Iterative Circulation in Chaucer: Medieval Contexts of Seriality

Works Cited

Alamichel, Marie-Françoise. 2014. “‘This wyde world, which that men seye is round’: Movement and Meaning in The Franklin’s Tale”. Études anglaises 67: 259–273.10.3917/etan.673.0259Search in Google Scholar

Arner, Timothy D. 2005. “No Joke: Transcendent Laughter in the Teseida and the Miller’s Tale”. Studies in Philology 102.2: 143–158.10.1353/sip.2005.0007Search in Google Scholar

Aronczyk, Melissa, and Alisa Craig. 2012. “Introduction: Cultures of Circulation”. Poetics 40.2: 93–100.10.1016/j.poetic.2012.02.001Search in Google Scholar

Askins, William. 2002. “The Tale of Melibee”. In: Robert M. Correale and Mary Hamel (eds.). Sources and Analogues of the Canterbury Tales. Vol. I. Cambridge: Brewer. 321–408.10.1515/9781846151569-011Search in Google Scholar

Bahr, Arthur. 2015. “Miscellaneity and Variance in the Medieval Book”. In: Michael Johnston and Michael van Dussen (eds.). The Medieval Manuscript Book: Cultural Approaches. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 181–198.10.1017/CBO9781107588851.010Search in Google Scholar

Baker, Donald C. 1961. “A Crux in Chaucer’s Franklin’s Tale: Dorigen’s Lament”. JEGP 60: 56–64.Search in Google Scholar

Barney, Stephen A. 1982. “Chaucer’s Lists”. In: Larry D. Benson and Siegfried Wenzel (eds.). The Wisdom of Poetry: Essays in Early English Literature in Honor of Morton W. Bloomfield. Kalamazoo, MI: Medieval Institute Publications. 189–223.Search in Google Scholar

Barthes, Roland. 1975. The Pleasure of the Text. Trans. Richard Miller. New York: Hill and Wang.Search in Google Scholar

Barton, Roman, Eva von Contzen, and Anne Rüggemeier. 2023. Literary Lists: A Short History of Form and Function. London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-3-031-28372-7Search in Google Scholar

Benson, Larry D. (ed.). 1987. The Riverside Chaucer. 3rd ed. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Search in Google Scholar

Blake, Kathleen A. 1973. “Order and the Noble Life in Chaucer’s ‘Knight’s Tale?’” Modern Language Quarterly 34.1: 3–19.10.1215/00267929-34-1-3Search in Google Scholar

Blättler, Christine. 2016. “Wider die Tragödie der Kultur: Vier Thesen zu Serialität und Poeisis”. In: Elisabeth Bronfen, Christiane Frey, and David Martyn (eds.). Noch einmal anders: Zu einer Poetik des Seriellen. Zurich: diaphanes. 137–149.Search in Google Scholar

Boitani, Piero. 1976. “Chaucer and Lists of Trees”. Reading Medieval Studies 2: 28–44.Search in Google Scholar

Brewer, Derek. 2003. “Knight and Miller: Similarity and Difference”. In: Wendy Harding (ed.). Drama, Narrative and Poetry in The Canterbury Tales. Toulouse: Presses Universitaires du Mirail. 127–138.Search in Google Scholar

Bridges, Margaret. 1989. “The Picture in the Text: Ecphrasis as Self-reflexivity in Chaucer’s Parliament of Fowles, Book of the Duchess and House of Fame”. Word and Image 5: 151–158.10.1080/02666286.1989.10435398Search in Google Scholar

Brooks, Douglas, and Alastair Fowler. 1970. “The Meaning of Chaucer’s Knight’s Tale”. Medium Aevum 39: 123–146.10.2307/43631267Search in Google Scholar

Burrow, John. 2015. “‘The Tale of Beryn’: An Appreciation”. The Chaucer Review 49.4: 499–511.10.5325/chaucerrev.49.4.0499Search in Google Scholar

