Criteria for Identification and Regulation of Systemically Important Banks
-
Alyona Dalke
,
Serik Svyatov
Abstract
Systemically important banks play a key role in ensuring the stability of the country’s financial system. Therefore, their identification and further regulation of their activities is an important objective facing the relevant authorities. Based on this, the research aims to evaluate Kazakhstan’s criteria for determining systemic importance in banking, assess the rationale behind its specific approach, and compare it with international practices to ensure effective management of systemic risks. The study calculates a generalized indicator of systemic importance for Kazakhstani banks by applying a weighted methodology based on assets, liabilities, deposits, loan portfolios, and other financial indicators to categorize banks into systemically important, potentially systemically important, and non-systemically important categories. Systemically important banks play a crucial role in the stability of both national financial systems and economies at large. In Kazakhstan, the National Bank identifies and supervises these banks using a methodology that evaluates the size of assets and liabilities, significance to the financial infrastructure, business complexity, and economic interconnectedness. The criteria aim to quantify the systemic importance and ensure that regulations are tailored to the risk profile of each institution. As of early 2023, institutions like JSC “Halyk Savings Bank of Kazakhstan” and JSC “Kaspi Bank” are recognized as systemically important, with others deemed potentially significant. The regulation of these banks includes additional capital provisions to mitigate risks and promote financial stability. Proposed measures suggest varying regulatory intensity based on the calculated systemic importance, including enhanced credit risk management. This approach aims to diminish market concentration and encourage equity among financial entities. Despite advancements, the Kazakhstani banking sector’s evolution faces challenges, such as the need for improved financial literacy and a more competitive environment. Continuous international cooperation is essential, as global practices provide valuable insights that can refine local regulations. This integration of local and international regulatory frameworks aims to foster a resilient financial system in Kazakhstan.
References
Abramova, I. 2021. “Theoretical Aspects of the Bank Management System.” Economic Forum 1 (1): 160–6. https://doi.org/10.36910/6775-2308-8559-2021-1-20.Search in Google Scholar
Agency of the Republic of Kazakhstan for Regulation and Development of the Financial Market. 2021. Results of the Supervisory Assessment of Banks Conducted by the Agency in 2021 According to the SREP Methodology. https://www.gov.kz/memleket/entities/ardfm/documents/details/283699?lang=ru.Search in Google Scholar
Aldasoro, I., and I. Alves. 2018. “Multiplex Interbank Networks and Systemic Importance: An Application to European Data.” Journal of Financial Stability 35: 17–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2016.12.008.Search in Google Scholar
Alzoubi, M., A. A. Alsmadi, and H. Kasasbeh. 2022. “Systemically Important Bank: A Bibliometric Analysis for the Period of 2002 to 2022.” Sage Open 12 (4): 21582440221141259. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221141259.Search in Google Scholar
Bao, C., D. Wu, and J. Li. 2020. “Measuring Systemic Importance of Banks Considering Risk Interactions: An ANOVA-Like Decomposition Method.” Journal of Management Science and Engineering 5 (1): 23–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmse.2019.12.001.Search in Google Scholar
Bavoso, V. 2021. “Market-Based Finance, Debt and Systemic Risk: A Critique of the EU Capital Markets Union.” Accounting, Economics, and Law: Convivium 11 (3): 20170039. https://doi.org/10.1515/ael-2017-0039.Search in Google Scholar
Bengtsson, E., U. Holmberg, and K. Jönsson. 2013. “Identifying Systemically Important Banks in Sweden–What Do Quantitative Indicators Tell Us?” Sveriges Riksbank Economic Review: 2.Search in Google Scholar
Biondi, Y., and I. J. Graeff. 2020. “Between Prudential Regulation and Shareholder Value: An Empirical Perspective on Bank Shareholder Equity (2001–2017).” Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium 14 (3): 395–429, https://doi.org/10.1515/ael-2019-0083.Search in Google Scholar
