Home German Linguistics Was motiviert die partielle Unflektiertheit des indefiniten Artikels? Markiertheitstheoretische und sprachhistorische Überlegungen / What motivates the partial uninflectedness of the indefinite article? Markedness-theoretical and languagehistorical considerations
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Was motiviert die partielle Unflektiertheit des indefiniten Artikels? Markiertheitstheoretische und sprachhistorische Überlegungen / What motivates the partial uninflectedness of the indefinite article? Markedness-theoretical and languagehistorical considerations

  • Dagmar Bittner EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: June 5, 2007
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill
Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik
From the journal Volume 34 Issue 3

Abstract

German noun phrases containing an article realise gender and case inflection on that article. There seems to be only a few exceptions to this rule, e.g., the indefinite article (ein) and the related negation (kein) and possessive articles (mein, dein, etc.) remain uninflected in nom.sg.msc. and nom./acc.sg.ntr. This is marked behaviour with respect to the dominating type of nominal inflection. It will be argued that there exists a markedness conflict between different structural parameters. The behaviour of the indefinite article is motivated, and thus unmarked, with respect to the structural parameters case hierarchy, gender hierarchy, and paradigmatic preferences for the form of articles. The development of noun or noun phrase inflection in language history reveals that both the emergence of the indefinite article and noun group inflection are part of a general reorganization of the formal means of nominal determination. As one result, central functions of nominal determination are formally separated from inflection. Being functional heads, the separate determiners attract other grammatical markings as well. However, the combined formal realisation of grammatical features does not involve a dependence of determination from inflection, thus the non-inflection of determiners in nom.sg.msc. and nom./acc.sg.ntr. is not marked with respect to nominal determination.

Published Online: 2007-06-05
Published in Print: 2007-03-20

© Walter de Gruyter

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Inhalt
  2. Jahresinhalt
  3. Nominale: flektiert und unflektiert / Nominals: inflected and uninflected
  4. (Nicht)Flexion des Substantiv(s). Neue Überlegungen zum finiten Substantiv / (Non)inflection of the substantive. New thoughts on the finite substantive
  5. Unflektierte Substantive sind nicht infinit / Uninflected substantives are not infinite
  6. Was motiviert die partielle Unflektiertheit des indefiniten Artikels? Markiertheitstheoretische und sprachhistorische Überlegungen / What motivates the partial uninflectedness of the indefinite article? Markedness-theoretical and languagehistorical considerations
  7. Die nicht-flektierten Adjektive / The uninflected adjectives
  8. Dieser freundlicher Streit mit Rivalem und andern welchen Leuten.Über aktuelle Ungewöhnlichkeiten und latente Möglichkeiten in der Nominalphrase / Dieser freundlicher Streit mit Rivalem und andern welchen Leuten.On current oddities and latent possibilities in the nominal phrase
  9. Historical Sociolinguistics Network (HiSoN)
  10. So, und so, und so weiter. Vom Sinn und Unsinn der Wortklassifikation / So, und so, und so weiter. On the purpose and nonsense of part-of-speech classification
  11. Dmitri Zakharine: Von Angesicht zu Angesicht. Der Wandel direkter Kommunikation in derostund westeuropäischen Neuzeit. / From Face to Face. The change of direct communication in East and Western European modern times
  12. Löcher bohren, Dächer bauen. Fachkonferenz “Perspektiven der Jugendsprachforschung” in Zürich, 17.-19.02.2005 / Löcher bohren, Dächer bauen. The symposium “Perspectives of research in adolescent language” in Zurich, 17–19 February 2005
  13. 11. Arbeitstagung zur Gesprächsforschung am Institut für Deutsche Sprache in Mannheim, 6.-8. April 2005 / 11th workshop on conversation and discourse analysis at the German Language Institute in Mannheim, 6–8 April 2005
  14. Language History from Below. Linguistic Variation in the Germanic Languages from 1700–2000, University of Bristol, 6–8 April 2005
  15. Cooperation and conflict in ingroup and intergroup communication „Dialoganalyse X“ 2005 – Bericht über den Kongress der IADA. Universität Bukarest, 25.-28. Mai 2005 / Report on the IADA Convention. University of Bucharest, 25–28 May 2005
  16. Computerlinguistik im Internet / Computer linguistics on the Internet
  17. Zeitschriftenschau
Downloaded on 25.1.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ZGL.2006.023/html
Scroll to top button