Home Dyadic versus triadic sign models in functional and object-oriented computer programming paradigms
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Dyadic versus triadic sign models in functional and object-oriented computer programming paradigms

  • Kumiko Tanaka-Ishii

    Kumiko Tanaka-Ishii (b. 1969) is an Associate Professor in the Department of Creative Informatics, Graduate School of Information Science and Technology at the University of Tokyo 〈kumiko@i.u-tokyo.ac.jp〉. Her research interests are computational semiotics, computational linguistics, and natural language processing. Her major publications include ‘Three RoboCup simulation league commentator systems’ (with E. Andre, K. Binstead et al., 2000); ‘Progress through performance competitions? A large-scale comparative study of multi-agent teams’ (with G. Kaminka, I. Frank, and K. Arai, 2001); and ‘Predictive text entry techniques using adaptive language models’ (in press).

    EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: April 28, 2006
Semiotica
From the journal Volume 2006 Issue 158

Abstract

The correspondence between the triadic sign model proposed by Peirce and the dyadic sign model proposed by Saussure is examined. Traditionally, it has been thought that Peirce's interpretant corresponds to Saussure's signified and Saussure's model lacks Peirce's object. However, our analysis of the two most widely used computer programming paradigms suggests that Peirce's object formally corresponds to Saussure's signified, and that Saussure's sign model is obtained when Peirce's interpretant is located outside of his model in the language system.

About the author

Kumiko Tanaka-Ishii

Kumiko Tanaka-Ishii (b. 1969) is an Associate Professor in the Department of Creative Informatics, Graduate School of Information Science and Technology at the University of Tokyo 〈kumiko@i.u-tokyo.ac.jp〉. Her research interests are computational semiotics, computational linguistics, and natural language processing. Her major publications include ‘Three RoboCup simulation league commentator systems’ (with E. Andre, K. Binstead et al., 2000); ‘Progress through performance competitions? A large-scale comparative study of multi-agent teams’ (with G. Kaminka, I. Frank, and K. Arai, 2001); and ‘Predictive text entry techniques using adaptive language models’ (in press).

Published Online: 2006-04-28
Published in Print: 2006-02-20

© Walter de Gruyter

Downloaded on 11.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/SEM.2006.006/html
Scroll to top button