Article
Licensed
Unlicensed
Requires Authentication
Modelling of Explosives Sensitivity Part 2: The Weibull-Model
-
Roland Wild
Published/Copyright:
February 18, 2010
Abstract
In the first part of this paper [Wild and von Collani, Economic Quality Control 17: 113-122, 2002] the Bruceton method and the underlying model assumptions for assessing the sensitivity of explosives were critically examined resulting in the recommendation not to use the Bruceton method. The second part describes an alternative model and method for analyzing the sensitivity of explosive materials. The resulting procedure is applied for comparing the explosive sensitivity of two different kinds of hexogen and for analyzing the sensitivity of a number of other popular explosives.
Published Online: 2010-02-18
Published in Print: 2002-October
© Heldermann Verlag
You are currently not able to access this content.
You are currently not able to access this content.
Articles in the same Issue
- Determination of Specifications for Tensile Strength of Castings
- Joint Design of Economic Manufacturing Quantity, Sampling Plan and Specification Limits
- Measurement Procedures for the Variance of a Normal Distribution
- A Bayesian View on Detecting Drifts by Nonparametric Methods
- Combining Process and Product Control for Reducing Sampling Costs
- Modelling of Explosives Sensitivity Part 2: The Weibull-Model
- Modified Tightened Three Level Continuous Sampling Plan
- A Note on the Continuous Sampling Plan CSP-V
Articles in the same Issue
- Determination of Specifications for Tensile Strength of Castings
- Joint Design of Economic Manufacturing Quantity, Sampling Plan and Specification Limits
- Measurement Procedures for the Variance of a Normal Distribution
- A Bayesian View on Detecting Drifts by Nonparametric Methods
- Combining Process and Product Control for Reducing Sampling Costs
- Modelling of Explosives Sensitivity Part 2: The Weibull-Model
- Modified Tightened Three Level Continuous Sampling Plan
- A Note on the Continuous Sampling Plan CSP-V
