Home Plant names and folk taxonomies: Frameworks for ethnosemiotic inquiry
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Plant names and folk taxonomies: Frameworks for ethnosemiotic inquiry

  • David Herman

    His research interests include interdisciplinary narrative theory, discourse analysis, conversational storytelling, and cognitive science and narrative. His publications include Universal Grammar and Narrative Form (1995); Story Logic: Problems and Possibilities of Narrative (2002); Narrative Theory and the Cognitive Sciences (2003); and Přirozený jazyk vyprávě;ní [Narration in Natural Language] (2005).

    EMAIL logo
    and Susan Moss

    Her research interests include indigenous plants and sustainable agricultural practices.

Published/Copyright: December 4, 2007
Semiotica
From the journal Volume 2007 Issue 167

Abstract

Examining the rich naming systems associated with plants, this paper suggests how ethnobiological (specifically, ethnobotanical) inquiry can benefit from greater cooperation and synergy among fields concerned with naming practices, including onomastics, lexicography, cognitive anthropology, and cognitive linguistics. Our pilot-study focuses on the names of approximately one hundred heirloom vegetables culled from seed catalogues and other publications devoted to the preservation of seeds for varieties of vegetables passed down from generation to generation (e.g. Brown 1996; Bradshaw 2001; and Rakita 2003). We characterize these plant names as elements in a folk-taxonomic system, arguing that the study of such native nomencla-tural schemes can productively inform research on the mapping relationships among names or words, conceptual categories, and structures in the world. In turn, research in ethnosemiotics, defined broadly as the study of native understandings of sign-systems (Hoppál 1988; Voigt 1994), stands to gain from a more extensive integration of tools developed by theorists of verbal language and of the cognitive bases for cross-culturally attested naming patterns. Interdisciplinary work of this kind promises not only to advance ethnosemiotic research, but also to help separate out what is cognitively universal from what is culturally variable in semiotic and communicative processes in general.

About the authors

David Herman

His research interests include interdisciplinary narrative theory, discourse analysis, conversational storytelling, and cognitive science and narrative. His publications include Universal Grammar and Narrative Form (1995); Story Logic: Problems and Possibilities of Narrative (2002); Narrative Theory and the Cognitive Sciences (2003); and Přirozený jazyk vyprávě;ní [Narration in Natural Language] (2005).

Susan Moss

Her research interests include indigenous plants and sustainable agricultural practices.

Published Online: 2007-12-04
Published in Print: 2007-11-20

© Walter de Gruyter

Downloaded on 15.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/SEM.2007.069/html
Scroll to top button