Article
Licensed
Unlicensed
Requires Authentication
When satisfaction is not enough. Comments on Schlenker's ‘Be Articulate. A pragmatic theory of presupposition projection’
-
Rob van der Sandt
Published/Copyright:
December 1, 2008
Published Online: 2008-12-01
Published in Print: 2008-12-01
© 2008 by Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, D-10785 Berlin
You are currently not able to access this content.
You are currently not able to access this content.
Articles in the same Issue
- Be Articulate: A pragmatic theory of presupposition projection
- As brief as possible (but no briefer)
- Transparency theory: Empirical issues and psycholinguistic routes
- Two short notes on Schlenker's theory of presupposition projection
- Why Be Articulate? Two ways to look at the Transparency Theory
- Transparency Theory and its dynamic alternatives: Commentary on “Be Articulate”
- Projection and pragmatics: Two comments
- When satisfaction is not enough. Comments on Schlenker's ‘Be Articulate. A pragmatic theory of presupposition projection’
- Presupposition projection: Explanatory strategies
Articles in the same Issue
- Be Articulate: A pragmatic theory of presupposition projection
- As brief as possible (but no briefer)
- Transparency theory: Empirical issues and psycholinguistic routes
- Two short notes on Schlenker's theory of presupposition projection
- Why Be Articulate? Two ways to look at the Transparency Theory
- Transparency Theory and its dynamic alternatives: Commentary on “Be Articulate”
- Projection and pragmatics: Two comments
- When satisfaction is not enough. Comments on Schlenker's ‘Be Articulate. A pragmatic theory of presupposition projection’
- Presupposition projection: Explanatory strategies
