Home Analytical performance and clinical results of a fully automated MEIA system for brain natriuretic peptide assay: comparison with a point of care testing method
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Analytical performance and clinical results of a fully automated MEIA system for brain natriuretic peptide assay: comparison with a point of care testing method

  • Simona Storti , Concetta Prontera , Michele Emdin , Claudio Passino , Paola Prati , Giuliana Fontani , Isabella Giannelli , Luc Zyw , Simona Vittorini , Giancarlo Zucchelli and Aldo Clerico
Published/Copyright: September 21, 2011

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the analytical performance of a recently available immunoassay for brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), based on microparticle enzyme immunoassay (MEIA, AxSYM System, Abbott Laboratories), whose analytical characteristics and clinical results were compared with those of a point of care testing (POCT) method (TRIAGE system, Biosite Diagnostics). The within-run and total imprecision of the MEIA system were 18.4% and 19.8% at 21 ng/l, 8.0% and 14.8% at 183 ng/l, and 5.7% and 14.0% at 319 ng/l, respectively. The detection limit of the MEIA system was tested by repeatedly measuring (n = 20) the 0 calibrator in four different runs; a mean +3 SD value of 5.6 ± 4.8 ng/l (range 1.8–12.6 ng/l) was obtained. A close linear relationship (MEIA = –22.5 + 1.71 POCT method, R = 0.950, n = 296) was found (BNP concentration: 5–5500 ng/l), with a significant bias (mean difference: 164.8 ng/l, p < 0.0001). Mean BNP concentration measured in 94 reference subjects (57 women and 37 men; mean age 43.5 ± 14.0 years) was higher with MEIA than POCT, (25.9 ± 32.7 ng/l vs. 11.7 ± 8.9 ng/l, p < 0.0001). The same trend was observed also in 202 cardiac patients (620.6 ± 1082.2 ng/l vs. 386.1 ± 594.5 ng/l, p < 0.0001). Our data suggest that MEIA and POCT have quite similar analytical performance but different clinical results. Then, different reference values, as well as cut-off values, should be taken into account for the clinical use of these two immunoassays.

References

1 Ruskoaho H. Cardiac hormones as diagnostic tools in heart failure. Endocr Rev 2003; 24:341–56.10.1210/er.2003-0006Search in Google Scholar

2 de Lemos JA, McGuire DK, Drazner MH. B-type natriuretic peptide in cardiovascular disease. Lancet 2003; 362:316–22.10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13976-1Search in Google Scholar

3 Clerico A, Emdin M. Diagnostic accuracy and prognostic relevance of the measurement of the cardiac natriuretic peptides: a review. Clin Chem 2004; 50:33–50.10.1373/clinchem.2003.024760Search in Google Scholar

4 De Bold AJ, Bruneau BG, Kuroski de Bold ML. Mechanical and neuroendocrine regulation of the endocrine heart [review]. Cardiovas Res 1996; 31:7–18.10.1016/S0008-6363(95)00121-2Search in Google Scholar

5 Richards AM, Lainchbury JG, Nicholls MG, Cameron AV, Yandle TG. Dendroaspis natriuretic peptide: endogenous or dubious? Lancet 2002; 359:5–6.10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07270-7Search in Google Scholar

6 Nakamura M, Endo H, Nasu M, Arakawa N, Segawa T, Hiramori K. Value of plasma B type natriuretic peptide measurement for heart disease screening in a Japanese population. Heart 2002; 87:131–5.10.1136/heart.87.2.131Search in Google Scholar

7 Koglin J, Pehlivanli S, Schwaiblmair M, Vogeser M, Cremer P, von Scheidt W. Role of brain natriuretic peptide in risk stratification of patients with congestive heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 38:1934–41.10.1016/S0735-1097(01)01672-2Search in Google Scholar

8 Lubien E, DeMaria A, Krishnaswamy P, Clopton P, Koon J, Kazanegra R, et al. Utility of B-natriuretic peptide in detecting diastolic dysfunction: comparison with Doppler velocity recording. Circulation 2002; 105:595–601.10.1161/hc0502.103010Search in Google Scholar

9 Morrison LK, Harrison A, Krishnaswamy P, Kazanegra R, Clopton P, Maisel A. Utility of a rapid B-natriuretic peptide assay in differentiating congestive heart failure from lung disease in patients presenting with dyspnea. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 39:202–9.10.1016/S0735-1097(01)01744-2Search in Google Scholar

10 Cabanes L, Richaaud-Thiriez B, Fulla Y, Heloire F, Vuillemard C, Weber S, et al. Brain natriuretic peptide blood levels in the differential diagnosis of dyspnea. Chest 2001; 120:2047–50.10.1378/chest.120.6.2047Search in Google Scholar PubMed

11 Remme WJ, Swedberg K. Task Force Report. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of chronic heart failure. Eur Heart J 2001; 22:1527–60.10.1053/euhj.2001.2783Search in Google Scholar

12 NICE Guideline No. 5. Chronic heart failure. National clinical guideline for diagnosis and management of heart failure in primary and secondary care. London: Royal College of Physicians, 2003:1–157.Search in Google Scholar

13 Clerico A, Del Ry S, Giannessi D. Measurement of natriuretic cardiac hormones (ANP, BNP, and related peptides) in clinical practice: the need for a new generation of immunoassay methods. Clin Chem 2000; 46:1529–34.10.1093/clinchem/46.10.1529Search in Google Scholar

14 Del Ry S, Giannessi D, Clerico A. Plasma brain natriuretic peptide measured by fully-automated immunoassay and by immunoradiometric assay compared. Clin Chem Lab Med 2001; 39:446–50.Search in Google Scholar

