Home Educational intervention together with an on-line quality control program achieve recommended analytical goals for bedside blood glucose monitoring in a 1200-bed university hospital
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Educational intervention together with an on-line quality control program achieve recommended analytical goals for bedside blood glucose monitoring in a 1200-bed university hospital

  • Víctor Sánchez-Margalet , Manuel Rodriguez-Oliva , Cristina Sánchez-Pozo , María Francisca Fernández-Gallardo and Raimundo Goberna
Published/Copyright: September 21, 2011

Abstract

Portable meters for blood glucose concentrations are used at the patients bedside, as well as by patients for self-monitoring of blood glucose. Even though most devices have important technological advances that decrease operator error, the analytical goals proposed for the performance of glucose meters have been recently changed by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) to reach <5% analytical error and <7.9% total error. We studied 80meters throughout the Virgen Macarena Hospital and we found most devices with performance error higher than 10%. The aim of the present study was to establish a new system to control portable glucose meters together with an educational program for nurses in a 1200-bed University Hospital to achieve recommended analytical goals, so that we could improve the quality of diabetes care. We used portable glucose meters connected on-line to the laboratory after an educational program for nurses with responsibilities in point-of-care testing. We evaluated the system by assessing total error of the glucometers using high- and low-level glucose control solutions. In a period of 6months, we collected data from 5642 control samples obtained by 14 devices (Precision PCx) directly from the control program (QC manager). The average total error for the low-level glucose control (2.77mmol/l) was 6.3% (range 5.5–7.6%), and even lower for the high-level glucose control (16.66mmol/l), at 4.8% (range 4.1–6.5%). In conclusion, the performance of glucose meters used in our University Hospital with more than 1000 beds not only improved after the intervention, but the meters achieved the analytical goals of the suggested ADA/National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry criteria for total error (<7.9% in the range 2.77–16.66mmol/l glucose) and optimal total error for high glucose concentrations of <5%, which will improve the quality of care of our patients.


Corresponding author: Raimundo Goberna, Department of Clinical Chemistry, Virgen Macarena University Hospital, Av. Dr. Fedriani 3, Seville 41071, Spain Phone: +34-955008104, Fax: +34-955008105,

References

1. American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care for patients with diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 2003;26:S33–50. 10.2337/diacare.26.2007.S33Search in Google Scholar

2. American Diabetes Association. Self monitoring of blood glucose. Diabetes Care 1994;17:S81–6. 10.2337/diacare.17.1.81Search in Google Scholar

3. Lewandrowski E, MacMillan D, Misiano D, Tochka L, Lewandrowski K. Process improvement for bedside capillary glucose testing in a large academic medical center: the impact of new technology on point-of-care testing. Clin Chim Acta 2001; 307: 175–9. 10.1016/S0009-8981(01)00462-4Search in Google Scholar

4. DCCT Research Group. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 1993;329:977–86. 10.1056/NEJM199309303291401Search in Google Scholar

5. UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet 1998;352:837–53. 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)07019-6Search in Google Scholar

6. Weitgasser R, Gappmayer B, Pichler M. New portable glucose meters analytical improvement compared with previous generation devices. Clin Chem 1999; 45: 1821–5. 10.1093/clinchem/45.10.1821Search in Google Scholar

7. American Diabetes Association. Consensus statement: self-monitoring of blood glucose. Diabetes Care 1987;10:95–9. 10.2337/diacare.10.1.95Search in Google Scholar

8. American Diabetes Association. Consensus statement: self-monitoring of blood glucose. Diabetes Care 1996;19:S62–6. 10.2337/diacare.19.1.S62Search in Google Scholar

9. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Point-of-care blood-glucose testing in acute and chronic care facilities: approved guideline, 2nd ed. NCCLS document C30-A2. Wayne, PA: National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, 2002. Search in Google Scholar

10. Keie S, Thue G, Nerhus K, Sandberg S. Instruments for self-monitoring of blood glucose: comparison of testing quality achieved by patients and a technician. Clin Chem 2002; 48: 994–1003. 10.1093/clinchem/48.7.994Search in Google Scholar

