Article
Licensed
Unlicensed
Requires Authentication
The second five years of LT: Editorial report
Published/Copyright:
January 3, 2007
Abstract
1. Vital statistics
When an article is submitted to LT, it is assigned a Responsible Editor from among the Editorial Board, who sends the submission to one, two, or more outside reviewers. Once the reviews are in, the Editorial Board decides on the basis of the Responsible Editor's report, which includes the full reviews, whether to accept the article for publication (unconditionally or, far oftener, subject to certain revisions), to recommend resubmission upon (usually major) revisions, or not to accept it (and not to invite resubmission in revised form either).
Published Online: 2007-01-03
Published in Print: 2006-12-01
© Walter de Gruyter
You are currently not able to access this content.
You are currently not able to access this content.
Articles in the same Issue
- Motivations for second position: Evidence from North-Central Australia
- Constituent order change in the Tai languages of Assam
- Typological variation in the ergative morphology of Indo-Aryan languages
- Randomization tests in language typology
- Book Reviews
- THE UNIVERSALS ARCHIVE goes do-it-yourself
- The second five years of LT: Editorial report
- Contents of Linguistic Typology Volume 10 (2006)
Articles in the same Issue
- Motivations for second position: Evidence from North-Central Australia
- Constituent order change in the Tai languages of Assam
- Typological variation in the ergative morphology of Indo-Aryan languages
- Randomization tests in language typology
- Book Reviews
- THE UNIVERSALS ARCHIVE goes do-it-yourself
- The second five years of LT: Editorial report
- Contents of Linguistic Typology Volume 10 (2006)
