Home Epicurean Feelings (pathē) as Criteria
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Epicurean Feelings (pathē) as Criteria

  • Jan Maximilian Robitzsch ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: September 27, 2022

Abstract

This paper is dedicated to feelings (pathē) as criteria of truth and criteria of choice and avoidance in Epicureanism. The first section reviews two features of the other two Epicurean criteria of truth, perceptions and preconceptions: their non-rational and evident character. The second section extends the account to feelings, showing how, on the basis of their non-rational and evident character, feelings can be used to gain insights. The third section of the paper finally turns to feelings as criteria of choice and avoidance. It examines some neglected textual evidence that shows that perceptions and feelings are closely connected to each other, that is, that Epicurean feelings are defined as perceptions and observances of themselves, shedding some new light on the joint role of feelings and perceptions in choices and avoidances.

Aikin, S. 2020. “Skeptical Responses to Stoics and Epicureans on the Criterion”. In The Routledge Handbook of Hellenistic Philosophy. Ed. by K. Arenson. London/New York, 198–210.10.4324/9781351168120-16Search in Google Scholar

Annas, J. 1992. Hellenistic Philosophy of Mind. Berkeley.10.1525/9780520912007Search in Google Scholar

–. (ed.) 2012/[2001]. Cicero: On Moral Ends. Trans. by R. Woolf. New York.Search in Google Scholar

Armstrong, D./McOsker, M. (eds.) 2020. Philodemus, On Anger. Atlanta.Search in Google Scholar

Arrighetti, G. (ed.) 1973. Epicuro: Opere. Turin.Search in Google Scholar

Asmis, E. 1984. Epicurus’ Scientific Method. Ithaca/London.Search in Google Scholar

–. 2010/[1999]. “Epicurean Epistemology”. In The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy. Ed. by K. Algra et al. New York, 260–94.Search in Google Scholar

–. 2020. “Psychology”. In Oxford Handbook of Epicurus and Epicureanism. Ed. by P. Mitsis. Oxford, 189–220.Search in Google Scholar

Bailey, C. (ed.) 1947. Titi Lucreti Cari De Rerum Natura Libri Sex. 3 vols. Oxford.10.1093/actrade/9780198755876.book.1Search in Google Scholar

–. 1964/[1928]. The Greek Atomists and Epicurus: A Study. New York.Search in Google Scholar

Bakker, F. 2016. Epicurean Meteorology: Sources, Method, and Organization. Leiden/Boston.10.1163/9789004321588Search in Google Scholar

Barney, J. 2015. PHerc. 698 Cr. 3–4: A New Edition. M.A. thesis. Brigham Young University. Provo.Search in Google Scholar

Brunschwig, J. 1986. “The Cradle Argument in Epicureanism and Stoicism”. In The Norms of Nature: Studies in Hellenistic Ethics. Ed. by M. Schofield/G. Striker. Cambridge, 113–44.Search in Google Scholar

Bury, R. G. (ed.) 1935. Sextus Empiricus: Against the Logicians. Cambridge/London.10.4159/DLCL.sextus_empiricus-against_logicians.1935Search in Google Scholar

Cavalli, R. 2012. “Il processo di ἐπαίσθησις presso gli Epicurei”. Würzburger Jahrbücher für die Altertumswissenschaft 36, 157–67.Search in Google Scholar

Delattre, D. (ed.) 2007. Philodème de Gadara: Sur la Musique Livre IV. 2 vols. Paris.Search in Google Scholar

Dimas, P. 2019. “Pleasure and the Human Good”. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 57, 309–40.10.1093/oso/9780198850847.003.0010Search in Google Scholar

Einarson, B./De Lacy, P. (eds.) 1967. Plutarch: Moralia XIV. Cambridge/London.Search in Google Scholar

Everson, S. 1990. “Epicurus on the Truth of the Senses”. In Epistemology. Ed. by S. Everson. Cambridge, 161–83.Search in Google Scholar

Fine, G. 2014. The Possibility of Inquiry: Meno’s Paradox from Socrates to Sextus. Oxford.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199577392.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Gigandet, A. 2007. “La connaissance: principes et méthode”. In Lire Épicure et les Epicuriens. Ed. by A. Gigandet/P.-M. Morel. Paris, 73–98.Search in Google Scholar

Glidden, D. 1979. “Epicurus on Self-Perception”. American Philosophical Quarterly 16(4), 297–306.Search in Google Scholar

–. 1985. “Epicurean Prolēpsis”. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 3, 175–218.Search in Google Scholar

Goldschmidt, V. 1978. “Remarques sur l’origine épicurienne de la ‘prénotion’”. In Les Stoïciens et leur logique. Ed. J. Brunschwig. Paris, 155–69.Search in Google Scholar

