Home Mathematics Theoretical analysis of a water wave model with a nonlocal viscous dispersive term using the diffusive approach
Article Open Access

Theoretical analysis of a water wave model with a nonlocal viscous dispersive term using the diffusive approach

  • EMAIL logo and
Published/Copyright: February 21, 2017

Abstract

In this paper, we study the following water wave model with a nonlocal viscous term:

u t + u x + β u x x x + ν π t 0 t u ( s ) t - s 𝑑 s + u u x = ν u x x ,

where 1 π t 0 t u ( s ) t - s 𝑑 s is the Riemann–Liouville half-order derivative. We prove the well-posedness of this model using diffusive realization of the half-order derivative, and we discuss the asymptotic convergence of the solution. Also, we compare our mathematical results with those given in [5] and [14] for similar equations.

MSC 2010: 35Q35; 35Q53; 35L05

1 Introduction

1.1 State of the art

The modeling and the mathematical analysis of water wave propagation are challenging issues. When the viscosity is neglected, it is classical to derive the so-called Boussinesq system or the Korteweg–de Vries equation from the Euler equations [3]. Taking into account the effects of viscosity on the propagation of long waves is a very important challenge and many studies have been carried out in the last decade. The pioneering work for this issue is due to Kakutani and Matsuuchi [12]. Recently, Liu and Orfila [13], and Dutykh and Dias [7] have independently derived viscous asymptotic models for transient long-wave propagation on viscous shallow water. These effects appear as nonlocal terms in the form of convolution integrals. A one-dimensional nonlinear system is presented in [6].

In their recent work [5], Chen et al. investigated theoretically and numerically the decay rate of solutions to the following water wave model with a nonlocal viscous dispersive term:

(1.1) u t + u x + β u x x x + ν π 0 t u t ( s ) t - s 𝑑 s + u u x = α u x x ,

where 1 π 0 t u t ( s ) t - s 𝑑 s represents the Caputo half-derivative in time. Here u is the horizontal velocity of the fluid, - α u x x is the usual diffusion, β u x x x is the geometric dispersion and 1 π 0 t u t ( s ) t - s 𝑑 s stands for the nonlocal diffusive-dispersive term. We denote by β, ν and α the parameters dedicated to balance or unbalance the effects of viscosity and dispersion against nonlinear effects. Particularly, Chen et al. [5] considered (1.1) with β = 0 supplemented with the initial condition u 0 L 1 ( ) L 2 ( ) . They proved that if u 0 L 1 ( ) is small enough, then there exists a unique global solution u C ( + ; L x 2 ( ) ) C 1 ( + ; H x - 2 ( ) ) . In addition, u satisfies

t 1 / 4 u ( t , ) L x 2 ( ) + t 1 / 2 u ( t , ) L x ( ) < C ( u 0 ) .

It is worth pointing out that this result is valid only for small initial data. Moreover, in a recent work [14], the second author investigated a derived model from (1.1), where the fractional term is described by the Riemann–Liouville half derivative instead of that of Caputo, namely,

(1.2) u t + u x + β u x x x + ν π t 0 t u ( s ) t - s 𝑑 s + u u x = α u x x .

She proved the local and global existence of solutions to problem (1.2) when β = 0 using a fixed point theorem. Then she studied theoretically the decay rate of the solutions in this case. She established that if u 0 L 1 ( ) is small enough, then there exists a unique global solution u C ( + ; L x 2 ( ) ) C 1 / 2 ( + ; H x - 2 ( ) ) . Besides, she proved that the solution u satisfies

max ( t 1 / 4 , t 3 / 4 ) u ( t , ) L x 2 ( ) + max ( t 1 / 2 , t ) u ( t , ) L x ( ) C ( u 0 ) .

In addition, she performed numerical simulations on the decay rate of the solutions for different values of the parameters α, ν and β.

However, all these results are performed assuming a smallness condition on the initial data. In order to remove this condition and to investigate model (1.2) for a large class of initial data, we introduce here the concept of diffusive realizations for the half-order derivative. This approach was initially developed during the last decade by numerous authors in the automatic community, see [21]. Diffusive realization make possible to represent nonlocal in time operators, and more generally causal pseudo-differential operators, in a state space model formulation where the state belongs to an appropriate Hilbert space. Moreover, this formulation is local in time. Hence, the new system is easier to solve analytically and numerically, see [4]. For more details, we refer the reader to [19, 18, 22, 23]. Different applications of this concept in many scientific domains may be find in [1, 2, 9, 8, 11, 15, 16, 20]. However, this list is by no means exhaustive.

In this paper, we assume that the effects of the geometric dispersion in (1.2) is less important than the viscosity effects (i.e., we take β = 0 in (1.2)), and we assume that the other constants are normalized. Thus, our model is reduced as follows:

(1.3) u t + u x + 1 π t 0 t u ( s ) t - s 𝑑 s + u u x = u x x .

We aim to discuss the convergence of the solution u to zero, removing the assumption of smallness of the initial data. To this end, we complete the introduction as follows. We first introduce the diffusive formulation of the half-order Riemann–Liouville derivative. Then we deduce the mathematical model that derives from (1.3) using the diffusive approach. Finally, we state the main results of this article to conclude the introduction.

1.2 Diffusive formulation of the model

We now describe the mathematical framework. We denote by

I 1 / 2 ( t ) = 1 π 0 t u ( s ) t - s 𝑑 s

the Riemann–Liouville half-order integral and by

D 1 / 2 u ( t ) = d d t I 1 / 2 u ( t ) = 1 π d d t 0 t u ( s ) t - s 𝑑 s

the Riemann–Liouville half-order derivative.

The diffusive realization requires to introduce a new variable y that is not physically relevant. To begin with, we fix x and recall that a realization of the half-order integral I 1 / 2 u ( t ) is given, for all t > 0 , by

(1.4) { t Φ ( t , y ) = Φ y y ( t , y ) + u ( t ) δ y = 0 , Φ ( 0 , y ) = 0 , y , I 1 / 2 u ( t ) = 2 δ y = 0 , Φ ( t , y ) 𝒟 , 𝒟 = 2 Φ ( t , 0 ) ,

where δ y = 0 is the Dirac delta function at y = 0 and u ( t ) δ y = 0 is the tensorial product in the distributions sense of the applications t u ( t ) and y δ y = 0 .

In order to get the diffusive realization of the Riemann–Liouville half-order derivative, we derive the half-order derivative in (1.4) with respect to time. Thus, we get

(1.5) { t Φ ( t , y ) = Φ y y ( t , y ) + u ( t ) δ y = 0 , Φ ( 0 , y ) = 0 , y , D 1 / 2 u ( t ) = 2 δ y = 0 , t Φ ( t , y ) 𝒟 , 𝒟 = 2 d d t Φ ( t , 0 ) .