Chaganti, Seeta. 2018. “Terpsichorean Form: Geoffrey Chaucer’s ‘Franklin’s Tale’ and Robert Smithson’s ‘Spiral Jetty’”. In: Robert John Meyer-Lee and Catherine Sanok (eds.). The Medieval Literary: Beyond Form. Cambridge: Brewer. 185–211.10.1017/9781787442191.009Search in Google Scholar

Contzen, Eva von. 2017. “Grenzfälle des Erzählens: Die Liste als einfache Form”. In: Albrecht Koschorke (ed.). Komplexität und Einfachheit: Villa Vigoni-Symposion 2015. Stuttgart: Metzler. 221–239.10.1007/978-3-476-04357-3_13Search in Google Scholar

Contzen, Eva von. 2021. “Theorising Lists in Literature: Towards a Listology”. In: Rebecca Lämmle, Cédric Scheidegger Lämmle, and Katharina Wesselmann (eds.). Lists and Catalogues in Ancient Literature and Beyond: Towards a Poetics of Enumeration. Berlin: De Gruyter. 35–54.10.1515/9783110712230-003Search in Google Scholar

Contzen, Eva von, and James Simpson (eds.). 2022. Enlistment: Lists in Medieval and Early Modern Literature. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.10.26818/9780814215227Search in Google Scholar

Cooper, Helen. 2004. The English Romance in Time: Transforming Motifs from Geoffrey of Monmouth to the Death of Shakespeare. New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Corbellini, Sabrina, Giovanna Murano, and Giacomo Signore (eds.). 2018. Collecting, Organizing and Transmitting Knowledge: Miscellanies in Late Medieval Europe. Turnhout: Brepols.Search in Google Scholar

Crane, Susan. 1994. Gender and Romance in Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400863754Search in Google Scholar

Da Rold, Orietta. 2010. “Textual Copying and Transmission”. In: Elaine Treharne and Greg Walker, with the assistance of William Green (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Medieval Literature in English. New York: Oxford University Press. 33–56.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199229123.013.0003Search in Google Scholar

Dean, Christopher. 1969. “Imagery in the ‘Knight’s Tale’ and the ‘Miller’s Tale’”. Mediaeval Studies 31: 149–163.10.1484/J.MS.2.306062Search in Google Scholar

Deleuze, Gilles. 1994. Difference and Repetition. Trans. Paul Patton. New York: Columbia University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Dempster, Germaine. 1937. “Chaucer at Work on the Complaint the Franklin’s Tale”. Modern Language Notes 52.1: 16–23.10.2307/2912305Search in Google Scholar

Eco, Umberto. 1985. “Innovation and Repetition: Between Modern and Post-Modern Aesthetics”. Daedalus 114.4: 161–184. Search in Google Scholar

Eco, Umberto. 1990. “Interpreting Serials”. The Limits of Interpretation. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press. 83–100.Search in Google Scholar

Eco, Umberto. 2009. The Infinity of Lists: From Homer to Joyce. Trans. Alastair McEwen. London: MacLehose.Search in Google Scholar

Epp, Garrett P.J. 1993. “The Towneley Plays, or, The Hazards of Cycling”. Research Opportunities in Renaissance Drama 32: 121–150.Search in Google Scholar

Fein, Susanna. 2003. “Boethian Boundaries: Compassion and Constraint in the Franklin’s Tale”. In: Wendy Harding (ed.). Drama, Narrative, and Poetry in the Canterbury Tales. Toulouse: Presses Universitaires du Mirail. 195–212. Search in Google Scholar

Fichte, Joerg O. 1975. “Man’s Free Will and the Poet’s Choice: The Creation of Artistic Order in Chaucer’s Knight’s Tale”. Anglia 93: 335–360.10.1515/angl.1975.1975.93.335Search in Google Scholar

Forster, E. M. 1955. Aspects of the Novel. San Diego: Harcourt.Search in Google Scholar

