Home Effects of phonological phrasing on syntactic structure
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Effects of phonological phrasing on syntactic structure

  • Nancy C Kula
Published/Copyright: August 17, 2007
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill
The Linguistic Review
From the journal Volume 24 Issue 2-3

Abstract

Bantu languages are renowned as tone languages that utilize this suprasegmental feature not only on the lexical level to distinguish lexical items, but also on the grammatical level to distinguish clause types. This article investigates one such use of grammatical tone in relative clauses in Bemba where a low tone can be used in place of a segmental relative marker. This low tone relative morpheme functions in conjunction with phrase boundary tone indicated on the head noun and which entails either restrictive or non-restrictive interpretations of relatives. Considering a mapping of XPs to major phonological phrases in the syntax-prosody interface, the resultant phonological phrasing in relatives influences the choice of syntactic structure. In the case at hand, a head-raising analysis provides an optimal mapping between syntax and prosody for restrictives. Further, a more direct influence of phonology on syntax can be seen in a perception-based model like Dynamic Syntax where the on-line building of syntactic trees can gain import from phonological information.

Published Online: 2007-08-17
Published in Print: 2007-08-21

© Walter de Gruyter

Downloaded on 20.11.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/TLR.2007.008/html
Scroll to top button