Now, we extend the diffusive realization (1.5) for u ( t ) L x 2 ( ) . The previous definition is valid for almost every x. To define the mathematical framework, we define the vector space

X = { v L 2 ( 2 ) | ( x , y ) v y L 2 ( 2 ) } .

We note that X is a Hilbert space for the scalar product

( v , w ) X = ( v , w ) L 2 ( 2 ) + ( v y , w y ) L 2 ( 2 ) for all  v , w X .

The corresponding norm is

v X = v L 2 ( 2 ) 2 + v y L 2 ( 2 ) 2 for all  v X .

Hence, the application

(1.6) Γ : X L 2 ( ) , ϕ ( t ) Γ ( ϕ ) ( t , x ) = ϕ ( t , x , y = 0 ) ,

is a linear and continuous operator. Its dual map Γ * is defined as

(1.7) Γ * : L x 2 ( ) X , u ( t ) Γ * ( u ) ( t , x ) = u ( t , x ) δ y = 0 ,

where X is the dual space of X.

Taking into account the previous notations and results, we define the diffusive realization of the Riemann–Liouville half-order derivative D 1 / 2 u ( t , x ) , for all t > 0 and x , as follows:

(1.8) { t Φ ( t , x , y ) = Φ y y ( t , x , y ) + Γ * ( u ) ( t , x ) , Φ ( 0 , x , y ) = 0 , x , y , D 1 / 2 u ( t , x ) = 2 d d t Γ ( Φ ) ( t , x ) ,

where Γ and Γ * are defined in (1.6) and (1.7), respectively. Thanks to the diffusive realization (1.8), problem (1.3) reads as follows:

(1.9) { u t ( t , x ) + 2 t ( Γ ( Φ ) ) ( t , x ) + u x ( t , x ) - u x x ( t , x ) + u ( t , x ) u x ( t , x ) = 0 , t > 0 , x , Φ t ( t , x , y ) - Φ y y ( t , x , y ) - Γ * ( u ) ( t , x ) = 0 , t > 0 , x , y , u ( 0 , x ) = u 0 ( x ) , x , Φ ( 0 , x , y ) = 0 , x , y .

1.3 Main results

First, we introduce the following notations:

  1. L x 2 = L 2 ( x ) , with ( , ) being the scalar product and | | L x 2 being the norm.

  2. 𝕃 x , y 2 = 𝕃 2 ( 2 ) = 𝕃 2 ( x × y ) ,with [ , ] being the scalar product and 𝕃 x , y 2 being the norm.

  3. H x 1 = H 1 ( ) and x , y 1 = 1 ( 2 ) = 1 ( x × y ) , with , being the duality product between H x 1 and H x 1 and , being the duality product between x , y 1 and x , y - 1 .

  4. C w ( [ 0 , T ] , L 2 ( ) ) is the space of weakly continuous functions on [ 0 , T ] that take values in L 2 ( ) .

The diffusive equation (1.9) is only partially diffusive since the Laplace operator acts with respect to the y variable and not to the x variable. For the sake of convenience, we introduce a (completely) parabolic regularization of this system that reads as follows:

(1.10) { u t ( t , x ) + 2 t ( Γ ( Φ ) ) ( t , x ) + u x ( t , x ) - u x x ( t , x ) + u ( t , x ) u x ( t , x ) = 0 , t > 0 , x , Φ t ( t , x , y ) - Φ y y ( t , x , y ) - ε Φ x x ( t , x , y ) - Γ * ( u ) ( t , x ) = 0 , t > 0 , x , y , u ( 0 , x ) = u 0 ( x ) , x , Φ ( 0 , x , y ) = 0 , x , y .

A first auxiliary result is the following.

Theorem 1.1.

For all initial data u 0 L 2 ( R ) , the regularized problem (1.10) has a unique global weak solution ( u ε , Φ ε ) such that for all T > 0 ,

  1. u ε L ( 0 , T , L x 2 ( ) ) C w ( [ 0 , T ] , L x 2 ( ) ) L 2 ( ( 0 , T ) , H x 1 ( ) ) ,

  2. Φ ε L ( 0 , T , x , y 1 ( 2 ) ) C ( [ 0 , T ] , 𝕃 x , y 2 ( 2 ) ) .

The second main result states as follows.

Theorem 1.2.

For all initial data u 0 L 2 ( R ) , the problem (1.9) has a unique global weak solution ( u , Φ ) . Moreover, for all T > 0 ,

  1. u L ( + , L x 2 ( ) ) C w ( + , L x 2 ( ) ) L 2 ( ( 0 , T ) , H x 1 ( ) ) ,

  2. Φ C ( + , 𝕃 x , y 2 ( 2 ) ) L ( ( 0 , T ) , X ) .

Concerning the issue of convergence of solutions towards 0 when t tends to + , we have the following result.

Proposition 1.3.

The solution u of equation (1.3) satisfies

(1.11) lim t + | u x ( t ) | L 2 = 0

and

(1.12) u ( t ) 0 weakly in  L 2 ( ) as  t + .

The remaining of this article is organized as follows. In Section 2.1, we prove Theorem 1.1 and Theorem 1.2 using an approximation method based on the Galerkin approximation. In Section 3, we establish Proposition 1.3 which provides the weak convergence of the solution; we complete this last section discussing why one cannot have a stronger convergence to zero.

2 Proofs of the main theorems

2.1 Proof of Theorem 1.1

To begin with, we define a weak solution of (1.10).

Definition 2.1.

By a weak solution of problem (1.10) we mean a pair ( u , Φ ) such that

u L ( + , L x 2 ( ) ) C w ( + , L x 2 ( ) ) L 2 ( ( 0 , T ) , H x 1 ( ) ) ,
Φ L ( + , x , y 1 ( 2 ) ) C ( + , 𝕃 x , y 2 ( 2 ) ) ,

and which verifies

{ d d t [ ( u ( t ) , u ~ ) L 2 ( ) + 2 ( Γ Φ ( t ) , u ~ ) L 2 ( ) ] + ( u x ( t ) , u ~ ) L 2 ( ) + ( u x ( t ) , u ~ x ) L 2 ( ) = - ( u ( t ) u x ( t ) , u ~ ) L 2 ( ) for all  u ~ H 1 ( ) , d d t [ Φ ( t ) , Φ ~ ] 𝕃 2 ( 2 ) + [ Φ y ( t ) , Φ ~ y ] 𝕃 2 ( 2 ) + ε [ Φ x ( t ) , Φ ~ x ] 𝕃 2 ( 2 ) = ( u ( t ) , Φ ~ ( x , 0 ) ) L 2 ( ) for all  Φ ~ 1 ( 2 ) , u ( 0 ) = u 0 L 2 ( ) , Φ ( 0 ) = 0 .

Before going to the proof of Theorem 1.1, we state some preliminary inequalities.

