Article
Licensed
Unlicensed
Requires Authentication
Bolzano und Leibniz über Klarheit und Deutlichkeit
-
Stefania Centrone
Published/Copyright:
February 17, 2011
Abstract
At a time when they had largely fallen into disrepute Bolzano reactivated the distinctions between ‚clear‘ and ‚obscure‘, ‚distinct‘ and ‚confused‘ ideas. In the central sections of this paper I offer a critical reconstruction of the explanations of these pairs of opposita which are to be found in vol. III of Bolzano's monumental Wissenschaftslehre (1837). I then provide a detailed account of its Leibnizian counterparts that were well-known to the ‚Bohemian Leibniz‘, and finally I evaluate Bolzano's criticism thereof.
Online erschienen: 2011-02-17
Erschienen im Druck: 2010-November
© Walter de Gruyter 2010
You are currently not able to access this content.
You are currently not able to access this content.
Articles in the same Issue
- Themistius on Concept Acquisition and Knowledge of Essences
- Locke and the Nature of Ideas
- Bolzano und Leibniz über Klarheit und Deutlichkeit
- Two Unpublished Letters of René Descartes: On the Printing of the Meditations and the Groningen Affair
- From a Philosophy of Self to a Philosophy of Nature: Goethe and the Development of Schelling's Naturphilosophie
- III. Rezensionen
Articles in the same Issue
- Themistius on Concept Acquisition and Knowledge of Essences
- Locke and the Nature of Ideas
- Bolzano und Leibniz über Klarheit und Deutlichkeit
- Two Unpublished Letters of René Descartes: On the Printing of the Meditations and the Groningen Affair
- From a Philosophy of Self to a Philosophy of Nature: Goethe and the Development of Schelling's Naturphilosophie
- III. Rezensionen
