Intrapartum fetal monitoring today

References

1 Althaus JE, SM Petersen, H Fox, et al.: Can electronic fetal monitoring identify preterm neonates with cerebral white matter injury? Obstet Gynecol105 (2005) 458Search in Google Scholar

2 Amer-Wahlin I, C Hellsten, et al.: Cardiotocography only versus cardiotocography plus ST analysis of fetal electrocardiography for intrapartum fetal monitoring: a Swedish randomized controlled trial. Lancet358 (2001) 534Search in Google Scholar

3 Antoine C, BK Young: Fetal lactic acidosis with epidural anesthesia. Am J Obstet Gynecol142 (1982) 55Search in Google Scholar

4 Arikan GM, MC Heausler, et al.: Maternal perceptions of labor with fetal monitoring by pulse oximetry in a research setting. Birth25 (1998) Sep 18210.1046/j.1523-536X.1998.00182.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

5 Badawi N, JJ Kurinczuk, et al.: Antepartum risk factors for newborn encephalopathy: the western Australian case-control study. Br Med J317 (1998) 1549Search in Google Scholar

6 Banta HD, SB Thacker: Assessing the costs and benefits of electronic fetal monitoring. Obstet Gynecol Surv34 (1979) Aug 62710.1097/00006254-197908000-00026Search in Google Scholar PubMed

7 Beard RW, ED Morris: Foetal and maternal acid-base balance during normal labor. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw72 (1965) 496Search in Google Scholar

8 Benson RC, F Shubeck, J Deutschberger, et al.: Fetal heart rate as a predictor of fetal distress. Obstet Gynecol32 (1968) 259Search in Google Scholar

9 Gambling DR, SK Sharma, SM Ramin, et al.: A randomized study of combined spinal-epidural analgesia versus intravenous meperidine during labor: impact on cesarean delivery rate. Anesthesiology89 (1998) 1336Search in Google Scholar

10 Garite TJ, GA Dildy, et al.: A multicenter controlled trial of fetal pulse oximetry in the intrapartum management of nonreassuring fetal heart rate patterns. Am J Obstet Gynecol183 (200) 104910.1067/mob.2000.110632Search in Google Scholar PubMed

11 Giannina G, ER Guzman, et al.: Comparison of effects of meperidine and nalbiphine on intrapartum fetal heart rate tracings. Obstet Gynecol86 (1995) 441Search in Google Scholar

12 Goodwin TM, L Milner-Masterson, RH Paul: Elimination of fetal scalp blood sampling on a large clinical service. Obstet Gynecol83 (1994) 971Search in Google Scholar

13 Hallak M, J Martinez-Poyer, et al.: The effect of magnesium sulfate on fetal heart rate parameters: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol181 (1999) 1122Search in Google Scholar

14 Hatjis Cg, PJ Meis: Sinusoidal fetal heart rate pattern associated with butorphanol administration. Obstet Gynecol67 (1986) 377Search in Google Scholar

15 Haverkamp AD, M Orleans, S Langendoerfer, et al.: A controlled trial of the differential effects of intrapartum fetal monitoring. Am J Obstet Gynecol134 (1979) 399Search in Google Scholar

16 Haverkamp AD, HE Thompson, JG McFee, et al.: The evaluation of continuous fetal heart rate monitoring in high-risk pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol125 (1976) 310Search in Google Scholar

17 Hofmeyer GJ: Amnioinfusion for potential or suspected umbilical cord compression in labour. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2005, Issue 3Search in Google Scholar

18 Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring. ACOG Practice Bulletin No.78, Dec 2005Search in Google Scholar

19 Johnson TR Jr, AA Compton, J Rotmensch, et al.: Significance of the sinusoidal fetal heart rate pattern. Am J Obstet Gynecol139 (1981) 446Search in Google Scholar

20 Jongsma HW, JG Nijhuis: Critical analysis of the validity of electronic fetal monitoring. J Perinat Med19 (1991) 33Search in Google Scholar

21 Klauser CK, EE Christensen, et al.: Use of fetal pulse oximetry among high-risk women in labor: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol192 (2005) 1810Search in Google Scholar

22 Kopecky EA, ML Ryan, et al.: Fetal response to maternally administered morphine. Am J Obstet Gynecol183 (2000) 183 30Search in Google Scholar

23 Kruger K, B Hallberg, et al.: Predictive value of fetal scalp blood lactate concentration and pH markers of neurologic disability. Am J Obstet Gynecol181 (1999) 1072Search in Google Scholar

24 Kubli F, EH Hon, et al.: Observations on heart rate and pH in the human fetus during labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol104 (1969) 1190Search in Google Scholar

25 Kulier R, AM Golmezoglu, et al.: Betamimetics in fetal distress: randomised controlled trial. J Perinat Med25 (1997) 97Search in Google Scholar

26 Kulier R, GJ Hofmeyr: Tocolytics for suspected intrapartum fetal distress. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 1998. Issue 1. Art. No.:CD00003510.1002/14651858.CD000035Search in Google Scholar PubMed

27 Kulier R, GJ Hofmeyr: Tocolytics for suspected intrapartum fetal distress. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2) (2000) CD000035Search in Google Scholar

28 Kunhert M, S Schmidt: Intrapartum management of nonreassuring fetal heart rate patterns: a randomized controlled trial of fetal pulse oximetry. Am J Obstet Gynecol191 (2004) 1989Search in Google Scholar