Lemma 2.2.

For all Φ X , we have

(2.1) | Γ ( Φ ) | L x 2 ( ) Φ 𝕃 2 ( 2 ) 1 / 2 Φ y 𝕃 2 ( 2 ) 1 / 2 .

Moreover, for all Φ H 1 ( R 2 ) , we have the straightforward consequence

| Γ ( Φ ) | L x 2 ( ) Φ 𝕃 2 ( 2 ) 1 / 2 Φ 1 ( 2 ) 1 / 2 .

Proof.

We prove (2.1) for Φ 𝒟 ( 2 ) smooth, and then proceed to a limit argument. For such a Φ, we have

0 + Φ ( x , y ) y Φ ( x , y ) 𝑑 y = 1 2 0 + y | Φ ( x , y ) | 2 d y = - 1 2 | Φ ( x , 0 ) | 2 ,
- 0 Φ ( x , y ) y Φ ( x , y ) 𝑑 y = 1 2 - 0 y | Φ ( x , y ) | 2 d y = 1 2 | Φ ( x , 0 ) | 2 .

It follows that

| Φ ( x , 0 ) | 2 = - 0 + Φ ( x , y ) y Φ ( x , y ) d y + - 0 Φ ( x , y ) y Φ ( x , y ) d y | Φ ( x , y ) | | y Φ ( x , y ) | d y .

Integrating this equation with respect to x and using the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality, we get

| Γ ( Φ ) ( x ) | L x 2 = | Φ ( x , 0 ) | 2 d x 2 | Φ ( x , y ) | | y Φ ( x , y ) | d x d y Φ 𝕃 x , y 2 y Φ 𝕃 x , y 2 .

Using the density of 𝒟 ( 2 ) into X completes the proof of the lemma. ∎

We now proceed to the core of the proof of Theorem 1.1. For convenience, we omit the subscript ε throughout this proof. The main idea here is to construct an approximate solution of the perturbed system (1.10) by a suitable Galerkin approximation, and then pass to the limit. Hence, let ( ( e i ) i 1 ) be an orthogonal basis of L x 2 ( ) . We suppose that every element e i is compactly supported. We may take, for example, a fractal wavelet basis of Daubechies (see [17]). Let V n = Span ( e 1 , , e n ) be the subspace of L x 2 ( ) spanned by e 1 , , e n and let W n = V n V n be the corresponding subspace of 𝕃 2 ( 2 ) . We then seek an approximate solution ( u n , Φ n ) n V n × W n that verifies the following approximate problem:

(2.2) { d d t [ ( u n ( t ) , u ~ ) L 2 ( ) + 2 ( Γ Φ n ( t ) , u ~ ) L 2 ( ) ] + ( u n x ( t ) , u ~ ) L 2 ( ) + ( u n x ( t ) , u ~ x ) L 2 ( ) = - ( u n ( t ) u n x ( t ) , u ~ ) L 2 ( ) for all  u ~ V n , d d t [ Φ n ( t ) , Φ ~ ] 𝕃 2 ( 2 ) + [ Φ n y ( t ) , Φ ~ y ] 𝕃 2 ( 2 ) + ε [ Φ n x ( t ) , Φ ~ x ] 𝕃 2 ( 2 ) = ( u n ( t ) , Φ ~ ( , 0 ) ) L 2 ( ) for all  Φ ~ W n , u n ( 0 ) = P n ( u 0 ) L 2 ( ) , Φ n ( 0 ) = 0 ,

where P n is the orthogonal projector onto V n .

Proposition 2.3.

The approximate problem (2.2) has a unique maximal solution defined on the interval [ 0 , T max [ , where 0 < T max + .

Proof.

First, we denote by p n ( t ) = ( p k n ( t ) ) 1 k n and q n ( t ) = ( q i j n ( t ) ) 1 i , j n , defined, respectively, by u n = p k n e k and Φ n = q i j n e i e j . Then the problem (2.2) can be written in the matrix form

(2.3) ( p ˙ n q ˙ n ) + 𝒩 ( p n q n ) = ( F 1 ( p n ( t ) ) 0 n 2 ) .

where

= ( I n 1 0 I n 2 ) ,

is a square matrix of order ( n + n 2 ) , I n is the n × n identity matrix and 1 is a square matrix of order n 2 . Moreover, 𝒩 is a square matrix of order ( n + n 2 ) . Finally, F 1 is a polynomial vectorial function with respect to p n ( t ) . Since is an invertible matrix, problem (2.3) can be written as

d d t ( p n q n ) = F ( p n q n ) ,

where F : n × n 2 n + n 2 is a locally lipschitzian map. The Cauchy–Lipschitz theorem applies and we deduce that there exists a unique maximal solution ( p n , q n ) of class C 1 from [ 0 , T max [ to n + n 2 , where 0 < T max + . ∎

We now proceed to the limit as n tends to infinity. For this purpose, we need following a priori estimates.

Lemma 2.4.

Let T > 0 . Then we have the following a priori estimates, uniformly with respect to n:

(2.4) ( u n ) n is bounded in  L ( 0 , T , L x 2 ( ) ) L 2 ( 0 , T , H x 1 ( ) ) ,
(2.5) ( Φ n ) n is bounded in  L ( 0 , T , x , y 1 ( 2 ) ) ,
(2.6) ( t Φ n ) n is bounded in  L 2 ( 0 , T , 𝕃 x , y 2 ( 2 ) ) ,
(2.7) ( Γ ( Φ n ) ) n is bounded in  L ( 0 , T , L x 2 ( ) ) .

Proof.

Set ( u ~ , Φ ~ ) = ( u n , Φ n t ) in (2.2). We then have

d d t ( 1 2 | u n ( t ) | L x 2 2 + Φ n y ( t ) L x , y 2 2 + ε Φ n x ( t ) L x , y 2 2 ) + ( | u n x ( t ) | L x 2 2 + 2 Φ n t ( t ) L x , y 2 2 ) = 0 .

Integrating in time, this leads to (2.4), (2.6) and to an upper bound for the gradient of Φ n . To complete the proof of (2.5), a bound on the L 2 norm of Φ n is required. We set Φ ~ = Φ n in the second equation in (2.2) and, thanks to the previous estimates and Lemma 2.2, we obtain

d d t Φ n ( t ) L x , y 2 2 + Φ n y ( t ) L x , y 2 2 ( u n ( t ) , Φ ~ ( , 0 ) ) L 2 ( ) C Φ n ( t ) L x , y 2 .

Then (2.5) follows promptly. Eventually, (2.7) is a consequence of the previous estimates and Lemma 2.2. ∎

Thanks to Lemma 2.4, we deduce that T max = + .

The limit process requires some compactness argument. For this purpose, we state the following lemma.

Lemma 2.5.