Graver, M. 1990. “The Eye of the Beholder: Perceptual Relativity in Lucretius”. Apeiron 23(4), 91–116.10.1515/APEIRON.1990.23.4.91Search in Google Scholar

Hahmann, A. 2015. “Epicurus on Truth and Phantasia”. Ancient Philosophy 35, 155–82.10.5840/ancientphil20153519Search in Google Scholar

Hahmann, A./Robitzsch, J. M. forthcoming. “Epicurus’ Non-Propositional Theory of Truth”. Mnemosyne.Search in Google Scholar

Held, K. 2007. Hēdonē und Ataraxia bei Epikur. Paderborn.10.30965/9783969750490Search in Google Scholar

Ierodiakonou, K. 2011. “The Notion of enargeia in Hellenistic Philosophy”. In Episteme, etc.: Essays in Honour of Jonathan Barnes. Ed. by B. Morison/K. Ierodiakonou. Oxford, 60–73.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199696482.003.0003Search in Google Scholar

Inwood, B./Gerson, L. 1997. Hellenistic Philosophy: Introductory Readings. Indianapolis/Cambridge.Search in Google Scholar

Jürss, F. 1978. “Epikur und das Problem des Begriffs (Prolepse)”. Philologus 121, 211–25.10.1515/9783112578360-004Search in Google Scholar

–. 1991. Die epikureische Erkenntnistheorie. Berlin.Search in Google Scholar

Koenen, M. 1997. “Lucretius’ Olfactory Theory in De Rerum Natura IV”. In Lucretius and his Intellectual Background. Ed. by K. Algra et al. Amsterdam, 163–77.Search in Google Scholar

–. 1999. “Lucretius’ Explanation of Hearing in ‘De Rerum Natura’ IV 524–562”. Mnemosyne 52(4), 434–63.10.1163/156852599323283568Search in Google Scholar

Konstan, D. 2006. “Epicurean ‘Passions’ and the Good Life”. In The Virtuous Life in Greek Ethics. Ed. by B. Reis. Cambridge, 194–205.10.1017/CBO9780511482595.011Search in Google Scholar

–. 2008. “Commentary on Morel”. Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 23, 49–55.Search in Google Scholar

Laursen, S. 1997. “The Later Parts of Epicurus, On Nature, 25th book.” Cronache ercolanesi 27, 5–82.10.1287/inte.27.4.82Search in Google Scholar

Lautner, P. 1989. “Das Verhältnis von pathos und aisthesis bei Epikur”. Acta Classica Universitatis Scientiarum Debreceniensis 25, 23–27.Search in Google Scholar

Lee, E. 1978. “The Sense of an Object: Epicurus on Seeing and Hearing”. In Studies in Perception: Interrelations in the History of Philosophy of Science. Ed. by P. Machamer/R. Turnbull. Columbus, 27–59.Search in Google Scholar

Leone, G. (ed.) 2012. Epicuro: Sulla natura, libro II. Naples.Search in Google Scholar

–. 2018. “Il Pherc. 1811/335: Epicuro, Sulla natura, libro III?” Cronache Ercolanesi 48, 5–24.Search in Google Scholar

Liu, I. 2005. HOMOIÔSIS THEÔI: Becoming like God in Stoic and Epicurean Philosophy. PhD thesis. University of Chicago.Search in Google Scholar

Long, A. 1971. “Aisthesis, Prolepsis, and Linguistic Theory in Epicurus”. Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 18, 114–33.10.1111/j.2041-5370.1971.tb00115.xSearch in Google Scholar

Long, A./Sedley, D. (eds.) 1987. The Hellenistic Philosophers. vol. 1. New York.10.1017/CBO9780511808050Search in Google Scholar

Mannebach, E. (ed.) 1961. Aristippi et Cyrenaicorum fragmenta. Leiden/Cologne.10.1163/9789004613287_006Search in Google Scholar

Manuwald, A. 1972. Die Prolepsislehre Epikurs. Bonn.Search in Google Scholar

Milos, A. G. 2012. “Epicurus on the Origin and Formation of Preconceptions”. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 12(35), 239–56.Search in Google Scholar

–. 2015. “Epicurean Conceptual Content”. Prolegomena 14(2), 167–91.Search in Google Scholar

Monet, A. 1996. “[Philodème, Sur les Sensations] PHerc. 19/698”. Cronache ercolanesi 26, 27–126.Search in Google Scholar

Morel, P.-M. 2008. “Method and Evidence on Epicurean Preconception”. Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 23, 25–48.10.1163/22134417-90000090Search in Google Scholar

–. 2019. “Epicurean Epistemology”. In The Philosophy of Knowledge: A History. Volume I: Knowledge in Ancient Philosophy. Ed. by N. D. Smith. London/New York, 169–86.Search in Google Scholar

