note that in the case when α = 1, this immediately follows from Lemma 2.7 when combined with Lemma 2.4, while if α = 2, then we may similarly conclude using Lemma 2.6 together with Lemma 2.4. When α ∈ (1, 2), (4.13) has precisely been asserted by Lemma 4.3.□

Instead of relying on (1.8), we can now directly estimate the integral on the right-hand side of (2.16) to achieve the following boundedness information which partially parallels that from Lemma 3.4 in its outcome, but which significantly differs from the latter with regard to its derivation.

Lemma 4.5.

Suppose that there exists α ∈ [1, 2] such that (1.9), (1.10) and (1.11) hold. Then there exists C > 0 such that with ( I ε ) ε ( 0,1 ) taken from (4.2) we have

(4.14) Ω u ε ( , t ) ln u ε ( , t ) C I ε ( T ) for all  t ( 0 , T ) ,  each  T > 0  and any  ε ( 0,1 )

as well as

(4.15) 0 T Ω ϕ ε ( v ε ) | u ε | 2 u ε C I ε ( T ) for all  T > 0  and  ε ( 0,1 ) .

Proof.

Based on (1.11), (1.10) and (2.9), we fix c 1 > 0 and c 2 > 0 such that | ϕ ε ( v ε ) | c 1 v ε α 1 and ϕ ε ( v ε ) c 2 v ε α in Ω × (0, ∞) for all ɛ ∈ (0, 1). Then relying on Young’s inequality, from Lemma 2.5 we infer that

d d t Ω u ε ln u ε + Ω ϕ ε ( v ε ) | u ε | 2 u ε = Ω ϕ ε ( v ε ) u ε v ε 1 2 Ω ϕ ε ( v ε ) | u ε | 2 u ε + 1 2 Ω u ε ϕ ε 2 ( v ε ) ϕ ε ( v ε ) | v ε | 2 1 2 Ω ϕ ε ( v ε ) | u ε | 2 u ε + c 1 2 2 c 2 Ω u ε v ε α 2 | v ε | 2 1 2 Ω ϕ ε ( v ε ) | u ε | 2 u ε + c 1 2 4 c 2 Ω v ε α 4 | v ε | 4 + c 1 2 4 c 2 Ω u ε 2 v ε α for all  t > 0  and  ε ( 0,1 ) .

The claim therefore results upon an integration using Lemma 2.4 and Corollary 4.4.□

Again, integrability features of fluxes can be gained by suitable interpolation:

Lemma 4.6.

Assume (1.9), (1.10) and (1.11) with some α ∈ [1, 2]. Then there exists C > 0 such that

(4.16) 0 T Ω ( u ε ϕ ε ( v ε ) ) 4 3 C I ε ( T ) for all  T > 0  and  ε ( 0,1 ) ,

where again ( I ε ) ε ( 0,1 ) is taken from (4.2).

Proof.

We proceed similarly as in Lemma 3.5 to see that thanks to Young’s inequality, (1.9), (1.11) and (2.9), we can find positive constants c 1 and c 2 such that for any t > 0 and ɛ ∈ (0, 1) we have

(4.17) Ω ( u ε ϕ ε ( v ε ) ) 4 3 c 1 Ω ϕ ε 4 3 ( v ε ) | u ε | 4 3 + c 1 Ω u ε 4 3 v ε 4 ( α 1 ) 3 | v ε | 4 3 c 1 Ω ϕ ε ( v ε ) | u ε | 2 u ε + c 1 Ω u ε 2 ϕ ε 2 ( v ε ) + c 1 Ω v ε α 4 | v ε | 4 + c 1 Ω u ε 2 v ε 3 α 2 c 1 Ω ϕ ε ( v ε ) | u ε | 2 u ε + c 2 Ω u ε 2 ϕ ε ( v ε ) + c 1 Ω v ε α 4 | v ε | 4 + c 2 Ω u ε 2 v ε α .

In view of Lemma 4.5, Lemma 2.4 and Corollary 4.4 an integration of (4.17) yields (4.16).□

Now to prepare an exploitation of the estimates from Lemma 4.5, Corollary 4.4 and Lemma 4.6 on fixed time intervals, we record a rough preliminary estimate for the expressions in (4.2).

Lemma 4.7.

If (1.9), (1.10) and (1.11) hold with some α ≥ 1, then the numbers from (4.2) satisfy

(4.18) I ε ( T ) 1 + T + u ̄ 0 v 0 L ( Ω ) | Ω | T for all  T > 0  and  ε ( 0,1 ) .