Bramer, P., and H. Gischer. 2012. “Domestic Systemically Important Banks: An Indicator-Based Measurement Approach for the Australian Banking System.” Working Paper Series 3. https://www.vwlgeld.ovgu.de/vwlgeld_media/downloads/publikationen/FEMM_2012_03.pdf.Search in Google Scholar
Chorna, N. P. 2009. “Development of Agrarian Business in Ukraine Under Influence of World Financial and Economic Crisis.” Actual Problems of Economics 11: 40–8.Search in Google Scholar
Ciula, J., A. Generowicz, A. Oleksy-Gebczyk, A. Gronba-Chyla, I. Wiewiorska, P. Kwasnicki, et al.. 2024. “Technical and Economic Aspects of Environmentally Sustainable Investment in Terms of the EU Taxonomy.” Energies 17 (10): 2239. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17102239.Search in Google Scholar
Cui, Z., Z. Liao, and Y. Luo. 2023. “How Should we Think About Common Prosperity and Challenges in the Context of Financialization?” Trans/Form/Acao: Revista de Filosofia 46: 291–318. https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-3173.2023.v46esp.p291.Search in Google Scholar
Dalke, А. Y., and S. А. Svyatov. 2022. “Systemically Significant Banks: Identification Criteria and Regulation Approaches in Kazakhstan.” Bulletin of Al-Farabi Kazakh National University 2 (140): 3–13.10.26577/be.2022.v140.i2.01Search in Google Scholar
Danchuk, V. D., L. S. Kozak, and M. V. Danchuk. 2015. “Stress Testing of Business Activity Using the Synergetic Method of Risk Assessment.” Actual Problems of Economics 171 (9): 189–98.Search in Google Scholar
Elsinger, H., A. Lehar, and M. Summer. 2006. “Systemically Important Banks: An Analysis for the European Banking System.” International Economics and Economic Policy 3: 73–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10368-006-0046-4.Search in Google Scholar
European Banking Authority. 2023. Guidelines on Criteria to Assess Other Systemically Important Institutions (O-SIIs). https://www.eba.europa.eu/regulation-and-policy/own-funds/guidelines-on-criteria-to-to-assess-other-systemically-important-institutions-o-siis-#pane-291.Search in Google Scholar
Furmanchuk, O. 2023. “The Role of State Finance Audit in the System of Accounting and Analytical Support of the State Funds Management System.” Economics of Development 22 (4): 34–42. https://doi.org/10.57111/econ/4.2023.34.Search in Google Scholar
Galaziuk, N., and O. Zelinska. 2021. “Current Trends of Transnational Banks and their Influence on the World Economy in the Context of Financial Globalization.” Economic Forum 1 (4): 42–8.10.36910/6775-2308-8559-2021-4-6Search in Google Scholar
Halyk Research. 2023. Banks of Kazakhstan in January 2023. https://halykfinance.kz/download/files/analytics/banks_jan23.pdf.Search in Google Scholar
Kerimkulova, D. D., M. T. Zholamanova, and I. V. Larionova. 2022. “Trends in Ensuring Financial Stability of the Banking Sector of Kazakhstan.” Bulletin of the L.N. Eurasian National University. Economic Series 2: 198–208. https://doi.org/10.32523/2789-4320-2022-2-198-208.Search in Google Scholar
Khalegi, F., A. Kadyraliev, D. Tursunalieva, A. Orozbekov, and A. Bigali. 2024. “Blockchain and Sustainable Finance: Enhancing Transparency and Efficiency in Green Investments.” Scientific Bulletin of Mukachevo State University. Series Economics 11 (3): 125–37. https://doi.org/10.52566/msu-econ3.2024.125.Search in Google Scholar
Miethlich, B., and L. Slahor. 2018. “Creating Shared Value Through Implementing Vocational Rehabilitation in the Corporate Social Responsibility Strategy: A Literature Review.” In Vision 2020: Sustainable Economic Development and Application of Innovation Management, 1444–60. Seville, Spain.10.33543/16001.14441460Search in Google Scholar
Moratis, G., and P. Sakellaris. 2021. “Measuring the Systemic Importance of Banks.” Journal of Financial Stability 54: 100878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2021.100878.Search in Google Scholar
Moutot, P. 2023. “Independence of Central Banks: The Need for an Urgent Revamp.” Accounting, Economics, and Law: Convivium 13 (2): 133–67. https://doi.org/10.1515/ael-2019-0070.Search in Google Scholar
National Bank of Kazakhstan. 2018. Information About Equity, Liabilities and Assets. https://www.nationalbank.kz/ru/news/svedeniya-o-sobstvennom-kapitale/rubrics/572.Search in Google Scholar