Mras, K. (ed.) 1954–56. Eusebius Werke 8: Die Praeparatio evangelica. Berlin.Search in Google Scholar

Prost, F. 2012. “La mesure des affections dans l’épicureisme”. Pallas 88, 71–81.10.4000/pallas.2463Search in Google Scholar

Rackham, H. (ed.) 1951. Cicero: On the Nature of the Gods. Academics. Cambridge/London.Search in Google Scholar

–. (ed.) 2006/[1931]. Cicero: On Ends. Cambridge/London.Search in Google Scholar

Robitzsch, J. M. 2021. “ἐπιβολή τῆς διανοίας: Reflections on the Fourth Epicurean Criterion of Truth”. Classical Quarterly 71(4), 601–16.10.1017/S0009838821000884Search in Google Scholar

Ross, G. R. T. (ed.) 1906. Aristotle: De Sensu and De Memoria. Cambridge.Search in Google Scholar

Ross, W. D. (ed.) 1956. Aristotelis De Anima. New York.Search in Google Scholar

Schwab, W./Shogry, S. forthcoming. “Epicureans and Stoics on the Rationality of Perception”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.Search in Google Scholar

Sedley, D. 1989. “Epicurus on the Common Sensibles”. In The Criterion of Truth. Ed. by P. Huby/G. Neal. Liverpool, 123–36.Search in Google Scholar

–. 1998. “The Inferential Foundations of Epicurean Ethics”. In Ethics. Ed. by S. Everson. Cambridge, 129–50.Search in Google Scholar

Smith, M. F. (ed.) 1993. Diogenes of Oenoanda: The Epicurean Inscription. Naples.Search in Google Scholar

–. (ed.) 2001. Lucretius: On the Nature of Things. Indianapolis.Search in Google Scholar

Spinelli, E. 2016. “Epistemologie ellenistiche: il problema del criterio”. In Storia della filosofia antica. Ed. by E. Spinelli. Rome, 169–96.Search in Google Scholar

Striker, G. 1974. “Κριτήριον τῆς ἀληθείας”. Nachrichten der Akademie der Wissenschaften in Göttingen 2, 47–110.Search in Google Scholar

–. 1996. “The Problem of the Criterion”. In Essays on Hellenistic Epistemology and Ethics. Ed. by G. Striker. New York, 150–65.Search in Google Scholar

Tepedino Guerra, A. 1985. “Il PHerc. 1678: Filodemo Sull’invidia?” Cronache ercolanesi 15, 113–25.Search in Google Scholar

Tsouna, V. 1998. The Epistemology of the Cyrenaic School. New York.10.1017/CBO9780511482663Search in Google Scholar

–. 2016. “Epicurean Preconceptions”. Phronesis 61, 160–221.10.1163/15685284-12341304Search in Google Scholar

Taylor, C. C. W. 1980. “All Perceptions Are True”. In Doubt and Dogmatism: Studies in Hellenistic Epistemology. Ed. by M. Schofield et al. Oxford, 105–24.Search in Google Scholar

Usener, H. (ed.) 1887. Epicurea. Leipzig.Search in Google Scholar

Verde, F. 2017. “Gli epicurei e la psicologia di Epicuro”. In Studi su ellenismo e filosofia romana. Ed. by F. Alesse et al. Rome, 33–64.Search in Google Scholar

–. 2018. “I pathe di Epicuro tra epsitemologia ed etica”. Elenchos 39(2), 205–30.10.1515/elen-2018-0014Search in Google Scholar

Vogt, K. 2016. “All Sense-Perceptions Are True: Epicurean Responses to Skepticism and Relativism”. In Lucretius and Modernity: Epicurean Encounters Across Time and Disciplines. Ed. by J. Lezra/L. Blake. New York, 145–59.10.1007/978-1-137-56657-7_9Search in Google Scholar

Warren, J. 2013. “Epicureans and Cyrenaics on Pleasure as a Pathos”. In Épicurisme et Scepticisme. Ed. S. Marchand/F. Verde. Rome, 85–103.Search in Google Scholar

–. 2016. “Epicurean Pleasure in Cicero’s De Finibus”. In Cicero’s De Finibus: Philosophical Approaches. Ed. by J. Annas/G. Betegh. Cambridge, 41–76.Search in Google Scholar

Wolfsdorf, D. 2009. “Epicurus on Εὐφροσύνη and Ἐνέργεια (DL 10.136)”. Apeiron 42(3), 221–58.10.1515/APEIRON.2009.42.3.221Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2022-09-27
Published in Print: 2024-11-26

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 20.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/agph-2021-0079/html
Scroll to top button