Proof.

Trivially estimating ε u ε 1 + ε u ε 1 for ɛ ∈ (0, 1), from (2.9) and (2.8) we obtain that

Ω ε u ε 2 v ε 1 + ε u ε Ω u ε v ε u ̄ 0 v 0 L ( Ω ) | Ω | for all  t > 0  and  ε ( 0,1 ) ,

whence (4.18) directly results from (4.2).□

Having this at hand, we can adapt the reasoning from Lemma 3.6, supplemented by an additional argument deriving (1.19) and (1.20) by means of a refined treatment of ( I ε ) ε ( 0,1 ) , to construct global solutions in the sense claimed in Theorem 1.2:

Lemma 4.8.

Suppose that there exists α ∈ [1, 2] such that (1.9), (1.10) and (1.11) hold, and assume (1.13). Then there exists ( ε j ) j N ( 0,1 ) such that ɛj ↘ 0 as j → ∞ and that (3.21)(3.23) hold with some functions u and v which satisfy (1.14) with u ≥ 0 and v > 0 a.e. in Ω × (0, ∞), for which (1.15), (1.19) and (1.20) hold, and which are such that (u, v) forms a global weak solution of (1.5) in the sense of Definition 2.1.

Proof.

In a first step estimating the elements of ( I ε ) ε ( 0,1 ) via Lemma 4.7, we can proceed in much the same manner as in Lemma 3.6, this time relying on Lemma 4.5, Corollary 4.4 and Lemma 4.6, to extract ( ε j ) j N such that ɛ j ↘ 0 as j → ∞, and that (3.21)(3.23) are valid with some global weak solution (u, v) of (1.5) which satisfy (1.14) as well as u ≥ 0 and v > 0 a.e. in Ω × (0, ∞), and for which (1.15) holds. It thus remains to verify the additional regularity properties in (1.19) and (1.20), for which purpose we may now rely on (3.21) and (3.22) to see that ε u ε 2 v ε 1 + ε u ε 0 a.e. in Ω × (0, ∞) as ɛ = ɛ j ↘ 0, so that since

0 ε u ε 2 v ε 1 + ε u ε = ε u ε 1 + ε u ε v ε u ε v 0 L ( Ω ) u ε in  Ω × ( 0 , ) for all  ε ( 0,1 )

according to (2.9), the L 1 approximation feature in (3.21) ensures that for each fixed T > 0,

0 T Ω ε u ε 2 v ε 1 + ε u ε 0 as  ε = ε j 0

due to the dominated convergence theorem. Hence, for any such T we infer from (4.2) that

I ε ( T ) 1 as  ε = ε j 0 ,

so that revisiting Lemma 4.5, Corollary 4.4 and Lemma 4.6 provides c 1 > 0, c 2 > 0 and c 3 > 0 with the property that whenever T > 0, we can find ɛ 0(T) ∈ (0, 1) such that

Ω u ε ln u ε c 1 and Ω | v ε | 2 c 2 for all  t ( 0 , T )  and  ε ( ε j ) j N ( 0 , ε 0 ( T ) )

as well as

0 T Ω v ε α 4 | v ε | 4 + 0 T Ω ( u ε ϕ ε ( v ε ) ) 4 3 c 3 for all  ε ( ε j ) j N ( 0 , ε 0 ( T ) ) .

In view of (3.21)(3.23), Fatou’s lemma and lower semicontinuity of L p norms with respect to weak convergence, taking ɛ = ɛ j ↘ 0 we therefore readily obtain that

Ω u ln u c 1 and Ω | v | 2 c 2 for a.e.  t > 0 ,

and that

0 T Ω v α 4 | v | 4 + 0 T Ω ( u ϕ ( v ) ) 4 3 c 3 for all  T > 0 ,

meaning that indeed both (1.19) and (1.20) hold.□

Also in the more strongly degenerate setting addressed in Theorem 1.2, we have thus found global solutions which even enjoy the additional boundedness and decay features expressed in (1.19) and (1.20):

Proof of Theorem 1.2.

We only need to apply Lemma 4.8.□


Corresponding author: Michael Winkler, Universität Paderborn, Institut für Mathematik, 33098 Paderborn, Germany, E-mail:

Funding source: „Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft“

Award Identifier / Grant number: Project No. 462888149

Acknowledgment

The author thanks both reviewers for careful reading and fruitful remarks.

  1. Research ethics: Not applicable.

  2. Author contributions: The author has accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Competing interests: The author states no conflict of interest.