Let T > 0 and δ ( 0 , T ) . There exists a constant C > 0 that may depends on T but that is independent of δ and n such that

(2.8) δ T - δ Φ n ( t + δ ) - Φ n ( t ) 𝕃 2 ( 2 ) 2 C δ 2 for all  n 0 ,
(2.9) δ T - δ | u n ( t + δ ) - u n ( t ) | L 2 ( ) 2 C δ for all  n 0 .

Proof of Lemma 2.5.

Let T > 0 and δ ( 0 , T ) . Using the mean value theorem, for all n , we get

Φ n ( t + δ ) - Φ n ( t ) = t t + δ t Φ n ( τ ) 𝑑 τ .

Using the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality yields

(2.10) Φ n ( t + δ ) - Φ n ( t ) 𝕃 2 ( 2 ) 2 δ t t + δ t Φ n ( τ ) 𝕃 2 ( 2 ) 2 d τ .

Now, we integrate (2.10) between 0 and T - δ . Then, using the Fubini–Tonelli theorem, we get

δ T - δ Φ n ( t + δ ) - Φ n ( t ) 𝕃 2 ( 2 ) 2 d t δ δ T - δ t t + δ t Φ n ( τ ) 𝕃 2 ( 2 ) 2 d τ d t .

Using the change of variables τ = t + δ , we deduce

δ T - δ Φ n ( t + δ ) - Φ n ( t ) 𝕃 2 ( 2 ) 2 d t δ 2 δ T t Φ n ( τ ) 𝕃 2 ( 2 ) 2 d τ .

Hence, using (2.6), we deduce (2.8).

In order to establish (2.9), we recall that u n satisfies, for any v V n , the following equation:

(2.11) d d τ ( u n ( τ ) v 𝑑 x + 2 Γ ( Φ n ) ( τ ) v 𝑑 x ) + u n x ( τ ) v 𝑑 x + u n x ( τ ) v x 𝑑 x = - u n ( τ ) u n x ( τ ) v 𝑑 x .

We now integrate (2.11) with respect to τ from t to t + δ . Then, setting v = u n ( t + δ ) - u n ( t ) , we get

| u n ( t + δ ) - u n ( t ) | L 2 ( ) 2 + 2 ( Γ ( Φ n ) ( t + δ ) - Γ ( Φ n ) ( t ) , u n ( t + δ ) - u n ( t ) ) L 2 ( )
+ t t + δ ( u n x ( τ ) , u n ( t + δ ) - u n ( t ) ) L 2 ( ) 𝑑 τ + t t + δ ( u n x ( τ ) , u n x ( t + δ ) - u n x ( t ) ) L 2 ( ) 𝑑 τ
(2.12) = - t t + δ ( u n ( τ ) u n x ( τ ) , u n ( t + δ ) - u n ( t ) ) L 2 ( ) 𝑑 τ .

Using first the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality and then the Young inequality, we get

2 δ T - δ ( Γ ( Φ n ) ( t + δ ) - Γ ( Φ n ) ( t ) , u n ( t + δ ) - u n ( t ) ) L 2 ( ) 𝑑 t
(2.13) C δ T - δ | Γ ( Φ n ( t + δ ) - Φ n ( t + δ ) ) | L 2 ( ) 2 d t + δ T - δ | u n ( t + δ ) - u n ( t ) | L 2 ( ) 2 d t .

From Lemma 2.2, we conclude that

δ T - δ | Γ ( Φ n ( t + δ ) - Φ n ( t ) ) | L 2 ( ) 2 d t C δ T - δ Φ n ( t + δ ) - Φ n ( t ) 𝕃 2 ( 2 ) Φ n ( t + δ ) - Φ n ( t ) 1 ( 2 ) d t .

Moreover, using the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality, and estimations (2.5) and (2.8), we get

(2.14) δ T - δ | Γ ( Φ n ( t + δ ) - Φ n ( t ) ) | L 2 ( ) 2 d t C δ .

Then, gathering (2.14) and (2.13), we obtain

(2.15) 2 δ T - δ ( Γ ( Φ n ) ( t + δ ) - Γ ( Φ n ) ( t ) , u n ( t + δ ) - u n ( t ) ) L 2 ( ) d t C δ + δ T - δ | u n ( t + δ ) - u n ( t ) | L 2 ( ) 2 d t .

In addition, using the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality and estimation (2.4), we get

(2.16) t t + δ ( u n x ( τ ) , u n ( t + δ ) - u n ( t ) ) L 2 ( ) 𝑑 τ C δ .

Finally, we integrate (2.16) with respect to t from δ to T - δ and get

(2.17) δ T - δ t t + δ ( u n x ( τ ) , u n ( t + δ ) - u n ( t ) ) L 2 ( ) 𝑑 τ 𝑑 t C δ .

In the same way, we establish that

t t + δ ( u n x ( τ ) , u n x ( t + δ ) - u n x ( t ) ) L 2 ( ) 𝑑 τ C δ | u n x ( t + δ ) - u n x ( t ) | L 2 ( ) .

From (2.5), we deduce

(2.18) δ T - δ t t + δ ( u n x ( τ ) , u n x ( t + δ ) - u n x ( t ) ) L 2 ( ) 𝑑 τ 𝑑 t C δ .

Then, using the Hölder and Agmon inequalities, we have

t t + δ ( u n ( τ ) u n x ( τ ) , u n ( t + δ ) - u n ( t ) ) L 2 ( ) d τ ( t t + δ | u n ( τ ) | L ( ) | u n x ( τ ) | L 2 ( ) d t ) | u n ( t + δ ) - u n ( t ) | L 2 ( )
( t t + δ | u n ( τ ) | L 2 ( ) 1 / 2 | u n x ( τ ) | L 2 ( ) 3 / 2 d t ) | u n ( t + δ ) - u n ( t ) | L 2 ( ) .

Moreover, using Lemma 2.4, we deduce that there exists a constant C > 0 such that

t t + δ ( u n ( τ ) u n x ( τ ) , u n ( t + δ ) - u n ( t ) ) L 2 ( ) 𝑑 τ C δ 1 / 4 | u n ( t + δ ) - u n ( t ) | L 2 ( ) .

Finally, using the Young inequality, we get

(2.19) δ T - δ t t + δ ( u n ( τ ) u n x ( τ ) , u n ( t + δ ) - u n ( t ) ) L 2 ( ) d τ d t C δ + 1 4 δ T - δ | u n ( t + δ ) - u n ( t ) | L 2 ( ) 2 d t .