Gaston, Kara. 2020. Reading Chaucer in Time: Literary Formation in England and Italy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198852865.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Gendt, Anne-Marie de, and Alicia C. Montoya (eds.). 2019. La pensée sérielle, du Moyen Age aux Lumières. Leiden: Brill.Search in Google Scholar

Gillespie, Alexandra, and Daniel Wakelin (eds.). 2011. The Production of Books in England, 1350–1500. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511976193Search in Google Scholar

Griffith, Gareth. 2019. “Romancing Geoffrey: Chaucer and Romance in the Manuscript Tradition”. In: Rachel Stenner, Tamsin Badcoe, and Gareth Griffith (eds.). Rereading Chaucer and Spenser: Dan Geffrey with the New Poete. Manchester: Manchester University Press. 137–149.10.7765/9781526136923.00013Search in Google Scholar

Halverson, John. 1960. “Aspects of Order in the Knight’s Tale”. Studies in Philology 57.4: 606–621.Search in Google Scholar

Hammond, Eleanor Prescott. 1969. English Verse between Chaucer and Surrey. New York: Octagon Books.Search in Google Scholar

Hanna, Ralph, III. 1992. “The Manuscripts and Transmission of Chaucer’s Troilus”. In: James M. Dean and Christian Zacher (eds.). The Idea of Medieval Literature: New Essays on Chaucer and Medieval Culture in Honor of Donald R. Howard. Newark, DE: University of Delaware Press. 173–188.Search in Google Scholar

Hanning, Robert W. 2007. “‘The Struggle between Noble Designs and Chaos’: The Literary Tradition of Chaucer’s Knight’s Tale”. In: Lee Patterson (ed.). Geoffrey Chaucer’s The Canterbury Tales: A Casebook. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 49–68.10.1093/oso/9780195175738.003.0003Search in Google Scholar

Higl, Andrew. 2009. “Joining the Canterbury Tales: The Interactivity of Its Reception and Transmission”. Journal of the Early Book Society 12: 29–49.Search in Google Scholar

Higl, Andrew. 2012. Playing the Canterbury Tales: The Continuations and Additions. Farnham: Ashgate.Search in Google Scholar

Ingham, Patricia Clare. 2015. The Medieval New: Ambivalence in an Age of Innovation. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.10.9783/9780812291230Search in Google Scholar

Jeay, Madeleine. 2006. Le commerce des mots: L’usage des listes dans la littérature médiévale (XII^e–XV^e siècles). Genève: Droz.Search in Google Scholar

Johnston, Andrew James. 2008. Performing the Middle Ages from Beowulf to Othello. Turnhout: Brepols.10.1484/M.LMEMS-EB.5.112215Search in Google Scholar

Johnston, Andrew James. 2014. “Ekphrasis in the ‘Knight’s Tale’”. In: R. Howard Bloch et al. (eds.). Rethinking the New Medievalism. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press. 181–197.Search in Google Scholar

Johnston, Andrew James. 2015. “Medieval Ekphrasis: Chaucer’s ‘Knight’s Tale’”. In: Gabriele Rippl (ed.). Handbook of Intermediality: Literature – Image – Sound – Music. Berlin: De Gruyter. 50–64.10.1515/9783110311075-004Search in Google Scholar

Johnston, Andrew James. 2021. “The Aesthetics of ‘Wawes Grene’: Planets, Painting and Politics in Chaucer’s Knight’s Tale”. In: Helen Fulton (ed.). Chaucer and Italian Culture. Cardiff: University of Wales Press. 145–168.10.2307/jj.14491573.9Search in Google Scholar

Johnston, Andrew James. 2024. “Vorwärts in die Vergangenheit: Gattungsfragen und Periodisierungskritik in Chaucer’s Franklin’s Tale”. In: Bernhard Huss, Bernd Roling, and Anita Traninger (eds.). Der Tumult der Anfänge und das Versickern am Ende: Gattungskonstruktionen zwischen Tradition und Novation und von der Antike bis zur Frühen Neuzeit. Berlin: De Gruyter. 95–107.10.1515/9783111624426-005Search in Google Scholar

