Home Linguistics & Semiotics The role of prominence in post-verbal word order alternation in Javanese applicatives
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

The role of prominence in post-verbal word order alternation in Javanese applicatives

  • Jozina Vander Klok
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill
Prominence in Austronesian
This chapter is in the book Prominence in Austronesian

Abstract

This chapter investigates post-verbal word order in Javanese across applicative and non-applicative constructions with two internal (non-subject) arguments. The morphosyntactic alternations of post-verbal arguments are examined from the perspective of their relative prominence in terms of grammatical relations and interactions with other syntactic operations like passivization. Beyond providing an in-depth description of the available post-verbal word orders across different predicate-types, my first main claim is that the post-verbal word orders and their restrictions across both applicative and non-applicative constructions follow from the relative prominence due to the grammatical relations hierarchy. Secondly, I suggest that restrictions on passivization to only the applied object with the ‘locative’ -i applicative follow from the prominence of the applied object as a structural attractor, but that independent factors such as additional variable word order with the ‘benefactive’ -ake/-ke/-no applicative has opened the possibility for the non-applied theme NP to be passivized.

Abstract

This chapter investigates post-verbal word order in Javanese across applicative and non-applicative constructions with two internal (non-subject) arguments. The morphosyntactic alternations of post-verbal arguments are examined from the perspective of their relative prominence in terms of grammatical relations and interactions with other syntactic operations like passivization. Beyond providing an in-depth description of the available post-verbal word orders across different predicate-types, my first main claim is that the post-verbal word orders and their restrictions across both applicative and non-applicative constructions follow from the relative prominence due to the grammatical relations hierarchy. Secondly, I suggest that restrictions on passivization to only the applied object with the ‘locative’ -i applicative follow from the prominence of the applied object as a structural attractor, but that independent factors such as additional variable word order with the ‘benefactive’ -ake/-ke/-no applicative has opened the possibility for the non-applied theme NP to be passivized.

Downloaded on 1.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110730753-005/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button