15 Clerico A, Del Ry S, Maffei S, Prontera C, Emdin M, Giannessi D. Circulating levels of cardiac natriuretic hormones in healthy adult subjects: effects of aging and sex. Clin Chem Lab Med 2002; 40:371–7.10.1515/CCLM.2002.060Search in Google Scholar

16 Mueller T, Gegenhuber A, Poelz W, Haltmayer M. Preliminary evaluation of the AxSYM B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) assay and comparison with the ADVIA Centaur BNP assay. Clin Chem 2004; 50:1104–6.10.1373/clinchem.2004.031484Search in Google Scholar

17 Prontera C, Emdin M, Zucchelli GC, Ripoli A, Passino C, Clerico A. Automated electrochemiluminescent immunoassay for N-terminal pro-BNP compared with IRMAs for ANP and BNP in heart failure patients and healthy individuals. Clin Chem 2003; 49:1552–54.10.1373/49.9.1552Search in Google Scholar

18 Prontera C, Emdin M, Zucchelli GC, Ripoli A, Passino C, Clerico A. Analytical performance and diagnostic accuracy of a fully-automated electrochemiluminescent assay of the N-terminal fragment of brain natriuretic peptide in patients with cardiomyopathy: comparison with immunoradiometric assay methods for brain natriuretic peptide and atrial natriuretic peptide. Clin Chem Lab Med 2004; 42:37–44.10.1515/CCLM.2004.008Search in Google Scholar

19 Wu AHB, Packer M, Smith A, Bijou R, Fink D, Mair J, et al. Analytical and clinical evaluation of the Bayer ADVIA centaur automated B-type natriuretic peptide assay in patients with heart failure: a multisite study. Clin Chem 2004; 50:857–63.Search in Google Scholar

20 Mueller T, Gegenhuber A, Poelz W, Haltmayer M. Head-to-head comparison of the diagnostic utility of BNP and NT-proBNP in symptomatic and asymptomatic structural heart disease. Clin Chim Acta 2004; 341:41–8.10.1016/j.cccn.2003.10.027Search in Google Scholar

21 Wu AHB, Smith A, Wieczorek S, Mather JF, Duncan B, White M, et al. Biological variations for N-terminal pro- and B-type natriuretic peptides and implications for therapeutic monitoring of patients with congestive heart failure. Am J Cardiol 2003; 92:628–31.10.1016/S0002-9149(03)00741-0Search in Google Scholar

22 Belenky A, Smith A, Zhang B, Lin S, Despres N, Wu ALH, Bluestein BL. The effect of class-specific protease inhibitors on the stabilization of B-type natriuretic peptide in human plasma. Clin Chim Acta 2004; 340:163–72.10.1016/j.cccn.2003.10.026Search in Google Scholar

23 Shimizu H, Masuta K, Aono K, Asada H, Sasakura K, Tamaki M, et al. Molecular forms of human brain natriuretic peptide in plasma. Clin Chim Acta 2002; 316:129–35.10.1016/S0009-8981(01)00745-8Search in Google Scholar

24 Shimizu H, Masuta K, Asada H, Sugita K, Sairenji T. Characterization of molecular forms of probrain natriuretic peptide in human plasma. Clin Chim Acta 2003; 334:233–9.10.1016/S0009-8981(03)00240-7Search in Google Scholar

25 Bland JM, Altman DG. Applying the right statistics: analysis of measurement studies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003; 22:85–93.10.1002/uog.122Search in Google Scholar PubMed

26 Sackett DL, Haynes RB. The architecture of diagnostic research. Br Med J 2002; 324:539–41.10.1136/bmj.324.7336.539Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Received: 2004-7-2
Accepted: 2004-8-10
Published Online: 2011-9-21
Published in Print: 2004-10-1

© Walter de Gruyter

Articles in the same Issue

  1. The significance of serum γ-glutamyltransferase in cardiovascular diseases
  2. Anti-tissue transglutaminase antibodies in inflammatory bowel disease: new evidence
  3. Expression level of MDR1 message in peripheral blood leukocytes from healthy adults: a competitive nucleic acid sequence-based amplification assay for its determination
  4. Characteristics of prolinase against various iminodipeptides in erythrocyte lysates from a normal human and a patient with prolidase deficiency
  5. Alteration of homocysteine catabolism in pre-eclampsia, HELLP syndrome and placental insufficiency
  6. Immune system-mediated endothelial damage is associated with NO and antioxidant system disorders
  7. Bone marrow microvascular density and angiogenic growth factors in multiple myeloma
  8. The insulin-like growth factor system in the circulation of patients with viral infections
  9. Time course of systemic markers of inflammation in patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes
  10. Age- and sex-related reference values for serum insulin concentration and its biological determinants in a French healthy population. The STANISLAS cohort
  11. Potential pitfalls of comparative measurements of reticulocytes with flow cytometry and microscopy in prematures and infants
  12. Screening of antinuclear antibodies: comparison between enzyme immunoassay based on nuclear homogenates, purified or recombinant antigens and immunofluorescence assay
  13. Analytical and diagnostic accuracy of the EliA™ automated enzyme fluoroimmunoassay for antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibody detection
  14. A particle-enhanced turbidimetric immunoassay for quantitative determination of orosomucoid in urine: development, validation and reference values
  15. Analytical performance and clinical results of a fully automated MEIA system for brain natriuretic peptide assay: comparison with a point of care testing method
  16. Multicentre performance evaluation of the E170 Module for MODULAR ANALYTICS
  17. Congress of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine Annual meeting of the German United Society for Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (DGKL), Düsseldorf, Germany, November 22-24, 2004
Downloaded on 15.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/CCLM.2004.238/html
Scroll to top button