Article
Licensed
Unlicensed
Requires Authentication
Case: ECJ – QDQ Media
-
Mauro Grondona
Published/Copyright:
August 22, 2007
Abstract
Judgment of the Court of 10 March 2005, QDQ Media SA v Alejandro Omedas Lecha, Case C-235/03
The Court rules as follows:
Where is not possible on the basis of national law to include, in the calculation of the costs which an individual who owes a business debt might be ordered to pay, the expenses arising from representation by an abogado or procurador of the creditor in judicial proceedings for the recovery of that debt, Directive 2000/35/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 June 2000 on combating late payment in commercial transactions cannot for itself serve as the basis for the inclusion of such expenses.
Published Online: 2007-08-22
Published in Print: 2007-06-19
© Walter de Gruyter
You are currently not able to access this content.
You are currently not able to access this content.
Articles in the same Issue
- Regulating Breach of Contract – The Right to Reject Performance by the Party in Breach
- Mortgage credit contracts and the Green Paper on Mortgage Credit – Controls on Transparency and Fairness
- Case: ECJ – Manfredi v Lloyd Adriatico
- Case: ECJ – QDQ Media
- European Community Legislation and Actions
- No sense of purpose or direction? The modernisation of European Consumer Law
- Austria – the Reform of Commercial Law
- Books Received and Book Reviews
Articles in the same Issue
- Regulating Breach of Contract – The Right to Reject Performance by the Party in Breach
- Mortgage credit contracts and the Green Paper on Mortgage Credit – Controls on Transparency and Fairness
- Case: ECJ – Manfredi v Lloyd Adriatico
- Case: ECJ – QDQ Media
- European Community Legislation and Actions
- No sense of purpose or direction? The modernisation of European Consumer Law
- Austria – the Reform of Commercial Law
- Books Received and Book Reviews