In conclusion, gathering (2.15), (2.17), (2.18), (2.19) and (2.12) yields (2.9). ∎

We rephrase Lemma 2.5 as follows: the sequences u n and Φ n are, respectively, bounded in H 1 / 4 ( 0 , T ; L 2 ( ) ) and H 1 ( 0 , T ; L 2 ( 2 ) ) . Combining this with the a priori bounds in Lemma 2.4 allow us to deduce that u n and Φ n converge strongly in L loc 2 ( ) and L loc 2 ( 2 ) , respectively. Gathering these and the weak convergence that comes from the a priori estimates, it is standard to pass to the limit when n tends towards + . We omit the details.

To complete the proof of the theorem, it remains to establish the continuity of the solution ( u , Φ ) of (1.10). First, we know that Φ L ( 0 , T , 1 ( 2 ) ) and Φ t L 2 ( 0 , T , 𝕃 2 ( 2 ) ) . Then, due to [24, Lemma 1.1, p. 250], we deduce that

Φ C ( [ 0 , T ] , 𝕃 x , y 2 ( 2 ) ) .

In the following, we establish new estimations on the approximate solution u n in order to establish the weak continuity of the solution over [ 0 , T ] with values in L x 2 ( ) .

Lemma 2.6.

Let δ ( 0 , 1 ) . There exists a constant C > 0 that may depend on T but that is independent of δ and n such that

| u n ( t + δ ) - u n ( t ) | H x - 1 C δ 1 / 4 .

Due to Lemma 2.6, we have that

| u ( t + δ ) - u ( t ) | H x - 1 lim inf n + | u n ( t + δ ) - u n ( t ) | H x - 1 C δ 1 / 4 ,

It follows that

lim δ 0 | u ( t + δ ) - u ( t ) | H x - 1 = 0 .

This implies that u is continuous [ 0 , T ] with values in H x - 1 ( ) . Also, we know that u L ( 0 , T , L x 2 ( ) ) . Hence, thanks to [24, Lemma 1.4, p. 263] and using the continuous injection L 2 ( ) H - 1 ( ) , we deduce that u is weak continuous with values in L x 2 ( ) .

The proof of the uniqueness of a solution is left to the reader.

2.2 Proof of Theorem 1.2

We now establish Theorem 1.2. To this end, we prove that the initial value problem (1.9) is well posed when passing to the limit as ε 0 + in the perturbed problem (1.10). We state the following results, whose proofs are mere consequence of the previous subsection.

Lemma 2.7.

For all T > 0 , we have the following a priori estimates that are uniform with respect to ε:

  1. ( u ε ) is bounded in L ( 0 , T , L x 2 ( ) ) and in L 2 ( 0 , T , H x 1 ( ) ) ,

  2. ( Φ ε ) is bounded in L ( 0 , T , 𝕃 x , y 2 ( 2 ) ) ,

  3. ( y Φ ε ) is bounded in L ( 0 , T , 𝕃 x , y 2 ( 2 ) ) ,

  4. ( ε 1 / 2 x Φ ε ) is bounded in L ( 0 , T , 𝕃 x , y 2 ( 2 ) ) ,

  5. ( t Φ ε ) is bounded in L 2 ( 0 , T , 𝕃 x , y 2 ( 2 ) ) .

In addition,

  1. ( Γ ( Φ ε ) ) is bounded in L ( 0 , T , L x 2 ( ) ) .

Finally, in order to pass to the limit in the nonlinear term, we state the following result.

Lemma 2.8.

Let T > 0 and δ ( 0 , T ) . There exists a constant C that may depends on T but that is independent of δ, ε such that

δ T - δ Φ ε ( t + δ ) - Φ ε ( t ) 𝕃 2 ( 2 ) 2 C δ 2 , δ T - δ | u ε ( t + δ ) - u ε ( t ) | L 2 ( ) 2 C δ

To establish Theorem 1.2, we pass to the limit when ε 0 + in the perturbed problem (1.10). This is standard and left as an exercise to the reader. It remains to check the continuity property.

Let ( u , Φ ) be a solution to the initial-value problem (1.9). First, applying [24, Lemma 1.1, p. 250] and using the continuous injection X 𝕃 2 ( 2 ) , we get

Φ C ( [ 0 , T ] , 𝕃 2 ( 2 ) ) .

To justify the weak continuity of u, we have the following result.

Lemma 2.9.

Let δ ( 0 , 1 ) . There exists a constant C > 0 such that

| u ( t + δ ) - u ( t ) | H x - 1 C δ 1 / 4 .

Due to Lemma 2.9, we conclude that

lim δ 0 | u ( t + δ ) - u ( t ) | H x - 1 = 0 .

This implies that u is continuous on [ 0 , T ] when it takes values in H x - 1 . Moreover, u L ( 0 , T , L x 2 ( ) ) . Thanks to [24, Lemma 1.4, p 263], we conclude that u is weakly continuous on [ 0 , T ] when it takes values in L x 2 ( ) .

3 Proof of Proposition 1.3

3.1 Proof of the proposition

Let t 0 . In system (1.9), taking the scalar product in L 2 ( ) of the first equation with u, and the scalar product in 𝕃 2 ( 2 ) of the second equation with Φ t , we get

(3.1) { 1 2 d d t | u ( t ) | L x 2 2 + 2 ( Γ ( Φ t ) ( t ) , u ( t ) ) + | u x | L x 2 2 = 0 , 1 2 d d t Φ y ( t ) 𝕃 x , y 2 2 + Φ t ( t ) 𝕃 x , y 2 2 = ( u ( t ) , Γ ( Φ t ) ( t ) ) .

Hence, system (3.1) implies that

(3.2) d d t ( 1 2 | u ( t ) | 2 + Φ y ( t ) 2 ) + | u x ( t ) | 2 + 2 Φ t ( t ) 2 = 0 .

We conclude that t 1 2 | u ( t ) | 2 + Φ y ( t ) 2 is decreasing and nonnegative, so there exists l 0 0 such that

(3.3) lim t + 1 2 | u ( t ) | 2 + Φ y ( t ) 2 = l 0 0 .

We now handle estimates for x u . In the equations of system (1.9), we take the derivative with respect to x. Then, letting v = u x and ψ = Φ x , it follows that ( v , ψ ) satisfies

(3.4) { v t + 2 Γ ( ψ t ) + v x - v x x = - ( u v ) x , ψ t - ψ y y - Γ * ( v ) = 0 .

In system (3.4), taking the scalar product of the two equations in L 2 ( ) × 𝕃 2 ( 2 ) with v and ψ t , respectively, we get

(3.5) 1 2 d d t | v ( t ) | 2 + 2 ( Γ ( ψ t ) ( t ) , v ( t ) ) + | v x ( t ) | 2 = - ( u ( t ) v ( t ) ) x v ( t ) 𝑑 x ,
(3.6) ψ t ( t ) 2 - ( ψ y y ( t ) , ψ t ( t ) ) = ( Γ * ( v ) ( t ) , ψ t ( t ) ) .

We observe that

(3.7) - ( ψ y y ( t ) , ψ t ( t ) ) = 1 2 d d t ψ y ( t ) 2 .

