Home Estimation of the limit of detection with a bootstrap-derived standard error by a partly non-parametric approach. Application to HPLC drug assays
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Estimation of the limit of detection with a bootstrap-derived standard error by a partly non-parametric approach. Application to HPLC drug assays

  • Kristian Linnet
Published/Copyright: September 21, 2011

Abstract

A recently proposed procedure for estimating the limit of detection (LoD) of an assay using a partly non-parametric approach is applied to five HPLC drug assays. The non-parametrically determined 95th percentile of the blank measurements (LoB) is obtained as the value of the N(95/100)+0.5 ordered observations. The LoD is the lowest level of analyte that is likely to yield a measured result exceeding the LoB. The LoD equals LoB+c β×SD S, where SD S is the analytical SD at low concentrations, and c β= z1–β/(1–1/(4× f)) ( f=degrees of freedom). c β≈1.65 for a type II error of 5%. The blank distributions deviated significantly from normality for four of the five assays because of skewness to the right. The estimated LoB ranged from 3.3 to 10.2nmol/L. The LoDs were in the interval from 7.8 to 17.2nmol/L. A new procedure for estimation of the standard error (SE) of the estimated LoD that is partly based on the bootstrap principle showed good performance in simulation studies. In conclusion, the partly non-parametric procedure for estimation of the LoD of typical HPLC drug assays was found to be a suitable approach.


Corresponding author: Kristian Linnet, MD, The Department of Forensic Chemistry, Institute of Forensic Medicine, University of Copenhagen, 11 Frederik V's Vej, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark Phone: +45-3532-7900, Fax: +45-3532-6085,

References

1 Currie LA. Nomenclature in evaluation of analytical methods including detection and quantification capabilities (IUPAC Recommendations 1995). Pure Appl Chem 1995; 67: 1699–723. 10.1351/pac199567101699Search in Google Scholar

2 International Organization for Standardization. Capability of detection – part 1: terms and definitions (11843-1). Geneva, Switzerland: ISO, 1997. Search in Google Scholar

3 International Organization for Standardization. Capability of detection – part 2: methodology in the linear calibration case (11843-2). Geneva, Switzerland: ISO, 2000. Search in Google Scholar

4 International Organization for Standardization. Capability of detection – part 3: methodology for determination of the critical value for the response variable when no calibration data are used (11843-3). Geneva, Switzerland: ISO, 2000. Search in Google Scholar

5 Linnet K, Kondratovich M. Partly nonparametric approach for determining the limit of detection. Clin Chem 2004; 50: 732–40. 10.1373/clinchem.2003.029983Search in Google Scholar

6 NCCLS. Protocols for determination of limits of detection and limits of quantitation: approved guideline. NCCLS document EP17-A (ISBN 1-56238-551-8). Wayne, PA, USA: NCCLS, 2004. Search in Google Scholar

7 Johnson NJ, Kotz S. Distributions in statistics, vol 2. Continuous univariate distributions. New York: Wiley, 1972:196–7. Search in Google Scholar

8 David HA. Order statistics. New York: Wiley, 1981:80–2. Search in Google Scholar

9 Linnet K. Nonparametric estimation of reference intervals by simple and bootstrap-based procedures. Clin Chem 2000; 46: 867–9. 10.1093/clinchem/46.6.867Search in Google Scholar

10 Efron B, Tibshirani R. Statistical data analysis in the computer age. Science 1991; 253: 390–5. 10.1126/science.253.5018.390Search in Google Scholar

11 Stuart A, Ord K. Kendall's advanced theory of statistics, vol 1, 6th ed. London: Arnold, 1994:364–8. Search in Google Scholar

12 Snedecor GW, Cochran WG. Statistical methods, 6th ed. Ames, IA, USA: Iowa State University Press, 1967:86. Search in Google Scholar

13 Stephens MA. EDF statistics for goodness of fit and some comparisons. J Am Stat Assoc 1974; 69: 730–7. 10.1080/01621459.1974.10480196Search in Google Scholar

14 Olesen OV, Plougmann P, Linnet K. Determination of nortriptyline in human serum by fully automated solid-phase extraction and on-line high-performance liquid chromatography in the presence of antipsychotic drugs. J Chromatogr B Biomed Sci Appl 2000; 746: 233–9. 10.1016/S0378-4347(00)00332-7Search in Google Scholar

15 Shah VP, Midha KK, Findlay JW, Hill HM, Hulse JD, McGilveray IJ, et al. Bioanalytical method validation – a revisit with a decade of progress. Pharm Res 2000; 17: 1551–7. 10.1023/A:1007669411738Search in Google Scholar

16 Brown EN, McDermott TJ, Bloch KJ, McCollom AD. Defining the smallest analyte concentration an immunoassay can measure. Clin Chem 1996; 42: 893–903. 10.1093/clinchem/42.6.893Search in Google Scholar

17 Kuttatharmmakul S, Smeyers-Verbeke J, Massart DL. The mean and standard deviation of data, some of which are below the detection limit: an introduction to maximum likelihood estimation. Trends Anal Chem 2000; 19: 215–22. 10.1016/S0165-9936(99)00197-1Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2004-10-7
Accepted: 2005-2-23
Published Online: 2011-9-21
Published in Print: 2005-4-1

© by Walter de Gruyter Berlin New York

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Autoantibodies against intrinsic factor (IF) measured with an ELISA using recombinant human IF as both catching and detecting reagent
  2. Antibody titer against malondialdehyde-modified LDL compares with HDL cholesterol concentration in identifying angiographically verified coronary artery disease. Comparison of tests by ROC analysis
  3. Fucosylation of serum glycoproteins in lung cancer patients
  4. Association of cytochrome P450 2E1 genetic polymorphisms with squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus
  5. α-Tocopherol as an antiretroviral therapy supplement for HIV-1-infected patients for increased lymphocyte viability
  6. The effect of antioxidant supplementation on superoxide dismutase activity, Cu and Zn levels, and total antioxidant status in erythrocytes of patients with Graves' disease
  7. Concentrations of calcium, copper, iron, magnesium, potassium, sodium and zinc in adult female hair with different body mass indexes in Taiwan
  8. Estimation of the limit of detection with a bootstrap-derived standard error by a partly non-parametric approach. Application to HPLC drug assays
  9. Pitfall in the high-throughput quantification of whole blood cyclosporin A using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry
  10. How accurate are clinical activity indices for scoring of disease activity in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)?
  11. An iterative method for improved estimation of the mean of peer-group distributions in proficiency testing
  12. Impact of a common CV evaluation scheme on overall laboratory performance: 8-year experience of a large national proficiency testing program in Japan
  13. Significance of small dense low-density lipoproteins as coronary risk factor in diabetic and non-diabetic Korean populations
  14. Evaluation of a rapid bedside test for the quantitative determination of C-reactive protein
  15. Power function of the reference change value in relation to cut-off points, reference intervals and index of individuality
  16. Erythrocyte ferritin concentration: analytical performance of the immunoenzymatic IMx-Ferritin (Abbott) assay
  17. Vitamin C and aberrant electrolyte results
  18. POX-ACT assay and d-ROMs test: comparison impossible
  19. A spectrophotometric micromethod for determining erythrocyte protoporphyrin-IX in whole blood or erythrocytes
Downloaded on 4.11.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/CCLM.2005.071/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button