Kelleter, Frank (ed.). 2012. Populäre Serialität: Narration – Evolution – Distinktion. Zum seriellen Erzählen seit dem 19. Jahrhundert. Bielefeld: transcript.10.1515/transcript.9783839421413Search in Google Scholar

Kelleter, Frank. 2017. “Five Ways of Looking at Popular Seriality”. In: Frank Kelleter (ed.). Media of Serial Narrative. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press. 7–34.10.2307/j.ctv10crd8x.5Search in Google Scholar

Kolve, A.V. 1984. Chaucer and the Imagery of Narrative: The First Five Canterbury Tales. London: Arnold. Search in Google Scholar

Lawton, David. 1985. Chaucer’s Narrators. Cambridge: Brewer.Search in Google Scholar

Lee, Benjamin, and Edward LiPuma. 2002. “Cultures of Circulation: The Imaginations of Modernity”. Public Culture 14.1: 191–213.10.1215/08992363-14-1-191Search in Google Scholar

Lerner, Bettina R. 2015. “Seriality and Modernity: L’almanach des Mystères de Paris”. L’Esprit créateur 55.3: 127–139.10.1353/esp.2015.0035Search in Google Scholar

Levine, Caroline. 2015. Forms: Whole, Rhythm, Hierarchy, Network. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.10.23943/princeton/9780691160627.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Mann, Jill. 1973. Chaucer and Medieval Estate Satire: The Literature of Social Classes and the General Prologue to the Canterbury Tales. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Mann, Jill. 2018. “Beginning with the Ending: Narrative Techniques and Their Significance in Chaucer’s Knight’s Tale”. In: Elizabeth Archibald, Megan Leitch, and Corinne Saunders (eds.). Romance Rewritten: The Evolution of Middle English Romance. Woodbridge: Brewer. 85–102.10.1017/9781787443341.005Search in Google Scholar

MED = Middle English Dictionary. 1952–2024. Ed. Hans Kurath, Sherman M. Kuhn, John Reidy, and Robert E. Lewis. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. <http://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/med/>.Search in Google Scholar

Mills, David. 1998. Recycling the Cycle: The City of Chester and its Whitsun Plays. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.10.3138/9781442679085Search in Google Scholar

Morgan, Gerald. 1977. “A Defence of Dorigen’s Complaint”. Medium Aevum 46: 77–97.10.2307/43621105Search in Google Scholar

Muscatine, Charles. 1950. “Form, Texture, and Meaning in Chaucer’s Knight’s Tale”. PMLA 65.5: 911–929.10.2307/459581Search in Google Scholar

Muscatine, Charles. 1957. Chaucer and the French Tradition: A Study in Style and Meaning. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Search in Google Scholar

Nichols, Stephen G., and Siegfried Wenzel (eds.). 1996. The Whole Book: Cultural Perspectives on the Medieval Miscellany. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.10.3998/mpub.14148Search in Google Scholar

Nolan, Barbara. 1986. “‘A Poet Ther Was’: Chaucer’s Voices in the General Prologue to the Canterbury Tales”. PMLA 101.2: 154–169.10.2307/462401Search in Google Scholar

Nuzzo, Enrico. 2019. “Penser la sérialité, de l’Antiquité au XVIIIe siècle”. In: Anne-Marie de Gendt and Alicia C. Montoya (eds.). La pensée sérielle, du Moyen Age aux Lumières. Leiden: Brill. 15–35.10.1163/9789004386006_003Search in Google Scholar

Orlemanski, Julie. 2019. Symptomatic Subjects: Bodies, Medicine, and Causation in the Literature of Late Medieval England. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press. 10.9783/9780812296082Search in Google Scholar

Patterson, Lee. 1991. Chaucer and the Subject of History. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Search in Google Scholar

Phillips, Helen. 2010. “The Matter of Chaucer: Chaucer and the Boundaries of Romance”. In: Helen Phillips (ed.). Chaucer and Religion. Cambridge: Brewer. 65–80.10.1017/9781846158865.008Search in Google Scholar

