Home Introduction: Current issues in optimality theoretic syntax
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Introduction: Current issues in optimality theoretic syntax

  • Peter Ackema EMAIL logo and Helen De Hoop
Published/Copyright: September 13, 2006
Linguistics
From the journal Volume 44 Issue 5

Abstract

1. Introduction to OT syntax

General tendencies that hold in or across languages are easy to find. For example, sentences in English usually have a subject. The subject often is the first element in the sentence. In many cases, the subject is the agent of the action expressed by the verb. Crucially, these statements are mere tendencies, not absolute laws. It is very difficult to find observable properties that hold without exception across languages. If we were to formulate these general statements as rules, these rules would often have to be broken because of a number of exceptions. In standard generative syntax, constraints are assumed to be inviolable, i.e., they must be satisfied in a grammatical sentence. In order to “save” generalizations (rules) from apparent violations (counterexamples) in the linguistic data, generally three strategies are applied:

  1. 1. assume empty structure to satisfy the constraint (invisibly);

  2. 2. assume an abstract level at which the constraint is satisfied (invisibly);

  3. 3. modify the constraint, making it less general, so that it is satisfied by the data.


*Correspondence address: Peter Ackema, Department of Linguistics and English Language, University of Edinburgh, 40 George Square, Edinburgh, EH8 9LL, United Kingdom.

Published Online: 2006-09-13
Published in Print: 2006-09-01

© Walter de Gruyter

Downloaded on 29.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/LING.2006.028/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button