11. Kristensen GB, Nerhus K, Thue G, Sandberg S. Standardized evaluation of instruments for self-monitoring of blood glucose by patients and a technologist. Clin Chem 2004; 50: 1068–71. 10.1373/clinchem.2004.031575Search in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Sacks DB, Bruns DE, Goldstein DE, MacLaren NK, McDonald JM, Parrott M. Guidelines and recommendations for laboratory analysis in the diagnosis and management of diabetes mellitus. Clin Chem 2002; 48: 436–72. 10.1093/clinchem/48.3.436Search in Google Scholar

13. The National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Ancillary (bedside) blood glucose testing in acute and chronic care facilities: approved guidelines. Villanova, PA: National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, 1994. Search in Google Scholar

14. American Diabetes Association. Bedside blood glucose monitoring in hospitals. Diabetes Care 2004;27(Suppl 1):S104. 10.2337/diacare.27.2007.S104Search in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Deyi VY, Philippe M, Alexandre KC, De Nayer P, Hermans MP. Performance evaluation of the Precision PCx point-of-care blood glucose analyzer using discriminant ratio methodology. Clin Chem Lab Med 2002; 40: 1052–5. 10.1515/CCLM.2002.184Search in Google Scholar PubMed

16. Nobels F, Beckers F, Bailleul E, De Schrijver P, Sierens L, Van Crombrugge P. Feasibility of a quality assurance programme of bedside blood glucose testing in a hospital setting: 7 years experience. Diabet Med 2004; 21: 1288–91. 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2004.01333.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Boyd JC, Bruns DE. Quality specifications for glucose meters: assessment by stimulation modelling of errors in insulin dose. Clin Chem 2001; 47: 209–14. 10.1093/clinchem/47.2.209Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2005-4-5
Accepted: 2005-6-17
Published Online: 2011-9-21
Published in Print: 2005-8-1

©2005 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin New York

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Familial hypercholesterolemia and response to statin therapy according to LDLR genetic background
  2. Detection of brain injury by fatty acid-binding proteins
  3. High-throughput scanning of breast tumor surgical specimens for low-level mutations
  4. Cardiovascular risk-associated allele frequencies for 15 genes in healthy elderly French and Chinese
  5. Soluble CD30 serum levels before and after treatment with α-interferon in patients with chronic hepatitis C
  6. Development, validation and evaluation of a homogenous one-step reverse transcriptase-initiated PCR assay with competitive internal control for the detection of hepatitis C virus RNA
  7. Counteracting adriamycin-induced oxidative stress by administration of N-acetyl cysteine and vitamin E
  8. Comparative analysis of the DNA staining efficiencies of different fluorescent dyes in preparative agarose gel electrophoresis
  9. Thyroglobulin assay 4 weeks after thyroidectomy predicts outcome in low-risk papillary thyroid carcinoma
  10. Measurement of troponin I 48h after admission as a tool to rule out impaired left ventricular function in patients with a first myocardial infarction
  11. The efficacy of cystatin C assay in the prediction of glomerular filtration rate. Is it a more reliable marker for renal failure?
  12. Reference materials (RMs) for analysis of the human factor II (prothrombin) gene G20210A mutation
  13. Influence of short-term venous stasis on clinical chemistry testing
  14. Educational intervention together with an on-line quality control program achieve recommended analytical goals for bedside blood glucose monitoring in a 1200-bed university hospital
  15. The reliability of calculated laboratory results
  16. Preliminary evaluation of the performance of a new, highly sensitive commercial immunoassay for serum ferritin determination
  17. Importance of the detection method for intact dimeric human chorionic gonadotropin without interference with the free human chorionic gonadotropin β subunit for pregnancy exclusion before liver transplantation in a woman with cholangiocarcinoma
  18. Comparison of Liaison N-tact PTH (Diasorin) and N-tact PTH SP IRMA (Diasorin) in hemodialyzed patients
Downloaded on 9.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/CCLM.2005.147/html
Scroll to top button