Putter, Ad, and Judith A. Jefferson (eds.). 2018. The Transmission of Medieval Romance: Metres, Manuscripts and Early Prints. Cambridge: Brewer.10.2307/j.ctv1qv186Search in Google Scholar

Raybin, David. 1992. “‘Wommen, of Kynde, Desiren Libertee’: Rereading Dorigen, Rereading Marriage”. The Chaucer Review 27.1: 65–86.Search in Google Scholar

Reichl, Karl. 1990. “Griselda and the Patient Wife: The Popular Tradition in Middle English Narrative”. In: Raffaele Morabito (ed.). La storia di Griselda in Europa. L’Aquila: Japadre Editore. 119–136.Search in Google Scholar

Rigby, Stephen H. 2009. Wisdom and Chivalry: Chaucer’s Knight’s Tale and Medieval Political Theory. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/ej.9789004176249.i-332Search in Google Scholar

Rippl, Gabriele. 2022. “Ekphrasis”. In: John Frow (ed.). The Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Literary Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Article published 25 June 2019. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190201098.013.1057>.10.1093/acrefore/9780190201098.013.1057Search in Google Scholar

Rowe, Elizabeth Ashman. 1986. “Structure and Pattern in Chaucer’s Knight’s Tale”. Florilegium 8: 169–186.10.3138/flor.8.009Search in Google Scholar

Ruffolo, Lara. 1993. “Literary Authority and the Lists of Chaucer’s House of Fame: Destruction and Definition through Proliferation”. The Chaucer Review 27.4: 325–341.Search in Google Scholar

Salter, Elizabeth. 1962. Chaucer: The Knight’s Tale and the Clerk’s Tale. London: Arnold.Search in Google Scholar

Saunders, Corinne. 2004. “Chaucer’s Romances”. In: Corinne Saunders (ed.). A Companion to Romance: From Classical to Contemporary. Malden, MA: Blackwell. 85–103.10.1111/b.9780631232711.2004.00008.xSearch in Google Scholar

Schlauch, Margaret. 1927. Chaucer’s Constance and Accused Queens. New York: New York University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Sielke, Sabine. 2012. “Joy in Repetition: Acht Thesen zum Konzept der Serialität und zum Prinzip der Serie”. In: Frank Kelleter (ed.). Populäre Serialität: Narration – Evolution – Distinktion. Zum seriellen Erzählen seit dem 19. Jahrhundert. Bielefeld: transcript. 383–398.10.1515/transcript.9783839421413.383Search in Google Scholar

Simpson, James. 2002. The Oxford English Literary History. Vol. 2: 1350–1547. Reform and Cultural Revolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Sledd, James. 1947. “Dorigen’s Lament”. Modern Philology 45.1: 36–45.10.1086/388745Search in Google Scholar

Smith, Warren S. 2002. “Dorigen’s Lament and the Resolution of the ‘Franklin’s Tale’”. The Chaucer Review 36.4: 374–390.10.1353/cr.2002.0015Search in Google Scholar

Turner, Mark W. 2019. “Serial Culture in the Nineteenth Century: George W. M. Reynolds, the Many Mysteries of London and the Spread of Print”. In: Daniel Stein and Lisanna Wiele (eds.). Nineteenth-Century Serial Narrative in Transnational Perspective, 1830s–1860s. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. 193–211.10.1007/978-3-030-15895-8_11Search in Google Scholar

Turner, Mark W. 2020. “Seriality, Miscellaneity, and Compression in Nineteenth-Century Print”. Victorian Studies 62.2: 283–294.10.2979/victorianstudies.62.2.16Search in Google Scholar

Whetter, K.S. 2008. Understanding Genre and Medieval Romance. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Search in Google Scholar

Winstead, Karen A. 1988. “The ‘Beryn’-Writer as a Reader of Chaucer”. The Chaucer Review 22.3: 225–233.Search in Google Scholar