29 Lieberman E, S O'Donoghue: Unintended effects of epidural analgesia during labor: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol186 (2002) S3110.1067/mob.2002.122522Search in Google Scholar PubMed

30 Maeda K, T Nagasawam: Automatic computerized diagnosis of fetal sinusoidal heart rate. Fetal Diagn Ther20 (2005) 328Search in Google Scholar

31 Magee LA, GS Dawes, et al.: A randomised controlled comparison of betamethasone with dexamethasone: effects on the antenatal fetal heart rate. Br J Obstet Gynaecol104 (1998) 1233Search in Google Scholar

32 Morrision JC, BF Chez, et al.: Intrapartum fetal heart rate assessment: monitoring by auscultation or electronic means. Am J Obstet Gynecol168 (1993) 63Search in Google Scholar

33 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Research Planning Workshop. Electronic fetal heart rate monitoring: research guidelines for interpretation. Am J Obstet Gynecol177 (1997) 1385Search in Google Scholar

34 Nielsen PV, B Stigsby, et al.: Intra- and inter-observer variability in the assessment of intrapartum cardiotocograms. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand66 (1987) 421Search in Google Scholar

35 Panayotopoulos N, E Slamalekis, et al.: Intrapartum vibratory acoustic stimulation after maternal meperidine administration. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol25 (1998) 139Search in Google Scholar

36 Park MI, JG Hwang, KJ Cha, et al.: Computerized analysis of fetal heart rate parameters by gestational age. Int J Gynaecol Obstet74 (2001) 157Search in Google Scholar

37 Rosen MG, JC Dickinson: The paradox of electronic fetal monitoring: more data may not enable us to predict or prevent infant neurologic morbidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol168 (1993) 745Search in Google Scholar

38 Saling E: [Microblood studies on the fetus. Clinical application and 1^st results.]Z Geburtshilfe Gynakol162 (1964) 56 (In German)Search in Google Scholar

39 Sameshima H, T Ikenoue: Predictive value of late decelerations for fetal acidemia in unselective low-risk pregnancies. Am J Perinatol22 (2005) 19Search in Google Scholar

40 Senat MV, S Minoui, et al.: Effect of dexamethasone and betamethasone on fetal heart rate variability in preterm labour: a randomized study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol105 (1998) 749Search in Google Scholar

41 Shy KK, DA Luthy, FC Bennett, et al.: Effects of electronic fetal-heart-rate monitoring, as compared with periodic auscultation, on the neurologic development of premature infants. N Engl J Med322 (1990) 588Search in Google Scholar

42 Skupski DW, CR Rosenberg, GS Eglinton: Intrapartum fetal stimulation tests: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol99 (2002) 129Search in Google Scholar

43 Strachan BK, WJ van Wijngaarden, et al.: Cardiotocography only versus cardiotocography plus PR-interval analysis in intrapartum surveillance: a randomized, multicentre trial. Lancet355 (2000) 456Search in Google Scholar

44 Suidan JS, BK Young: Outcome of Fetuses with lactic academia. Am J Obstet Gynecol150 (1984) 33Search in Google Scholar

45 Tejani NA, UL Verma, et al.: Terbutaline in the management of acute intrapartum fetal acidosis. J Reprod Med28 (1983) 857Search in Google Scholar

46 Thacker SB, D Stroup, M Chang: Continuous electronic heart rate monitoring for fetal assessment during labor. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2001; CD00006310.1002/14651858.CD000063Search in Google Scholar PubMed

47 Walker N: The case for conservativism in management of fetal distress. Br Med J2 (1959) 122210.1136/bmj.2.5161.1221Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

48 Westgate J, M Harris, et al.: Plymouth randomized trial of cardiotocogram only versus ST waveform plus cardiotocogram for intrapartum monitoring in 2400 cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol169 (1993) 1151Search in Google Scholar

49 Westgren M, K Kruger, S Ek, et al.: Lactate compared with pH analysis at fetal scalp sampling: a prospective randomised study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol105 (1998) 29Search in Google Scholar

50 Young BK, M Katz, et al.: The relationship of fetal heart rate patterns and tissue pH in the human fetus. Am J Obstet Gynecol134 (1979) 685Search in Google Scholar

51 Young BK, M Katz, et al.: Fetal blood and tissue pH with moderate bradycardia. Am J Obstet Gynecol135 (1979) 45Search in Google Scholar

52 Young BK, M Katz, et al.: Fetal blood and tissue pH with variable deceleration patterns. Obstet Gynecol56 (1980) 170Search in Google Scholar

53 Young BK, M Katz, et al.: Sinusoidal fetal heart rate I: Clinical significance. Am J Obstet Gynecol136 (1980) 587Search in Google Scholar

54 Young BK, M Katz, et al.: Sinusoidal fetal heart rate II: Continuous tissue pH studies. Am J Obstet Gynecol136 (1980) 594Search in Google Scholar

55 Young BK: Monitoring the fetal heart: a continuing controversy. Obstet Gynecol Surv50 (1995) 69910.1097/00006254-199510000-00001Search in Google Scholar PubMed

56 Young BK, J Noumoff, et al.: Continuous fetal tissue pH measurement in labor. Obstet Gynecol52 (1978) 533Search in Google Scholar

57 Young BK, HM Weinstein: Moderate fetal bradycardia. Am J Obstet Gynecol126 (1976) 271Search in Google Scholar