Abstract
This article looks into the way in which public-service as well as commercial TV stations in the Netherlands assume their social responsibility towards a pluralist society. After all, television channels are expected to be ‘mirrors of society’; the key question is then how successful their programs are in conveying a well-balanced representation of all groups in society. By means of a quantitative analysis, the Diversity Monitor charts the (re)presentation of different groups, with a particular focus on gender, age, and ethnicity. Apart from diversity, and as a subcomponent of the Quality Card (McKinsey, 2003), the Monitor also reviews innovation as an indicator of program quality. The results reveal a wide diversity of TV programs in the Netherlands, but diversity as such is no guarantee of a balanced (re)presentation of society at large. Due to selection mechanisms on the side of the broadcaster and the public, what the viewer eventually gets is at the most a mirror of his or her own group.
© Walter de Gruyter
Articles in the same Issue
- Moral philosophy as the foundation of normative media theory: The case of African Ubuntuism
- Nostalgic memories. Qualitative reception analysis of Flemish TV fiction, 1953–1989
- Beyond accessibility? Toward an on-line and memory-based model of framing effects
- Systems approaches and communication research. The age of entropy
- Diversity Monitor 2005. Diversity as a quality aspect of television in the Netherlands
- Book Reviews
- Contributors
Articles in the same Issue
- Moral philosophy as the foundation of normative media theory: The case of African Ubuntuism
- Nostalgic memories. Qualitative reception analysis of Flemish TV fiction, 1953–1989
- Beyond accessibility? Toward an on-line and memory-based model of framing effects
- Systems approaches and communication research. The age of entropy
- Diversity Monitor 2005. Diversity as a quality aspect of television in the Netherlands
- Book Reviews
- Contributors