  4. Research funding: „Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft“ (Project No. 462888149).

  5. Data availability: Not applicable.

References

[1] J. Belmonte-Beitia, T. E. Woolley, J. G. Scott, P. K. Maini, and E. A. Gaffney, “Modelling biological invasions: individual to population scales at interfaces,” J. Theor. Biol., vol. 334, pp. 1–12, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2013.05.033.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[2] C. Engwer, A. Hunt, and C. Surulescu, “Effective equations for anisotropic glioma spread with proliferation: a multiscale approach and comparisons with previous settings,” Math. Med. Biol., vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 435–459, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1093/imammb/dqv030.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[3] X. Fu, L. H. Tang, C. Liu, J. D. Huang, T. Hwa, and P. Lenz, “Stripe formation in bacterial systems with density-suppressed motility,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 180, 2012, Art. no. 198102. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.108.198102.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[4] C. Liu, et al.., “Sequential establishment of stripe patterns in an expanding cell population,” Science, vol. 334, no. 6053, pp. 238–241, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1209042.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[5] H. G. Othmer and A. Stevens, “Aggregation, blowup and collapse: the ABC’s of taxis in reinforced random walks,” SIAM J. Appl. Math., vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 1044–1081, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1137/s0036139995288976.Search in Google Scholar

[6] E. F. Keller2 and L. A. Segel, “Model for chemotaxis,” J. Theor. Biol., vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 225–234, 1971. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(71)90050-6.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[7] E. F. Keller and L. A. Segel, “Initiation of slime mold aggregation viewed as an instability,” J. Theor. Biol., vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 399–415, 1970. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(70)90092-5.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[8] J. Ahn and C. Yoon, “Global well-posedness and stability of constant equilibria in parabolic-elliptic chemotaxis systems without gradient sensing,” Nonlinearity, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 1327–1351, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6544/aaf513.Search in Google Scholar

[9] M. Burger, P. Laurençot, and A. Trescases, “Delayed blow-up for chemotaxis models with local sensing,” J. Lond. Math. Soc., vol. 103, no. 4, pp. 1596–1617, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1112/jlms.12420.Search in Google Scholar

[10] K. Fujie and J. Jiang, “Global existence for a kinetic model of pattern formation with density-suppressed motilities,” J. Differ. Equ., vol. 269, no. 6, pp. 5338–5378, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2020.04.001.Search in Google Scholar

[11] K. Fujie and J. Jiang, “Comparison methods for a Keller-Segel-type model of pattern formations with density-suppressed motilities,” Calc. Var. Partial Differ. Equ., vol. 60, no. 3, 2021, Art. no. 92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00526-021-01943-5.Search in Google Scholar

[12] K. Fujie and J. Jiang, “Boundedness of classical solutions to a degenerate Keller-Segel type model with signal-dependent motilities,” Acta Appl. Math., vol. 176, 2021, Art. no. 3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10440-021-00450-1.Search in Google Scholar

[13] K. Fujie and T. Senba, “Global existence and infinite time blow-up of classical solutions to chemotaxis systems of local sensing in higher dimensions,” Nonlinear Anal. Theory Methods Appl., vol. 222, 2022, Art. no. 112987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.na.2022.112987.Search in Google Scholar

[14] J. Jiang and P. Laurençot, “Global existence and uniform boundedness in a chemotaxis model with signal-dependent motility,” J. Differ. Equ., vol. 299, pp. 513–541, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2021.07.029.Search in Google Scholar

[15] Y. Tao and M. Winkler, “Effects of signal-dependent motilities in a Keller-Segel-type reaction-diffusion system,” Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci., vol. 27, no. 9, pp. 1645–1683, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1142/s0218202517500282.Search in Google Scholar

[16] H.-Y. Jin, Y.-J. Kim, and Z.-A. Wang, “Boundedness, stabilization, and pattern formation driven by density-suppressed motility,” SIAM J. Appl. Math., vol. 78, no. 3, pp. 1632–1657, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1137/17m1144647.Search in Google Scholar

[17] W. Lv and Q. Wang, “Global existence for a class of chemotaxis systems with signal-dependent motility, indirect signal production and generalized logistic source,” Z. Angew. Math. Phys., vol. 71, no. 2, 2020, Art. no. 53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00033-020-1276-y.Search in Google Scholar

[18] W. Lv and Q. Wang, “Global existence for a class of Keller-Segel model with signal-dependent motility and general logistic term,” Evol. Equ. Control Theory, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 25–36, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3934/eect.2020040.Search in Google Scholar