In addition,

(3.8) ( u ( t ) v ( t ) ) x v ( t ) 𝑑 x = 1 2 v 3 ( t ) 𝑑 x .

Gathering (3.5), (3.7) and (3.8) yields

d d t ( 1 2 | v ( t ) | 2 + ψ y ( t ) 2 ) + | v x ( t ) | 2 + 2 ψ t ( t ) 2 = - 1 2 v 3 ( t ) 𝑑 x .

Using the Young and Agmon inequalities, we get

d d t ( 1 2 | v ( t ) | 2 + ψ y ( t ) 2 ) + | v x ( t ) | 2 + 2 ψ t ( t ) 2 c | v ( t ) | 5 / 2 | v x ( t ) | 1 / 2 c ( | v ( t ) | 10 / 3 + | v x ( t ) | 2 ) .

Using the fact that | v ( t ) | 2 | v ( t ) | 2 + ψ y 2 , we obtain

d d t ( | v ( t ) | 2 + 2 ψ y ( t ) 2 ) c | v ( t ) | 2 ( | v ( t ) | 2 + ψ y ( t ) 2 ) 2 / 3 .

Hence, we deduce that

(3.9) d d t ( ( | v ( t ) | 2 + 2 ψ y ( t ) 2 ) 1 / 3 ) c | v ( t ) | 2 .

Using (3.2) and (3.9), we get

d d t ( ( | v ( t ) | 2 + 2 ψ y ( t ) 2 ) 1 / 3 + c 2 | u ( t ) | 2 + c Φ y ( t ) 2 ) 0 .

We conclude that the function

t ( | v ( t ) | 2 + 2 ψ y ( t ) 2 ) 1 / 3 + c 2 | u ( t ) | 2 + c Φ y ( t ) 2

is decreasing. Moreover, it is nonnegative, so there exists l 1 0 such that

(3.10) lim t + ( | v ( t ) | 2 + 2 ψ y ( t ) 2 ) 1 / 3 + c 2 | u ( t ) | 2 + c Φ y ( t ) 2 = l 1 0 .

Combining (3.3) and (3.10), we deduce that there exists a nonnegative real number l 2 such that

(3.11) lim t + 1 2 | v ( t ) | 2 + ψ y ( t ) 2 = l 2 < + .

Moreover, using the Cesàro lemma, we deduce that

(3.12) lim t + 1 t 0 t ( 1 2 | v ( s ) | 2 + ψ y ( s ) 2 d s ) = l 2 .

In the following, we establish new estimates for ( v , ψ ) . Hence, taking the scalar product in 𝕃 2 ( 2 ) of the second equation of system (3.4) with ψ t , we get

1 2 d d t ψ ( t ) 2 - ( ψ y y ( t ) , ψ ( t ) ) = ( Γ * ( v ) ( t ) , ψ ( t ) ) = ( v ( t ) , Γ ( ψ ) ( t ) ) .

Using Lemma 2.2 and the Young inequality, we get

(3.13) 1 2 d d t ψ ( t ) 2 + 3 4 ψ y ( t ) 2 3 4 | v ( t ) | 4 / 3 ψ ( t ) 2 / 3 .

We integrate (3.13) from 0 to t, and then use the Hölder inequality to the resulting inequality. Since v = u x L 2 ( ( 0 , + ) , L x 2 ( ) ) , we get

ψ ( t ) 2 + 3 4 0 t ψ y ( s ) 2 d s c ( 0 t ψ ( s ) 2 d s ) 1 / 3 .

Since ψ ( 0 ) = 0 , there exists a constant c 1 > 0 such that

0 t ψ ( s ) 2 d s c 1 t 3 / 2 ,

which implies that

0 t ψ y ( s ) 2 d s ψ ( t ) 2 + 3 4 0 t ψ y ( s ) 2 d s c 1 t 1 / 2 .

We deduce that

(3.14) 1 t 0 t ( 1 2 | v ( s ) | 2 + ψ y ( s ) 2 ) 𝑑 s c t + c 1 t 1 / 2 .

Passing to the limit as t + in (3.14) and using (3.12), we deduce that l 2 = 0 . Hence, we conclude, from (3.11), that lim t + | v ( t ) | 2 = 0 .

In order to establish (1.12), we equivalently establish that for all sequences ( t n ) such that t n + , we have

u ( t n ) 0 weakly in  L 2 ( ) .

First, from Theorem 1.2, we have

(3.15) u L ( ( 0 , + ) , L x 2 ( ) ) .

Then, using the Agmon inequality, we deduce that for all t > 0 , there exists a constant c > 0 such that

| u ( t ) | L ( ) c | u x ( t ) | L 2 ( ) 1 / 2 .

Hence, using (1.11), we conclude that

(3.16) | u ( t ) | L ( ) 0 as  t + .

Let ( t n ) be a sequence which tends to + . Then, from (3.16), we deduce that

u ( t n ) 0 in  𝒟 ( ) .

Moreover, from (3.15) we have that ( u ( t n ) ) is bounded in L 2 ( ) . Then there exists a subsequence ( t n ) of ( t n ) such that

u ( t n ) u * weakly in  L 2 ( ) .

This implies that u * = 0 .

3.2 Miscelleanous remarks

One may wonder why we do not have, by a more direct approach, better results for the convergence towards 0 when t tends towards + . On the one hand, due to the presence of the half-derivative in time, we cannot apply the so-called Schonbek splitting lemma (see [10] and the references therein). We do not have, for instance, an upper bound in L 1 ( ) (nevertheless, see Appendix A). On the other hand, the nonlinear term 1 2 ( u 2 ) x does not amplify the decay rate towards 0. For larger pure power polynomial terms, we expect that the nonlinear equation has the same decay rate as the linear one (the nonlinearity is asymptotically weak, following the classification in [10]). The results for the generalized equation ( p > 1 )

u t + u x + ν π t 0 t u ( s ) t - s 𝑑 s + u p u x = ν u x x ,

will appear in a forthcoming work.

Funding statement: This work was supported by “PHC Utique ASEO”, KIG1503, and exchange program CNRS/DGRS “modèles non locaux en dynamique des fluides”. A part of this article was performed during the stay of the second author in the LAMFA with the support of the exchange program SSHN2015.

A Appendix

We state and prove a result for smooth nonnegative solutions of equation (1.3).

Proposition A.1.

Consider a smooth and nonnegative initial data u 0 . Then u ( t , x ) remains nonnegative for all times.

Proof.

We first assume that u 0 > 0 , the general case follows by a limiting argument. Let us argue by contradiction. We introduce

T = inf t > 0 { x : u ( t , x ) < 0 } .

There exists x 0 where u achieves its minimum and such that u ( T , x 0 ) = u x ( T , x 0 ) = 0 u x x ( T , x 0 ) .

