Abstract
Structuralism
One of the most significant developments of linguistics in the past century is undoubtedly the introduction of the distinction between form and substance. The adoption of this dichotomy was a crucial part of the launching of structural linguistics. Although today these Saussurean terms may have an obsolete ring to them, it is nonetheless true that this distinction still enjoys the status of ‘inescapable’ cornerstone of linguistic methodology. For the linguist the primary focus is on structure whereas the study of the way this structure is actualized in speaking and listening falls in the domain of performance, behavioral research and experimental phonetics.
© Walter de Gruyter
Articles in the same Issue
- A theoretical synopsis of Evolutionary Phonology
 - Comments on Juliette Blevins, “A theoretical synopsis of Evolutionary Phonology”
 - An evolutionary perspective on stop inventories
 - Transmissibility and the role of the phonological component
 - On the use of Evolutionary Phonology for phonological theory
 - On the typology of final laryngeal neutralization: Evolutionary Phonology and laryngeal realism
 - The Amphichronic Program vs. Evolutionary Phonology
 - Rejecting the phonetics/phonology split
 - Reply to commentaries
 
Articles in the same Issue
- A theoretical synopsis of Evolutionary Phonology
 - Comments on Juliette Blevins, “A theoretical synopsis of Evolutionary Phonology”
 - An evolutionary perspective on stop inventories
 - Transmissibility and the role of the phonological component
 - On the use of Evolutionary Phonology for phonological theory
 - On the typology of final laryngeal neutralization: Evolutionary Phonology and laryngeal realism
 - The Amphichronic Program vs. Evolutionary Phonology
 - Rejecting the phonetics/phonology split
 - Reply to commentaries