Home Law The Draft-Common Frame of Reference, Methodological Nationalism and the Way Forward
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

The Draft-Common Frame of Reference, Methodological Nationalism and the Way Forward

  • Jan M. Smits
Published/Copyright: November 10, 2008
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill
European Review of Contract Law
From the journal Volume 4 Issue 3

Abstract

This contribution claims that the Draft Common Frame of Reference (DCFR) for a European Private Law (2008) suffers from so-called methodological nationalism: the DCFR adopts a view of law and lawmaking developed for national societies and in doing so, it takes too little into account that what is best at the national level may not be optimal at the European one. This is demonstrated by reference to three different features of the Draft-CFR: the idea of comprehensive codification, the choice of the relevant rules and the way in which law is represented. European private law should be presented in a differentiated way, dependent on whether its function is to create binding rules, offer a source of inspiration for legal scholarship and teaching or form the first step towards the creation of an optional contract code.

Published Online: 2008-11-10
Published in Print: 2008-October
Downloaded on 13.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ERCL.2008.270/pdf?lang=en
Scroll to top button