We introduce

v ( t , x ) = u ( t , x ) + 1 π 0 t u ( s ) t - s 𝑑 s .

Since

v t = u x x - u u x - u x ,

we have that v t ( T , x 0 ) 0 .

On the other hand, we compute (omitting x 0 and writing u ( T , x 0 ) = u ( T ) for simplicity)

Q ε = u ( T ) - u ( T - ε ) ε + 1 ε π 0 T - ε u ( s ) ( 1 T - s - 1 T - ε - s ) 𝑑 s + 1 ε π T - ε T u ( s ) T - s 𝑑 s .

We know that Q ε converges towards v t ( T ) 0 when ε goes to zero. We also know that u ( T ) - u ( T - ε ) ε 0 , since u ( T ) = 0 . We also have

| 1 ε π T - ε T u ( s ) T - s 𝑑 s | = | 1 ε π T - ε T u ( s ) - u ( T ) T - s 𝑑 s | C ε 1 / 2 .

This implies that

1 ε π 0 T - ε u ( s ) ( 1 T - s - 1 T - ε - s ) 𝑑 s - Q ε + O ( ε 1 / 2 ) .

Gathering these information and invoking Fatou’s lemma, we have

1 π 0 T u ( s ) 2 ( T - s ) 3 / 2 d s lim inf ε 0 ( 1 ε π 0 T - ε u ( s ) ( 1 T - ε - s - 1 T - s ) d s ) 0 .

This is a contradiction and the proof is complete. ∎

Corollary A.2.

Assume u 0 is nonnegative and in L 1 ( R ) L 2 ( R ) . Then

lim t + u ( t ) L 2 ( ) = 0 .

Proof.

Integrating equation (1.3) with respect to x, we have that if

m ( t ) = u ( t , x ) 𝑑 x = u L 1 ( ) ,

then

m t + D 1 / 2 m = 0 .

This leads to u ( t ) L 1 ( ) u 0 L 1 ( ) . On the other hand, we know that u x converges strongly in L 2 ( ) to zero. Using an interpolation result completes the proof. ∎

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank S. Dumont and E. Zahrouni for challenging discussions about this work.

References

[1] J. Audounet, V. Giovangigli and J. Roquejoffre, A threshold phenomenon in the propagation of a point-source initiated flame, Phys. D 121 (1998), 295–316. 10.1016/S0167-2789(98)00153-5Search in Google Scholar

[2] J. Audounet, D. Matignon and G. Montseny, Opérateurs différentiels fractionnaires, pseudo-différentiels et représentations diffusives, Report Number N-99501, Laboratoire d’analyse et d’architecture des systèmes, Toulouse, 1999. Search in Google Scholar

[3] J. Bona, M. Chen and J.-C. Saut, Boussinesq equations and other systems for small-amplitude long waves in nonlinear dispersive media I: Derivation and the linear theory, J. Nonlinear Sci. 12 (2002), 283–318. 10.1007/s00332-002-0466-4Search in Google Scholar

[4] C. Casenave and G. Montseny, Introduction to diffusive représentation, IFAC Proc. Vol. 43 (2010), no. 21, 370–377. 10.3182/20100915-3-IT-2017.00064Search in Google Scholar

[5] M. Chen, S. Dumont, L. Dupaigne and O. Goubet, Decay of solutions to a water wave model with a nonlocal viscous dispersive term, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 27 (2010), no. 4, 1473–1492. 10.3934/dcds.2010.27.1473Search in Google Scholar

[6] D. Dutykh, Viscous-potential free-surface flows and long wave modelling, Eur. J. Mech. B Fluids 28 (2009), 430–443. 10.1016/j.euromechflu.2008.11.003Search in Google Scholar

[7] D. Dutykh and F. Dias, Viscous potential free surface flows in a fluid layer of finite depth, C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris 347 (2007), 113–118. 10.1016/j.crma.2007.06.007Search in Google Scholar

[8] H. Haddar and D. Matignon, Well-posedness of non-linear conservative systems when coupled with diffusive systems. Vol. 1, Nonlinear Control Systems (Stuttgart 2004), Elsevier, Amsterdam (2005), 237–242. 10.1016/S1474-6670(17)31229-6Search in Google Scholar

[9] H. Haddar and D. Matignon, Theoretical and numerical analysis of the Webster Lokshin model, Report Number RR-6558, Institut National de la Recherche en Informatique et Automatique, 2008. Search in Google Scholar

[10] N. Hayashi, E. Kaikina, P. Naumkin and I. Shishmarev, Asymptotics For Dissipative Nonlinear Equations, Lecture Notes in Math. 1884, Springer, Berlin, 2006. Search in Google Scholar

[11] T. Helie and D. Matignon, Diffusive reprentations for the analysis and simulation of flared acoustic pipes with visco-thermal losse, Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 16 (2006), 503–536. 10.1142/S0218202506001248Search in Google Scholar

[12] T. Kakutani and M. Matsuuchi, Effect of viscosity of long gravity waves, J. Phys. Soc. Japan 39 (1975), 237–246. 10.1143/JPSJ.39.237Search in Google Scholar

[13] P. Liu and A. Orfila, Viscous effects on transient long wave propagation, J. Fluid Mech. 520 (2004), 83–92. 10.1017/S0022112004001806Search in Google Scholar

[14] I. Manoubi, Theoretical and numerical analysis of the decay rate of solutions to a water wave model with a nonlocal viscous dispersive term with Riemann–Liouville half derivative, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 19 (2014), 2837–2863. 10.3934/dcdsb.2014.19.2837Search in Google Scholar

[15] D. Matignon and B. d’Andréa-Novel, Spectral and time-domain consequences of an integro-differential perturbation of the wave PDE, Mathematical and Numerical Aspects of Wave Propagation (Mandelieul-la-Napoule 1995), SIAM, Philadelphia (1995), 769–771. Search in Google Scholar

[16] D. Matignon and C. Prieur, Asymptotic stability of linear conservative systems when coupled with diffusive systems, ESAIM Control Optim. Calc. Var. 11 (2005), 487–507. 10.1051/cocv:2005016Search in Google Scholar

[17] Y. Meyer and R. Coifman, Wavelets, Calderón–Zygmund and Multilinear Operators, Cambridge Stud. Adv. Math. 48, Cambridge University, Cambridge, 1997. Search in Google Scholar

[18] G. Montseny, Diffusion monodimensionnelle et intégration d’ordre 1 / 2 , Report Number 91232, Laboratoire d’analyse et d’architecture des systèmes, Toulouse, 1991. Search in Google Scholar

[19] G. Montseny, Représentation Diffusive, Hermes Science, Paris, 2005. Search in Google Scholar