[19] W. Lv and Q. Wang, “A n-dimensional chemotaxis system with signal-dependent motility and generalized logistic source: global existence and asymptotic stabilization,” Proc. R. Soc. Edinburgh, Sect. A, vol. 151, no. 2, pp. 821–841, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1017/prm.2020.38.Search in Google Scholar

[20] J. Wang and M. Wang, “Boundedness in the higher-dimensional Keller-Segel model with signal-dependent motility and logistic growth,” J. Math. Phys., vol. 60, no. 1, 2019, Art. no. 011507. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5061738.Search in Google Scholar

[21] M. Winkler, “Can simultaneous density-determined enhancement of diffusion and cross-diffusion foster boundedness in Keller-Segel type systems involving signal-dependent motilities?” Nonlinearity, vol. 33, no. 12, pp. 6590–6623, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6544/ab9bae.Search in Google Scholar

[22] C. Xu and Y. Wang, “Asymptotic behavior of a quasilinear Keller-Segel system with signal-suppressed motility,” Calc. Var. Partial Differ. Equ., vol. 60, no. 5, 2021, Art. no. 183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00526-021-02053-y.Search in Google Scholar

[23] G. Li and M. Winkler, “Relaxation in a Keller-Segel-consumption system involving signal-dependent motilities,” Commun. Math. Sci., vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 299–322, 2023. https://doi.org/10.4310/cms.2023.v21.n2.a1.Search in Google Scholar

[24] D. Li and J. Zhao, “Global boundedness and large time behavior of solutions to a chemotaxis-consumption system with signal-dependent motility,” Z. Angew. Math. Phys., vol. 72, no. 2, 2021, Art. no. 57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00033-021-01493-y.Search in Google Scholar

[25] K. Kawasaki, A. Mochizuki, K. Matsushita, T. Umeda, and N. Shigesada, “Modeling spatio-temporal patterns generated by Bacillus subtilis,” J. Theor. Biol., vol. 188, no. 2, pp. 177–185, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1006/jtbi.1997.0462.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[26] J. F. Leyva, C. Málaga, and R. G. Plaza, “The effects of nutrient chemotaxis on bacterial aggregation patterns with non-linear degenerate cross diffusion,” Phys. A, vol. 392, no. 22, pp. 5644–5662, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2013.07.022.Search in Google Scholar

[27] M. Winkler, “A quantitative strong parabolic maximum principle and application to a taxis-type migration-consumption model involving signal-dependent degenerate diffusion,” Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré, Anal. Non Linéaire., vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 95–127, 202410.4171/aihpc/73Search in Google Scholar

[28] M. Winkler, “Application of the Moser-Trudinger inequality in the constuction of global solutions to a strongly degenerate migration model,” Bull. Math. Sci., vol. 13, no. 2, 2023, Art. no. 2250012. https://doi.org/10.1142/s1664360722500126.Search in Google Scholar

[29] M. Winkler, “Stabilization despite pervasive strong cross-degeneracies in a nonlinear diffusion model for migration-consumption interaction,” Nonlinearity, vol. 36, no. 8, pp. 4438–4469, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6544/ace22e.Search in Google Scholar

[30] P. Laurençot, “Long term spatial homogeneity for a chemotaxis model with local sensing and consumption,” Commun. Math. Sci., vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 1743–1750, 2023. https://doi.org/10.4310/cms.2023.v21.n6.a14.Search in Google Scholar

[31] P. L. Lions, “Résolution de problèmes elliptiques quasilinéaires,” Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., vol. 74, pp. 335–353, 1980. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00249679.Search in Google Scholar

[32] M. Winkler, “Global large-data solutions in a chemotaxis-(Navier-)Stokes system modeling cellular swimming in fluid drops,” Commun. Partial Differ. Equ., vol. 37, nos. 1–3, pp. 319–351, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1080/03605302.2011.591865.Search in Google Scholar

[33] M. Winkler, “Approaching logarithmic singularities in quasilinear chemotaxis-consumption systems with signal-dependent sensitivities,” Discrete Continuous Dyn. Syst. Ser. B, vol. 27, no. 11, pp. 6565–6587, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3934/dcdsb.2022009.Search in Google Scholar

[34] R. Temam, “Navier-Stokes equations. Theory and numerical analysis,” in Studies in Mathematics and its Applications, vol. 2, Amsterdam, North-Holland, 1977.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2023-12-18
Accepted: 2024-03-15
Published Online: 2024-04-30

© 2024 the author(s), published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloaded on 24.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ans-2023-0131/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button