National Bank of Tajikistan. 2023. Rules for Determining Systemically Important Credit Institutions. https://nbt.tj/ru/suboti-moliyavi/sanadho/koidahoi-muayyan-namudani-tashkilot-oi-arzii-nizomsoz.php.Search in Google Scholar
National Bank of the Republic of Belarus. 2023. List of Systemically Important Banks and Non-Bank Financial Institutions. https://www.nbrb.by/system/main-banks.Search in Google Scholar
National Bank of the Republic of Kazakhstan. 2019. Resolution No. 240 On Approval of the Rules for Classifying Financial Institutions as Systemically Important. https://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/V1900019925#z76.Search in Google Scholar
National Bank of Ukraine. 2023. About Systemically Important Banks. https://bank.gov.ua/ua/supervision/about/sib.Search in Google Scholar
Niyazbekova, S., A. Zverkova, N. Sokolinskaya, and S. Kerimkhulle. 2023. “Features of the «Green» Strategies for the Development of Banks.” E3S Web of Conferences 402: 08029. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202340208029.Search in Google Scholar
Oleksy-Gebczyk, A. 2024. “Inflation in Poland: Macroeconomic Analysis.” Academy Review 2: 242–55. https://doi.org/10.32342/2074-5354-2024-2-61-17.Search in Google Scholar
Prymostka, L., and T. Kysil. 2023. “Intelligent Information Systems of the Banking Sector: General Characteristics and Information Environment.” Scientific Bulletin of Mukachevo State University. Series Economics 10 (4): 43–53. https://doi.org/10.52566/msu-econ4.2023.43.Search in Google Scholar
Rizwan, M. S., G. Ahmad, and D. Ashraf. 2020. “Systemic Risk: The Impact of COVID-19.” Finance Research Letters 36: 101682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2020.101682.Search in Google Scholar
Roncoroni, A., S. Battiston, M. D’Errico, G. Hałaj, and C. Kok. 2021. “Interconnected Banks and Systemically Important Exposures.” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 133: 104266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jedc.2021.104266.Search in Google Scholar
Salim, M. Z., and K. Daly. 2021. “Modelling Systemically Important Banks vis-a-vis the Basel Prudential Guidelines.” Journal of Risk and Financial Management 14 (7): 295. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14070295.Search in Google Scholar
Slovik, P. 2012. “Systemically Important Banks and Capital Regulation Challenges.” OECD Economics Department Working Papers 916. https://doi.org/10.1787/5kg0ps8cq8q6-en.Search in Google Scholar
Spytska, L. 2023. “Prospects for the Legalization of Cryptocurrency in Ukraine, Based on the Experience of Other Countries.” Social and Legal Studios 6 (4): 226–32. https://doi.org/10.32518/sals4.2023.226.Search in Google Scholar
Svyatov, S. A., and M. A. Svyatova. 2021. “Systemically Important Banks in the National Economy: Identification Criteria, Role and Approaches to Regulation.” Finance and Accounting 4 (133): 127–35.Search in Google Scholar
Tabak, B. M., D. Fazio, and D. Cajueiro. 2013. “Systemically Important Banks and Financial Stability: The Case of Latin America.” Journal of Banking & Finance 37 (10): 3855–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.06.003.Search in Google Scholar
Thomson, J. B. 2010. “On Systemically Important Financial Institutions and Progressive Systemic Mitigation.” ExpressO. https://works.bepress.com/james_thomson/1/.10.2139/ssrn.1474836Search in Google Scholar
Vovchenko, O. 2021. “Development of the Banks’ Risk Management System Under Conditions of Uncertainty.” Economics of Development 20 (4): 8–15. https://doi.org/10.57111/econ.20.4.2021.8-15.Search in Google Scholar
World Bank. 2020. Kazakhstan’s Transition to a Market Economy: Economic Reforms and Challenges. https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/kazakhstan.Search in Google Scholar
World Bank. 2024. Challenges and Changes: Kazakhstan Through Eyes of World Bank. https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/opinion/2024/03/27/challenges-and-changes-kazakhstan-through-eyes-of-world-bank.Search in Google Scholar
Zhagyparova, A. O., L. M. Sembiyeva, and G. A. Samarkhan. 2021. “The Current State of the Banking System of Kazakhstan in a Crisis.” Financial Space 1 (41): 82–97.Search in Google Scholar
© 2025 CONVIVIUM, association loi de 1901