[20] G. Montseny, J. Audounet and D. Matignon, Diffusive representation for pseudo-differentially damped nonlinear systems, Nonlinear Control in the Year 2000. Vol. 2, Lecture Notes in Control and Inform. Sci. 259, Springer, London, (2000), 163–182. 10.1007/BFb0110300Search in Google Scholar

[21] G. Montseny, J. Audounet and B. Mbodge, A simple viscoelastic damper model – application to a vibrating string, Analysis and Optimization of Systems: State and Frequency Domain Approaches for Infinite-Dimensional Systems, Lecture Notes in Control and Inform. Sci. 185, Springer, Berlin (1993), 436–446. 10.1007/BFb0115042Search in Google Scholar

[22] G. Montseny, J. Audounet and B. Mbodge, Optimal models of fractional integrators and application to systems with fading memory, IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (Le Touquet 1993), IEEE Press, Piscataway (1993), 65–70. 10.1109/ICSMC.1993.390826Search in Google Scholar

[23] O. Staffans, Well-posedness and stabilizability of a viscoelastic equation in energy space, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 345 (1994), 527–575. 10.1090/S0002-9947-1994-1264153-XSearch in Google Scholar

[24] R. Temam, Navier–Stokes Equations Theory and Numerical Analysis, Revised edition, Stud. Math. Appl. 2, North Holland, Amsterdam, 1979. Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2016-12-23
Accepted: 2017-01-12
Published Online: 2017-02-21

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Public License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Asymptotic behavior of evolution systems in arbitrary Banach spaces using general almost periodic splittings
  3. Solvability of a product-type system of difference equations with six parameters
  4. On Dirichlet problem for fractional p-Laplacian with singular non-linearity
  5. Absence of Lavrentiev gap for non-autonomous functionals with (p,q)-growth
  6. On a class of fully nonlinear parabolic equations
  7. On sign-changing solutions for (p,q)-Laplace equations with two parameters
  8. Weighted Caffarelli–Kohn–Nirenberg type inequalities related to Grushin type operators
  9. On the fractional p-Laplacian equations with weight and general datum
  10. An elliptic equation with an indefinite sublinear boundary condition
  11. Liouville-type theorems for elliptic equations in half-space with mixed boundary value conditions
  12. Well/ill-posedness for the dissipative Navier–Stokes system in generalized Carleson measure spaces
  13. Hypercontractivity, supercontractivity, ultraboundedness and stability in semilinear problems
  14. Theoretical analysis of a water wave model with a nonlocal viscous dispersive term using the diffusive approach
  15. A multiplicity result for asymptotically linear Kirchhoff equations
  16. Higher-order anisotropic models in phase separation
  17. Well-posedness and maximum principles for lattice reaction-diffusion equations
  18. Existence of a bound state solution for quasilinear Schrödinger equations
  19. Existence and concentration behavior of solutions for a class of quasilinear elliptic equations with critical growth
  20. Homoclinics for strongly indefinite almost periodic second order Hamiltonian systems
  21. A new method for converting boundary value problems for impulsive fractional differential equations to integral equations and its applications
  22. Diffusive logistic equations with harvesting and heterogeneity under strong growth rate
  23. On viscosity and weak solutions for non-homogeneous p-Laplace equations
  24. Periodic impulsive fractional differential equations
  25. A result of uniqueness of solutions of the Shigesada–Kawasaki–Teramoto equations
  26. Solutions of vectorial Hamilton–Jacobi equations are rank-one absolute minimisers in L
  27. Large solutions to non-divergence structure semilinear elliptic equations with inhomogeneous term
  28. The elliptic sinh-Gordon equation in a semi-strip
  29. The Gelfand problem for the 1-homogeneous p-Laplacian
  30. Boundary layers to a singularly perturbed Klein–Gordon–Maxwell–Proca system on a compact Riemannian manifold with boundary
  31. Subharmonic solutions of Hamiltonian systems displaying some kind of sublinear growth
  32. Multiple solutions for an elliptic system with indefinite Robin boundary conditions
  33. New solutions for critical Neumann problems in ℝ2
  34. A fractional Kirchhoff problem involving a singular term and a critical nonlinearity
  35. Existence and non-existence of solutions to a Hamiltonian strongly degenerate elliptic system
  36. Characterizing the strange term in critical size homogenization: Quasilinear equations with a general microscopic boundary condition
  37. Nonlocal perturbations of the fractional Choquard equation
  38. A pathological example in nonlinear spectral theory
  39. Infinitely many solutions for cubic nonlinear Schrödinger equations in dimension four
  40. On Cauchy–Liouville-type theorems
  41. Maximal Lp -Lq regularity to the Stokes problem with Navier boundary conditions
  42. Besov regularity for solutions of p-harmonic equations
  43. The classical theory of calculus of variations for generalized functions
  44. On the Cauchy problem of a degenerate parabolic-hyperbolic PDE with Lévy noise
  45. Hölder gradient estimates for a class of singular or degenerate parabolic equations
  46. Critical and subcritical fractional Trudinger–Moser-type inequalities on
  47. Multiple nonradial solutions for a nonlinear elliptic problem with singular and decaying radial potential
  48. Quantization of energy and weakly turbulent profiles of solutions to some damped second-order evolution equations
  49. An elliptic system with logarithmic nonlinearity
  50. The Caccioppoli ultrafunctions
  51. Equilibrium of a production economy with non-compact attainable allocations set
  52. Exact behavior around isolated singularity for semilinear elliptic equations with a log-type nonlinearity
  53. The higher integrability of weak solutions of porous medium systems
  54. Classification of stable solutions for boundary value problems with nonlinear boundary conditions on Riemannian manifolds with nonnegative Ricci curvature
  55. Regularity results for p-Laplacians in pre-fractal domains
  56. Carleman estimates and null controllability of a class of singular parabolic equations
  57. Limit profiles and uniqueness of ground states to the nonlinear Choquard equations
  58. On a measure of noncompactness in the space of regulated functions and its applications
  59. p-fractional Hardy–Schrödinger–Kirchhoff systems with critical nonlinearities
  60. On the well-posedness of a multiscale mathematical model for Lithium-ion batteries
  61. Global existence of a radiative Euler system coupled to an electromagnetic field
  62. On the existence of a weak solution for some singular p ( x ) -biharmonic equation with Navier boundary conditions
  63. Choquard-type equations with Hardy–Littlewood–Sobolev upper-critical growth
  64. Clustered solutions for supercritical elliptic equations on Riemannian manifolds
  65. Ground state solutions for the Hénon prescribed mean curvature equation
  66. Quasilinear equations with indefinite nonlinearity
  67. Concentrating solutions for a planar elliptic problem with large nonlinear exponent and Robin boundary condition
  68. Retraction of: Concentrating solutions for a planar elliptic problem with large nonlinear exponent and Robin boundary condition
Downloaded on 1.4.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/anona-2016-0274/html
Scroll to top button