The Benefits of Bilateral Versus Unilateral Amplification for the Elderly: Are Two Always Better than One?

Y. Henkin,; A. Waldman,; L. Kishon-Rabin,

doi:10.1515/JBCPP.2007.18.3.201

Home Medicine The Benefits of Bilateral Versus Unilateral Amplification for the Elderly: Are Two Always Better than One?

Article

Licensed

Unlicensed Requires Authentication

The Benefits of Bilateral Versus Unilateral Amplification for the Elderly: Are Two Always Better than One?

Y. Henkin, , A. Waldman, and L. Kishon-Rabin,

Published/Copyright: September 1, 2007

Published by

Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Submit Manuscript Author Information Explore this Subject

From the journal Journal of Basic and Clinical Physiology and Pharmacology Volume 18 Issue 3

MLA
APA
Harvard
Chicago
Vancouver

MLA
APA
Harvard
Chicago
Vancouver

Henkin,, Y., Waldman,, A. and Kishon-Rabin,, L.. "The Benefits of Bilateral Versus Unilateral Amplification for the Elderly: Are Two Always Better than One?" Journal of Basic and Clinical Physiology and Pharmacology, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 201-216. https://doi.org/10.1515/JBCPP.2007.18.3.201

Henkin,, Y., Waldman,, A. & Kishon-Rabin,, L. (). The Benefits of Bilateral Versus Unilateral Amplification for the Elderly: Are Two Always Better than One?. Journal of Basic and Clinical Physiology and Pharmacology, 18(3), 201-216. https://doi.org/10.1515/JBCPP.2007.18.3.201

Henkin,, Y., Waldman,, A. and Kishon-Rabin,, L. () The Benefits of Bilateral Versus Unilateral Amplification for the Elderly: Are Two Always Better than One?. Journal of Basic and Clinical Physiology and Pharmacology, Vol. 18 (Issue 3), pp. 201-216. https://doi.org/10.1515/JBCPP.2007.18.3.201

Henkin,, Y., Waldman,, A. and Kishon-Rabin,, L.. "The Benefits of Bilateral Versus Unilateral Amplification for the Elderly: Are Two Always Better than One?" Journal of Basic and Clinical Physiology and Pharmacology 18, no. 3 (): 201-216. https://doi.org/10.1515/JBCPP.2007.18.3.201

Henkin, Y, Waldman, A, Kishon-Rabin, L. The Benefits of Bilateral Versus Unilateral Amplification for the Elderly: Are Two Always Better than One?. Journal of Basic and Clinical Physiology and Pharmacology. ;18(3): 201-216. https://doi.org/10.1515/JBCPP.2007.18.3.201

Copy

Copied to clipboard

BibTeX EndNote RIS

Published Online: 2007-09

You are currently not able to access this content.

Articles in the same Issue

CONTENTS
The Cochlear Microphonic Potential Does Not Reflect the Passive Basilar Membrane Traveling Wave
Salicylate Ototoxicity and its Implications for Cochlear Microphonic Potential Generation
Bone Conduction in Otosclerosis - Operated Versus Non- Operated Ears
The Benefits of Bilateral Versus Unilateral Amplification for the Elderly: Are Two Always Better than One?
Abstracts Presented at the 2007 Meeting of the Israeli Society for Auditory Research

Search journal Search the content of this journal

https://doi.org/10.1515/JBCPP.2007.18.3.201

Articles in the same Issue

CONTENTS
The Cochlear Microphonic Potential Does Not Reflect the Passive Basilar Membrane Traveling Wave
Salicylate Ototoxicity and its Implications for Cochlear Microphonic Potential Generation
Bone Conduction in Otosclerosis - Operated Versus Non- Operated Ears
The Benefits of Bilateral Versus Unilateral Amplification for the Elderly: Are Two Always Better than One?
Abstracts Presented at the 2007 Meeting of the Israeli Society for Auditory Research